Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+71
diabetus
billybatts91
Big_Gazza
nomadski
thegopnik
The-thing-next-door
Rodion_Romanovic
walle83
Belisarius
TMA1
Arkanghelsk
Podlodka77
AZ-5
lyle6
RTN
zepia
ALAMO
GreyHog
Finty
lancelot
Backman
miketheterrible
mnztr
Arrow
kvs
jhelb
LMFS
Hole
Isos
d_taddei2
PapaDragon
Odin of Ossetia
airstrike
OminousSpudd
Walther von Oldenburg
Solncepek
JohninMK
Werewolf
Kyo
AlfaT8
AirCargo
sepheronx
max steel
nemrod
victor1985
magnumcromagnon
andalusia
Airbornewolf
ATošić
higurashihougi
Hannibal Barca
Mike E
TR1
Sujoy
Mindstorm
Russian Patriot
medo
IronsightSniper
SOC
GarryB
KamovHelicopter
Viktor
nightcrawler
ahmedfire
NationalRus
solo.13mmfmj
milky_candy_sugar
Jelena
Vladislav
Turk1
Admin
75 posters

    US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Finty
    Finty


    Posts : 539
    Points : 545
    Join date : 2021-02-10
    Location : Great Britain

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Rude Rams deployed to Europe

    Post  Finty Sat Feb 19, 2022 12:21 am

    https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/rude-rams-deployed-to-europe


    Amidst fears of Russia invading Ukraine, the USAF sent a dozen 5th Generation fighter aircraft to Europe.

    On the afternoon of 16 February 2022, twelve Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning IIs from the 34th Fighter Squadron arrived at Spangdahlem air base (Germany).

    Based at Hill AFB (UT), the 34th Fighter Squadron, named the Rude Rams, were taken from the USAF's toolbox when additional forces are required for a designated Lead Wing, also known as Lead Wings in Extremis.

    USA 34th FS patch 320Recently, the 388th Fighter Wing with its squadrons, including the 34th FS, were assigned to provide enabling requirements when needed.

    At this moment Scramble Magazine assesses that Spangdahlem's 52nd Fighter Wing has become the lead wing. It is not known how long the Hill based F-35As will stay or even if they will stay at Spangdahlem. We assess that his will depend on further developments in Ukraine
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39146
    Points : 39644
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB Sat Feb 19, 2022 4:28 am

    Sent them to Germany?

    Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?

    This could spread very rapidly if western powers don't take this seriously.
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 2720
    Points : 2718
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  lancelot Sat Feb 19, 2022 6:04 am

    GarryB wrote:Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?

    If NATO tries to take Kaliningrad the Baltics are gonski.

    GarryB and Hole like this post

    Arkanghelsk
    Arkanghelsk


    Posts : 3665
    Points : 3671
    Join date : 2021-12-08

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Arkanghelsk Sat Feb 19, 2022 7:42 am

    They cant take kaliningrad or even use those F35s with the new S400s now sitting at Grodno and Minsk , Belarus changes the operational picture of eastern and even central europe

    GarryB and magnumcromagnon like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39146
    Points : 39644
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:18 am

    You two know that, and I know that, but do western politicians actually believe the BS they spread or do they understand this too?
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11318
    Points : 11288
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Isos Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:21 am

    lancelot wrote:
    GarryB wrote:Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?

    If NATO tries to take Kaliningrad the Baltics are gonski.

    London and Washington are also gonski. They weren't testing their nuks today for a firework sow.

    GarryB and owais.usmani like this post

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13306
    Points : 13348
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  PapaDragon Sun Feb 20, 2022 4:54 am

    lancelot wrote:
    GarryB wrote:Probably expecting to use them against Kaliningrad in a little tit for tat land grab if things get nasty?

    If NATO tries to take Kaliningrad the Baltics are gonski.

    Entire European continent is gonski and that's just the warning salvo

    Kaliningrad isn't Tartus or Karabah, it's Russian territory

    GarryB, Hole and owais.usmani like this post

    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18341
    Points : 18838
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 Mon May 02, 2022 6:17 am

    The first Boeing T-7A training aircraft of an experimental batch for the US Air Force was built

    lancelot likes this post

    TMA1
    TMA1


    Posts : 1135
    Points : 1133
    Join date : 2020-11-30

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  TMA1 Mon May 02, 2022 3:28 pm

    Hideous. Doesnt deserve to take the place of the lovely northrop t-38 talon. Ruskies now have the sexiest trainer aircraft. Used to be the opposite and we had the fairest gem while ruskies had the ugly czech l-29.
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 2720
    Points : 2718
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  lancelot Mon May 02, 2022 4:03 pm

    Calling it a Boeing is a bit of a stretch though. It was designed by SAAB. It is basically a neutered cost reduced Gripen and even uses the same engine. Supposedly the avionics are based on the ones on the Gripen as well.

    GarryB likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39146
    Points : 39644
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB Tue May 03, 2022 4:27 am

    Their efforts to create something new and great have not gone well.... F-22 and F-35... so maybe a little off the shelf mature design (F-15 and perhaps modified new build F-16) is what they need going forward.

    I mean going all Star Trek is fine, but for most jobs older aircraft could already do the job just fine.

    Personally the prettiest LIFT I have seen is the Rafale... yeah I know it is supposed to be a fighter but it is so small and that fixed inflight refuelling probe makes it look like a LIFT.

    (Have always had a soft spot for the F-5 and though the F-20 should have done much better than it did... it could have been a KISS light cheap simple fighter with AAMs and a good cannon... the FSW F-29 looked interesting too... with the paddles thrust vectoring...)

    TMA1 likes this post

    avatar
    Belisarius


    Posts : 756
    Points : 756
    Join date : 2022-01-04

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Belisarius Tue Jul 05, 2022 11:54 am

    out of 186 F-22 Raptor fighters, only about 93 are ready to fly at any time...
    https://topwar.ru/198538-parni-na-chem-voevat-budete.html

    GarryB, zardof and Hole like this post

    TMA1
    TMA1


    Posts : 1135
    Points : 1133
    Join date : 2020-11-30

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  TMA1 Tue Jul 05, 2022 9:50 pm

    Me too bro. As a kid the f-5 was my favorite. I used to hate Russian fighters as a kid, now they are my obsession. We used to make such lovely fighters like the f-104, f-105... damn thing looked like a cadillac with wings I love it. Our last glory was the teen fighters.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39146
    Points : 39644
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:00 am

    I used to hate Russian fighters as a kid, now they are my obsession.

    I used to find some Soviet fighters a bit boring... the tubes with wings like the MiG-15/17/19/21 and Su-7/9/11/17/22, and even the Tu-128 and Tu-95, but that was probably because that was all we really saw most of the time. The Su-15 is a pretty plane and in many ways looks like a super F-5...

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Fbbgik10

    As an adult I have learned to appreciate more aircraft for what they do... the An-2 for instance... first flight in 1949 and still a very good aircraft for the job... if they found a warehouse with brand new aircraft you could continue to use them another 70 years because they are simple and cheap with astounding flight performance. In a strong headwind they can almost hover above one point on the ground.

    The MiG-25 is just the other end of the spectrum and is a rocket ship.

    TMA1 likes this post

    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 14814
    Points : 14951
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  JohninMK Fri Jul 08, 2022 1:11 pm

    By Ryan Finnerty7 July 2022

    Save article

    The US Air Force (USAF) is partnering with the UK’s Reaction Engines to improve the performance of hypersonic and near-hypersonic engines.

    The partnership between the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and Oxfordshire-based Reaction will focus expanding the performance envelope of a cooling technology that enables high-Mach engines to function more efficiently, the company says on 7 July.

    J79 and GSE

    Source: Reaction Engines

    Reaction Engines has been testing its hypersonic cooling system in Colorado using a GE Aviation J79 turbojet engine, which formerly powered the Vietnam-era McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom

    Reaction Engines specialises in developing methods for managing the build-up of heat in a variety of aerospace functions, including hypersonic-capable engines. That is generally defined as flight at speeds of Mach 5 (6,174 km/h) or above.

    Although the US military typically develops sensitive new technologies with domestic companies, the Defense Department’s Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT) programme provides a path for non-US companies with ground-breaking technology to work with the Pentagon.

    “FCT demonstrates US commitment to a ‘two-way street’ for defence procurements with both allied and friendly nations,” says USAF FCT manager William Reed. “Reaction Engines technology is world-class and is a great fit for the FCT programme.”

    The company is developing the Synthetic Air Breathing Rocket Engine (SABRE), which Reaction says can function at speeds in excess of M5.

    Key to the operation of SABRE at hypersonic speeds is a proprietary coolant system, known as precooler, which can rapidly reduce the temperature of intake air from 1,000°C (1,832°F) to ambient levels, according to Reaction.

    The company says SABRE has the potential to provide air-breathing thrust from standstill on the runway to speeds more than five times the speed of sound in the atmosphere. The engine also has potential applications in space propulsion.

    Individual components of the engine have been successfully demonstrated on the ground.

    The latest test programme aims to further expand upon those capabilities. Reaction says the goal is to increase the delivered air mass flow rate of its cooling system, which it the company hopes “will result in a three-fold increase in the total energy transfer”.

    Andrew Piotti, Reaction’s US engineering manager, says if the new test programme goes well, the precooler technology could help boost the performance of existing jet engines

    “The exciting outcome that I am looking forward to over the coming weeks is the validation that our technology could enable current jet engines to operate from takeoff up through Mach 4 and beyond,” Piotti says.

    Reaction Engines has been conducting research testing at the Colorado Air and Space Port near Denver.

    https://www.flightglobal.com/engines/us-air-force-partners-with-reaction-engines-on-high-mach-engine-testing/149320.article
    avatar
    walle83


    Posts : 968
    Points : 976
    Join date : 2016-11-13
    Location : Sweden

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  walle83 Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:47 pm

    lancelot wrote:Calling it a Boeing is a bit of a stretch though. It was designed by SAAB. It is basically a neutered cost reduced Gripen and even uses the same engine. Supposedly the avionics are based on the ones on the Gripen as well.

    Saab also developt the software for the airplane. Probably more a Saab project then a Boeing if you look on every detail. But Boeing is paying so they get top billing.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18341
    Points : 18838
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:53 am

    Contracts issued for the development of engines for the promising American NGAD fighter

    https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4576157.html
    Rodion_Romanovic
    Rodion_Romanovic


    Posts : 2441
    Points : 2608
    Join date : 2015-12-30
    Location : Merkelland

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Rodion_Romanovic Wed Sep 21, 2022 6:58 pm

    https://redstate.com/streiff/2022/09/18/unexpectedly-the-usaf-finds-itself-with-a-critical-shortage-of-pilots-while-it-says-it-has-too-many-white-officers-n629231


    Unexpectedly, the USAF Finds Itself With a Critical Shortage of Pilots While It Says It Has Too Many White Officers

    The authors go on to propose a solution. The USAF should create a major incentive program that would keep those majors and lieutenant colonels in the Air Force and available for flight duty if needed.

    I think the authors aren’t looking at the real problem. If a lack of incentives were the problem, the officers they are trying to retain would never have made it to this point in their Air Force career. The problem is that mid-career aviators have been told that they aren’t wanted. By told, I don’t mean it has been hinted at; I mean they have seen it in writing from the three-star general who runs Air Force recruiting. This is from Major General Ed Thoma, USAF recruiting poohbah, in October 2020

    https://www.yahoo.com/video/86-of-air-force-pilots-are-white-men-heres-why-this-needs-to-change-155046366.html

    We simply can no longer afford for significant segments of our society to be underrepresented in our U.S. Air Force or our newest branch, the U.S. Space Force.

    To be clear, the Air and Space Forces are not setting quotas based on race or gender. We will, however, focus intensely and concentrate our efforts in traditionally underserved communities. It wouldn’t be legal or productive to hold recruiters accountable for bringing in a certain number of recruits from various demographic groups. But if we see that we’re not hitting recruiting targets that mirror the qualified population in those categories, we will adjust to concentrate on areas where we can get a more representative balance in our applicant pool. To use a fishing analogy, recruiters must not only cast a wide net but ensure we are spending time in the right fishing holes.

    And by measuring those targets, we’ll employ the old management axiom that what gets measured gets done. And we’ll get it done.

    While we are meeting or exceeding nearly all demographic targets in our enlisted ranks, inside our cockpits is where we have the greatest disparities and opportunities for improvement. In all, 86 percent of our aviators are white males. Less than 3 percent of our fighter pilots are females. This is why we established a detachment within Air Force recruiting two years ago charged with improving diversity for those who wear flight suits. The mission of Detachment 1 is to bring a singular focus to recruiting qualified women and minorities who have not always felt they belonged.




    The USAF has responded to the challenge by eliminating prior flight training as a “plus” on pilot selection. They found that such training favored applicants who could afford private flight lessons. It has also announced that it intends to reduce the number of white officers from 80% to 67.5%.

    Compounding the outright racism and bigotry involved in these “goals,” the Department of Defense’s new Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity oberführer, Kelisa Wing, is, to be charitable, a pathological and virulent racist, tweeting out such nuggets of wisdom as

    Suppose you are a mid-career officer and pondering your professional future. On one hand, you are looking at a higher salary and a more stable domestic environment for your family, along with a lot less risk. But, on the other hand, your employer is sending clear signals that your contribution and actual presence is not valued but detrimental to organizational goals, and they bring in a blatant racist to oversee the race-based policies that will determine your future. What do you do? Hang around and wait for the axe to fall, see your career stall, or leave? I know what I’d do.

    GarryB, lancelot and Broski like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39146
    Points : 39644
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB Thu Sep 22, 2022 4:29 am

    I wonder if they will assign race and sexuality profiles to AI... that would be a good way to get the diversity up very quickly... Shocked

    Hole likes this post

    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10825
    Points : 10803
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 48
    Location : Scholzistan

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Hole Sun Nov 13, 2022 1:33 pm

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Image-10
    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Image-11
    How many aircraft/helis could they really bring into the air? Much less then the politicians in Washington think.

    GarryB, Belisarius and Podlodka77 like this post

    Podlodka77
    Podlodka77


    Posts : 2589
    Points : 2591
    Join date : 2022-01-06
    Location : Z

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Podlodka77 Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:57 am

    RAW VIDEO: F-35 crashes during test flight at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth

    avatar
    Arrow


    Posts : 2769
    Points : 2761
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Arrow Sun Jan 15, 2023 4:33 pm

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Fm-QDx-Ij-XEAAya3-H
    The-thing-next-door
    The-thing-next-door


    Posts : 1302
    Points : 1358
    Join date : 2017-09-18
    Location : Uranus

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  The-thing-next-door Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:28 pm

    It looks more like i light bomber more than a fighter or interceptor, and the lack of supercruise or maneuverability in its requirements brings into question it's utility in it's intended role.

    Though it is possible that the high payload could mean that the pindos might accidentally make a decent strike aircraft.

    It is possible that they intend it to use missiles for self defence, but considering that the Russians have talked bout clustered terminal stages for long range air to air missiles that may become a rather difficult task.
    thegopnik
    thegopnik


    Posts : 1739
    Points : 1741
    Join date : 2017-09-20

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  thegopnik Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:33 pm

    Based on my previous conversations with another user here with my conclusion. https://defencehub.live/threads/3-stream-cycle-engines.11702/

    If you want to piss off U.S. aviation fanboys more than Pierre Sprey, you simply call the NGAD a 5th gen +

    GarryB likes this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 39146
    Points : 39644
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:21 am

    But does it exceed the performance specs of 5th gen... do any of their 5th gen jets?

    Perhaps the F-22 and F-35 and this new NGAD are just 5 minus generation jets... not quite 5th gen for various reasons... Laughing

    The-thing-next-door and Broski like this post


    Sponsored content


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 20 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri May 17, 2024 6:08 am