Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+16
Mir
GarryB
Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E
Scorpius
marcellogo
Rodion_Romanovic
SeigSoloyvov
kvs
Arrow
zare
lancelot
sepheronx
Pincus Shain
mnztr
Podlodka77
Isos
20 posters

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    OnlineGarryB
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38982
    Points : 39478
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand
    • Post n°1

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  GarryB Sun Nov 05, 2023 8:32 am

    Besides the Russians don't have too many Mig-29's around - let alone Mig-35's!

    Because of their own decisions and choices.

    If they decide they need to massively ramp up the number of modern fighters they have they could do it faster and cheaper by making MiG-29Ms and MiG-35s.

    Later on as the technology gets cheaper they could upgrade those MiG-29Ms to MiG-35 standard easily enough.
    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°2

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Sun Nov 05, 2023 9:03 am

    @GarryB

    I guess they could get the Migs up and running - however I think they will rather concentrate their efforts into producing more Su-57's. This is the fighter they really need to counter the west. The F-16 is not going to be the game changer they hope for. In fact it should be easy pickings for the Russians - and this includes any so-called long range missile that will come with it. They may get a few bites but in the end they will run out of steam (and F-16's). Then what? F-35's perhaps?

    The Su-57 and it's little checkmate brother is going to be needed. Cool

    GarryB, Hole and Belisarius like this post

    • Back to top
    OnlineGarryB
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38982
    Points : 39478
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand
    • Post n°3

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  GarryB Sun Nov 05, 2023 10:02 am


    however I think they will rather concentrate their efforts into producing more Su-57's. This is the fighter they really need to counter the west.

    If they need lots of aircraft quickly that can carry modern AAMs and launch them at targets at massive distances then they will be able to crank out MiG-29Ms faster than any other type at the moment and the cost of operating them won't break their budget that also has to pay for new missiles of a range of types.


    The Su-57 and it's little checkmate brother is going to be needed.

    The fact that Checkmate has been revealed to the public suggests it is not the Russian AF funded project for light 5th gen fighter, which is secret.

    It would be that single engined MiG model that is derided as a fighter trainer type aircraft, but ironically that would be the best light 5th gen design.

    Small, cheap to buy, cheap to operate, stealthy with internal weapons... single engined. That is what they wanted, but it seems anything MiG is bad.

    kvs, Eugenio Argentina, Hole and Belisarius like this post

    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°4

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:24 pm

    GarryB wrote:That is what they wanted, but it seems anything MiG is bad.

    Not at all! I just think Mig is currently tied up with the development of the "Mig-41" which by all accounts is an enormous and very challenging task.

    Rodion_Romanovic and jon_deluxe like this post

    • Back to top
    Isos
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11301
    Points : 11271
    Join date : 2015-11-06
    • Post n°5

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Isos Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:31 pm

    Mir wrote:
    GarryB wrote:That is what they wanted, but it seems anything MiG is bad.

    Not at all! I just think Mig is currently tied up with the development of the "Mig-41" which by all accounts is an enormous and very challenging task.

    Not taking all the ressources.

    Mig has already worked on new light trainer jets, new 5th gen fighter and the modernized mig-29, the mig-35.

    They could easily develop a light single engine 5th gen fighter with their previous works. It's not like they would go from scratch. They spent all the 00s till 2020 developing the SMT variant, the M and 35 which isn't impressive.

    Mig-41 is a big program and they are lucky they had the mig-31 so they naturally received the funds for it. If not, sukhoi would have won it too.

    Reality is they don't receive enough money. Neither from export nor from russians. They barely have to sustain normal company activities.

    jon_deluxe likes this post

    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°6

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Sun Nov 05, 2023 12:54 pm

    Isos wrote:

    Not taking all the ressources.

    Mig has already worked on new light trainer jets, new 5th gen fighter and the modernized mig-29, the mig-35.

    Yes perhaps they are not the favorite son like they used to be in Soviet times and Sukhoi has taken over that role as a leading designer - and deservingly so. Neither the Mig-AT jet trainer nor the Mig1.41 was a great success in terms of design. The 1980's Mig-29M was a stunner though and would have been in service in large numbers IF...but shit happens.

    Decades later it was developed into the New Mig-29M and Mig-35 but it was too little too late.

    Podlodka77 likes this post

    • Back to top
    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77


    Posts : 2589
    Points : 2591
    Join date : 2022-01-06
    Location : Z
    • Post n°7

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Podlodka77 Sun Nov 05, 2023 1:03 pm

    As far as I'm concerned, I think that for a country the size of Russia, the MiG-29 aircraft platform is insufficient.
    That aircraft was forgotten for decades and, unlike the Su-27 platform, it did not receive successors (at least not in large numbers) in the past decades, such as the Su-30SM and Su-35S and even the Su-34 strike variant.
    I don't think that the Russian idea of ​​going with the single-engine principle with the Su-75 as well as the F-35 is good. I think the best thing is done by the Chinese with the FC-31.
    I think that every pilot will much more appreciate an airplane that has a higher rate of climb, a better range, a larger payload, and therefore better maneuverability. Two engines are two engines and there is nothing to be smart about. Russia needs the Su-57 first and a successor to the still unbeatable MiG-31.

    Mir likes this post

    • Back to top
    mnztr
    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2773
    Points : 2811
    Join date : 2018-01-21
    • Post n°8

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  mnztr Sun Nov 05, 2023 9:15 pm

    Mir wrote:
    mnztr wrote:

    Just maintain a patrol with MIG-31. They can get close enough real fast to launch R-37's . You don't need more the 4 planes to cover a massive amount of space.

    The Su-35 can pretty much do the same thing (not to mention the Su-57). The whole Su-27/30 family is perfectly suitable for the CAP role with their huge internal fuel loads. They can also be used as point interceptors or air superiority fighters with a lighter fuel load but also with a serious amount of AA missiles. Besides the Russians don't have too many Mig-29's around - let alone Mig-35's!  

    What the Mig 31 has is its ability to far more rapidly close to launch range and launch from much higher altitude and speed imparting much more energy on the missile and significantly increasing its range. that extra 20K feet and 700 kph makes a big difference

    GarryB likes this post

    • Back to top
    OnlineGarryB
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38982
    Points : 39478
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand
    • Post n°9

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Didn't realise they celebrated

    Post  GarryB Mon Nov 06, 2023 2:22 am


    Not at all! I just think Mig is currently tied up with the development of the "Mig-41" which by all accounts is an enormous and very challenging task.

    In terms of development that will be some work, but their production and suppliers for engines and radar and other equipment, not to mention the factories that normally build their planes will be idle doing nothing waiting to assemble MiG-41 prototypes or upgrade MiG-31s. Making some new fighters would be good for them and for Russia.

    They could easily develop a light single engine 5th gen fighter with their previous works.

    They are doing that most likely. The claim from officials was that when the Su-57 entered serial production that funding for the light partner to it would be funded, so it should be getting funding now.

    They spent all the 00s till 2020 developing the SMT variant, the M and 35 which isn't impressive.

    To be fair the MiG-35 has most of the features of the Rafale for a tiny fraction of the price. 8 billion might only get you 30 Rafales, but it would probably get you 200 MiG-29Ms or 150 MiG-35s.

    I know which would be more use.

    Mig-41 is a big program and they are lucky they had the mig-31 so they naturally received the funds for it. If not, sukhoi would have won it too.

    Sukhoi has no historic experience with speed record breaking aircraft for the PVO. The Su-15 was mach 2 capable, but was not a ground breaking design.

    Reality is they don't receive enough money. Neither from export nor from russians. They barely have to sustain normal company activities.

    Mostly due to decision beyond their control and the power of Sukhoi influencing decisions in their own favour... not a good way to run the military.

    The SMO taught the Russians some hard lessons - and even more so when it comes to the navy. Lets see where all that money goes but I am willing to say that the navy will get a fair slice of the pie - and that includes new submarines.

    I would say lesson number one was that  big ships that are not upgraded with modern air defence equipment are not as useful as they appear, but the biggest lesson they should realise is that they were in a colony slave relationship with the west where most of their trade went through western markets and western ports to the rest of the world and that their future is to break away from that and to trade with the rest of the world directly. That means they need a civilian merchant marine force that is much bigger than now and they need a decent navy to support that.

    Submarines are mostly defensive things that are only really useful during war time, and have little real influence during peacetime.

    Not suggesting they don't need subs, but they need surface ships that can visit foreign ports and show the flag and make foreign countries feel safer trading with you.

    Building international naval trade will pay for the ships you need and more so.

    The UK and US didn't become powerful and then build big navies... it was their navies that gave them global reach and access to markets that made them rich.

    but for decades things in the VMF are not as they should be and what's worst - the fleet is shrinking.

    There are lots of ships that need replacing in the VMF and you can't replace them all at once. Ships and subs take time to build... perhaps now is an excellent time to pause most new construction and finish things being built and using the time to upgrade and improve the shipyards themselves so that they can produce ships faster and more efficiently, and then start producing more. They are having civilian ships built in India with Indian money they have... that is sensible too because it expands production capacity for things that will make money for Russia.

    Neither the Mig-AT jet trainer nor the Mig1.41 was a great success in terms of design.

    Both cases were a bit dodgy in my opinion. The MiG-AT was much cheaper than the Yak-130 in addition to be rather simpler too, and probably would have been a better aircraft they could have produced in larger numbers and gotten them into service faster.

    The S-37 that beat the MiG 1.41 looked nothing like the final aircraft so by what criteria was it better if they had to completely and fundamentally change the design for the final product?

    The MiG 1.41 could arguably be said to be flying in larger numbers in China...

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond J-20-m12

    There are less changes between the MiG 1.41 and the J-20 than between the S-37 and Su-57.

    Decades later it was developed into the New Mig-29M and Mig-35 but it was too little too late.

    But is it?

    A modern F-16 is not a bad plane for right now with many features and capabilities the F-35 is not good enough for in its current and foreseeable versions and the MiG-35 is just a twin engined F-16 really, though with thrust vectoring probably rather better in close combat.

    That aircraft was forgotten for decades and, unlike the Su-27 platform, it did not receive successors (at least not in large numbers) in the past decades, such as the Su-30SM and Su-35S and even the Su-34 strike variant.

    The Su-30 is a fancy name for a Su-27UB, the MiG-29SMT and MiG-29M and MiG-29KR and MiG-35... all they are missing is an Su-34 equivalent, which is redundant really.

    Hole likes this post

    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°10

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Mon Nov 06, 2023 7:36 pm

    GarryB wrote:Both cases were a bit dodgy in my opinion. The MiG-AT was much cheaper than the Yak-130 in addition to be rather simpler too, and probably would have been a better aircraft they could have produced in larger numbers and gotten them into service faster.

    Both were designed as advanced trainers and light combat aircraft in a competition to replace the L-29 and the L-39. The Mig-AT had a low set straight wing and was overall aerodynamically inferior to the Yak-130. The MiG-AT's fly-by-wire controls allowed the aircraft to replicate the characteristics of third- and fourth-generation jet fighters, whilst the Yak-130 can do all that and is also able to replicate the characteristics of several 4+ generation fighters as well as the fifth-generation Sukhoi Su-57. Initially the French was involved with the Mig-AT design whilst the Italians in turn with the Yak. The Italians liked the design so much that they practically stole the design for their M-346 Master advanced trainer.

    Edit: adding some pictures.

    The Mig-AT
    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Mig-at10

    The Yak-130
    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Yak-1310


    GarryB wrote:The S-37 that beat the MiG 1.41 looked nothing like the final aircraft so by what criteria was it better if they had to completely and fundamentally change the design for the final product?

    Whilst the Mig1.41 was designed to counter the AFT developments in the US (F-22) the S-37 was an experimental aircraft from the start - basically to test the forward sweep wing design that was first adopted in another experimental aircraft in the US (X-29). It was also a testbed for composite materials and sophisticated fly-by-wire control systems, as well as advanced airframe technologies. A number of those technologies found it's way in the Su-35 and current fifth-generation jet fighter Su-57, but it was never designed as a 5th gen fighter.

    The prototype Mig1.41 (1.44) did not offer any real advanced stealth features in the design and it had no internal weapons bay - whilst the sole S-37 had this feature. I'm sure that the J-20 looks like what the final Mig product could have been though, but it was cancelled.

    The Mig-1.44
    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Mig14410

    The S-37 in formation with a Su-27 development aircraft
    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond S37_2010


    Last edited by Mir on Thu Nov 23, 2023 6:45 pm; edited 2 times in total
    • Back to top
    OnlineGarryB
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38982
    Points : 39478
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand
    • Post n°11

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty The helmets alone suggest this is a test aircraft.

    Post  GarryB Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:28 pm


    The Mig-AT had a low set straight wing and was overall aerodynamically inferior to the Yak-130. The MiG-AT's fly-by-wire controls allowed the aircraft to replicate the characteristics of third- and fourth-generation jet fighters, whilst the Yak-130 can do all that and is also able to replicate the characteristics of several 4+ generation fighters as well as the fifth-generation Sukhoi Su-57.

    The MiG AT was much cheaper and simpler and could have done the job better. The Yak was expensive and got the job because it had a heavier external payload of 3 tons vs 2 tons for the AT. The claim being that the  Yak-130 could be developed into a light cheap fighter and also a light ground attack type to replace the MiG-29 and the Su-25, except it was expensive and had a foreign engine too so it was a while before they got it into serial production and it still hasn't replace all the L29s.

    It was tested as a replacement standoff ground attack platform but was too fragile to operate over the battlefield. The light fighter has the same problem... too vulnerable because it lacks all the things that makes fighters useful... when you add those things on then it wasn't much cheaper than a MiG-29M.

    There was talk of putting the MiG-AT into production to be used as a cheap simple Jet trainer with the Yak-130s being the advanced jet trainers.

    Neither types have thrust vectoring engines so full simulation of 5th gen fighters is not possible.

    The Italians liked the design so much that they practically stole the design for their M-346 Master advanced trainer.

    Their Italians and their western customers are more used to spending enormous amounts of money on a LIFT... Russia needed a jet trainer they could make in enormous numbers that airfields could use as a hack...

    A number of those technologies found it's way in the Su-35 and current fifth-generation jet fighter Su-57, but it was never designed as a 5th gen fighter.

    It was the design competition to decide which company would take lead on what eventually became the Su-57.


    The prototype Mig1.41 (1.44) did not offer any real advanced stealth features in the design and it had no internal weapons bay

    Being a prototype I doubt they were interested in revealing their secrets to the public and their enemies... with that forward swept wing the S-37 wouldn't be very stealthy either... those forward swept wings acting like a radar reflector in the forward hemisphere... not to mention those canards.
    • Back to top
    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77


    Posts : 2589
    Points : 2591
    Join date : 2022-01-06
    Location : Z
    • Post n°12

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Podlodka77 Thu Nov 09, 2023 1:37 pm

    The period after SMO...

    * VVS priority number 1; PAK-DP
    The MiG should focus on the PAK-DP because the MiG-31 has no major problems other than the ravages of time.
    I think that the entire OAK and certainly Sukhoi will work on this plane. If nothing else, production of PAK-DP could FINALLY go full steam ahead in "Sokol".
    All aircraft manufacturing companies produce something (KAPO, NAPO, Avaistar-SP, Irkut, and especially KNAAZ), but I'm not sure about "Sokol".
    Except for a solid number of crashes in flight, the MiG-31 not only exceeded all other expectations, but it is really an extraordinary machine.

    * The Tu-160M ​​and Su-57 have finally become the present and are being produced, thank God, and the serial production of the S-70 Okhotnik (English pronunciation; Okhotnik) is on the way. What is the intended role of that giant UCAV and how the Russians will use it remains to be seen.

    * Su-30SM/34/35S; I think that all aircraft based on the Su-27 platform will cease to be produced either by the end of this decade or by the middle of the next decade.

    I don't know what the Russians are doing in terms of replacing the light transport aircraft and the medium transport aircraft, so I don't know how legitimate it is to use the Il-112V and Il-276 designations anymore.
    There is also a problem for the replacement of anti-submarine platforms. The biggest problem of Russian aviation is; light transport aircraft, medium TA, as well as the new ASW aircraft.
    Transport aviation remains the biggest problem even though the workhorse (and basis of the Russian TA) is finally yielding results and Aviastar-SP is producing more and more Il-76MD-90A.
    The work on the Il-78M-90A is certainly nearing completion, and I hope that Beriev will complete the A-100 as well.

    I wouldn't waste my time on the single engine Su-75.
    I'm sorry, but a single-engine plane has no climbing speed, no range, smaller radar, smaller payload, worse maneuverability, lower flight ceiling.
    It is good for dispersing crows and seagulls in peacetime over Kaliningrad and Sevastopol, but if a conflict starts then you need Su-57 and PAK-DP will be needed.
    I think that in 5 to 10 years, stealth will be far less "famous" than it is now, and then we will return to the flight characteristics of the aircraft. I know that every pilot looks at the flight characteristics of the plane first.

    It's better to have two "eggs" than one, right ?
    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°13

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Thu Nov 09, 2023 5:58 pm

    @GarryB

    Sorry for the somewhat delayed response but I got a bit distracted with my new laptop.
    Anyway in relation to what aircraft may be required for the SMO:

    GarryB wrote:The MiG AT was much cheaper and simpler and could have done the job better...There was talk of putting the MiG-AT into production to be used as a cheap simple.

    ...and are they rolling off the production line? I think the Yak-152 won that competition for a basic trainer?

    Neither types have thrust vectoring engines so full simulation of 5th gen fighters is not possible.

    I have not seen any advance trainer with thrust vectoring - have you? You probably won't either. However most advanced trainers claim to be able to simulate the latest gen fighters and they do it pretty well...as advanced trainers.

    GarryB wrote:Being a prototype I doubt they were interested in revealing their secrets to the public and their enemies... with that forward swept wing the S-37 wouldn't be very stealthy either... those forward swept wings acting like a radar reflector in the forward hemisphere... not to mention those canards.

    As I've said the S-37 was an experimental aircraft and the forward swept wings was there for science. It proved to be extremely effective in high G maneuvers.

    But more importantly - why would Mig build a prototype 5th gen stealth fighter technology demonstrator and then actually build one with nearly zero stealth features? What is the point of trying to keep it secret? You keep it a secret in a hanger until you reveal the prototype. Clearly they lacked the expertise at that stage.

    "...those canards"? You must be joking  Laughing

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond J-20-m10

    Fact is - NONE of these Mig aircraft ever made it into production for the VVS (6 Mig-35's just don't cut it). On the other hand the Yak-130, the Su-35 and the Su-57 did.
    • Back to top
    Pincus Shain
    avatar
    Pincus Shain


    Posts : 26
    Points : 30
    Join date : 2016-07-31
    • Post n°14

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Pincus Shain Thu Nov 09, 2023 6:05 pm

    Mir wrote:@GarryB
    Fact is - NONE of these Mig aircraft ever made it into production for the VVS (6 Mig-35's just don't cut it). On the other hand the Yak-130, the Su-35 and the Su-57 did.

    Mig-29K for Indian Navy and Russian Navy weren't bad at all.

    GarryB and Big_Gazza like this post

    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°15

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Thu Nov 09, 2023 6:07 pm

    @Pincus Shain

    Absolutely...and Mig has build some amazing aircraft through the years.
    • Back to top
    Onlinesepheronx
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8532
    Points : 8794
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada
    • Post n°16

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  sepheronx Thu Nov 09, 2023 6:22 pm

    Pinnacle of what Mikoyan can do is MiG-31. And I do believe they still have it in them to do the replacement and advancements of the MiG-31. MiG-29 was fantastic as a light fighter but has taken a rather back seat since sukhoi got the financing.

    Mir likes this post

    • Back to top
    OnlineGarryB
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38982
    Points : 39478
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand
    • Post n°17

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  GarryB Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:01 am


    ...and are they rolling off the production line? I think the Yak-152 won that competition for a basic trainer?

    The talk was just talk, just like they didn't adopt the SR-10 as a basic jet trainer either, but the fact remains the Yak-130 is too expensive for what it is.

    Maybe it is because they haven't used Yaks in a while and it has become a boutique organisation kept alive with its LIFT programme...

    If some people here get their wish the same might happen to MiG and the MiG-41 might get horribly expensive too.


    I have not seen any advance trainer with thrust vectoring - have you?

    Well it is really only Russia that has fighters with thrust vectoring engines as an option as standard so that really isn't surprising.

    However most advanced trainers claim to be able to simulate the latest gen fighters and they do it pretty well...as advanced trainers.

    Simulate... not replicate.

    The thing is that the Su-35 and presumably new upgraded Su-30s have TVC and the MiG-35 was supposed to have that too so I would say it would be standard on modern Russian 4++ and 5th gen fighters moving forward which would make thrust vectoring flight an important part of flight training moving forward.

    Note their LIFTs are not supersonic capable but you don't really need to train for that.

    I would say a Yak-130 with TVC engines might actually be interesting as a light fighter... but then that model of the new MiG light 5th gen fighter could be the basis of a new light fighter and also a new LIFT too.

    As I've said the S-37 was an experimental aircraft and the forward swept wings was there for science. It proved to be extremely effective in high G maneuvers.

    But not stealthy and it was never going to be stealthy because forward swept wings reflect radar forward while rear swept wings redirect radar sideways...

    They used the S-37 to test a few different technologies including forward swept wings which were not much use for a stealth fighter but might have been useful for something else.

    why would Mig build a prototype 5th gen stealth fighter technology demonstrator and then actually build one with nearly zero stealth features?

    Why do western "experts" admit the current Su-57 is stealthy when they claimed the flying prototypes were not. Even the S-70 had a non stealthy engine nozzle which will be changed in the service model. The flying prototype was to test aerodynamics and flight performance and other things related to flight and manufacture. The stealthy model was supposed to be kept secret but was designed to be stealthy.

    You keep it a secret in a hanger until you reveal the prototype. Clearly they lacked the expertise at that stage.

    Lacking expertise presumes there was no hangar prototype that was stealthy because they couldn't manage it.

    Prototypes are hand made and I would argue that most countries can make a stealth prototype... mass production in a factory built to tolerances that maintain stealthy performance is another matter of course... do you think Sukhois factories just went from Su-35s to Su-57s without any problems or issues at all?

    "...those canards"? You must be joking

    The priority for Russian 5th gen fighters was to be able to fight and be stealthy second.

    Who is to say what those canards are made of... they could be radar transparent for all we know.


    Fact is - NONE of these Mig aircraft ever made it into production for the VVS (6 Mig-35's just don't cut it). On the other hand the Yak-130, the Su-35 and the Su-57 did.

    And the VVS never makes bad choices?

    The MiG-AT is a better trainer aircraft than the Yak-130... when discussing putting the MiG into production it was admitted as such... the costs of the Yak-130 are like that of a light fighter like a MiG-29SMT but it is no fighter and making it a useful light fighter would make it cost rather more without reaching the cost performance of the MiG-35.

    The Su-35 makes sense and so does the Su-57 but Russia can't really afford an all Su-35 and Su-57 fleet... they are just too expensive and cost too much to operate to have them in useful numbers to protect the entire country.

    Sukhoi admit that themselves when they talk about Su-75s and their low purchase price and low operational costs... but of course they want to sell aircraft.


    Mig-29K for Indian Navy and Russian Navy weren't bad at all.

    And the reason the Russian Navy wanted MiG-29Ks was because it was a numbers aircraft. With Su-33s, perhaps upgraded to Su-35s they wont be able to carry as many aircraft as they could if they had both Flankers and MiGs and numbers are important too.

    MiG-29 was fantastic as a light fighter but has taken a rather back seat since sukhoi got the financing.

    It think it is more about poltics... Sukhoi people secured high up jobs where they get to make decisions for government and they prefer Flankers.

    Quite old, but good video explaining Russian doomers

    And his comparison of Russians thinking government will screw things up and Americans thinking they can do no wrong because they are the good guys... is about right and about what most pro west people think... Russians are realists and pessimists, which makes them frustrating at times, because pessimists miss opportunities because they expect to fail or lose. A bit like lacking confidence and not going for a better job.

    There was a YT video for HT saying Biden is not telling Zelensky to talk peace.

    The amusing thing is that they probably think Putin will accept things the way they are now, but I think they have a shock coming....

    Regular likes this post

    • Back to top
    lancelot
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 2695
    Points : 2693
    Join date : 2020-10-18
    • Post n°18

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  lancelot Fri Nov 10, 2023 11:40 am

    GarryB wrote:
    ...and are they rolling off the production line? I think the Yak-152 won that competition for a basic trainer?
    The talk was just talk, just like they didn't adopt the SR-10 as a basic jet trainer either, but the fact remains the Yak-130 is too expensive for what it is.

    Maybe it is because they haven't used Yaks in a while and it has become a boutique organisation kept alive with its LIFT programme...

    If some people here get their wish the same might happen to MiG and the MiG-41 might get horribly expensive too.

    The problem with the Yak-152 is the lack of engine for it. It was supposed to use the RED A03 V-12 diesel engine. But it was made in Germany and with EU sanctions on sales of military related equipment after 2014 annexation of Crimea it just wasn't possible to get the engine anymore. Considering this engine was made by a Russian designer with Russian funding, it was a big mistake to make the factory in Germany.

    Until the VK-650 turboprop engine is available, or they get the APD-500 engine of the Aurus certified for aircraft use, this project is going nowhere.

    The issues have nothing to do with Yakolev design bureau or the factory. The bureau is working just fine as can be seen by Yak-130 and MS-21 aircraft programs. The factory is still producing the Yak-130. And I wouldn't call its production "boutique". The factory produced almost 200 such aircraft.

    Mir likes this post

    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°19

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Fri Nov 10, 2023 2:44 pm

    GarryB wrote:Maybe it is because they haven't used Yaks in a while and it has become a boutique organisation kept alive with its LIFT programme...

    Lancelot answered this bit more than adequately before I could get a go.

    GarryB wrote:Note their LIFTs are not supersonic capable but you don't really need to train for that.

    Again I don't know of any other LIFT's that can go supersonic but as you say they don't really need that. Neither would they need to train for thrust vectoring - that is what aircraft in OC units are for. Besides it's going to make the trainer way too expensive and add unnecessary weight.

    GarryB wrote:Well it is really only Russia that has fighters with thrust vectoring engines as an option as standard so that really isn't surprising.

    Not quite. I'm mainly referring to production aircraft here. The F-22 has 2D TV as well as the J-20 (later variants should have 3D) and let's not forget about the F-35B.

    For now the Russians have 3D TV - on the Sukhoi fighters; Su-30SM, Su-35S, Su-57 and the S-37 experimental fighter.
    Only ONE Mig was ever fitted with TV - the Mig-29OVT, which incidentally is also one of my favorite Migs. It was rebuild from the Mig-29M prototype (Blue 156).  Wink

    GarryB wrote:Why do western "experts" admit the current Su-57 is stealthy when they claimed the flying prototypes were not.

    So do you believe these Western "experts"? If you do, then I would say you should know better than that! Clearly the Su-57 prototype offered great frontal stealth features from the start.

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Su57-t10

    GarryB wrote: do you think Sukhois factories just went from Su-35s to Su-57s without any problems or issues at all?

    Nothing in this business is ever a smooth ride but for the most part - YES!

    GarryB wrote: Who is to say what those canards are made of... they could be radar transparent for all we know.

    So it seems that this only applies to the Mig-1.41 but not the S-37! - an experimental aircraft known for testing all sorts of new materials to be used in future Sukhoi aircraft?

    GarryB wrote: And the VVS never makes bad choices?

    To be honest, in this instance they made the correct decision to pick the Su-27 family of fighters instead of Mig-29's. The Su-27 was far more advanced  with it's FBW controls and the aircraft offered much greater operational flexibility.

    GarryB wrote:The MiG-AT is a better trainer aircraft than the Yak-130... when discussing putting the MiG into production it was admitted as such...

    Where do you get this?  Laughing
    How can it be better as "an advanced trainer" if it had very basic aerodynamic properties and manual controls vs the Yak's FBW and it's far superior aerodynamics?

    In fact in the original tender Sukhoi's rather brilliant S-54 design earned the top marks, but was rejected as it was a single engine design. The tender commission submitted the following to the VVS: "The conceptual designs of the Sukhoi and Mikoyan design bureaux do not meet the specifications requirements", suggesting that "the development and mock-up manufacture of the UTK-Yak (Yak-130) and  Myasishev UTK-2000 be continued". However, Mikoyan cried like a baby and insisted they should be allowed to carry on with their bidding, with the result that the VVS awarded contracts for both the Yak and the Mig. Talk about bad politics!  Laughing

    GarryB wrote:the costs of the Yak-130 are like that of a light fighter like a MiG-29SMT but it is no fighter and making it a useful light fighter would make it cost rather more without reaching the cost performance of the MiG-35.

    The Yak-130 unit price is given at around $15 million on the open market. The very basic Mig-29 was around $20 million per unit at the time. The SMT is far more advanced and the cost of a current generation Mig-29 is close to $30 million.
    • Back to top
    zare
    avatar
    zare


    Posts : 60
    Points : 60
    Join date : 2013-05-31
    • Post n°20

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  zare Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:07 pm

    Mir wrote:
    The Yak-130 unit price is given at around $15 million on the open market. The very basic Mig-29 was around $20 million per unit at the time. The SMT is far more advanced and the cost of a current generation Mig-29 is close to $30 million.

    These planes were never advertised as light fighters. Outside the training role they can take COIN tasks meaning very light strike/recon/air support.

    Nobody ever bought any model in quantity to be used for these roles. It's merely advertised because it can be done, so why not. It's a sideeffect of having weapon loadout and electronics on a flying machine, nothing more. Just like the modern fridge has a web browser, doesn't mean anyone is buying them for web browsing.

    Re. MiG-31. It's one of the greatest assets left over from USSR to Russia. The importance of the aircraft is depicted in Tolkachev's defection story. VVS budget suffered heavily but refactoring leaked components was a hard priority. I heard that cost until 1992 would cover about 30% more operational Su-27S/P in the fleet. On the other hand, NATO had no way of really knowing state of MiG-31B for years. They could've slowed down on the mitigation plan, allocate the funds elsewhere, but they didn't and it tells a lot. It means that MiG-31 was so crucial to defense of the country and multiple important military programs should suffer budget cuts instead.

    I had a keen interest in this airship. Spent years gathering materials, books, anything that can be found.
    One of the most impressive stories was a crew interview from the mid 80s. On the surface, nothing thrilling in it, but the way the pilots described interaction with the aircraft as it were a computer and they were in a game is the earliest example of pilot comfort, reduced workload, increased situational awareness "testimony" in a Russian setting.

    Since 2005 I've claimed publicly that MiG-31 is able to mission kill F-22 without any issues and I still stand by that.






    GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E, mnrck, Eugenio Argentina, Mir and jon_deluxe like this post

    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°21

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:17 pm

    The Mig-31 is just an amazing interceptor. If you compare it to it's roots - the Mig-25P - it's a huge step forward!
    When the radar was first revealed most Western "experts" fainted! Laughing
    Hopefully the Mig-41 will be a similar advance as an interceptor.

    GarryB, zare, Big_Gazza, zardof, Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E and Eugenio Argentina like this post

    • Back to top
    OnlineArrow
    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 2719
    Points : 2711
    Join date : 2012-02-12
    • Post n°22

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Arrow Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:47 pm

    Hopefully the Mig-41 will be a similar advance as an interceptor. wrote:

    We won't find out anytime soon. The MiG-41 may appear in two decades.

    zare and owais.usmani like this post

    Big_Gazza dislikes this post

    • Back to top
    Mir
    Mir
    Mir


    Posts : 3133
    Points : 3135
    Join date : 2021-06-10
    • Post n°23

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Mir Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:52 pm

    That is a bit of a long wait! I believe a prototype will be revealed within the next two to three years.
    But perhaps I am a bit too enthusiastic. Laughing

    This is the spot where they build Mig prototypes. I'd like to believe that right now they have something good cooking over there Twisted Evil

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond 831-310

    GarryB, Big_Gazza, Eugenio Argentina and jon_deluxe like this post

    • Back to top
    OnlineArrow
    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 2719
    Points : 2711
    Join date : 2012-02-12
    • Post n°24

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Arrow Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:09 pm

    During the Cold War, there was no need to wait for the next generations of aircraft. The progress has been amazing. Now new generations appear every few decades. I think that if all goes well, we'll see the prototype after 2030.
    • Back to top
    zare
    avatar
    zare


    Posts : 60
    Points : 60
    Join date : 2013-05-31
    • Post n°25

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  zare Fri Nov 10, 2023 10:55 pm

    Arrow wrote:

    We won't find out anytime soon. The MiG-41 may appear in two decades.

    Yeah. In this situation they need to do it in secrecy. And that raises the effort massively.

    Modern processes and full secrecy do not go well together. If it takes the same security effort to handle data as in a secure military installation, that will massively hamper the speed of the development and the number of potential people that can work on this project in any capacity. MiG-41 needs to fly faster and higher and shoot more lethal weapons than anything deployed anywhere in the world after its projected operational date, and years to come after. So throughout the already long project no data leaks can be tolerated because they will provide countermeasure information to the adversary. And that further moves the operational date.

    Simply put they can't afford the MiG-31 leaks this time around.
    If UAC pulls this off it will be just like building the Yamato but in 21st century, very impressive.

    jon_deluxe likes this post

    • Back to top
    Sponsored content

    Sponsored content


    • Post n°26

    Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond Empty Re: Competing Aircraft Designs of the 90's and Beyond

    Post  Sponsored content

    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am