Syrian Civil War: News #4

d_taddei2 wrote:i am not sure about everyone else but i am finding it a little frustrating that it is taking so long to liberate, Latakia as well as north/north west/north east Hama province, and the area north of Homs city, as well taking back the area in between aleppo international airport and Keweyres military airport, the latter area could easily be taken back fairly quickly.

As for the other areas like the area north of Homs city the terrorists are completely surrounded so there supplies must be running short, but liberating this area would free up troops to send to the eastern areas Homs to tackle ISIS,

the southern Aleppo offensive i presume will be aimed at taking back as much of of the highway as possible and taking back Abu Al Duhur air base.

i think do to the numbers of the SAA and and its allies for it makes sense to try and tackle some of the easier targets and enclosed areas to free up troops to tackle the harder areas, as in each and every battle there will be casualties on both sides and the SAA and its allies need to keep as many troops as possible for the when the time comes to tackle Aleppo city, Idlib city, and Jisr Shughur city.

Deir ez zor and the southern areas are purely a waiting game hoping that they can hold out, because if Aleppo city and Idlib city are reclaimed you may find that the south and Deir ez zor will be given up my the terrorists. Deir ez zor i think is on borrowed time despite the successes defending the place the casualties on the SAA side are slowly being depleted.

whats peoples views on the above.

As for Damascus this to needs to taken back quickly i am guessing huge amount of forces are being tied up fighting here.

ShahryarHedayatiSHBA wrote:Before the Russian intervention:








Current situation:

i am not sure about everyone else but i am finding it a little frustrating that it is taking so long to liberate, Latakia as well as north/north west/north east Hama province, and the area north of Homs city, as well taking back the area in between aleppo international airport and Keweyres military airport, the latter area could easily be taken back fairly quickly.

As for the other areas like the area north of Homs city the terrorists are completely surrounded so there supplies must be running short, but liberating this area would free up troops to send to the eastern areas Homs to tackle ISIS

i think do to the numbers of the SAA and and its allies for it makes sense to try and tackle some of the easier targets and enclosed areas to free up troops to tackle the harder areas, as in each and every battle there will be casualties on both sides and the SAA and its allies need to keep as many troops as possible for the when the time comes to tackle Aleppo city, Idlib city, and Jisr Shughur city.

Deir ez zor and the southern areas are purely a waiting game hoping that they can hold out, because if Aleppo city and Idlib city are reclaimed you may find that the south and Deir ez zor will be given up my the terrorists. Deir ez zor i think is on borrowed time despite the successes defending the place the casualties on the SAA side are slowly being depleted.

ShahryarHedayatiSHBA wrote:Another Russian missiles heading for Syria landed in Iran

Militarov wrote:



Good shot of control plate on missile and possible failure at launch.

Vann7 wrote:

ShahryarHedayatiSHBA wrote:Another Russian missiles heading for Syria landed in Iran

ANother?

You talk as if previous claims of Russian missiles falling in IRAN were true.  

Go away troll.

ShahryarHedayatiSHBA wrote:

Vann7 wrote:

ShahryarHedayatiSHBA wrote:Another Russian missiles heading for Syria landed in Iran

ANother?

You talk as if previous claims of Russian missiles falling in IRAN were true.  

Go away troll.

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:



Good shot of control plate on missile and possible failure at launch.

Yep the moderates usually don't show the juicy parts (like ID stencil). However, this isn't failure at launch, it's the internal gyro that went bust, because the missile blew, while it got out of the tube.

Also almost 26 years old missile yo...(january 1990). Possibly reconditioned/C&D tube, but wow, they're lucky the ignition didn't blew them all up.

KoTeMoRe wrote:Pls go away, you're ruining a perfectly valid thread with personal attacks. SHBA it looks like it's close to the launch point from the aerial footage, can you confirm in any way?

Militarov wrote:

KoTeMoRe wrote:

Militarov wrote:



Good shot of control plate on missile and possible failure at launch.

Yep the moderates usually don't show the juicy parts (like ID stencil). However, this isn't failure at launch, it's the internal gyro that went bust, because the missile blew, while it got out of the tube.

Also almost 26 years old missile yo...(january 1990). Possibly reconditioned/C&D tube, but wow, they're lucky the ignition didn't blew them all up.

Yeah, but its still kinda failure at launch i mean..it didnt go far But yeah truly lucky, they could have all died there... guys died in field from far less dangerous failures.

KoTeMoRe wrote:Lubnani music with persian reef? Hizb'Ichaat or Hizb'Allah?

Nevermind Nujaba, Hizb'chaat Iraqi shi'a.

BTW, these guys were figthing the US not so far ago.

BTW you can notice the IRGC guys in the formations. Not good for OPSEC.

Cyberspec wrote:

Pro-gov Shia groups in Syria. Overwhelmingly Iraqi....there's even a Yemeni group

KoTeMoRe wrote:SHBA I owe you an apology, this time around there are photos, it looked like a kh 55 initially, and so it is, it looks like the kh 55 has just pancaked somehow and is completely off course, thus it possibly failed to ignite or had a hiccup, not optimal for the locals.