Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Best russian attack helicopter?

    Share

    Poll

    If you could only have one type of attack helicopter which would it be?(please read below first)

    [ 9 ]
    28% [28%] 
    [ 6 ]
    19% [19%] 
    [ 17 ]
    53% [53%] 

    Total Votes: 32

    d_taddei2
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 739
    Points : 899
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  d_taddei2 on Sun Aug 10, 2014 10:51 pm

    if you were in charge of procurement and were told you could only have one type of attack helicopter which would you have? bearing in mind that all 3 types are different in there own way, but which would you choose. Please feel free to post comments and please this is just for interest and people views and doesnt have to be taken way over the top on seriousness.

    My personal choice is the MI-35 for its versatillity being able to be used as an attack helicopter which can be armed for any occassion and the ability to carry troops/cargo, its also able to carry underslung loads.


    Last edited by George1 on Wed Mar 18, 2015 2:22 am; edited 3 times in total (Reason for editing : spelling)

    Mike E
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2789
    Points : 2853
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Mike E on Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:14 pm

    Hmmmm.... They are all good choices! That being said, I chose the Havoc (personal choice).  russia

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:44 pm

    Well that is actually a hard choice which i feel bad having three options and all of them are quite unique in their design and philosophy.

    The Mi-24VM2 (Mi-35M), is the most versitile and could easily be used in 50 years future and that very capable. The point i love about the Crocodile is it has a compartment which gives you lot of space for transporting armed troops, supplies, extra munition or evacuation and even when the Crocodile would end its military duty it had customers in civil sector,because the cargo capability is also loved in civil and duty purposes for police, UN supply helicopter armored for not so safe regions

    The modernisations for Crocodile are the vast spectrum, from different radars for different purposes, to cargo modernisations for NBC environmental operation. It was even suggest to be used as an UCAV with enough space for lot of avionics,mechanism and Electronic Warfare equipment. Not to mention all kind of fantasies for modernisation of this beauty. Very Happy 

    The Mi-28N is the most solid for regular army with powerful weapons,armor and a limited cargo for 2-3 people to evacuate which it was designed for to evacuate and carry the pilots of the downed Havoc in an armored compartment safe from ground fire which most helicopters lack and therefor through necessity for evacuation have to transport people either on stubbed wings next to the running engine or on the wheel and in both cases soldiers are exposed to ground fire and also the helicopter can not maneuver without killing the people on wheel or stubbed wing resulting that the Helicopter is far more exposed to all kind of weaponaries.

    But when thinking in long term having a Ka-52 is the best way, since Co-axial rotor systems are quite unique in their technology and dealing now with all issues the logistical and mechanical personal would face and teaching them over the early years untill Co-axial helicopters in military come more common which will respresent Co-axial/Compound 5th Gen helicopters, that will help easing the entire situation in the military and the experience they could gather would also give enough solutions for issues that can/will occure.
    Not to mention that the safest one hell of reliable (14 days without major maintenance) and with the strongest weaponary and maneuverability on an Attack Helicopter would be working for you.

    So yes i would go with Ka-52, but i find it heartbreaking to give me the pain and forcing me to decide which beauties i had to leave a side.  cry

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  GarryB on Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:48 pm

    The Hind would be the cheapest and with upgrades from the Mi-28N would have lots of capabilities of the newer model and the cost sharing would reduce costs for both types as both are widely produced.

    The Ka-52 will be more expensive and also more capable but I don't think it will be as well protected even though it does have ejection seats for the crew most helos can autorotate.

    I would probably go for the Mi-28M with various upgrades including internal cannon ammo storage and more aerodynamic gun setup with increased on board ready to fire ammo and fully operational DIRCMs self defence suite (in this sense the Kamov is probably the most ready to go right now).

    Having said all that... any or a combination of the three would be fine too.

    Perhaps a high low mix of Hinds as the numbers aircraft and Havocs as heavy support... but I would use them with a decent CAS aircraft like Su-25 to increase effectiveness, while the Ka-52 could be used for special missions... and from ships.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    medo
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3052
    Points : 3150
    Join date : 2010-10-24
    Location : Slovenia

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  medo on Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:30 pm

    I would take Ka-52 any time. It is not armored as Mi-28N, but is better equipped and better armed. It have full ESM complex with RWR, LWR, MAWS, chaff and flares dispenser, DIRCM and ECM. It have whole EO suite and multimode radar. It will use Vikhr and Hermes missiles, but what is more important, Ka-52 could carry bigger missiles like Kh-31A/P in naval version. Such capabilities could also have ground based Ka-52.

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:04 pm

    So far the members are even in the poll for which helicopter they would choose, but i'm interested in the end result.

    d_taddei2
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 739
    Points : 899
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    reply

    Post  d_taddei2 on Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:32 pm

    Hi all, just want to say thanks to everyone for taking the time to vote and your comments. One thing i think everyone can agree on is its a tough decision and all three have there good and bad points, and most people have stated they would want at least two of the types lol. does anyone know the costs of each aircraft?

    Hannibal Barca
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1219
    Points : 1241
    Join date : 2013-12-13

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Hannibal Barca on Wed Aug 13, 2014 12:08 am

    Ka-52 is the most advanced and most beautiful. Also the most capable flier thus I voted to have it in my garage so to speak.
    But Ka-52's don't win wars. What you need when in the mid of the hell is a Mi28 for a breakthrough and then a Mi35 to carry your men around.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  GarryB on Wed Aug 13, 2014 12:48 pm

    The Mi-35 is a very good aircraft... its weak points was lack of all weather capability and the fact that it wasn't very sophisticated in terms of guided weapons or unguided weapons accuracy.

    With the new model Mi-35 with night and all weather optics plus laser range finder unguided weapons accuracy is greatly improved and with the new small low drag wings with the capacity to carry ATAKA and SHTURM and now Krisantema its capabilities in terms of air to ground precision attack is greatly enhanced.

    Its twin barrel 23mm cannon should be devastating.

    The thing they learned with the Hind in Afghanistan and elsewhere was that for small operations it is useful for delivering or retrieving small groups, but for landing troops in large numbers (and large numbers is the best way to deliver them most of the time) then the Mi-8 and Mi-17 have rather more troop capacity with easier exit and entry options.

    the hind is more use orbiting the area blasting everything that puts its head up, while the Mi-8/17s bring the troops in bulk or take them out rapidly.

    the rear area is useful for extra equipment and ammo and having three crew as standard can be useful sometimes... there is an engineer that sits in a small tunnel between the troop cabin and the rear pilot position.

    the flexibility for landing troops and the fact that it is probably the cheapest of the three do count for it too.

    the upgrades that largely involve adding Mi-28 components to the Mi-35 make the two aircraft even more complimentary and capable.

    With all the ground based development of unmanned gun mounts I would love to see a rear facing system on the Mi-35 with either a 4 barrel gatling 12.7mm calibre or perhaps a 40mm grenade launcher.... with full remote control of course.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4467
    Points : 4658
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:06 pm

    GarryB wrote:

    With all the ground based development of unmanned gun mounts I would love to see a rear facing system on the Mi-35 with either a 4 barrel gatling 12.7mm calibre or perhaps a 40mm grenade launcher.... with full remote control of course.

    I suggest for future modernization of the the Mi-24 should have:

    All the defensive suites (or at least as many as possible) as the Ka-52. A modular rear payload, so instead of a mandatory passenger area I suggest having a set up similar to the Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe, where the back area is by default empty, but compatible with modular cargo/payload attachments. One attachment could be a passenger cargo attachment, another could be a special passenger medical attachment with hospital machines equipment to treat the wounded. Another payload attachment could be designed to hold significant more ready-to-fire ammo and is directly connected for mounted turrets, and replacing the chin mounted twin 23mm guns with a long barrel AGS‑40 Balkan, which has similar range to other Mi-24 gun mounts firing from the ground, but with significantly less recoil and shot from the air the range should improve and increase beyond 4 km's, or  a long barrel 57 mm grenade launcher which by it self has range that is over 6 km's. Another attachment could have a large specialized defensive payload designed to hold aerial launched Morfey missiles, integrated with the a Ka-52 level defensive suite and you have a helicopter set up comparable to an airborne SAM, could be especially useful when protecting VIP in places like Afghanistan.

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:41 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    GarryB wrote:

    With all the ground based development of unmanned gun mounts I would love to see a rear facing system on the Mi-35 with either a 4 barrel gatling 12.7mm calibre or perhaps a 40mm grenade launcher.... with full remote control of course.

    I suggest for future modernization of the the Mi-24 should have:

    All the defensive suites (or at least as many as possible) as the Ka-52. A modular rear payload, so instead of a mandatory passenger area I suggest having a set up similar to the Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe, where the back area is by default empty, but compatible with modular cargo/payload attachments. One attachment could be a passenger cargo attachment, another could be a special passenger medical attachment with hospital machines equipment to treat the wounded. Another payload attachment could be designed to hold significant more ready-to-fire ammo and is directly connected for mounted turrets, and replacing the chin mounted twin 23mm guns with a long barrel AGS‑40 Balkan, which has similar range to other Mi-24 gun mounts firing from the ground, but with significantly less recoil and shot from the air the range should improve and increase beyond 4 km's, or  a long barrel 57 mm grenade launcher which by it self has range that is over 6 km's. Another attachment could have a large specialized defensive payload designed to hold aerial launched Morfey missiles, integrated with the a Ka-52 level defensive suite and you have a helicopter set up comparable to an airborne SAM, could be especially useful when protecting VIP in places like Afghanistan.

    So i am not the only one dreaming of lots of useful modernisations/versions for weaponary in the cargo room.

    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4467
    Points : 4658
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Aug 13, 2014 6:53 pm

    Werewolf wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    GarryB wrote:

    With all the ground based development of unmanned gun mounts I would love to see a rear facing system on the Mi-35 with either a 4 barrel gatling 12.7mm calibre or perhaps a 40mm grenade launcher.... with full remote control of course.

    I suggest for future modernization of the the Mi-24 should have:

    All the defensive suites (or at least as many as possible) as the Ka-52. A modular rear payload, so instead of a mandatory passenger area I suggest having a set up similar to the Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe, where the back area is by default empty, but compatible with modular cargo/payload attachments. One attachment could be a passenger cargo attachment, another could be a special passenger medical attachment with hospital machines equipment to treat the wounded. Another payload attachment could be designed to hold significant more ready-to-fire ammo and is directly connected for mounted turrets, and replacing the chin mounted twin 23mm guns with a long barrel AGS‑40 Balkan, which has similar range to other Mi-24 gun mounts firing from the ground, but with significantly less recoil and shot from the air the range should improve and increase beyond 4 km's, or  a long barrel 57 mm grenade launcher which by it self has range that is over 6 km's. Another attachment could have a large specialized defensive payload designed to hold aerial launched Morfey missiles, integrated with the a Ka-52 level defensive suite and you have a helicopter set up comparable to an airborne SAM, could be especially useful when protecting VIP in places like Afghanistan.

    So i am not the only one dreaming of lots of useful modernisations/versions for weaponary in the cargo room.

    Yes! I feel like if Mil goes through a evolutionary path of Mi-24 modernization in the modular cargo load out format that I've mentioned, than I can see Mi-24's still being useful and in service post-2030, and quite possibly post-2040.

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Wed Aug 13, 2014 7:42 pm

    Most probably we will see Mi-24 even in a century but only when Mil company would supply spare parts.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  GarryB on Thu Aug 14, 2014 12:53 am

    The Soviets had gunpods designed to be mounted on pylons that could be elevated and traversed over a limited range of angles.

    The SPPU-22 has a twin barrel 23mm cannon that can be raised and lowered from 0 degrees to -30 degrees so you can aim at a target in a dive and then pull up up to 30 degrees with the computers keeping the gun barrels on target.

    The SPPU-6 uses the 6 barrel 23mm gatling which can depress even further with angles of 0 to -45 degrees and can also turn left or right 45 degrees.

    On the upgraded Hind with four weapons pylons with the outer pylon able to carry 8 ATAKA or SHTURM or Krisantema then that leaves the inner pylon for an SPPU-6 gun pod. the pod itself can hold 500 rounds of ready to fire ammo, but a large ammo tank in the main cabin could be fitted with an ammo feed leading out to the inner pylon. the 500 rounds in the gun pod could be replaced with a water cooling system and improved traversing gear, while the cabin could hold several thousand rounds ready to fire for each inner pylon mounted gun.

    Most importantly the weapon sharing would allow the gunner to operate the chin mounted gun, while the pilot could operate the gunpods like the guns on a fighter plane but able to track the target while the helo is manouvered.

    With laser range finding the low velocity of the 23mm gun becomes unimportant because the ballistic computer should be able to accurately predict the impact points in real time.

    the very high rate of fire of the 23mm gatling... which may also be present on the Armata BMPT.. good for commonality of ammo... means a dozen HE projectiles could land nearly together in a shotgun blast type effect... scattering deadly shrapnel all over the target area in an instant... easily making up for the smaller calibre... but the higher velocity means they will arrive on target faster than 40mm grenades....


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Aug 14, 2014 1:24 am

    Using the cargo for ammunition of Grenade launchers or 12.7 up to 23mm HEFI ammunition would be one easiest ways to upgrade ammo storage and firepower against Soft targets.

    Theoratically, a autoloader inside the cargo room for B-8B20A unguided rocket pods could go on pylons which are running on tracks (inner pylons) to the inside turning them 180° re arming them with unguided rockets and bringing them back in position a similiar system is used on ships, the only big issue is how much weight such a mechanism would take from the 1200kg cargo weight capacity to make in beneficial so not to many unguided rockets would be cut off in weight from the 1200kg not including the 2100kg on weapon pylons.

    But i guess such a reloading mechanism would be far to heavy to even allow 452kg of unguided rockets ready to reload which would make about 2 extra armed B-8B20A pods, but i doubt the reloading mechanism with the running tracks mechanism from stubbed wings to inner cargo would weight less then 800kg.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  GarryB on Thu Aug 14, 2014 1:36 am

    To be fair though the mechanism does not need to extend to the inner pylon.

    Some sort of automated ammo feed system that sticks out the side of the helo far enough to be clear of the fuselage for a launch with a launch position at the extreme outside point with some sort of linkless feed system... in fact a rotary tube launcher with 5 ready to launch positions with one open position that rockets fed via a linkless feed down from the cabin... rockets are fed down from the cabin into the open position which then rotates to allow another rocket in until all five tubes are full... fire the five rockets and then reload the 5 tubes...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Aug 14, 2014 1:48 am

    That could do the job, but as i read the inner pylons have the minimum acceptable distance from the fuselage because on Mi-24A when they placed this missiles on the side they raised concerns that this missile is to close to the fuselage and during launch and in case of maneuvering it could strike the fuselage.



    So in your case and according to the concerns of the launch to close to the fuselage it would mean they need an extendable mechanism which would expose the entire rotating rocket launcher out of the fuselage, which gives a few problems, more wind drag therefor stronger and heavier mechanism would be necessary at least ot the point which the one rocket tube which is the farest away from the fuselage and would reach the minimum acceptable distance from fuselange and that could be launching point.

    Well all such systems have their advantages and disadvantages but for now i think they don't to invest any money for such a modification even tho when i would run a country i would immidiatley ask Mil if they can come up with a version and i would most probably buy it.


    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4467
    Points : 4658
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Thu Aug 14, 2014 1:56 am

    Personally I think the best modernization plan for Mi-24 would be transforming it from being a attack/transport helicopter to being an attack/cargo helicopter, where a passenger transport module would be an option but it will not be mandatory, and applying the domestic equivalent of Mi-26 engines on the Mi-24 would make it that much more capable.

    Morpheus Eberhardt
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1967
    Points : 2092
    Join date : 2013-05-20

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt on Thu Aug 14, 2014 2:59 am

    Briefly, from a "classical" military science point of view, here are a few related definitions and theorems.

    1- BTR (APC): BTR's main role is to provide for the infantry support of tanks. Amphibious capability is a must.

    2- BMP (IFV): BMP's main role is to provide for the infantry support of tanks. Amphibious capability is a must.

    3- Medium/heavy tank (MBT): Requires supporting infantry.

    4- TBTR ("main battle APC", MBAPC): BTR with an armor which is in the same class as a medium/heavy tank.

    5- TBMP ("main battle IFV", MBIFV): BMP with an armor which is in the same class as a medium/heavy tank. MBBMP can replace both the MBT and the IFV; this form of deployment would not be optimal though.

    6- Mi-28, Ka-50, and Ka-52: Aerial main battle tank (AMBT)

    7- Ka-50: Aerial main battle tank (AMBT) enabled through artificial intelligence (AI)

    8- Mi-24, Mi-40, Mi-42, Ka-??: Aerial main battle IFV (AMBIFV). By analogy, AMBIFV's main role is to provide for the aerial infantry support of AMBTs. In reality, AMBIFVs can be utilized independently of AMBTs; this form of deployment may not be optimal though.

    9- If we assume an AMBT is 6 times as fast as an MBT, just due to this factor, each AMBT can replace at least 6^2 = 36 MBTs (plus all the huge amount of the water obstacle assets crossing, the air defense assets that would become redundant, and ...). By the way the only time I have seen this power-of-two relationship being put in writing outside Russia was when Mindstorm wrote about it here.

    10- By analogy with the MBTs, AMBTs require supporting aerial infantry. In reality, AMBTs can be utilized independently of aerial infantry.


    Last edited by Morpheus Eberhardt on Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:33 am; edited 1 time in total

    higurashihougi
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2129
    Points : 2244
    Join date : 2014-08-13
    Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  higurashihougi on Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:31 am

    The Hind and Havoc versions are probably the most practical choice for the land force tropical/subtropical developing countries i.e. most of the countries in this world due to the low price, low maintenance cost, formidable power and all-weather capabilities... besides many of them already have some old versions of the Mi-24 therefore they should follow with similar ones like Mi-35 or the Mì-28.

    But for poor/developing countries with strong focus on naval force, for example Vietnam, I wonder whether the Ka-52K is a good choice or not. As far as I know, the coaxial rotor is very good against extreme environment for example strong winds in the sea. Vietnam already have some Ka-27s service in the Navy as anti-submarine helicopters, wonder whether the Ka-52K can be modified to function similarly...

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:50 am

    Except that you have one point wrong, Ka-52 are not cheap and surely not so in the maintenance and logistical sphere when comparing it with Mi-35 or Mi-28.

    The countries which could beneficially use more than one kind of attack helicopter and actually bear the logistical,financial and entire branch of facilities and political involved route to ensure the servicing capacity of more than one attack helicopter, those few countries can be counted on one hand, at least at this moment. That would be only US,Russia,China,India and some countries who could do it in few years, some are trying to get a modern MIC running like Turkey is currently trying to buy off whatever technologies companies have either closed to lack of funding,results or failed projects or just some lower end quality technologies like the A-129 since they were the only company that met the requirement of ToT license production which Turkey has tried to get two times before they actually got it for any Attack Helicopter.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  GarryB on Thu Aug 14, 2014 11:23 am

    Actually I was thinking more in terms of a mission pod where the doors on both sides are removed and a large box shaped pod is slid into place from one side and bolted into position and plugged into the system.

    the box would have two arms sticking out... one each side of the fuselage... a bit like wings but angled out and down so as not to block ordinance on the wings with the rotary rocket launcher at the tips on each side, with the arms consisting of linkless feed mechanisms for the 80mm rockets.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:34 pm

    Well that sounds more practical and there is quite a big cargo for lot of sorts of weaponary and mechanisms, i could imagine that even each cargo window would be armed with PKM or AGS-17 grenadelauncher and that they are all linked with a RWS system for a UCAV purpose unit.

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Werewolf on Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:05 pm

    This is a chart of target spectrum of attack helicopters, including unfinished prototypes who's capabilities are unclear in standardized active service.



    There is another chart unfinished yet about effective, maximum range of weapons versus specific targets aswell maximum and effective range of targets against helicopters to illustrate their danger zones.

    Isos
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 307
    Points : 311
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Isos on Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:37 pm

    Mi-28 !!!!!!!

    It's a Mi-24 with more agility. It has a small compartiment for one extra man or some more ammo for the gun. Would like to see it in Syria.

    Mi-24 lacks agility.

    The side by side configuration of the the Ka 52 is dangerous for close fight as the pilot can't see on the right side.

    The weapons used by all three are almost the same. The big missiles carried by the Ka 52 would probably used by an aircraft.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Best russian attack helicopter?

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 11:11 pm


      Current date/time is Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:11 pm