3M22 Zircon Hypersonic Cruise Missile

Directed energy weapons aren't a solution. Thry work vest at close range and you need to focys the beam for some time before destroying the target.

Hypersonic missiles like Zirkon fly only few seconds in their engagement zone.

And the kinetic energy will still send the missile on its target or close by unless you destroy the warhead.

Zircon is very resistant to the high temperatures that occur at hypersonic speeds.

Well directed energy weapons have the speed of light so Zirkon speed and manoeuvring isn't an issue, they will always be able to direct their enery on it.

But for ABM system, even a 3° correction of zirkon will switch the interception point few km away and the interceptor missile won't be able to catch it. For this you are right.

That's what I am saying. The laser or micro wave weapons will target it fairly easily but it will go through their engagement zone too fast and they won't have time to "burn" it.

The DEW loose energy over the distance. Best ranges achieved today are few km against drone like technology which is plastic and not some harder stuff like metal alloys or new anti laser stuff that could be used to envelop the front to protect electronics parts and warhead.

R-37 AAM is able to maintain hypersonic speed right from launch all the way upto the target, isn't it?

The R-37 is a solid fuelled rocket with two stages of rocket fuel... high energy high acceleration fuel to climb to altitude and get to high speed and then a longer burn lower energy fuel to maintain speed and altitude till it reaches its target to dive down onto to attack.

It will accelerate very quickly to about mach 6 and then maintain that speed at very high altitude and then dive on its target.

Most of its targets will be aircraft or cruise missiles whose comparative speed is almost stationary, but against very high speed targets it does not have to match or exceed the speed of its target.... just like a cricket bat or tennis racket does not need to move faster than the ball to intercept it in flight.

The R-37 is probably also qualified to shoot down enemy hypersonic cruise missiles.

and

Zircon is at best Mach 10. You can probably use a multiple stage solid to intercept it. Think of something like the Sprint missile.
The cost of designing a defense system would likely be horrendous, and it would have poor range though.

The hypersonic weapons their enemy has do not manouver which makes them rather easier to intercept... imagine a tennis ball coming over the net at you... it has speed but does not change direction mid flight so its trajectory and path are predictable... but if the opposition tennis player made you think they were hitting the ball directly at you and instead at the very last second they hit the ball towards the opposite side of the court to which you are standing you don't have time to get to a position where you can reach the ball, and that is the problem manouvering hypersonic weapons create... they can change direction quickly but their flight speed means the intercept point will then shift perhaps hundreds of kms in a split second and you were already streaking at high speed towards the original intercept point you might not have the time or the fuel to reach the new intercept point so you miss.

It is not just a question of being able to match the speed of the incoming threat, it is matching the 4D intercept point... latitude, longitude, altitude, and time... if any one of those is wrong then you miss... I can go an stand on the spot below where the US nuclear bomb destroyed Nagasaki, but because the time is not the same I wont be killed by that nuclear blast.

But for ABM system, even a 3° correction of zirkon will switch the interception point few km away and the interceptor missile won't be able to catch it. For this you are right.

Exactly... with it moving at 3km per second even half a second late or early and you miss by over 1km, which means even a nuclear warhead might not stop the missile, but a small turn shifts the intercept point several kms and it will take a second or two to realise the turn and the effect on its flightpath and to calculate a new intercept point so now your interceptor has to calculate how to turn the missiles already fired to go to the new intercept point by the new intercept time... the target missile might turn in a way that shortens the flightpath of the missile you have launched, so it might need to wiggle and manouver to try to slow down so it does not blow past the new intercept location too early... early or late is a miss.

By which time the sensors on the Zircon might have detected the active radar signals from the approaching SAM which triggers its autopilot to turn away from the signal and climb a little which further shifts the intercept point again several kms in a different direction and at a higher altitude... it is probably already flying at 40-50km altitude anyway, which is already a problem for most conventional SAMs.

There will need to be a lot of work done on directed energy weapons to solve this problem... simply mirrorising the nose might be enough to deal with lasers... reflecting away enough energy so it does not heat up very much at all...

For ICBMs one solution was to make them spin which meant the laser could not focus on any part of the skin for longer than half a second as it rotated out of sight...

Another solution was to have a layer of a high temperature glass that was transparent and filled with a coloured liquid... the laser beam passes through the transparent outer layer but the energy of the laser is absorbed heating the liquid, which means it does no damage at all.

https://t.me/militaryrussiaru/5251

The frigate of the Russian Navy "Admiral Golovko" on the roads of Severomorsk.
Ship March 31 this year arrived at the Northern Fleet for sea trials. "Admiral Golovko" is the first full-time carrier of hypersonic cruise missiles "Zirkon". The frigate is expected to test this missile on April 25-29, 2023 in accordance with the announced NOTAM.

Very interesting where it was shot from. From the north? This would mean that its range is much greater than 1000 km. From the Black Sea. Does this mean that they have already adapted 21631 to launch Tsirkon? However, Russia risked using Tsirkon in Ukraine.

However, Russia risked using Tsirkon in Ukraine.

A real operational test would be valuable, and even if the warhead failed to explode it will be hitting the target at 3km/s so the kinetic energy alone would hide the aerodynamic nose shape and the scramjet engine configuration and design.

Their might be new alloys and materials for them to find, but nothing that will help them much.

Any new missile/launcher will be design to be used from ground or ships anyway.

The thing is that the UKSK vertical launch system for the Russian Navy is called a universal missile launch system.

So any new missile will be designed to be launched from the UKSK system because that is what it is for.

The ZIrcon replaces the Onyx and is essentially the same missile with the ramjet of the Onyx replaced in the Zircon with a scramjet which offer and enormous boost in flight speed... meaning the nose of the missile will be modified in shape to deal with the very high speed airflow and will be made from new materials of course, but otherwise, a solid rocket booster that accelerates the missile in the direction of the target to then fall away and the main jet engine of the missile lights up and powers the missile away to high speed and high altitude.

aning the nose of the missile will be modified in shape to deal with the very high speed wrote:

Unfortunately, the available photos of the poor quality of Tirkon show that the nose of the rocket is not modified in the way you describe and is often described as such.

Who told you that you have up-to-date data that has not been corrected?) wrote:

Yes this way they could test different aerodynamic concepts. In one photo, the concept looks like most hypersonic missile concepts.




There is also an air intake concept similar to the Onyx.

You do understand that looking at a shape from different angles can lead you to think it is different shapes.

If you look at the Su-34 nose from directly above or directly below it looks a rather different shape than it does from the front.

The intake for the Onyx is round and is a ramjet engine and is rather similar to the nose engine intake for the MiG-21, but a round curved air intake is to complex to model for the intake flow models so most scramjet air intakes are likely to be rectangular with the nose of the missile being chisel shaped to ride the hypersonic bow wave the missile creates for itself.

If you look at the first two images these are take from the side and show the chisel nose shape... sometimes called a wave rider... very much not new... look to rather old images of hypersonic bomber designs and you see the same shape used.

The bottom image differs in being taken from above and behind a flying missile... presumably before it accelerated out of view so the nose looks rounded... but it is a rounded chisel shape...

Even from the side and above it looks like this:



But it is the underside that is the critical shape the west really wants to see to copy.