Spain Politics and elections

Maybe this of interest to our Russian members, I will provide a translation into english of the spanish translation when I can

As a Spaniard I am both impressed and saddened by the accuracy of the analysis




Spanish translation here

Spoiler:

It would be great if you can translate in English!

No great surprises were expected in the spanish election, with the exception that everybody wondered how much would grow the position of the informal left party "Podemos " [we can] . Curiosly, the following
pattern is observed in european politics. Euroskepticism grows everywhere, and the parties that oppose EU, and sometimes even NATO, are winning traction. However, if in north Europe they are as a rule, conservative right wing parties: "National Front" in France, "Alternative for Germany", "Freedom Party" in Austria, meanwhile in the south of Europe the leading euroskeptics are left wing parties. In Greece, Syriza of Tsipras. In Spain, "Podemos". However, Italy os dividided. in the north of the country the main euroskeptics are the very popular "North League" and in the south the mainly leftist coalition "5 Stars", but the general panorama is very simmetrical.

In regard to "Podemos". Today is the second largest party and the third party in number of seats in parliament. Unfortunately it was founded under the direct patronage of George Soros and his employee the french theorist s Stéphane Hessel, author of the pompous book "Be outraged", that invokes all the maltcontents to build up the preconditions for starting the "color revolutions". Of those outraged of Soros came Pablo Iglesias [leader of "Podemos"]. In the beginning the group of the insante hipercapitalist Soros was named movement 15 M [fifteeen March, after the date of street protests], then as in the essay of Hessel "outraged", and last, "Podemos." Of course they can, if behind there is Freedom House, the CIA and the multimillionaire George Soros.

Because of its ideology , "Podemos" can be called cultural capitalism. In their program they talk about aprture of frontiers, of the needs of providing housing to refugees, of supporting the rights of sodomites, and things of the same kind. The leader of "Podemos" went a few years ago to Wall Street, where he said that "there is no alternative to capitalism". So all the "outrage" ends in this manner.

Is interesting that in this elections in Spain took part anothr project purely Sorosian. The group "Ciudadanos" [Citizens] . Once more time the theme of Civil Society and Open Society - typical hallmarks of the famous speculator Soros. although "Podemos" is a pseudo-left, that is, a liberal left, citizens is a una pseudo-izquierda, es decir, la izquierda liberal, "Ciudadanos" are oure liberals [in the European sense of the word, that is right wing, free market][ . They, too, are outraged as well, but they because taxes in Spain are too high. "Ciudadanos" defends openly the capitalist free market. But they consider that in Spain and Europe capitalism is too scarce. The leader of "Ciudadanos" Albert Rivera, serves straight under USA orders. So recentely he travelled to Venezuela, where he spoke in support of the oposition and against the regime of Maduro.

See what happens. In Spain was created a skyjump for the new politics of the future, as envisiones by Soros. In the center: all the boring imbecile liberals of the right in the Popular Party and the totally discredited liberal left of the Socialist Party. That is, the aging and totally corrupt bureaucrtas integrated in Brussels. In this way the the disgruntled population receives an alternative under the guise of the "outraged". However, the alternative here is simply insane. On one side, to the left of the socialist, the liberal ultra-left of Soros, "Podemos", and ont he right of the Popular Party – the free market ultra-liberals of Soros ,"Ciudadanos". And nobody else. Neither conservatives, nor christian, nor true socialists, not even nationalists as they have in the rest of Europe. No one. This is the Europe that globalists see as their ideal.


And all this happens in the conservative catholic Spain, with a monarch as head of state, and an heroical history of resistance to the spirit of modernty and the masonic plans for the elimination of the traditional Europe. It is incredible.

Summing it up, the results of the elections in Spain have absolutately no worth nor influence. However, the composition of the parties that took part in it is insanity. What's this, if not the twilight of Spain and Europe?

Poor and beatiful Spain, Spain dark and deep, what they have done to you?"

F@ck, I agree 100% with Dugin. This is indeed great analysis. You really don't need anything more to know about Spanish politics.

Hannibal Barca wrote:F@ck, I agree 100% with Dugin. This is indeed great analysis. You really don't need anything more to know about Spanish politics.

All you need to know about Podemos is that it has George Soros finger prints all over it, just like Yanis Varo-fuck-ass...

Hahahaha you understand more about Varoufakis than 95% of Greeks.

Hannibal Barca wrote:Hahahaha you understand more about Varoufakis than 95% of Greeks.

Here's an article by a Pan-Orthodox website covering the Spaniard election. Katehon.com is a pro-Orthodox site which provides excellent geopolitical analyses, their articles are English:

THE IRON HEEL OF SOROS: ELECTIONS IN SPAIN AS THE MODEL OF EUROPEAN POLITICS

Amazing site about geopolitics. Dwarfs sites like stratfor easily.

This piece of retardation forgets that the last time the traditional catholic Kingdom of Spain rose up against modernity it ended up in a civil war.

whir wrote:This piece of retardation forgets that the last time the traditional catholic Kingdom of Spain rose up against modernity it ended up in a civil war.

Last I remember it ended up with the commies loosing the war.
Civil is a relative term in such wars, when one side is internationalist and aims to erase the local tradition, culture, population and history.

KiloGolf wrote:Last I remember it ended up with the commies loosing the war.

Civil is a relative term in such wars, when one side is internationalist and aims to erase the local tradition, culture, population and history.

And among the losers there were those defending their own identity from state sponsored catholicism.