What do you live for then, antichrist ?
He said he was an Athiest.... therefore Christ, along with the Anti Christ are made up characters in a vast conspiracy to enslave the masses... just like Heaven is the carrot and Hell is the stick to enforce cooperation.
Athiests don't go door to door recruiting to build their numbers, but we will fight not not have some hoki religion foisted on us by those weak enough to need a made up higher power that controls everything but wont help you in any way even when you really need it.
If religion is irrelevant to you, give your son the name Muhammad or Sinan. And who cares about your worldview ? I see that you are crying for a fictional nation (Soviets), as well as a fictional state - the USSR.
Why punish a child with a religious name... how many children in the west are called Jesus that are white?
How many people in the west think Jesus is white?
It’s not just about religion, of course, but it goes much deeper. Socialism did not create the Russian state. Socialism did not create the Russian language. And if you thought about it, you would probably understand that it was the Russian Orthodox Church that created this Russian people - which is different from the West.
You say it is not about religion, and then immediately afterwards say the ROC created the Russian people and that is what differentiates Russia from the West.
Tsarist Russia, not your communists and atheists, created Russia as it is.
The current Russia is about as different from Communism as it is from Tsarist Russia. Democracy has very little to do with the west... their intelligences agencies have infiltrated their media and the ownership of their media by the most rich people in the west means they have no free press.
Some rich people in Russia own and control some media outlets, but the government paid media is not government controlled so it is essentially a free media.
There seems to be a separation between the rich and the political powers... this is critical too.
Russias future is not privatising everything, and letting the rich buy up and exploit the wealth of the nation for themselves, the Russians need to ensure the mineral wealth of the country benefits the population of the country and not just one or two who, with the support of western companies scoop up resources on the cheap and send the benefits and profits overseas... that should be what every country wants.
But the US and the west wants you to think that is communism and communism is bad.
Socialism has NEVER succeeded in practice, because even in Roman times the Roman emperor and the Roman senate lived well, while the common people were happy to get bread while watching the gladiators in the Colosseum.
Atheist and antichrist, from today you are on the block list.
Bad news my friend, I am an Athiest too, and with business being focused on profits for shareholders only you need some trades some industries some services that are not interested in profit, but in the service they provide.
Hospitals and Schools and Prisons and Police Forces and a wide range of other critical or potentially very profitable areas should be government managed because greedy men and women cannot be trusted.
BTW you can't block me... nor should you because if I give instructions on behaviour and those instructions are ignored... that is grounds for a ban under the rules of this forum.
I stand behind my words that the communists in the USSR killed as many of their own people as the Nazis killed the Russians.
And so therefore all communists are bad because of Stalin and Lenin.... look at the west how many do they kill?
Most of the people the Soviets are accused of killing came back to live at about 1942 when they were needed, and the exaggeration was only created to demonise the commies. The famines in the 1930s were also blamed on the commies and the Russians, but one could blame that on the west who demanded payment in grain rather than gold or other materials... maybe the ongoing war with the west had more to do with the famine and various deaths that communism itself.
The Nazis killed twice as many Soviet civilians as they did Soviet Soldiers even though they shot female soldiers on sight...
For the Russians, the Communists were just as devastating as the Nazis.
Not even close. The communists didn't level any Soviet cities, and a percentage of the people they killed could have been traitors anyway... look at any country getting its freedom... the first thing it does is rounds up its 5th column enemies at home and makes them go away.
And remember forever that Russia has existed in one way or another since at least 882, while UTOPIA called the USSR and the "Soviets" ended up where it should be - in the sewers.
The Soviet Union was Russia, it was the commies that split it up into regions.
Unlike the communists who glorify the "Soviet" victory in the Second World War, I know and claim that it was a victory for the Russian people.
It was a Soviet effort whether you agree with that or not... denying the effort by the other republics is like the west ignoring the eastern front and claiming D Day is what won WWII.
How many millions of people died unnecessarily because of the red plague that Lenin brought in the civil war in Russia ?
HItler wanted his living space in the east whether they were communist or not so by 1941 when Germany invaded it was coming... ready or not.
Without the communists essentially imposing an industrial revolution on Russia, there is no way Russia would have existed to the Urals, and if that was the case the Japanese would have suceeded in Mongolia and the Pacific campaign would not have happened the way it did because Japan could have had Siberia and could have built up militarily for a decade... the UK would have been crushed after Germany had Russian resources behind them and millions of new soldiers who weren't commies so the Germans could use them.
Communism damaged Russia but the Tsars were worse and kept the country as a child... weak and vulnerable to any enemy strong enough to go that far logistically... and Germany was in a much better state to invade and hold Russia than Napoleon was because of mechanisation.
How many people did Stalin and Lenin kill in purges, starvation?
No where near as many as western documentation pretends.
How many millions of people died unnecessarily in World War II because of the idiot Stalin and his disbelief in the attack on the USSR?
Bugger all... a delay of a couple of days was meaningless in terms of losses... if the Tsars were in charge they would have soldiers on horseback instead of T-34s... their airforce would be European junk from WWI because that would be all the west would sell to them...
Tens of thousands of officers were killed in purges before World War II. And what are you, the same as him, selling me a "trick" about socialism and atheism ?
Don't you mean millions or billions... officers that suddenly reappeared in 1942...
I'm not a stubborn believer, but I don't like atheists.
As dangerous as it is ignorant...
And ? If you are a communist (socialist), then you and I have nothing to write about. For me, communists are the same as Nazis, and whoever writes that the Soviet Union won World War II and not Russia, I will block it.
Nazis believe in their own racial superiority over others and will invade other countries because as the superior race the resources of other countries naturally belong to them... god tells them it is so.
Russia was part of the Soviet Union, so when you say the Soviets won WWII then you include Russia as part of that, but a lot of the fighting took place in Belarus and Ukraine.
There were plenty of traitors in those two parts of the Soviet Union but it is equally patently obvious they can't all have been traitors or Russia could not have defeated them as well as the Germans and her allies.
Do you think Stalin would have spared them if they were all traitors?
No Backman, it's not about the economy, it's about millions of Russians who died unnecessarily for the red disease.
Capitalism is the greatest evil, but it cannot be eradicated, because it is in human nature - many are greedy and want everything for themselves.
You have things arse backwards like most in the west... communism is what people had before money and for the vast majority of human history that is how things worked and worked well...
Ask a native American...
If these Soviets have already "won" the Second World War, then why is no one in Russia today declaring itself as a Soviet ?
How many are declaring themselves Tsarist?
The Tsars, like the Soviets are gone... history.
But plenty of Soviet flags on vehicles going in to the Ukraine though.
I do not agree. Proposing the release of Assange would be a master move that would generate a lot of support for Russia.
And both he and Snowden have been good allies in exposing all information from Western governments and leaders.
In a sense Russia should support him because he is essentially a media publisher that published the truth, including about Russia and China, but their skeletons were not scary enough to have any impact while the western closet was deep and full of bones.
He is not pro Russia at all however and giving up actual western criminals for someone who is not a criminal does not seem like a fair trade to me...
He is Australian... how about the Australian government fights for him and his rights?
They try to get drug trafickers released from Asian prisons when they get caught... they could at least do the same for Assange.
Ukrainian Nazism is simple hatred of Russia and functionality to an international Zionism.
At the core of Nazism is your race is pure and unique and goes back millions of years and any other race infects yours and dilutes it and makes it less pure.... even an albino Swede would corrupt their blood... it is not about white.... it is about made up mythical Ayrian which other whites don't belong to the same group and therefore are as dirty as any other skin colour.
Zionism is very similar in the sense they believe they are both a religion and a race... they keep themselves apart which makes them easy targets for criminals and idiots to hate and then they claim to be victims while murdering people in neighbouring countries or even the country they made up themselves...
If you are a Nazi, you are supposed to care about the white race and its culture.
No, they are a special branch of the white race... remember they don't like jews either, but will of course use jews if it is useful.
Who defends you better? Putin's Russia or the United States and Western Europe. The answer is very obvious. Putin has been one of the few European leaders to talk about the birth problem.
But Putin is not racist... he happens to lead a country that is mostly white, but he is not limiting or banning interracial cohabitation or marriage... with the west now cut off Russia will turn to China and Asia and the rest of the world for trade and cooperation.
Anyone hoping that Russia will defend the white race is delusional... and not any saner than the KKK, the Nazis, and the Zionist Juice.
If you really care about the race you should pay attention to a leader who thinks like that. That is why abortion and homosexual propaganda have been one of his criticisms.
Well that is an important thing... if you want to ban abortion then you need the infrastructure to deal with the consequences of unwanted children... if you are not prepared to spend billions on looking after all those extra children being born then you create more problems than you solve because broken homes are likely to created broken people which is never good for quality of life or socially responsible citizens.
That is why it has limited immigration and I am sure that the Russians have much more ethnic awareness than the rest of the Europeans, who have lost it after decades of multiculturalism.
Putin, without saying it openly (because it would be frowned upon), is the only European leader who defends the white race.
There is no white race, just like there is no black or yellow race. Are Chinese and Japanese and Korean people the same?
If Putin is defending the white race then why are White Ukrainians supported by white EU members and with the US at the rear driving this whole conflict fighting?
Whites are in control in all western countries... it is white people who drive racist policies like affirmative action and quotas for minorities...
We will not talk about it anymore, except that I will write to you that the Russian civil war is the greatest evil that has ever hit Russia. Ever
All civil wars are the most bloody and destructive...
The essence is that Russia destroyed communism, and that is better and more important than the victory over the Nazis. MIR, I appreciate many of your publications, but do not write with me about the Communists, because they were justifiably destroyed by those to whom the Communists stole the state - the Russians.
Communism wasn't destroyed and lives in China... what happened in Russia was that a large portion of the population were not happy being the playthings of monarchs and decided they wanted a change... various factions fought and the commies won despite also fighting foreigners... perhaps it was the foreign interference that let the commies win... who likes foreign interference from countries that are not your friend. The Commies then spent quite some time consolodating their place and changing things to the way they wanted them... there would always be turmoil and problems in that phase... the more so in Russia because of a world wide depression and famines happening all over the place... which had nothing at all to do with communism.
After 70 odd years of fighting the west over their political beliefs the Russian people decided to become a democracy and the west say they are still communist and Putin is worse than Stalin, so instead of letting the rich western companies buy up or steal all their resources Russia essentially has a socialist model where the government has shares in companies that extract the wealth of the country so the whole country benefits with an income that would otherwise disappear overseas into secret bank accounts.
But the west wont let up, so Russia has given up on the west, and they certainly wont piss everything away on a pure western capitalist model that is currently destroying the west as the wealth of the country slowly gravitates towards the richest people and companies at the expense of everyone else.
For communism everything is artificial, it lacks transcendence due to its materialism.
Think you are confused... materialism is a western construct and nothing to do with democracy or communism... getting a vote every 5 to 7 years does not make you religious.
There is nothing inherently atheistic about communism... in fact most comunes in the west are religious in nature... what you call a democracy is actually a very recent invention... and is very unnatural.
That is why Stalin defeated Hitler, because he recovered Russian nationalism. He appealed to the Church, to the tsars, to the heroes of deep Russian history.
The ROC didn't beat Hitler, Hitler defeated Hitler by murdering everyone on the eastern front with no accountability... the people on the eastern front had no choice but to fight, and it wasn't for Stalin or for communism... it was because the white European west had created a monster that was more evil that Russias monster... Stalin killed less than 5 million Soviet citizens, Hitler was responsible for ten times that number dead, but of course he would not have gotten into power if the west had treated the Germans with respect... but they couldn't do that and steal their colonies so they had to demonise them and the Soviets paid a hefty price for that.
Do you think that the USSR would have defeated the Nazis by appealing to the "international proletarian brotherhood"?
No. Do you think god helped them? The USSR defeated the Nazis with blood and effort.
Nazism was not wrong in many of its ideas (the defense of the race, solidarity or the real problem of Judaism),
Nazism is wrong on every count... as is Zionist Judaism.
the problem is that Hitler was destructive and an ignorant German/Austrian who saw the Slavs as enemies, being peoples honorable throughout history.
You could make the same claims about Stalin ruining the name of Communism, but it is more complex than that.
Nazism is destructive and requires expansion and the elimination of enemies... communism was a reform to try to eliminate the class system and eliminate want and need... it failed of course, but people having food and education and healthcare and a job and eventually a home of your own... with better management it could actually make sense.
The alternative western democracy model is materialistic and very wasteful, and pretty much every man for themselves.
Or they forgot that they were the only ones to defeat the Theotonic Order, Napoleon, the Swedes. Hitler never got rid of this crude German supremacism, which has no basis whatsoever.
You don't need a superior ideology... most of it is open to interpretation and do you think anyone looks at their own ideology fairly?
If Hitler had shaken hands with Russia (understanding its historical importance) would have saved millions of innocent deaths and we would have a better world and a fairer order for all peoples, I have no doubts. It was a missed historic opportunity.
If Hitler had made it about Stalin and not about communism and slavs then I suspect quite a few Russian and Soviet citizens might have supported him, but the way the Germans acted in the eastern front there was no chance... it wasn't just the nazis... however much they want you to believe that... all German units shot female Soviet soldiers on sight, and their treatment of civilians and soldiers alike was shocking to say the least.
Well, if you have a relative view of morality, denying good and evil. (Yes, good and evil exist). You are much closer to the thought of the enemy. Western postmodernity and all the cultural destruction it has brought has denied transcendent values: Truth, Beauty, Good.
Morality and ethics and truth have very little to do with religion... most religions will tell you unbelievers are sinners and need to be converted...
Most religions are like the west today... promises of plenty and a future of comfort and safety.... how is that going in Libya and Syria and Ukraine today?
There are good and bad people in all nationalities, religions, worldviews or whatever tribalistic group they want to be part off.
A great philosopher of the 20th century once said: "There is good and bad in everyone.... but we don't all let it through..."
Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
caveat emptor
