They moved in to take Kiev when thier first lighter airborne units failed.
Ohh please... are you that dumb.... the VDV was sent to capture the airfield... which they did but you think they were supposed to march on and take Kiev... are you kidding me?
There was never any move to take Kiev, it was partially surrounded and then the forces waited.
If the Nazi army collapsed and Zelensky surrendered they might have marched in to Kiev to accept his surrender but they never had anything like the number of forces to take Kiev which clearly suggests that was not their intended role.
They tried for three months to incircle the capital but was unable.
If they had completely encircled it who would feed the population of Kiev?
They don't want Kiev... they want the nazis out of donbass and lugansk...
This because of heavy resistens from the Ukrainans but mostly because of incompetens in everything from tactics, logistics and planning from the Russian leaders.
What heavy resistance. At no point were they pushed back by force around Kiev... they held their positions and waited... enormous columns of forces were unmolested and intact stretching back to Belarus.
The heavy resistance in Kiev was Zelensky handing assault rifles out to the general population and having friendly fire incidents because everyone thought the people with the guns were Russian spies and saboteurs...
They learned thier lesson somewhat and backed off and returned to a more classic Russian way of fighting, destroy everything with artillery and then move forward.
Yes, stick to your stereotypes... they will save you.
And stop this nonsense about Nazis. Plain Russian bs propaganda. No one outside Russia belives a word about that crap.
Of course a European will protect Nazis, there has been plenty of evidence found and shown that proves these extremists are nazis.
The VDV secured all the locations it was supposed to. Gostomosel - Ukrainians couldn't retake it no matter how many reinforcements they flooded in. The VDV weren't dislodged from anywhere else wither.
And yet those same reliable reports that tell us there are no nazis also tell us the VDV got crushed in those attacks and were defeated and pushed back multiple times with Putin having to throw more and more bodies into the meat grinder to achieve his aims... ironic considering what is actually happening.
Certain soldiers on a certain island were also brave heroes that threw back the evil Russian invaders... until the truth was revealed and like sensible normal people they surrendered rather than be hopelessly slaughtered.
My version is that the hopes of splitting the Ukrainian elite, prying the generals away from the political leadership, or otherwise destabilizing the situation in Kiev did not pan-out.
The Nazis had 8 years to get rid of pro Russian sympathisers... the chances of a coup in Kiev were tiny... the purpose of those forces near Kiev was to tie down Orc forces across the country so they don't all rush to the Donbass and overwhelm the force of Russians there to dismantle their military.
After a few weeks of destroying armour and ammo and fuel depots the Orc army was no longer a mobile military force, so the need for the forces near Kiev diminished so they withdrew.
Orcs rushing forward to occupy the territory they held and declared victory is hilarious... like the British victory at Dunkirk.
Others say that they were never in sufficient numbers to take the city in the first place and that it was a pure feint - although I would counter with questioning the point of bringing in so much hardware if you wouldn't use it should the opportunity happen to present itself. The best feint is the one you're prepared to make real.
They had forces that could surround Kiev and lay seige to it, but not enough forces to take it by force... if they wanted to take it they would first need to seal it up and then bring in more forces to take it, but they did neither... which suggests they were there to prevent Kiev from sending everything to the Donbass.
The reason you don't believe in Nazis is the same reason you believe in everything you've written - it suits you, but it has nothing to do with reality.
The reality is that just like the Ukraine they have to pick a side and they depend more on the west than they do on Russia so reality has nothing to do with it.
A Ukrainian leader chooses a Russian deal... that Russian deal was not exclusive... as far as the Russians were concerned they could have taken the EU and the Chinese deals too... it was the EU deal where they said if you take our deal you can't trade with Russia or China... and they spent 5 billion and kicked him out of office with lots of violence and death.
If Sweden or Finland wanted to remain neutral do you think the US would not do to them what they did to the Ukraine?
Even if they didn't how long before the EU and HATO decided to extend their sanctions against Russia to sanctions against countries that trade with Russia.
Essentially Sweden and Finland have to choose between cutting all ties with Russia or all ties with the EU and the west, so I perfectly understand their choice in the matter, but don't go trying to convince me that the Russians are the liars and the aggressors and the bad guys in this... you are giving in to the real bad guys because you know they will not only **** you over but your family and your kids too.
Instead of trying to put all the blame on Russia why don't you man up and accept the reality here... you have just become a colony of the US.
The way they are acting though I don't think you need to worry about it for too long... eventually the EU will realise what the US has done to them and that Russia was rather more important to them than the US will be... no cheap oil and gas from the US to help the EU through this...
Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
Kiko
