Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Share
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2806
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Mike E on Sat Oct 11, 2014 9:17 pm

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:If nobody "has any idea" when the kronshtadt will be finished then there's something wrong. Ships in production usually have deadlines.
    Not when it is a secretive project in general... I'm sure it could be found, but nobody wants to go look for it. - I'll take a couple of minutes...

    EDIT; It will be *commissioned* around the end of 2017 at the very latest.
    avatar
    runaway

    Posts : 348
    Points : 369
    Join date : 2010-11-12
    Location : Sweden

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  runaway on Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:36 pm

    Mike E wrote:
    The heck are you smoking?

    All of the so-called "faults" in the design have been resolved/fixed, this has been said enough already... If St Petersburg is never in active services, it would be because it is the lead ship, which was built without knowledge of problems for obvious reasons...
    Really? So every lead ship is built without knowledge of problems, and some so grave the ship will never enter service? I agree every lead ship have Some problems, but none so bad it wont enter service, then its a much bigger problem. Design.



    The F-22 is the US Air Force's most successful project in recent times (F-35...), and most of its problems, including the oxygen related ones, have been fixed. The M551 was a great design with a crappy gun, with a 105 it would have been amazing...

    If you really think the M551 was a great design and with a 105 it would have been great, your lack of knowledge is amazing.

    (From military today and wiki)
    On March 1971, five Sheridans from the 11th ACR were lost in one day to RPG fire, all five vehicles burst into flames and were totally destroyed.[13] It became a common scene to observe melted Sheridan hulls with their sunken steel turrets sitting at odd angles with their gun tubes pointing towards the sky in various parts of the country.
    The aluminium armor was not good, it was very vulnerable and couldnt drive through trees as could the M48. Most opinions were negative,
    this was largely due to the high casualty rate of both Sheridans and their crews as mines and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) that would only damage an M48 Patton tank, would destroy the Sheridan and kill or wound most, if not all, of its crew

    It was a very innovative light tank design, however due to it's numerous faults the M551 Sheridans have been replaced in reconnaissance role with the M60A1 main battle tanks and later with the M3 Bradley armored reconnaissance vehicles.


    Several attempts to improve or replace the Sheridan have been made over the years since it was introduced. Several experimental versions of the Sheridan mounting a new turret carrying the NATO-standard 105mm gun were made, but the resulting recoil was so great as to make the vehicle almost unusable.



    And i still question if Lada will be a succes, i hope so, certainly. But maybe it would have been wiser to do a "Mike", or T-95. Cancel and Continue with the next step in evolution.


    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2806
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Mike E on Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:26 am

    runaway wrote:
    Mike E wrote:
    The heck are you smoking?

    All of the so-called "faults" in the design have been resolved/fixed, this has been said enough already... If St Petersburg is never in active services, it would be because it is the lead ship, which was built without knowledge of problems for obvious reasons...
    Really? So every lead ship is built without knowledge of problems, and some so grave the ship will never enter service? I agree every lead ship have Some problems, but none so bad it wont enter service, then its a much bigger problem. Design.



    The F-22 is the US Air Force's most successful project in recent times (F-35...), and most of its problems, including the oxygen related ones, have been fixed. The M551 was a great design with a crappy gun, with a 105 it would have been amazing...

    If you really think the M551 was a great design and with a 105 it would have been great, your lack of knowledge is amazing.

    (From military today and wiki)
    On March 1971, five Sheridans from the 11th ACR were lost in one day to RPG fire, all five vehicles burst into flames and were totally destroyed.[13] It became a common scene to observe melted Sheridan hulls with their sunken steel turrets sitting at odd angles with their gun tubes pointing towards the sky in various parts of the country.
    The aluminium armor was not good, it was very vulnerable and couldnt drive through trees as could the M48. Most opinions were negative,
    this was largely due to the high casualty rate of both Sheridans and their crews as mines and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) that would only damage an M48 Patton tank, would destroy the Sheridan and kill or wound most, if not all, of its crew

    It was a very innovative light tank design, however due to it's numerous faults the M551 Sheridans have been replaced in reconnaissance role with the M60A1 main battle tanks and later with the M3 Bradley armored reconnaissance vehicles.


    Several attempts to improve or replace the Sheridan have been made over the years since it was introduced. Several experimental versions of the Sheridan mounting a new turret carrying the NATO-standard 105mm gun were made, but the resulting recoil was so great as to make the vehicle almost unusable.



    And i still question if Lada will be a succes, i hope so, certainly. But maybe it would have been wiser to do a "Mike", or T-95. Cancel and Continue with the next step in evolution.


    Not necessarily, but the Lada brings a lot of untested technology into the Russian diesel sub market.

    Maybe not amazing, but the ideology behind it was genius! - Light weight, lots of firepower, quick, air-drop capable... Its execution wasn't perfect, but what vehicle is? As for the 105, it should have been a low-recoil gun... They are widely available.

    Why question? Think of it as an improved 636!
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16510
    Points : 17116
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  GarryB on Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:11 am

    Because the design is obviously faulty, St Petersburg will not enter service, that should be proof enough.

    If it is obviously faulty then why are they keeping the original in service as a testing platform for new systems, and continuing to build the other two vessels laid down?

    When planning and developing a new complex system you have design objectives that you have no idea whether they can be met. with new systems you have to estimate and calculate but until the thing is actually built and tested you may never know its real world performance.

    There were requirements and specifications for the Lada sub and when the sub was finally built it was found it did not meet requirements in a couple of areas. Before the other two were built they were able to test the first and decide on new systems and parameters and solve the problems.

    the two new subs will get more powerful Lithium ion batteries and an indigenous AIP system to greatly improve performance... almost to SSN level in fact and your expert opinion is it is a failure?

    Remember the Project 685 Plavnik? Just built in one example, and for a reason.

    It was an operational test bed designed to test a range of new technologies... it was expensive to build, so when it was lost most of the new technologies were tested on other new sub designs and its design was cancelled as too ambitious.

    The Lada didn't sink, so information about what worked and what didn't and what needed improving and what was performing fine was collected and applied to the other two vessels in the class.


    The PAK-FA is not a faulty design, it keeps meeting performance criterias. You reason with mockery and sarcasm, i dont like that and it doesnt add to a good discussion.

    One PAK FA lost an engine and could not be displayed, and another caught fire... Cancel it immediately!


    When a submarine has been on the staples for 10 years, one should question if its a good project. And no i dont read twitters.

    I have never been to twitter, but it seems to be a website for insecure people who want to talk to anyone about their mundane lives. Is it because you have not heard constant updates about Lada that you think it is a failure?

    They have tested its AIP and it will be fitted to the other two Lada hulls... does that suggest they are failures?

    Do you seriously think the construction time is two years?

    Why not? You were happy to think it was 10 years... they aren't finished yet... if they enter service in 2017 that would mean 5 years construction, does that sound excessive?

    Its called prestige, and we can blame much to that.

    We certainly can, but cancelling a project when you spent all that money to actually make it work would be stupid if the final product is a generation ahead of everything else you have and you have a need for it.

    The new 636 is a top of the line submarine, and can certainly be used as a stopgap until a new design is ready for production. Like the T-90, T-95 and finally Armata.

    The problem there is that the T-95 was a cold war dead end, while Armata is a family of vehicles of a new concept.

    If they cancelled the Lada now and started from scratch developing a new sub using all new technologies they would develop... a Lada... it already uses new technologies and does everything they want it to do.

    It would be like having the T-90s in service and developing the Armata and then cancel the armata and make more T-90s for 10 years while you throw out the Armata design and come up with... an armata design that could be called Armata-M.

    The M551 was a great design with a crappy gun, with a 105 it would have been amazing...

    Ignoring the gun, which was a colossal waste of money and time, the Sheridan is basically what you get if you want an airborne armoured vehicle... for airborne forces given the choice of armour or walking I think the advantages of some armour protection and much better mobility is clear.

    It is pretty funny when the Discovery channel does a programme on the worlds best tanks and includes the Sheridan... Sprut is far superior...

    EDIT; It will be *commissioned* around the end of 2017 at the very latest.

    Boy, my guess above was pretty accurate.

    They are adding new batteries and a new AIP so the production time for the next vessels in the class should be quicker to make.

    Really? So every lead ship is built without knowledge of problems, and some so grave the ship will never enter service? I agree every lead ship have Some problems, but none so bad it wont enter service, then its a much bigger problem. Design.

    Look at the Kiev class ships... especially near the take off ramp... they spent a fortune trying to fix the air flow there with ramps and walls on all the vessels of that class, the last in the class had so many changes they wanted to call it Improved Kiev in the west.

    there are so many complex interactions in a modern vessel that problems will be expected... the question is, what sort of solutions are there and how easy are they to impliment... especially without creating new problems.

    It became a common scene to observe melted Sheridan hulls with their sunken steel turrets sitting at odd angles with their gun tubes pointing towards the sky in various parts of the country.

    The Sheridans gun used combustable propellent stubs made of cardboard that were an enormous fire risk. Storing ammo in the crew compartment any penetration showered the ammo with sparks leading to immediate ignition of the propellent... T-64 and T-80 have the same problem.

    Change to 105 would fix that.

    The aluminium armor was not good, it was very vulnerable and couldnt drive through trees as could the M48.

    Delivered by parachute the Sheridan is a useful light vehicle with a crap gun. the M48 would be a hole in the ground.


    Several attempts to improve or replace the Sheridan have been made over the years since it was introduced. Several experimental versions of the Sheridan mounting a new turret carrying the NATO-standard 105mm gun were made, but the resulting recoil was so great as to make the vehicle almost unusable.

    Even a 90mm gun would be an improvement over the 152mm gun it carried.

    Cancel and Continue with the next step in evolution.

    The Lada-M with LI Ion batteries and AIP IS THE NEXT STEP.




    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    KomissarBojanchev

    Posts : 1183
    Points : 1336
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 19
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  KomissarBojanchev on Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:23 am

    5 years is exccessive for( by your definitions) a puny non strategic sub, especially if its not a lead ship. That's the time it should take a to build an entirely new class leader ballistic sub.
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2806
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Mike E on Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:24 am

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:5 years is exccessive for( by your definitions) a puny non strategic  sub, especially if its not a lead ship. That's the time it should take a to build an entirely new class leader ballistic sub.

    As said earlier, when the construction on the 636 is finished, the Lada will be built much faster... - ~ 2 years
    avatar
    TR1

    Posts : 5680
    Points : 5708
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  TR1 on Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:11 am

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:5 years is exccessive for( by your definitions) a puny non strategic  sub, especially if its not a lead ship. That's the time it should take a to build an entirely new class leader ballistic sub.

    That is because the original project was an utter failure in terms of technical specs, MOD-shipyard-design bureau coordination, and anything else you can think of.

    The two follow on hulls were done pretty fast, it is just they had no systems to instal since the systems themselves were not working on the experimental boat.

    As for "everything being solved", well, I will believe it when the St. Petersburg doesn't need to be TOWED to its supposed operational residence.


    avatar
    kvs

    Posts : 3146
    Points : 3269
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  kvs on Mon Oct 13, 2014 5:02 am

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:5 years is exccessive for( by your definitions) a puny non strategic  sub, especially if its not a lead ship. That's the time it should take a to build an entirely new class leader ballistic sub.

    These subs are actually quite valuable against strategic nuclear subs. They are small and take advantage of the thermocline in the oceans to
    hide themselves in the background noise. Having these subs patrolling a one 500-1000 km zone around Russia's coasts would be quite
    worthwhile.

    Six project 636 boats are being built at the same time and are to be completed by the end of 2015. The Black Sea will be the home
    of some of them. The time to build each boat is just under 1.5 years.
    avatar
    TR1

    Posts : 5680
    Points : 5708
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  TR1 on Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:15 am

    kvs wrote:

    The time to build each boat is just under 1.5 years.  

    Not a single boat of the class for Russia has been built in 1.5 years.
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2806
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Mike E on Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:21 am

    TR1 wrote:
    kvs wrote:

    The time to build each boat is just under 1.5 years.  

    Not a single boat of the class for Russia has been built in 1.5 years.
    True, but they been built quickly nonetheless. When the Lada is ready, they should be built quicker because of the lower displacement and single-hull. - Have to wait and see, preferable after the 636's are completely and more funding and time can be given to the Lada.

    type055

    Posts : 103
    Points : 110
    Join date : 2014-09-03

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  type055 on Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:20 am

    Is there any news about lada sub export contract between China and Russia ? most import factor about lada is the HULL
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2806
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Mike E on Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:16 pm

    type055 wrote:Is there any news about lada sub export contract between China and Russia ?   most import factor about lada is the HULL
    Don't think so... Even when the Lada's are completed, I doubt Russia will be willing to sell them soon after due to their advanced nature. To be honest, China doesn't really need any new SSK's right now anyway. - They already have 12 kilos, multiple Yuan class etc. They are probably more interested in the Lada's technology than the sub itself.

    type055

    Posts : 103
    Points : 110
    Join date : 2014-09-03

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  type055 on Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:44 pm

    Mike E wrote:
    type055 wrote:Is there any news about lada sub export contract between China and Russia ?   most import factor about lada is the HULL
    Don't think so... Even when the Lada's are completed, I doubt Russia will be willing to sell them soon after due to their advanced nature. To be honest, China doesn't really need any new SSK's right now anyway. - They already have 12 kilos, multiple Yuan class etc. They are probably more interested in the Lada's technology than the sub itself.



    yes they are interest in mono hull , from chinese site, navy want to learn to build single hull sub, and use that tech in new nuclear sub , cos all subs china have built are double hull .
    Navy want to use their own aip and weapon , and russia build the hull, 2+2 2 made in russia 2 in China,
    but lada program seems stuck , what happen ?
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2760
    Points : 2806
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Mike E on Mon Oct 13, 2014 11:49 pm

    type055 wrote:
    Mike E wrote:
    type055 wrote:Is there any news about lada sub export contract between China and Russia ?   most import factor about lada is the HULL
    Don't think so... Even when the Lada's are completed, I doubt Russia will be willing to sell them soon after due to their advanced nature. To be honest, China doesn't really need any new SSK's right now anyway. - They already have 12 kilos, multiple Yuan class etc. They are probably more interested in the Lada's technology than the sub itself.



    yes they are interest in mono hull , from chinese site, navy want to learn to build single hull sub, and use that tech in new nuclear sub ,  cos all subs china have built are  double hull .
    Navy want to use their own aip and weapon , and russia build the hull,  2+2 2 made in russia 2 in China,
    but lada program seems stuck , what happen ?

    As I said, they are interested in the 'technology" and not the sub itself.  Russia wouldn't build the hull for China, or at least they shouldn't... They are already loaded with work, last thing they need to do is start building more export hulls. China could just license hull design or something like that. 

    It isn't stuck, read the former posts on this thread. It was delayed indefinitely, but has resumed.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16510
    Points : 17116
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  GarryB on Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:04 am

    5 years is exccessive for( by your definitions) a puny non strategic sub, especially if its not a lead ship. That's the time it should take a to build an entirely new class leader ballistic sub.

    We have guessed at 5 years, but the second two vessels were only laid down... they haven't worked on them for 5 years... they only had a successful test of the new AIP this year, so including the one year from 2005 and 2006, and from this year to the start of 2017 when it will likely be put in the water we are talking about actually 4 years and possibly less.

    The second two vessels will have significant changes from the first boat so can't be considered serial production, which means delays and testing to make sure everything works properly.

    With the actual work time 4 years or less I would say they are doing very well to produce a modern very capable SSK with all new state of the art technologies... of which there is no western equivalent.

    That is because the original project was an utter failure in terms of technical specs, MOD-shipyard-design bureau coordination, and anything else you can think of.

    If it was an utter failure it would not be kept in service... they don't need a dog.

    but lada program seems stuck , what happen ?

    AIP only just had full size testing, and Lithium Ion batteries are also new.

    When ready its performance will be excellent.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 10511
    Points : 10988
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  George1 on Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:54 am

    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 10511
    Points : 10988
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  George1 on Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:16 am

    "Varshavyanka" submarines for the Russian Navy will not be built more.
    As explained by the Deputy Director General for Foreign Economic Affairs and Military-Technical Cooperation CDB ME "Rubin" Andrey Baranov, then move to the next generation of boat building - Project 677 "Lada.

    http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20141208/1037115302.html

    Austin

    Posts : 6327
    Points : 6727
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Austin on Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:54 am

    CDB "Ruby": submarine with VNEU in Russia will be built in 2016


    Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering (CDB ME) "Ruby" is the chief architect of the construction of submarines in Russia. According to the drawings, "Rubin" is now under construction and the latest nuclear missile type "Northwind", and diesel-electric "Lada" and "Varshavyanka", and others. Until the end of the year "Admiralty Shipyards" give another submarine of the Russian Navy, "Rostov-on-Don."

    On what are the plans of "Ruby" in 2015 and what tasks submarine designers decide today told the heads of the relevant wording RIA Novosti Sergei Safronov, Deputy Director General for Foreign Economic Affairs and Military-Technical Cooperation CDB ME "Rubin" Andrey Baranov.


    - Andrew I., tell us about the development of the project "Harmony". Do resumed their construction?

    - As for the "Lada" answer is obvious - their construction resumed. "Kronstadt" is based on "Sevastopol" must be signed state contract for construction. About the sins of which we are accused Vladimir Vysotsky (former Commander of the Navy criticized the project for the 677 most noise - Ed.), Then we get rid of them during execution of the tasks on the head boat "Saint Petersburg".

    Now for the sins we are not numbers, so these boats are built as a serial.

    - Will the "Kronstadt" and "Sevastopol" feature anaerobic (airindependent) power plants?

    - Anaerobic installation developing a parallel course. It is a prototype. Completed research and development, so now the next stage of work - creation of a prototype. Prototype, in fact, this is the compartment of the submarine.

    - When can I see it in the metal?


    - Our plans have not changed yet, 2016 - year of prototyping.

    - They can be set to "Kronstadt" and "Sebastopol"?

    - No, but these boats are built to improve the draft, they VNEU not installed. This decision was taken by the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation for the purpose of construction of these two ships as soon as possible to the boat became part of the Russian Navy in the early part of the program update non-nuclear fleet. VNEU can be installed from the fourth body, that we must now confirm the tests to be performed with the prototype.

    - Technologically, they also can be embedded in the body, for example, "Kronstadt"?


    - This is hardly anyone will do, but conditional yes. You can embed always something, but are engaged only in extreme cases. We are talking about the development of this series, so much more logical to build a fourth, fifth, sixth, and so on housing. It will be technically justified, and the money is much more effective. The more that the freshly boat again to put the plant and cut in half ... So why we built it? Not for experiments, they need the fleet - every bayonet counts.

    - What are the prospects of the project 636 boats? A series of these boats for the Black Sea Fleet will be the last?


    - Over the past 15 years, tirelessly, we sell for export boats of this project in different countries. All of them are armed with highly effective missile complex "Club", which works both on shore and on ships. Boats of this project is fully updated electronics, mechanical equipment, hydrodynamics. This boat is almost perfect. Another thing is that it is larger than the "Lada". And it can be regarded as a definite minus. After all, "Lada" has the same features. On the other hand, it is a ship flue which "Admiralty shipyard" built every year practically continuously. The second decade they are doing, so here is fully debugged cooperation, serial clearly allows the algorithm to predict construction. Do not want to jinx "Shipyards", but they are not in breach of any term obligations to supply boats or 636 for foreign customers or to our fleet. It's worth it.

    If you look at what is happening in the world, you will see a failure occurred on the Spanish S-80, the supply of which they delayed for a few years. And what were the difficulties in the same boat at the time of the Germans to the Greeks. Therefore, I believe that the Navy has taken quite the right decision to close the current gap for non-nuclear submarines, decided to build a boat of 636 project for the Black Sea Fleet.

    Of course, they have the resources to upgrade, but for the Russian Navy, perhaps this is the last order for non-nuclear submarines of this project. Then of course pass on boat building the next generation - Project 677 "Lada".

    - That is, the project will be eliminated?

    - There can not talk about the elimination, in this project, firstly, there is a large export potential. Secondly, this project has a very good possibility of modernization. If the boat this year entered the Black Sea Fleet, then it specified lifetime of 25 years, plus the possibility of extending more than ten years. Here and add. Will not find it. These boats will be active participants in the military-industrial activity in the next 30 years, or even 40, given that this series has not yet mastered all. Plus that is based on the export ... So this is a very serious issue, a serious business in all respects. Many countries are in need of maintenance, spare parts to it.

    - Rocket complex "Club" also will be improved?

    - Missiles as a complex "Club" is the export performance of the domestic complex "Caliber" (which, in particular, armed with the latest Russian submarine type "Severdvinsk" (Project 885) "Ash" - Ed.). It has great potential, including for export. At the "CLUB" is limited to a distance of 300 kilometers, and "Caliber" - a thousand.

    - In October in Paris hosted the exhibition "Euronaval 2014". What are the prospects of military-technical cooperation, "Rubin" with other countries?

    - There are prerequisites to expand our traditional geography, for which we are actively fighting. The most promising region - is South-East Asia. In Latin America, the political situation easier, and in Southeast Asia are all friendly and and sharpen knives. There's degree of tension is growing very rapidly. Significantly, as promptly Vietnam decided to strengthen its submarine fleet. This is not something to record, but it is one of the most quickly prepared, designed and carried out contracts. He's already at the final stage - a contract to build six submarines of project 636 (upgraded Project 877 "Varshavyanka" was signed in 2009).

    - When it is completed?

    - I think that in 2015, because it has already dealt the final boat ... This is a very long product - submarine. He suggests a long ointment parties acquaintance, usually it is very important what basis exists in the relations of countries. And with Vietnam the situation is resolved in a fantastic pace. In 2008 he was the first trip to the technical presentations, and now, six years have passed, we have, in fact, complete the contract. Now this year laid the last boat of the contract, two in the fleet are already active, the two will be directed, that is, the process of developing with tremendous speed.

    - And the creation of infrastructure for the deployment of boats in Cam Ranh is also spelled out in the contract?


    - Be sure, but there are different performers head. For the construction of boats - it works "Admiralty Shipyards" for infrastructure - Technology Center and shipbuilding, which specializes in these matters, and, again, "Admiralty Shipyards", which carry the warranty. Year warranty from the moment the last boat will be commissioned, plus one year. This period dense presence "Admiralty Shipyards" in Vietnam as part of a group guarantee to solve all the problems that may arise.

    Infrastructure for the home being built now active, but we must distinguish between the infrastructure for the deployment and repair.

    For the home is in a high-availability, and to repair because the repair is still somewhere ahead, will be completed later. I have no doubt that all this will be done on time, with quality, because we have a very good partnership with the country.

    - Which countries are still negotiating the possible purchase of boats?


    - There were negotiations with Indonesia, which, unfortunately, give up our Project 877 boats from the presence of the fleet. Was this story this year. Two boats from the Russian Navy and offer to repair them pass.

    Nevertheless, interest in our boats in Indonesia is preserved. This country for a long time, we are looking with great interest, with a great desire to work with them.

    As for the other countries in the region, there is already a clear separation of suppliers. As you know, Malaysia and Singapore - relatively pro-European, Thailand was not identified, but he, like all the countries of the region, quite a tight budget. They must first find out who would give money to debt. Then, of course, who gave, he also sold. Nevertheless, we are also trying to Thailand in the format of exhibitions in the region to maintain cordial relations. There are quite fallen Philippines, they are pro-American, but at the same time now there is a trend that the Americans are treated with some suspicion as to the suppliers. Either they have to completely surrender and follow in line with their policy, and then everything will be fine. But if you want to have anything to do an opinion, you have to be quite careful. It is very important the country's reputation as a reliable supplier. In the naval sphere we still keep the brand, try to observe all obligations.

    For example, the French now for us is very dangerous competitor, one of the most powerful players, and the situation with the "Mistral" is important from the point of view of a reliable supplier. If the contract is for Russia to "Mistral" will fail, it will strain once a number of countries that might be in the same situation as Russia.

    It must be borne in mind that the involvement of at least one country in the orbit of our cooperation boat - it's almost a watershed event.

    - What is the state contract with Italy on the development of small diesel-electric submarine S-1000 thousand tons of displacement?


    - The project is now frozen for political reasons. But privately with Fincantieri we continue to contact, clerical process goes forward to normalize the situation.

    - Before freezing the contract that the parties have time to do?


    - Conceptual design has been developed, a business plan, that is, in fact, prepared an offer to a potential customer. We have been jointly developing the marketing program to promote this boat in the regions. In the past year, we have already begun to implement this program. The Italians offered to this project in South Africa. This boat is offered to countries that are potentially interested in buying an inexpensive, compact, simple enough to operate the submarine. But this year, the process has stalled.

    - Where it is supposed to build S-1000?


    - The question of where it will build this boat until open. We will rely on the capabilities of the Russian factories and the ability of Fincantieri. The issue price and the issue of customer preference. In general, everything is developing normally. Submarines - not fast theme, but in fact the year, unfortunately, we have already lost. We had planned a working group in March, but, unfortunately, it is now postponed indefinitely. Now the plan was to take place the Russian-Italian commission on military cooperation, but so far there is no evidence, and the plans for its implementation.

    - The project is now frozen, it can not be eliminated at all?

    - The project is not going anywhere, ready to hand at the political decision to resume the dialogue. And I think this applies to a wide range of cooperation between Russia and European countries.
    Sergey Safronov
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 10511
    Points : 10988
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  George1 on Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:15 pm

    what is VNEU ?

    Alex555

    Posts : 32
    Points : 34
    Join date : 2014-01-20

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Alex555 on Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:27 pm

    George1 wrote:what is VNEU ?
    VNEU = anaerobic (airindependent) power plants.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16510
    Points : 17116
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  GarryB on Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:35 pm

    Interesting post, so the second and third Lada vessels will only have Lithium Ion batteries to boost performance, while the fourth Lada vessel will have AIP and LiIon batteries.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    mutantsushi

    Posts : 282
    Points : 304
    Join date : 2013-12-11

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  mutantsushi on Mon Dec 15, 2014 1:01 am

    Yeah, with Nuclear boats already in fleet, ultra long range/endurance isn't necessarily the #1 priority,
    the advances in stealth, capabilities, are what is wanted out of these boats, so losing some endurance isn't worst thing.

    Interestingly, I've read that Japan now plans to upgrade future Soryu with solely Li-ion batteries without any AIP...
    Australia is also supposedly sole sourcing from Japan (+stretch?) rather than competing vs. Navantia et al.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16510
    Points : 17116
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  GarryB on Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:29 am

    The key thing there is that the Russian AIP is brand new technology, while the Japanese/Aussie tech is hydrogen membrane fuel cell.

    The Russian technology has the enormous advantage that the raw resource is diesel, from which electricity is produced at a dramatically faster rate than a hydrogen fuel cell.

    This means that the Aussie/Jap AIP needs hydrogen handling equipment at every port the sub will operate from... hydrogen handling equipment is expensive because hydrogen slowly seeps through all sorts of materials and is a huge fire risk.

    Every port on the planet has infrastructure already in place to deliver diesel fuel to ships and subs.... even tiny ports because that is the standard fuel of most ocean going vessels (civilian anyway).

    I rather suspect the second and third Lada will be fitted for, but not with AIP just because of the time scales.

    Experience in retrofitting AIP to the Ladas would be instrumental in deciding whether to retro fit AIP to the Kilos.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    mutantsushi

    Posts : 282
    Points : 304
    Join date : 2013-12-11

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  mutantsushi on Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:45 pm

    ???
    Japan (and now likely AU) is planning on dumping AIP completely and going 100% Li-ion batteries.
    Japan previously used a licenced Kockums Stirling system,
    what you describe with hydrogen fuel cells sounds like AIP used in HDW 212...
    The new Russian AIP system in fact sounds broadly similar to what DCNS is planning for their next gen AIP,
    I'd be curious what any major differences are, but they both suppose to use diesel and not store Hydrogen AFAIK.
    The thing with both is by the time their development is done, battery tech will also have advanced as well.
    avatar
    Stealthflanker

    Posts : 800
    Points : 882
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 29
    Location : Indonesia

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Stealthflanker on Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:51 pm

    mutantsushi wrote:???
    Japan (and now likely AU) is planning on dumping AIP completely and going 100% Li-ion batteries.
    Japan previously used a licenced Kockums Stirling system,
    what you describe with hydrogen fuel cells sounds like AIP used in HDW 212...
    The new Russian AIP system in fact sounds broadly similar to what DCNS is planning for their next gen AIP,
    I'd be curious what any major differences are, but they both suppose to use diesel and not store Hydrogen AFAIK.
    The thing with both is by the time their development is done, battery tech will also have advanced as well.

    Yes.. Nonetheless AIP submarine with Li-Ion battery will have longer endurance than one rely on the Li-Ion battery alone.


    Sponsored content

    Re: Lada/Amur Submarine: News and Development

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:30 pm