Russian military operation in Ukraine #64

It was a drone attack on one of the Rosrezerv (Federal Agency for State Reserves) depots for aviation fuel. wrote:

For strategic aviation.

Trump „is not trying to give anything to Putin or the Russians,” but „is trying to save Ukraine and preserve its sovereignty,” the president-elect’s special representative Keith Kellogg said on Fox News.

„And he’s going to make sure that it’s fair and that it’s honest. And he’s talked about it repeatedly, both when Zelensky met with him at Trump Tower and when he talked about it at his press conference,” Kellogg said.

He added that Trump would speak with both Zelensky and Putin, and set 100 days as the deadline for a possible agreement.



There will be either another very unfavorable agreement similar to Minsk or further war until Ukraine capitulates. We will see what Putin does.

As I wrote earlier, Trump will not change anything. US policy will be even more aggressive.

SocialEurope: "In a world ruled by Trump and Putin , the EU has no future unless it reconnects with the Global South."

The entire west has burned its bridges with BRICS and the global south... reconnecting with the global south would require disconnecting the American hand from up their butt... not going to happen... US military bases across the EU prove that is not going to happen.

ECFR (European Council on Foreign Relations): " Europe is expecting a migration explosion (with tenfold flows from Syria and Ukraine ) that will make the figures for 2015 pale in comparison."

Both times it was a refugee problem created by the actions of the EU and her leaders in the US.

Neue Zürcher Zeitung: "There is no hope for peace in Europe."

Of course there will... just not on western terms.

Back in November, this last resort was mentioned by STRATCOM Admiral Thomas Buchanan, who, when discussing the concept of limited nuclear strikes, said that "we are prepared for that scenario." That's why Politico's list of futurological predictions for 2025 includes an additional item in small print: "Nuclear weapons may be used."

Hahaha... except the guy in charge of the US and therefore also HATO is hinting that those nukes might be used against Greenland and Canada and Panama...

"Our country - independent, free and strong - was able to respond to the most difficult challenges. And now, on the threshold of the new year, we are thinking about the future. We are sure that everything will be fine. We will only move forward. When we are together - everything will come true."

And that means we will live.

Interesting the number of western leaders talking about being Americas ally but also talking about soverignty... almost like soverignty and independence are becoming a thing again for the west... after a few years of anything you say and burning bridges with BRICS countries they used to have a lot of trade with....

A bunch of crap. If poles step a foot in ukraine they will be targeted.

Dead right Lsos... Putin and Lavrov have not ignored HATO countries pumping weapons and ammo into Kiev to murder Russians and to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia that destroys it and makes its resources available for auction to the highest western bidders like the 1990s again.

They will target and destroy western forces with glee that enter this battlefield. They have already killed a few HATO advisors and commanders and planners who were in country in places they thought were safe... but it turns out even Kinzhal and Zircon and Kh-32 can reach interesting places too.

This is if an agreement is signed which is close to 1% chances.

No agreement Russia signs will allow HATO or EU troops into any areas of the Ukraine.

When the Ukraine military collapses the Russians will move in and secure the weapons and equipment of the surrendering Ukrainian military and keep order while referendums and elections are sorted out. The people will get their say but their options will be restricted to the options Russia will allow. They will get their vote and their choices will be respected.

They will reach the western border and make a siege of Lviv and Kiev until total redition of the ukrainian leadership.

I don't think there will be any sieges... they will likely offer terms and accept their surrender after their military has collapsed.

Amassing troops in large number is not possible for NATO even if they decide to send their own soldiers. That's because such a gathering will required competent SAM systems to intercept a large scale Russian missile strike. However, most US SAM systems are not effective.

The US Army has no faith in the PAC-3. They have now opted for a ground based version of the SM-6.

And they are right not to trust it... even an enormous air defence force would not stop Russian missile and drone attacks...

Last seconds...

Nice drone jammer antenna on the roof of the vehicle...  

Its war and shit happens, but honestly looked a lot like LA

Always going to be an easy soft target... and of course it means the price of energy will go up so more profits for Russia.

For the Russian military the orcs could hit them every night for the rest of the year and the Russians wont run out of fuel and lubricants.

Of course the reality is that they might be able to mount such attacks once a fortnight or even less often...

For strategic aviation.

Even if it was a total loss at this location, they are not going to run out any time soon. I rather expect their response will be interesting because now the Ukraine has stopped all gas and oil transit across their territory it no longer has any value to Russia so it can be destroyed along with their gas storage sites...

German Masters treating their slaves accordingly...

Wow. I am sure in their heads they would give the child a better future and be better parents... but not from jail.

Trump „is not trying to give anything to Putin or the Russians,” but „is trying to save Ukraine and preserve its sovereignty,”

Trump snr has already blamed everything on Biden so he doesn't need to get a win out of it... other than the end of hostilities in Europe.

There will be either another very unfavorable agreement similar to Minsk or further war until Ukraine capitulates. We will see what Putin does.

Yeah, Putin is just hoping for a Minsk 5 so he can end the conflict... have you not noticed he didn't rush to speak to Trump, he has not rushed to engage any leader from the west to talk about ending the conflict... the only western leaders he has spoken to went to him and they didn't get any concessions at all.

Trump will have to go to Putin and will have to start getting rid of a lot of sanctions... and most of them Putin does not care about whether they stay or go, but the economic sanctions he would probably prefer lifted... but even then he is not going to trade a repeat of what has happened in the Ukraine 5 or 10 years down the track just to get sanctions relief... he has seen what Trump did to Iran and he knows Trump can't be trusted and the EU can't be trusted...

He is going to listen... they will lay out their views and he will restate Russias position for about the millionth time and essentially Putin is going to agree to nothing and the war in continue till Kievs military collapses.

As I wrote earlier, Trump will not change anything. US policy will be even more aggressive.

Trumps expertise is ripping up agreements... how many did he actually sign.

The only one I can think of would be the withdrawal from Afghanistan... did he bully the Taliban into making huge concessions?

No.

Did he leave an enormous amount of gear they could have sent to the Ukraine... yes.

Even more aggressive? How, and with what money? wrote:

From printed money. They can print it without limits and now it's rather adding zeros in the tables.

"Myśl Polska" has about 2% coverage of the Polish audience, and represents the opinion of about 3% of the voters.
It does not matter if they are reasonable or not - just showing the proportions.

From printed money. They can print it without limits and now it's rather adding zeros in the tables.

He certainly could but he is a businessman and he knows.... all his advisors will tell him not to get involved in this conflict because Kiev is over and now it is just a money sink where cash and weapons and ammo disappear to and are never seen again.

Biden throws money because he has links in that chain that benefit and gain lots of money from this money laundering and he will justify it by saying most of the money is going to the US MIC to make more weapons over the next decade to restock all the ammo and weapon stores that were depleted. Old tanks and BMPs and artillery and ancient stuff has all been used up from all the HATO allies and now they need to restock with brand new American ammo that is expensive and those HATO allies are going to be paying 5% of their gdp for the foreseeable future to pay for it all.... but throwing more money at the Ukraine is not going to help anything.

Trump doesn't give a shit about the country and probably wants Russia to sell to western countries in US dollars again... which they can't do while they are under sanctions.

He is currently swinging his dick around being aggressive regarding Greenland and Panama and Canada and Mexico... you know... he is taking on the big powerful countries of the world like America is well known for doing... have you noticed Greenland and Canada (arctic trade routes), Mexico and Panama (US trade through the canal to get goods from the East coast of the US of A to Asia and the West coast to Europe means the Panama canal or the North West Passage... or the other two routes... one of which goes through Russian waters... while the alternative further north will be thicker ice and ice for longer periods of the year...

He will be very keen to make trades and he will sell out Kiev for magic beans if he could.

The valuable land in the Ukraine is being overrun by the Russians so the investment is becoming less and less attractive when it moves to being in Russian Federation territory.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated that Kiev would hardly be able to “return” the territories that became part of Russia after the referendums, but Ukraine needs security guarantees.

What security guarantees does Russia have with HATO and the EU?

Why does nazi Kiev need such agreements and considering their performance with Minsk 1 and Minsk 2 and Istanbul... what would any agreement be worth anyway... from a Russian perspective that is...

It does not matter if they are reasonable or not - just showing the proportions.

Such views would not be tolerated 2 or even just 1 year ago... now they are beginning to realise the goal of a strategic defeat for Russia is not going to happen.

It is funny that they thought Russia should just accept HATO troops in Ukraine when Moron has said Russian troops in Ukraine is unacceptable to HATO.

Before the conflict started Putin went to the EU and US with security guarantees to discuss to ensure security in Europe.

They both laughed in his face.

Perhaps this time when they go to him and want to talk he wont kick too much sand in their faces.

just in case if anybody needs some small light in this very dark world war 3 being waged against Russia by NATO in Ukraine.

Good to see animals being looked after and protected... but so many pets would be abandoned and the main available food on a battlefield for adult dogs and cats is the meat lying around the place...