Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+72
11E
lancelot
andalusia
Gazputin
limb
lyle6
marcellogo
Giulio
GunshipDemocracy
Cyberspec
Isos
Mir
KeMac
kvs
The-thing-next-door
Hole
dino00
RusMil
miketheterrible
David27mc
JMCR
sjosiowicz
amcm923
Sanctus Ferri
Arctic_Fox
franco
Zhongqing
russianrisk
atiboss
Cplnew83
magnumcromagnon
Regular
ult
par far
Captain Nemo
Walther von Oldenburg
Stiangul
higurashihougi
r111
zg18
Anas Ali
Werewolf
Zivo
Rpg type 7v
collegeboy16
SSDD
Stealthflanker
ricky123
TR1
KomissarBojanchev
Mr.Kalishnikov47
ahmedfire
flamming_python
George1
ehtesham
AlexanderGiorev
njb1
Austin
IronsightSniper
Viktor
medo
GarryB
nightcrawler
Russian Patriot
Farhad Gulemov
fabyak47
milky_candy_sugar
DrofEvil
sepheronx
Sukhoi37_Terminator
Admin
10misha10
76 posters

    Question Thread: Russian Army

    Mr.Kalishnikov47
    Mr.Kalishnikov47


    Posts : 293
    Points : 336
    Join date : 2012-02-26
    Age : 36
    Location : U.S.A

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  Mr.Kalishnikov47 06/04/12, 06:58 am

    I found this just now

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 1e81a310
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39326
    Points : 39824
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  GarryB 06/04/12, 10:37 am

    That is one of the photos I remember seeing... Smile

    I am sure I have also seen 2-3 Vodniks escorting a TOPOL-M vehicle down a road through a forest too.
    Mr.Kalishnikov47
    Mr.Kalishnikov47


    Posts : 293
    Points : 336
    Join date : 2012-02-26
    Age : 36
    Location : U.S.A

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  Mr.Kalishnikov47 06/04/12, 12:39 pm

    Well at least I know it's being used, that's all I wanted to know. Thanks for the help Garry Very Happy
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18364
    Points : 18861
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Soviet "Big 7". Russian Big-7??

    Post  George1 28/04/12, 01:26 am

    In 1981 U.S. military published this poster illustrating 7 types of Red Army equipment that were expected to inflict the most damage on NATO should a war with Warsaw Pact break out.

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Soviet10


    1.ZSU-23-4 anti-aircraft weapon
    2.T-72 tank
    3.SA-8 Gecko surface-to-air missile system
    4.Mi-24 Hind-D gunship
    5.BMP-1 ainfantry combat vehicle
    6.2S1 Gvozdika 122mm self-propelled gun
    7.2S3 Akatsiya 152mm self-propelled gun



    What about the new Russian Big-7. Which systems would include?


    Last edited by George1 on 15/02/16, 11:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18364
    Points : 18861
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  George1 28/04/12, 01:37 am

    1. Tunguska-M1 anti-aircraft weapon
    2. T-90 Main Battle Tank
    3. Tor-M2 SAM System
    4. Mi-28 Attack Helicopter
    5. BMP-3 Infantry Fighting Vehicle
    6. Tornado-G MRLS
    7. 2S19 Msta self-propelled howitzer
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  TR1 28/04/12, 08:11 am

    Russia has no Tor-M2 in service
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39326
    Points : 39824
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  GarryB 28/04/12, 10:42 am

    After their experience in Afghanistan I rather suspect a list like this:

    Pecheneg,
    RPG-28,
    RPG-29,
    Kornet,
    Smerch/Tornado,
    Iskander,
    Igla-S
    medo
    medo


    Posts : 4342
    Points : 4422
    Join date : 2010-10-25
    Location : Slovenia

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  medo 28/04/12, 07:44 pm

    TR1 wrote:Russia has no Tor-M2 in service

    No? Interesting. In December last year they reported, that first Tor-M2U were deployed in south military district.

    http://www.itar-tass.com/en/c154/307597.html
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  TR1 29/04/12, 09:59 am

    medo wrote:
    TR1 wrote:Russia has no Tor-M2 in service

    No? Interesting. In December last year they reported, that first Tor-M2U were deployed in south military district.

    http://www.itar-tass.com/en/c154/307597.html

    Well, this is one of those cases where I default to "Pics or I am suspicious".
    Thanks for link though.
    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 9154
    Points : 9216
    Join date : 2012-01-31

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  flamming_python 30/04/12, 02:29 am

    War with NATO?

    Voyevoda
    Topol-M
    Tu-160
    Tu-95
    Tu-22M3
    Iskander-M
    Sineva

    There you have it. The Big 7 Very Happy
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18364
    Points : 18861
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  George1 30/04/12, 05:19 am

    The post referred to Soviet Army equipment not, Air Force, Navy, nuclear forces etc etc etc.

    It is about ground forces equipment
    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 9154
    Points : 9216
    Join date : 2012-01-31

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  flamming_python 02/05/12, 11:00 am

    Hmm in terms of pure casualty counts I would say something like:

    AK-74
    Grad
    Smerch
    Tochka-U
    Msta-S
    Su-25
    BMP-2

    Mkay.. something like that
    IronsightSniper
    IronsightSniper


    Posts : 414
    Points : 418
    Join date : 2010-09-26
    Location : California, USA

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  IronsightSniper 25/06/12, 12:38 am

    There's really no dispute on which modern equipment would cause the most damage, however there may be some debatable question: such as, which ADS is the best? The answer to that is, non, since the whole point of an IADS (Integrated Air Defense System) is to have all the bases covered, from short to long to anti-helicopters to anti-ballistic missiles. However, in terms of sheer versatility, the Pantsyr would probably be the most efficient ADS.
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  TR1 25/06/12, 05:52 am

    Well it is hard to look at Pantsyr alone - I think more useful would be the S-400 site as a whole, protected by the Pantsir batteries.

    S-400 + Pantsir = scary.


    Tor fans might disagree though, many people are not a fan of Pantsir's wheeled base. Though that might not be a huge problem for its current role, if Army ever acquires it, it will certainly have tracked chassis.
    Zivo
    Zivo


    Posts : 1487
    Points : 1511
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  Zivo 25/06/12, 12:06 pm

    TR1 wrote:Well it is hard to look at Pantsyr alone - I think more useful would be the S-400 site as a whole, protected by the Pantsir batteries.

    S-400 + Pantsir = scary.


    Tor fans might disagree though, many people are not a fan of Pantsir's wheeled base. Though that might not be a huge problem for its current role, if Army ever acquires it, it will certainly have tracked chassis.

    Like this?

    http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/422082_341838505839495_2021873323_n.jpg
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  TR1 25/06/12, 01:24 pm

    Yeah thats the one I had in mind.

    Though I suspect army might be interested in putting it on a new unified chassis.
    Zivo
    Zivo


    Posts : 1487
    Points : 1511
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  Zivo 25/06/12, 02:08 pm

    No doubt they will, the one in the pic is just a floor model at the factory.

    Anyone figured out what radar the darker pantsir in the back has? I remember seeing it sometime back when it was painted tan and I've still never found an answer to what system it is.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39326
    Points : 39824
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  GarryB 25/06/12, 09:17 pm

    Different forces will use different versions of TOR and Pantsir-S1.

    The Air Force will use wheeled versions, while the Army will use tracked models of both vehicles as they have done previously. The GM-xxxx tracked vehicle chassis is made in Belarus, but there is no place for that in the heavy, medium, or light brigades as their purpose is simplified logistics and operational performance as all vehicles in the units have the same level of protection and mobility. This would mean that any missile (TOR) or Gun missile (Pantsir-S1/Tunguska-S1) regiments would need Armata, kurganets-25, Boomerang-25 or Boomerang-10 based vehicles. The Tunguska is a 34 ton vehicle so I would suspect lightened versions in all but the Armata formations. For batteries that operate with other units like S-400 batteries then wheeled versions make sense though for TOR or Pantsir-S1 batteries that operate with S-300V it would make sense to use tracked models there too for obvious reasons.

    I rather suspect for Light Brigades there will be a lighter AD vehicle... there was a suggestion that the VDV are getting a new air defence vehicle developed for them... one can only guess if that is a BMD-4 or Boomerang-10 based vehicle, though it will replace the stopgap SA-13 systems introduced to replace the ZU-23 units. It could be Phoenix or SOSNA-R, or a light Tunguska with 4 missiles and one twin barrel gun... it could even be Kornet-EM based...
    KomissarBojanchev
    KomissarBojanchev


    Posts : 1429
    Points : 1584
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 26
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty What does C4I mean?

    Post  KomissarBojanchev 07/11/12, 05:15 am

    What does C4I mean? I assume it has nothing to do with explosives?
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18364
    Points : 18861
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  George1 07/11/12, 06:09 am

    C4ISR is a term used by the U.S. military (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance)
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  TR1 07/11/12, 09:38 am

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=C4I
    avatar
    ricky123


    Posts : 221
    Points : 325
    Join date : 2012-08-21

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  ricky123 13/11/12, 11:53 pm

    come to india instead . $25k will last u a few years and u may even get a chance to join indian army . if at all u are not able to do that . u can still recover $25000 in less then 2 years by working in IT companies lol .... Twisted Evil
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 2926
    Points : 3798
    Join date : 2009-07-10

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  Admin 14/11/12, 04:42 am

    Is the FFL not an option? If you go there you get to join a foreign unit loaded with Russians. Make a friend who is headed back and they will sponsor you for migration to Russia. After your service you will have an EU passport and a Russian connection. Go to UK, Netherlands, Germany or wherever you want to get a job and migrate, or get your sponsor into Russia. It isn't an immediate solution but it is a path to what you want while you serve the military.
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  TR1 14/11/12, 09:23 am

    Consider college before getting into something like the military.

    It will be a great failsafe and backup option.


    By the way- if there is a massive European and American economical collapse, things will not be rosy in Russia.
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-07

    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  TR1 14/11/12, 09:25 am

    Vladimir79 wrote:Is the FFL not an option? If you go there you get to join a foreign unit loaded with Russians. Make a friend who is headed back and they will sponsor you for migration to Russia. After your service you will have an EU passport and a Russian connection. Go to UK, Netherlands, Germany or wherever you want to get a job and migrate, or get your sponsor into Russia. It isn't an immediate solution but it is a path to what you want while you serve the military.

    They pay solid as well.
    Probably as good or better than most jobs you can find without a college degree these days in the states.


    Sponsored content


    Question Thread: Russian Army - Page 4 Empty Re: Question Thread: Russian Army

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is 14/06/24, 08:04 pm