Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+86
Mir
Russian_Patriot_
mavaff
The_Observer
lancelot
lyle6
ahmedfire
limb
Big_Gazza
marcellogo
Mindstorm
kvs
calripson
Hole
PhSt
AJ-47
bolshevik345
Walther von Oldenburg
The-thing-next-door
miketheterrible
dino00
JohninMK
LMFS
General
KomissarBojanchev
Peŕrier
kopyo-21
wilhelm
Interlinked
BM-21
Book.
Cheetah
0nillie0
SeigSoloyvov
franco
Isos
MonkeymodelBananaRepublic
KiloGolf
Benya
airstrike
galicije83
VladimirSahin
DerWolf
nemrod
d_taddei2
PapaDragon
hoom
higurashihougi
KoTeMoRe
sepheronx
Mike E
Kimppis
cracker
Kyo
akd
runaway
Morpheus Eberhardt
zino
Pugnax
xeno
Vann7
Werewolf
magnumcromagnon
Asf
Zivo
collegeboy16
George1
volna
zg18
flamming_python
TR1
Regular
a89
Vympel
AlfaT8
Stealthflanker
Dima
TheArmenian
medo
Cyberspec
BTRfan
Viktor
IronsightSniper
Austin
GarryB
Admin
90 posters

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    franco
    franco

    Posts : 4406
    Points : 4438
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  franco Mon Aug 30, 2021 8:46 pm

    At the exhibition of military equipment "Army-2021" in Simferopol and Sevastopol, new T-72B3M tanks, which have recently entered service with the tank battalion of the 126th coastal defense brigade of the 22nd Army Corps of the Black Sea Fleet, are shown for the first time.


    since 2016, upgraded T-72B3M tanks have received for complete rearmament:

    - three tank battalions of the 68th tank regiment of the 150th motorized rifle division
    - three tank battalions of the 1st tank regiment of the 2nd motorized rifle division
    - three tank battalions of the 6th tank brigade
    - tank battalion of the 228th motorized rifle regiment of the 90th tank division
    - tank battalion of the 79th motorized rifle regiment of the 18th motorized rifle division
    - tank battalion of the 103rd motorized rifle regiment of the 150th motorized rifle division
    partially rearmed two tank battalions of the 239th tank regiment of the 90th tank division

    https://bmpd.livejournal.com/4384955.html
    avatar
    ALAMO

    Posts : 637
    Points : 639
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  ALAMO Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:43 pm

    That makes +/- 400 units, right?
    franco
    franco

    Posts : 4406
    Points : 4438
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  franco Mon Aug 30, 2021 11:23 pm

    ALAMO wrote:That makes +/- 400 units, right?

    16 battalions or so would make almost 500. World Military Balance for 2021 was claiming 570 T-72B3M end of 2020. That would represent another 2 battalions or so.

    EDIT: I have read that the 2 battalions of the 21st Guards Motor Rifle brigades are also T-72B3M's.
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 16580
    Points : 17085
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  George1 Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:17 am

    franco wrote:
    ALAMO wrote:That makes +/- 400 units, right?

    16 battalions or so would make almost 500. World Military Balance for 2021 was claiming 570 T-72B3M end of 2020. That would represent another 2 battalions or so.

    EDIT: I have read that the 2 battalions of the 21st Guards Motor Rifle brigades are also T-72B3M's.

    can we have an update of numbers by type here? Smile

    https://www.russiadefence.net/t2p175-russia-tank-force-present-and-future-numbers
    avatar
    ALAMO

    Posts : 637
    Points : 639
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  ALAMO Tue Aug 31, 2021 9:34 am

    franco wrote:
    16 battalions or so would make almost 500. World Military Balance for 2021 was claiming 570 T-72B3M end of 2020. That would represent another 2 battalions or so.

    EDIT: I have read that the 2 battalions of the 21st Guards Motor Rifle brigades are also T-72B3M's.

    You mentioned 14 battalions there, including 2 incomplete - that is why I have asked.
    Still, that is really something, as we remember that it goes in parallel with new tanks, and other modernization programs.
    Murican scrapyard at Lima can't even dream about such a peak.

    Hole likes this post

    Russian_Patriot_
    Russian_Patriot_

    Posts : 1137
    Points : 1151
    Join date : 2021-06-08
    Location : Perm, Russia

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Russian_Patriot_ Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:54 pm

    T-72B3M tanks of the 126th Coastal Defense Brigade
    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 2uvdp010
    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Trnuoj10
    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Icy-ch10T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 X707rn10
    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 6udu8s10

    Mir likes this post

    Russian_Patriot_
    Russian_Patriot_

    Posts : 1137
    Points : 1151
    Join date : 2021-06-08
    Location : Perm, Russia

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Russian_Patriot_ Thu Sep 02, 2021 3:17 pm

    Loading ammunition into the T-72B3. It looks very uncomfortable. 
    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Zyqm-d10
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Isos Thu Sep 02, 2021 3:50 pm

    They must have been really scared by the outcome of drone use against tanks in NK to quickly put those top protections.

    IMO they are working on a 360° APS to counter them.

    I wonder what nato tanks will look like. Probably put some more protection on the top and increase weight to 100t.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 30564
    Points : 31094
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  GarryB Fri Sep 03, 2021 8:21 am

    Loading ammunition into the T-72B3. It looks very uncomfortable.

    Quite slow, and the propellent stubs are rather flammable so you handle them carefully by all accounts.

    I seem to remember they are loaded into the auto loader from the commanders side so you can indicate which round goes where...

    ie when loading a HE frag round you have to tell the system that a HE FRAG round is going to that carosel position so the system knows where each type of round is loaded so when the gunner selects a HE FRAG round it knows that this and all the other cells where HE FRAG rounds are loaded and can move to the nearest one to load that type of round.

    They must have been really scared by the outcome of drone use against tanks in NK to quickly put those top protections.

    IMO they are working on a 360° APS to counter them.

    I wonder what nato tanks will look like. Probably put some more protection on the top and increase weight to 100t.

    Don't be silly... the west uses drones against the bad guys... the bad guys will never use drones against HATO... until they do and they they will rush something into service... or not.

    Russia has shown it has precision guided cruise missiles but HATO has done very little to develop IADS to counter them let alone developed air defence systems and long range SAMs to deal with them....

    dino00 likes this post

    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Isos Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:27 am

    Drones are more easily accessible than cruise missile.

    All the ground vehicles are at risk against suicide drones.

    It was already the case against rpg/atgm but drones are even cheaper.
    avatar
    ALAMO

    Posts : 637
    Points : 639
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  ALAMO Fri Sep 03, 2021 10:31 am

    It proves one more thing.
    How elastic and effective is the Russian tank business for real.
    You have a solution designed, checked, and implemented in a relatively short time period.
    This is something outmatched.

    Isos likes this post

    avatar
    Mindstorm

    Posts : 1112
    Points : 1279
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Mindstorm Sat Sep 04, 2021 10:25 am

    Isos wrote:Drones are more easily accessible than cruise missile.

    All the ground vehicles are at risk against suicide drones.

    It was already the case against rpg/atgm but drones are even cheaper.


    What suicide drones ?

    If you mean the really cheap and numerous ones (like the Zerbe-1K) is important to clarify that those UAVs, in the NK conflict have ,except for few instances of equipment losses (3 : two with the drone passing through the opened turret's hatch and one with fire originating from the engine ) and the obvious propaganda effect generated by the video recording of theirs hits, only caused cosmetic damages to Artsakh's tanks

    Long range UAVs truly capable to destroy a MBT usually cost like a tank or even more.

    Those metal grill domes are aimed mostly at top-attack ATGMs and precise guided munitions delivered by airborne platforms ,particularly laser guided ones. The position of the grill attempt to cover also area of major density of sensor suit of the tank.

    flamming_python, x_54_u43, LMFS, Hole and The_Observer like this post

    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Isos Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:46 am

    Suicide drones won't destroy a tank but can damage it badly, specially if they have HEAT warhead. The top is generally few cm armoured so even a small HEAT will go through.

    But tanks are a small portion of armoured vehicles. Other lighter and not armoued ones will be easy prays for those small drones.

    flamming_python likes this post

    avatar
    Mindstorm

    Posts : 1112
    Points : 1279
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Mindstorm Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:50 pm

    Isos wrote:Suicide drones won't destroy a tank but can damage it badly, specially if they have HEAT warhead. The top is generally few cm armoured so even a small HEAT will go through.

    But tanks are a small portion of armoured vehicles. Other lighter and not armoued ones will be easy prays for those small drones.


    Suicide drones can also confidently destroy an MBT if it hit, at example an Harop UAV can surely destroy also a modern MBT if it would achieve a plain hit.

    The problem is that class of UAVs cost on average 10-11 ml dollars at piece ......a T-72 like those operated by Artsakh forces is around 450-500 thousands dollars !!

    Light suicide drones ,that are the unique really "cheap", have not the necessary warhead's volume and stand-off for an efficient HEAT and show truly minuscule amount of explosive that, except in very specific and very rare instances, is incapable to inflict noticeable damages on heavily armoured vehicles (the typical sign of an UAV's hit on an Artsakh's tank was usually a specific dent on the perimeter of turret's armor).

    What instead those drones surely achieve is to impress the common viewer, that observing the video recording of the explosion of those UAVs after an hit on an armoured vehicle (susally in night vision mode), deduce a completely twisted idea of the outcome of those hits.

    Emplpyment of those suicide UAVs against infantry squads in the open or against not-armoured transport trucks for artillery/infantry ammunitions is another history.

    dino00 and LMFS like this post

    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 4499
    Points : 4491
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 45
    Location : Merkelland

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Hole Sat Sep 04, 2021 8:25 pm

    That´s why I prefer the concept of the Karnivora drone, which is like an RBK with wings and an engine, that can drop all kinds of submuitions on targets, over the common suicide drone. Cheaper and can be adapted to different targets.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Isos Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:26 pm

    Harop is a dual drone for recco or suicide attacks. That's it is expensive.

    Russian kalashnikov's KUB for exemple will be far cheaper than a harop or a t-72. Its 3kg warhead if used for a HEAT charge is more than enough to go through the roof of any tank. And like we saw in NK the drone controller can choose wisely where to hit because it is very precise. Azeri used to hit t-72 hatches. So you can target the munition compartement easily.

    And 3kg is fatal to any non armoured vehicle.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 30564
    Points : 31094
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  GarryB Sun Sep 05, 2021 11:37 am

    Which would be why most modern armoured forces will be operating with EW units who can detect drone signals and tv or video feeds and not just jam them but locate both the drone and the operator for attention...
    avatar
    Mindstorm

    Posts : 1112
    Points : 1279
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Mindstorm Sun Sep 05, 2021 11:38 am

    Isos wrote:Harop is a dual drone for recco or suicide attacks. That's it is expensive.

    Russian kalashnikov's KUB for exemple will be far cheaper than a harop or a t-72. Its 3kg warhead if used for a HEAT charge is more than enough to go through the roof of any tank. And like we saw in NK the drone controller can choose wisely where to hit because it is very precise. Azeri used to hit t-72 hatches. So you can target the munition compartement easily.

    And 3kg is fatal to any non armoured vehicle.


    Any idea of the reason the makers of those light UAV have not integrated an HEAT warhead in theirs products ?......

    Well this is the section design of an FGM-148 "Javelin" missile the staple sample of top-attack ATGMs

    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/javelin.htm

    The system has a range of a bit more than 2 km and require around 20 seconds only for its seeker to acquire the intended target in ideal conditions, the mass of its tandem warhead is 8,4 Kg and its penetration potential is, since several years, considered by the same US expert incapable to penetrate turrets of relatively modern Russian-built MBTs equiped with ,by now, largely surpassed ERA tiles, to the point that an urgent improvement was ordered (and never materialized).

    Lockheed Martin engineers (but also ours...) must be truly incompetent not realizing that was possible to add to the design dozen of km of range , capability to maneuver, redirect or annull the attack, add several sensors for reconnaissance, reduce of 4 times the volume of the warhead and 3 times the mass eliminate completely the launcher cost and weight and easily destroy enemy MBTs and IFV......Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

    Let a military force fully equipped with light suicide drones confront the assault of a mechanized/armoured force equiped with equipment costing 1/3 of that of the UAV side and afetr some hours you will find only the burning fragments of the corpses of those enthusiasts UAV's operators.

    War respect only cold reality, not trendy ideas .

    GarryB, flamming_python, dino00, x_54_u43, LMFS and Hole like this post

    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Isos Sun Sep 05, 2021 12:32 pm

    Javelin has nothing tp do with drone.

    And no one will send soldiers with drones against tanks. They will be there as a support force. There will be friendly tanks and atgm teams.

    Those drones have 70km range and will attack girst and kill or mobility kill as many enemy vehicles as possible before they face your friendly tanks.
    x_54_u43
    x_54_u43

    Posts : 312
    Points : 328
    Join date : 2015-09-19

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  x_54_u43 Sun Sep 05, 2021 8:41 pm

    Isos wrote:Javelin has nothing tp do with drone.

    And no one will send soldiers with drones against tanks. They will be there as a support force. There will be friendly tanks and atgm teams.

    Those drones have 70km range and will attack girst and kill or mobility kill as many enemy vehicles as possible before they face your friendly tanks.

    Did you not read?

    Mindstorm informed you that your idea about a 3kg HEAT warhead on Kub is absurd given that Javelin has near 3 times heavier warhead and is not considered effective any longer against tanks
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Isos Sun Sep 05, 2021 9:05 pm

    x_54_u43 wrote:
    Isos wrote:Javelin has nothing tp do with drone.

    And no one will send soldiers with drones against tanks. They will be there as a support force. There will be friendly tanks and atgm teams.

    Those drones have 70km range and will attack girst and kill or mobility kill as many enemy vehicles as possible before they face your friendly tanks.

    Did you not read?

    Mindstorm informed you that your idea about a 3kg HEAT warhead on Kub is absurd given that Javelin has near 3 times heavier warhead and is not considered effective any longer against tanks

    Yes I did and I said with drones you can target the part of the tank you want to hit contrary to javelin which hit randomly the tank. Russian tanks have that revolver loader right at the center so from the top you can just target the entrance hatches which can be penetrated easily and touch it.

    Or you can target the top of the engine which isn't protected at all.

    3kg is more than enough. PG-7 rockets are less than 3kg abd can pentrate some 300-500mm which is enough to go through any tank from the top if you don't hit the ERA.
    x_54_u43
    x_54_u43

    Posts : 312
    Points : 328
    Join date : 2015-09-19

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  x_54_u43 Mon Sep 06, 2021 6:47 am

    Isos wrote:

    Yes I did and I said with drones you can target the part of the tank you want to hit contrary to javelin which hit randomly the tank. Russian tanks have that revolver loader right at the center so from the top you can just target the entrance hatches which can be penetrated easily and touch it.

    Or you can target the top of the engine which isn't protected at all.

    3kg is more than enough. PG-7 rockets are less than 3kg abd can pentrate some 300-500mm which is enough to go through any tank from the top if you don't hit the ERA.


    ZERO in-service Russian tanks have revolver loaders, and your thinking about just magically targeting specific hatches and flying into the ammo storage at the bottom of the tank is some Death Star trench run shit dude. Hatches can't be significantly armored nowadays apparently as well, and it would also not work on Armata whatsoever.

    Just bury this fantasy you have of tiny drones with 3kg HEAT warheads going around ammo detonating tanks dude, it's not a thing.

    Engine decks also have significant armor as well, I doubt 3kg HEAT warheads would significantly impact them at all, nvm the diameter of this warhead and the UAV design.

    Mindstorm put it very simply to you, and you should sit down and think about why there are no such kamikaze UAVs around with HEAT warheads that would just magically delete tanks for you.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 30564
    Points : 31094
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  GarryB Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:00 am

    The Russians have binoculars that have built in lasers to detect enemy optics of snipers and ATGM teams from several kms range and to direct a laser at the said target to damage them so they can't be used.

    Do you think Russian Armour does not have something similar fitted with all those optical sensors and equipment?

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Lvqn9h11

    This was being used in the 1980s or earlier AFAIK... the set that they used to prevent Chavez being sniped was based on a set of hand held binoculars.... I would think it would be easy to incorporate such laser dazzlers in a tank and an aircraft... they call them DIRCMs.

    dino00 likes this post

    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7865
    Points : 7849
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Isos Mon Sep 06, 2021 11:32 am

    x_54_u43 wrote:


    ZERO in-service Russian tanks have revolver loaders, and your thinking about just magically targeting specific hatches and flying into the ammo storage at the bottom of the tank is some Death Star trench run shit dude. Hatches can't be significantly armored nowadays apparently as well, and it would also not work on Armata whatsoever.

    Just bury this fantasy you have of tiny drones with 3kg HEAT warheads going around ammo detonating tanks dude, it's not a thing.

    Engine decks also have significant armor as well, I doubt 3kg HEAT warheads would significantly impact them at all, nvm the diameter of this warhead and the UAV design.

    Mindstorm put it very simply to you, and you should sit down and think about why there are no such kamikaze UAVs around with HEAT warheads that would just magically delete tanks for you.

    All of them have such relaoder/storage magazin, revolver like :


    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Update10


    The top is unarmoured and a 3kg HEAT warhead can go easily through. Everyone is producing top attack missiles and drones for that reason.

    3kg HEAT isn't fantasy. Rpg-7 rounds are less than 3kg and can penetrate 500mm.engines are not armoured on the top at all like you can see they need fresh air to work.

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Le-t-710
    avatar
    Mindstorm

    Posts : 1112
    Points : 1279
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Mindstorm Mon Sep 06, 2021 1:41 pm

    Isos wrote:
    x_54_u43 wrote:
    Isos wrote:Javelin has nothing tp do with drone.

    And no one will send soldiers with drones against tanks. They will be there as a support force. There will be friendly tanks and atgm teams.

    Those drones have 70km range and will attack girst and kill or mobility kill as many enemy vehicles as possible before they face your friendly tanks.

    Did you not read?

    Mindstorm informed you that your idea about a 3kg HEAT warhead on Kub is absurd given that Javelin has near 3 times heavier warhead and is not considered effective any longer against tanks

    Yes I did and I said with drones you can target the part of the tank you want to hit contrary to javelin which hit randomly the tank. Russian tanks have that revolver loader right at the center so from the top you can just target the entrance hatches which can be penetrated easily and touch it.

    Or you can target the top of the engine which isn't protected at all.

    3kg is more than enough. PG-7 rockets are less than 3kg abd can pentrate some 300-500mm which is enough to go through any tank from the top if you don't hit the ERA.


    Isos the problem is that you believe that is possible to mount an HEAT warhead, and even more a 3kg one, on this class of lightweight UAVs, while i instead are attempting to explain that this idea in your head is terribly difficult to realize in reality (mostly at cause of lack of standoff space ).

    The result would be that in the same space of the common 3 kg warhead (with 800 gr to 1,2 kg of explosive) you would obtain a minuscle HEAT warhead with anti-armor penetration potential likely worse that the HE/frag mounted now.

    The most advanced western attempt in this direction is the Switchblade 600 that employ a purposely adapted multipurpose warhead from FGM-148 Javelin that, by makers claims, is now capable to engage also light armoured vehicles.

    https://www.avinc.com/tms/switchblade-600



    That model increased the mass of the UAV (effectively now a guided missile) to 15 kg and the entire launcher system to 54,4 kg and obviously cost (it cost more than the БТР-70 destroyed in the presentation video).



    dino00 and x_54_u43 like this post


    Sponsored content

    T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants - Page 29 Empty Re: T-72 ΜΒΤ modernisation and variants

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Sep 18, 2021 9:19 pm