Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Share
    avatar
    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3012
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  max steel on Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:18 pm

    I believe Iskander missiles are really not nuclear but we are to pretend they are.
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4496
    Points : 4675
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:44 pm

    max steel wrote:I believe Iskander missiles are really not nuclear but we are to pretend they are.

    They (Iskander-M/K) are capable of carrying thermonuclear warheads but are using conventional warheads 99.9% of the time. INF restricts the use of ground based munitions with a range of 500-5,500 km range regardless if they're thermonuclear or conventional.
    avatar
    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3012
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  max steel on Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:51 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:

    They (Iskander-M/K) are capable of carrying thermonuclear warheads but are using conventional warheads 99.9% of the time. INF restricts the use of ground based munitions with a range of 500-5,500 km range regardless if they're thermonuclear or conventional.

    Don't you think both Iskanders and ATACMS are same in performance ? US will be making 500km range ATACMS. But do they both follow same trajectory ?
    avatar
    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 10058
    Points : 10546
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  George1 on Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:25 pm

    whats the actual maximum range of that cruise missile??


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov

    avatar
    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5428
    Points : 5473
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Militarov on Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:30 pm

    George1 wrote:whats the actual maximum range of that cruise missile??

    Russians claim its 500km so it does not break INF Treaty. But they have potential to have same or similar range of Kalibr, aka 1500-2000km depending on warhead type. Its basically weaken Kalibr.
    avatar
    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 10058
    Points : 10546
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  George1 on Mon Apr 18, 2016 11:40 pm

    so it is in the same range as the ballistic missile of Iskander


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov

    avatar
    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5428
    Points : 5473
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Militarov on Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:00 am

    George1 wrote:so it is in the same range as the ballistic missile of Iskander

    Yeah, but its range can be extended 3 or 4 times if you ignore threaty. Also its should be cheaper as it shares most of its components with Kalibr and its variants.
    avatar
    Isos
    Senior Lieutenant
    Senior Lieutenant

    Posts : 646
    Points : 650
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Isos on Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:10 am

    Militarov wrote:
    George1 wrote:so it is in the same range as the ballistic missile of Iskander

    Yeah, but its range can be extended 3 or 4 times if you ignore threaty. Also its should be cheaper as it shares most of its components with Kalibr and its variants.

    There was some concerns from the pentagone that russia tested a new +2500km cruise missile for Iskander. Maybe it's not this one.
    avatar
    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5428
    Points : 5473
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Militarov on Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:27 am

    Isos wrote:
    Militarov wrote:
    George1 wrote:so it is in the same range as the ballistic missile of Iskander

    Yeah, but its range can be extended 3 or 4 times if you ignore threaty. Also its should be cheaper as it shares most of its components with Kalibr and its variants.

    There was some concerns from the pentagone that russia tested a new +2500km cruise missile for Iskander. Maybe it's not this one.

    Yeah, this one. But there were also few never finished USSR projects that they claim Russians might have reactivated.
    avatar
    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3012
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  max steel on Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:58 pm

    Isos wrote:

    Statement from Russia's Defense Ministry said:

    "The missile, made with the use of the radar signature reduction technology, was not detected by electronic warfare from the imaginary enemy and destroyed the target successfully". [It] was flying at an altitude of 40-50 kilometres (25-31 miles) while manoeuvring with 20-fold G force in some parts of the flight."

    Missiles launched from the Iskander-M have a range of 500 kilometres (250-310 miles), at 2100–2600 m/s (Mach 6–7), with the system capable of delivering several types of 500kg (1,100lb) warheads to destroy a wide variety of ground targets.

    The guided missiles can locate targets either via satellite or aircraft, through a conventional intelligence centre, or from aerial photos scanned into a computer.

    They can be re-targeted during flight if engaging mobile targets, and use stealth technology as well as electronic warfare jamming devices for suppression of enemy radar.

    The Iskander launch platform can be transported by any means of transport, including airplanes, with this mobility making it harder to prevent launches. It was outfitted with a new aeroballistic missile late last year.

    It takes 16 minutes to launch a missile from the complex, but this can be cut to four minutes in case of operational readiness. A second missile can be launched in under 50 seconds.
    avatar
    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5669
    Points : 6318
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Viktor on Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:08 pm

    Extremelly interesting !!!

    Explains much about the Iskander about what mindstorm has been saying Laughing

    Russia Focussing on Exploiting Vulnerabilities of NATO Missile Shield
    avatar
    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5669
    Points : 6318
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Viktor on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:37 pm

    Good, its about time for the next contract and I suspect quite a large one thumbsup

    Chemezov: missile systems, "Iskander" will not go for export
    avatar
    franco
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2245
    Points : 2283
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  franco on Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:40 pm

    7th brigade switched to SS-26

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1988614.html
    avatar
    d_taddei2
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 782
    Points : 942
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    reply

    Post  d_taddei2 on Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:47 am

    ok has anyone heard of this? i dont really see the point when they have such a good system already the Iskander.

    http://tass.com/russia/800059

    Russia developing upgraded version of Oka tactical missile system — defense ministry

    "There is no need in restoring the old system. We’re developing a new complex," Borisov said, adding the new missile system would be based on the Oka principle.




    avatar
    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5669
    Points : 6318
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Viktor on Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:00 am

    Could it be Frontier?

    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 6088
    Points : 6494
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Austin on Wed Aug 31, 2016 4:58 pm

    Whats the point developing a Iskander like missile ? They already have a INF compliant BM and then develop a new one ?
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4496
    Points : 4675
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:56 am

    Austin wrote:Whats the point developing a Iskander like missile ? They already have a INF compliant BM and then develop a new one ?

    A smaller compact Iskander means cheaper missiles that could be bunched in greater numbers on a launcher. Maybe instead of #2 450-500km missiles per launcher, the same launcher could hold #4 250km missiles, or maybe #8 125km missiles.

    It can differentiate itself from normal MLRS by having many of the same "tricks" the normal Iskander-M has, and be used specifically to overwhelm IAD with a ground based SEAD/DEAD barrage.
    avatar
    OminousSpudd
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 873
    Points : 890
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Age : 21
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  OminousSpudd on Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:06 am

    Austin wrote:Whats the point developing a Iskander like missile ? They already have a INF compliant BM and then develop a new one ?

    In a word; saturation.

    ...and what Magnum mentioned.
    avatar
    GunshipDemocracy
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1495
    Points : 1533
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:26 pm

    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Austin wrote:Whats the point developing a Iskander like missile ? They already have a INF compliant BM and then develop a new one ?

    In a word; saturation.

    ...and what Magnum mentioned.

    Not necessairly. There was considered a variant of OKA with 900km range...
    avatar
    franco
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2245
    Points : 2283
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  franco on Mon Sep 19, 2016 12:35 am

    Nice photo's from Army 2016;

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2136150.html
    avatar
    Project Canada
    Senior Lieutenant
    Senior Lieutenant

    Posts : 607
    Points : 614
    Join date : 2015-07-20
    Age : 28
    Location : Canada

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Project Canada on Mon Oct 03, 2016 5:49 am




    Russia developing upgraded version of Oka tactical missile system — defense ministry

    The Oka system had a range of 400 km (248.5 miles) and, consequently, was excluded from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) but was nonetheless scrapped under the treaty

    MOSCOW, June 10. /TASS/. Russia is developing an upgraded version of the Oka tactical missile system (NATO reporting name: SS-23 Spider) scrapped under the INF Treaty, Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov said on Wednesday.
    "There is no need in restoring the old system. We’re developing a new complex," Borisov said, adding the new missile system would be based on the Oka principle.

    Present-day technologies allow for improving the system’s range and accuracy characteristics, the deputy defense minister said.
    The OTR-23 Oka tactical ballistic missile system entered service in the Soviet Army in 1983. According to military experts, the Oka complexes made the US newest Patriot air defense missile systems completely ineffective at that time.
    The Oka system had a range of 400 km (248.5 miles) and, consequently, was excluded from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) but was nonetheless scrapped under the treaty.

    The INF Treaty signed between the Soviet Union and the United States in 1987 stipulated the elimination of all ground-based ballistic missiles with the shorter ranges of between 500 and 1,000 km and the intermediate ranges of between 1,000 and 5,000 km.
    The disposal of the ballistic missiles under the INF Treaty ended in 1991 and Russia and the United States completed their inspections in 2001.
    The Soviet Union eliminated over 200 Oka missiles and 102 launchers.

    http://tass.com/russia/800059


    Isn't Iskander the successor to the Oka? then why bother develop a "new complex" based on Oka?



    avatar
    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4496
    Points : 4675
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:07 am

    Project Canada wrote:


    Russia developing upgraded version of Oka tactical missile system — defense ministry

    The Oka system had a range of 400 km (248.5 miles) and, consequently, was excluded from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) but was nonetheless scrapped under the treaty

    MOSCOW, June 10. /TASS/. Russia is developing an upgraded version of the Oka tactical missile system (NATO reporting name: SS-23 Spider) scrapped under the INF Treaty, Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov said on Wednesday.
    "There is no need in restoring the old system. We’re developing a new complex," Borisov said, adding the new missile system would be based on the Oka principle.

    Present-day technologies allow for improving the system’s range and accuracy characteristics, the deputy defense minister said.
    The OTR-23 Oka tactical ballistic missile system entered service in the Soviet Army in 1983. According to military experts, the Oka complexes made the US newest Patriot air defense missile systems completely ineffective at that time.
    The Oka system had a range of 400 km (248.5 miles) and, consequently, was excluded from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) but was nonetheless scrapped under the treaty.

    The INF Treaty signed between the Soviet Union and the United States in 1987 stipulated the elimination of all ground-based ballistic missiles with the shorter ranges of between 500 and 1,000 km and the intermediate ranges of between 1,000 and 5,000 km.
    The disposal of the ballistic missiles under the INF Treaty ended in 1991 and Russia and the United States completed their inspections in 2001.
    The Soviet Union eliminated over 200 Oka missiles and 102 launchers.

    http://tass.com/russia/800059


    Isn't Iskander the successor to the Oka? then why bother develop a "new complex" based on Oka?




    They could be creating a cheaper "dumb" SRBM, as opposed to the more expensive SRBM known as Iskander-M.
    avatar
    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5669
    Points : 6318
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Viktor on Wed Nov 09, 2016 7:23 pm

    8th thumbsup

    MSC transmits eighth Defense Ministry "Iskander-M"
    avatar
    jhelb
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 425
    Points : 491
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  jhelb on Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:06 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    A smaller compact Iskander means cheaper missiles that could be bunched in greater numbers on a launcher. Maybe instead of #2 450-500km missiles per launcher, the same launcher could hold #4 250km missiles, or maybe #8 125km missiles.

    But then ground launched cruise missile can do the same job. What's the need for tactical ballistic missiles like the Iskander?
    avatar
    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5669
    Points : 6318
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Viktor on Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:41 pm

    jhelb wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    A smaller compact Iskander means cheaper missiles that could be bunched in greater numbers on a launcher. Maybe instead of #2 450-500km missiles per launcher, the same launcher could hold #4 250km missiles, or maybe #8 125km missiles.

    But then ground launched cruise missile can do the same job. What's the need for tactical ballistic missiles like the Iskander?

    It certainly can not - thats why there is a ballistic and cruise missile technology each with advantages and disadvantages depending on the scenario.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone):

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:04 pm