Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+58
Belisarius
AlfaT8
Podlodka77
Arkanghelsk
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E
Mir
Firebird
Lennox
thegopnik
ALAMO
Broski
Russian_Patriot_
Lurk83
Kiko
jhelb
AlexDineley
11E
owais.usmani
flamming_python
arbataach
limb
walle83
RTN
JohninMK
dino00
lyle6
marcellogo
magnumcromagnon
TMA1
Backman
lancelot
Isos
SeigSoloyvov
PhSt
Tai Hai Chen
LMFS
Tsavo Lion
Arrow
kvs
The-thing-next-door
william.boutros
George1
GunshipDemocracy
ultimatewarrior
kumbor
mnztr
Hole
Regular
PapaDragon
miketheterrible
medo
Gazputin
hoom
andalusia
GarryB
x_54_u43
Rodion_Romanovic
Big_Gazza
62 posters

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    marcellogo
    marcellogo


    Posts : 640
    Points : 646
    Join date : 2012-08-02
    Age : 55
    Location : Italy

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  marcellogo Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:03 pm

    I think the WORST of Erdogan but comparing him with the maniac monsters that ruled Argentina at time is just unconceivable and offensive.
    Same comparing actual Russia with SU, the former was a real enemy and the forebearer of a worldwide ideological system of oppression, the actual one I love you I love you I love you instead.

    It was also notorious for don't gave their best weaponries neither to its more obedient thralls, let's figure a sworn enemy.

    Argentina made a whole series of political errors, worst one was however to act too fast without a minimum of military preparation.
    Some air tankers and some more Super Etandards would have dramatically changed the income.

    Falkland was a test, Harrier passed it and was deemed worth of an ulterior evolution.

    And it also showed how our own ships, weapon systems and ABOVE ALL the integration between them were of immensely superior design than the one of rosbif's.
    Lesson learned and passed into Jokes.

    TMA1 likes this post

    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2786
    Points : 2824
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  mnztr Sun Feb 07, 2021 8:43 pm

    GarryB wrote:

    I rather suspect the Argentinians looked at the situation... the big carriers are gone... only little unproven carriers with little unproven Harriers... and a woman in charge... what are the chances they will sail 10,000km for a few farmers and a few sheep on those wind swept rocks...


    No one was there for the farmers, windswept rocks or nationalism. They were there for the 60B barrels of oil in the surrounding waters. (3-6T dollars)

    If the one Argentine sub had maintained its torpedos properly and the Argies had sorted out the fusing of their dumb bombs, the carnage on the Brits would have been 3-4 x and they very well may have lost. If they had enough Excets to ripple fire them - carnage. If they had taken delivery of the 14 they ordered and had ample Exocets they could have fired 7 at a time and that would have been impossible for the Brits to deal with.

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39149
    Points : 39647
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  GarryB Mon Feb 08, 2021 10:59 am

    Falkland was a test, Harrier passed it and was deemed worth of an ulterior evolution.

    I agree, but it was rigged and the result cost the Brits in the long term... and the Americans.

    The AV-8II was a vast improvement but they would all be horribly vulnerable to MANPADS of any kind or model, and the added disadvantage that most Soviet AAMs in the BVR range had an IR guided example... all of which would be terribly effective against the Harrier and similar types.

    The Harrier was supposed to be the only plane flying on day two of the third world war in Europe, and honestly that was just bullshit.

    And it also showed how our own ships, weapon systems and ABOVE ALL the integration between them were of immensely superior design than the one of rosbif's.

    A case where tradition and pride transcends reality and the old codger thinks he is still 18 years old when he can barely walk on his own.


    No one was there for the farmers, windswept rocks or nationalism. They were there for the 60B barrels of oil in the surrounding waters. (3-6T dollars)

    Except the promise of oil is not the same as the real thing...

    It is probably not financially viable to recover at current oil prices and promises to curb carbon emissions by 2050 suggest it wont be that much more promising in the near future either.


    If the one Argentine sub had maintained its torpedos properly and the Argies had sorted out the fusing of their dumb bombs, the carnage on the Brits would have been 3-4 x and they very well may have lost. If they had enough Excets to ripple fire them - carnage. If they had taken delivery of the 14 they ordered and had ample Exocets they could have fired 7 at a time and that would have been impossible for the Brits to deal with.

    Buying Phantoms from the Americans and extending the runway on the islands to allow fighters to operate from there...

    But the real difference was in the troop training... the Brits used HATO training where the troops are trained to kill. The Argentines were trained like troops from WWII and essentially were not the ruthless killers the brits were on the ground.
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion


    Posts : 5815
    Points : 5771
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  Tsavo Lion Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:49 pm

    IMO, if the Argentines were better armed, a USN CBG/MEU &/ AF would get involved "to help liberate them from the junta that attacked our NATO & British ally & prevent Soviet influence from increasing there". After the war, access to bases in the S. Atlantic with rich fishing grounds & next to Antarctic Peninsula wouldn't hurt.

    TMA1 likes this post

    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11319
    Points : 11289
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  Isos Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:58 am

    Tsavo Lion wrote:IMO, if the Argentines were better armed, a USN CBG/MEU &/ AF would get involved "to help liberate them from the junta that attacked our NATO & British ally & prevent Soviet influence from increasing there". After the war, access to bases in the S. Atlantic with rich fishing grounds & next to Antarctic Peninsula wouldn't hurt.

    Argentina was their ally back then. That's why soviets didn't help them and just watch the show of US allies fight each other.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39149
    Points : 39647
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  GarryB Tue Feb 09, 2021 2:10 am

    Reagan remained neutral and didn't lift a finger to help Maggie.

    If the Argentinians had F-4 Phantoms then there would be no interference either.

    "to help liberate them from the junta that attacked our NATO & British ally & prevent Soviet influence from increasing there".

    The US created most of the worst dictators and their juntas in the region then and today...

    American oil companies would be telling Ronny to stay out of it because that oil belongs to American oil companies... not British ones...
    RTN
    RTN


    Posts : 742
    Points : 719
    Join date : 2014-03-24
    Location : Fairfield, CT

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  RTN Tue Feb 09, 2021 4:49 pm

    Isos wrote:Argentina was their ally back then. That's why soviets didn't help them and just watch the show of US allies fight each other.
    France, did share the codes of the Exocet missile they sold to Argentina with the U.K.

    LMFS and TMA1 like this post

    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11319
    Points : 11289
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  Isos Tue Feb 09, 2021 5:38 pm

    RTN wrote:
    Isos wrote:Argentina was their ally back then. That's why soviets didn't help them and just watch the show of US allies fight each other.
    France, did share the codes of the Exocet missile they sold to Argentina with the U.K.

    UK operated the exocet. They had all the information they needed.

    French engineers that were there to maintain french stuff on the other hand helped Argentina to adapt its ship launched exocet on super etandard.

    GarryB likes this post

    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5104
    Points : 5100
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  LMFS Tue Feb 09, 2021 8:32 pm

    Isos wrote:UK operated the exocet. They had all the information they needed.

    French engineers that were there to maintain french stuff on the other hand helped Argentina to adapt its ship launched exocet on super etandard.

    It is known that the French threw Argentina under the bus with the Exocet. I guess they were not interested in a wave of UK-sponsored decolonization efforts on their overseas territories...
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13308
    Points : 13350
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  PapaDragon Tue Feb 09, 2021 8:56 pm

    LMFS wrote:
    Isos wrote:UK operated the exocet. They had all the information they needed.

    French engineers that were there to maintain french stuff on the other hand helped Argentina to adapt its ship launched exocet on super etandard.

    It is known that the French threw Argentina under the bus with the Exocet. I guess they were not interested in a wave of UK-sponsored decolonization efforts on their overseas territories...

    Still doesn't change the fact that Argentina was just a couple of faulty bombs away from magnificent victory

    And that biggest kill of the war was scored by a UK submarine

    Coastal aviation and submarines, magical combo


    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11319
    Points : 11289
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  Isos Tue Feb 09, 2021 9:42 pm

    LMFS wrote:
    Isos wrote:UK operated the exocet. They had all the information they needed.

    French engineers that were there to maintain french stuff on the other hand helped Argentina to adapt its ship launched exocet on super etandard.

    It is known that the French threw Argentina under the bus with the Exocet. I guess they were not interested in a wave of UK-sponsored decolonization efforts on their overseas territories...

    Your statement is the opposite of what happened.

    Exocet work better than expected and french engineers did everything for that.

    British were so afraid they tried to stop the sell of exocet to Peru so that they don't go to Argentina.

    Argentina lost because they had not enough of hardware and faulty german torpedos. If they had working torpedos and 20 more of everything (super etandard and exocet) they would have send all the british ships to the bottom.

    GarryB likes this post

    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5104
    Points : 5100
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  LMFS Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:16 am

    Nuclear "Manatee": the head of the USC spoke about the prospect of creating a new aircraft carrier in Russia

    The project involves equipping this powerful ship with a nuclear power plant.

    Alexey Rakhmanov, General Director of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, spoke about the technological advantages that the creation of a new aircraft carrier together with an air group can bring to Russia.

    Rakhmanov admitted that the USC design bureaus could not stay away from the project of such a large and powerful ship, despite the fact that it was created on a purely initiative basis.

    As a prospective aircraft carrier for the Russian Navy, "Nevsky PKB" prepared the "Manatee" project, which not only absorbed the developments and promising ideas of today, but also left in itself a large modernization reserve.

    “I am convinced that the implementation of the project to create an aircraft carrier (and its air group) can lead to a technological breakthrough, and for more than 10 years, in many segments of the economy and industry: in addition to shipbuilding, also in aircraft construction, mechanical engineering, nuclear technology, instrumentation, IT, production of weapons, metallurgy and metalworking ", - the head of USC told" Zvezda ".

    He added that the project involves equipping the Manatee with a nuclear power plant, as well as the ability to operate not only existing, but also promising aircraft. This will be done through the use of both a springboard and, in the future, an electromagnetic catapult.

    https://tvzvezda.ru/news/opk/content/2021291819-5ixAv.html
    avatar
    owais.usmani


    Posts : 1787
    Points : 1783
    Join date : 2019-03-27
    Age : 37

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  owais.usmani Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:36 pm

    LMFS wrote:Nevskoe design bureau presented the project of the universal sea ship "Varan"

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 5946567

    It can carry 24 multipurpose aircraft, six helicopters and up to 20 unmanned aerial vehicles.

    MOSCOW, January 18. / TASS /. The Nevsky Design Bureau (PKB, part of the United Shipbuilding Corporation) has developed two new projects of universal ships, in particular the Varan universal sea ship (UMK) and a new universal landing ship (UDC). This is stated in the materials of the PKB dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the enterprise and available to TASS.

    UMK "Varan" is an aircraft-carrying complex, characterized by a high degree of automation and the possibility of using robotic systems. It can carry 24 multipurpose aircraft, six helicopters and up to 20 unmanned aerial vehicles.

    The ship's displacement is about 45 thousand tons, length - about 250 m, width - 65 m, draft at the structural waterline - 9 m. "Varan" is capable of speeds up to 26 knots.

    The displacement of the promising UDC is about 30 thousand tons. The length of the ship reaches about 220 m, the width is 42 m, the draft along the constructive waterline is 7 m. The new UDC is capable of developing a speed of about 24 knots. There are seven helicopter landing pads on the deck of the ship.

    Nevskoe PKB is one of the largest domestic developers of universal ships and the only designer of aircraft carriers and training complexes in Russia. The company celebrates its 90th anniversary on 18 January.

    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/10488643

    Nevskoe design bureau started working out the concept of floating airfields


    The bureau said that these platforms will become "a kind of centers for supporting the entire spectrum of activities of Russia and partner countries in the Arctic."

    MOSCOW, January 18. / TASS /. The Nevsky Design Bureau (PKB, part of the United Shipbuilding Corporation) develops floating airfields for aviation for various purposes. This is stated in the materials of the PKB dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the enterprise and available to TASS.

    "As part of the initiative work of the Nevsky Design Bureau, pre-design studies of the architectural and structural appearance of floating islands and airfields are being carried out," the materials say.

    As noted in the bureau, floating airfields can be used to support the actions of transport, rescue and military aviation in the Arctic, develop new gas fields in the northern seas, ensure the safety of navigation of the Northern Sea Route and perform the functions of the Ministry of Defense in the Arctic zone. "[These platforms] will become a kind of centers for supporting the entire spectrum of activities of Russia and partner countries in the Arctic," the booklet says.

    The PKB stressed that floating aerodromes ensure all-weather use of the runway in the Arctic, as well as countering the longitudinal and lateral rolling of the platform during takeoff and landing operations.

    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/10488755

    Some more pics from Balancer forum:

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Umk_va10
    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Umk_va11

    dino00, LMFS, lancelot and Backman like this post

    Broski dislikes this post

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13308
    Points : 13350
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  PapaDragon Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:55 pm


    Looking good thumbsup
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5104
    Points : 5100
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  LMFS Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:33 pm

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 EuxJCEAXIAAoYle?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 EusAuOyXIAADELV?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13308
    Points : 13350
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  PapaDragon Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:53 pm


    In Royal Navy it would have been called HMS Reasonable
    avatar
    11E


    Posts : 119
    Points : 129
    Join date : 2020-12-08

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  11E Sun Feb 21, 2021 9:00 pm

    GarryB wrote:Reagan remained neutral and didn't lift a finger to help Maggie.

    If the Argentinians had F-4 Phantoms then there would be no interference either.

    "to help liberate them from the junta that attacked our NATO & British ally & prevent Soviet influence from increasing there".

    The US created most of the worst dictators and their juntas in the region then and today...

    American oil companies would be telling Ronny to stay out of it because that oil belongs to American oil companies... not British ones...

    Not entirely neutral. The US did an ''emergency'' delivery of the newest AIM-9Ls. The Sea Harrier had the AIM-9G during that time.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/sep/06/falklands.world

    Regards
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39149
    Points : 39647
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  GarryB Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:01 am

    Officially those Mike and Lima model Sidewinders were for HATO stocks which the UK misused.

    What pissed the Argentines most was there was an agreement in central and south america which effectively states that you be Americas bitch and America will protect you from any and all outside interference... including European colonial powers.

    Based on that agreement I think Argentina was probably expecting active US support but Ronnie loved Maggie which led a lot of countries in the region to realise there is a pecking order and America will only protect you against some threats and not others.
    marcellogo
    marcellogo


    Posts : 640
    Points : 646
    Join date : 2012-08-02
    Age : 55
    Location : Italy

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  marcellogo Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:24 pm

    LMFS wrote:Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 EuxJCEAXIAAoYle?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 EusAuOyXIAADELV?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

    May I dare say that some projects seems me to have their own numbers (Displacement, length, number of aeromobiles) assembled together quite casually.

    Also because an UAV, an helo, a MiG-29 and a Su-33 cannot be put together in same list.

    Look, my one is better, at half displacement host double number of planes!
    OKKAaay, I know, you are right, they are mainly An-2 but what matter? Have you something against biplanes?
    Backman
    Backman


    Posts : 2606
    Points : 2618
    Join date : 2020-11-11

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  Backman Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:37 pm

    The Varan looks like a converted ice breaker ship. Just the blunt front end and the placement of the bridge.
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5104
    Points : 5100
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  LMFS Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:49 pm

    marcellogo wrote:May I dare say that some projects seems me to have their own numbers (Displacement, length, number of aeromobiles) assembled together quite casually.

    Also because an UAV, an helo, a MiG-29 and a Su-33 cannot be put together in same list.

    Look, my one is better, at half displacement host double number of planes!
    OKKAaay, I know, you are right, they are mainly An-2 but what matter? Have you something against biplanes?

    Yeah it is not easy to judge those values published, but we know a couple of things. For instance, the Krylov hull type allowed much higher amount of aircraft per kT. The hull of the Varan seems really wide, I doubt it has the speed of designs like the Kuznetsov, but maybe it actually has a very big internal capacity. In the diagram, the carrier missing is the one which is the most interesting, the medium carrier by Krylov, with 60 kT and almost he capability of the Shtorm. Electromechanical catapults and CONAG propulsion, the perfect balance. It was mentioned but either it was not shown, or they used the same basic layout of the light carrier by Krylov. I think that is the really promising design VMF has got their hands onto, maybe Nevskoye is trying now to counterattack with other innovative proposals?
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11319
    Points : 11289
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  Isos Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:44 pm

    Varan is too small. They put no weapons on it so no radar and FCS.

    Adding another 30m wouldn't be bad.


    It's too much compact. On the picture it's easy to draw 24 aircraft but in operation I doubt it could have more than 10 on the bridge. Not to mention that high intensity operations would be complicated by the recovery being impossible when plane takes off. Not only do the catapult precent that but they would also oblige sailors and plabes to move around the landing zone.

    IMO it's as good as the indian carrier, pretty bad. But the design looks good and the island is small and good looking. Some pantsir on the side should be added.
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5104
    Points : 5100
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  LMFS Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:41 pm

    It does not even have ramp, no mast for proper radars, second TO position in the middle of landing strip etc. It is difficult to understand what the proposal is all about, honestly.
    avatar
    limb


    Posts : 1550
    Points : 1576
    Join date : 2020-09-17

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  limb Thu Feb 25, 2021 8:56 am

    One consideration against a light carrier like the 45000ton Varan is the power needed to use the electromagnetic catapult. I dont know if power miniaturization and capacitor tech has gone far enough, and capacitors for it will take a lot of space, and on a small carrier space is at a premium. Also the larger the carrier is, the more powerful and rapid charging  the catapult so that would improve loadout capabilities and sortie rate.
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 5104
    Points : 5100
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  LMFS Thu Feb 25, 2021 4:01 pm

    Must read about Varan, from Nevskoye

    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/10773887

    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 6003503

    The key: it is not a carrier, but an UDK!

    Sponsored content


    Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2 - Page 21 Empty Re: Future Russian Aircraft Carriers and Deck Aviation. #2

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri May 17, 2024 8:45 am