Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+58
Gazputin
teh_beard
ucmvulcan
rigoletto
Urluber
Pacense
jhelb
Krepost
caveat emptor
TMA1
andalusia
kvs
Rasisuki Nebia
GunshipDemocracy
Karl Haushofer
Autodestruct
Firebird
limb
x_54_u43
Russian_Patriot_
ludovicense
Tingsay
ALAMO
JohninMK
Daniel_Admassu
higurashihougi
Tsavo Lion
SeigSoloyvov
nero
thedrunkengeneral
PapaDragon
lyle6
Azi
lancelot
Nomad5891
owais.usmani
Hole
troperker
mnztr
magnumcromagnon
slasher
Scorpius
franco
par far
LMFS
Big_Gazza
miketheterrible
AlfaT8
elconquistador
George1
Backman
GarryB
flamming_python
calripson
PhSt
Vann7
Arrow
Kiko
62 posters

    Russian Economy General News: #12

    franco
    franco


    Posts : 5139
    Points : 5171
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  franco Mon Mar 28, 2022 2:52 pm

    G7 rejects Russian demand to pay for gas in rubles – German energy minister

    The Group of Seven major economies have collectively agreed to reject Moscow’s demand to pay for energy imports from Russia in rubles, according to Germany’s energy minister Robert Habeck.

    “All G-7 ministers agreed completely that this (would be) a one-sided and clear breach of the existing contracts,” Habeck told journalists on Monday.

    The minister added that “payment in ruble is not acceptable” and that the nations will urge the companies affected "not to follow” the demand voiced by Russian President Vladimir Putin last week.

    On Monday, the Russian president ordered the government, the central bank, and Gazprombank to develop the necessary tools to switch all payments for Russian natural gas from “unfriendly states” to rubles starting March 31.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Russia will stop shipping natural gas to countries rejecting the demand.

    https://www.rt.com/business/552844-g7-rejects-rubles-gas/

    GarryB, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs, GunshipDemocracy and lancelot like this post

    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible


    Posts : 7403
    Points : 7377
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  miketheterrible Mon Mar 28, 2022 3:41 pm

    franco wrote: G7 rejects Russian demand to pay for gas in rubles – German energy minister

    The Group of Seven major economies have collectively agreed to reject Moscow’s demand to pay for energy imports from Russia in rubles, according to Germany’s energy minister Robert Habeck.

    “All G-7 ministers agreed completely that this (would be) a one-sided and clear breach of the existing contracts,” Habeck told journalists on Monday.

    The minister added that “payment in ruble is not acceptable” and that the nations will urge the companies affected "not to follow” the demand voiced by Russian President Vladimir Putin last week.

    On Monday, the Russian president ordered the government, the central bank, and Gazprombank to develop the necessary tools to switch all payments for Russian natural gas from “unfriendly states” to rubles starting March 31.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Russia will stop shipping natural gas to countries rejecting the demand.

    https://www.rt.com/business/552844-g7-rejects-rubles-gas/

    And the G7 matters how exactly? Its an echo chamber for US stooges and it kicked Russia out long ago. Add to that, they breached every contract known to man over this Ukraine situation so they dont even have a leg to stand on.

    russia will just end up turning the gas off on them and they will be begging sooner than later.

    GarryB, franco, flamming_python, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs, GunshipDemocracy and like this post

    kvs
    kvs


    Posts : 12881
    Points : 13028
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Kanada

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  kvs Mon Mar 28, 2022 4:11 pm

    Russia must turn off the taps to teach these f*ckers what reality is. They are so high on their hubris and propaganda that
    they are unable to engage basic thinking. They can only respond to a pain stimulus.

    GarryB, franco, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, GunshipDemocracy, Rodion_Romanovic, miketheterrible and like this post

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 1110
    Points : 1110
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  lancelot Mon Mar 28, 2022 4:32 pm

    The sabotage companies like Maersk and DHL are doing to Russia must be punished I think.
    Maersk in particular supplied US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. And they won't supply Russians in Russia.

    GarryB, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs, GunshipDemocracy, miketheterrible, Scorpius and bitch_killer like this post

    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible


    Posts : 7403
    Points : 7377
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  miketheterrible Mon Mar 28, 2022 4:37 pm

    lancelot wrote:The sabotage companies like Maersk and DHL are doing to Russia must be punished I think.
    Maersk in particular supplied US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. And they won't supply Russians in Russia.

    Dont know much about Maersk but DHL has a shady past. Look it up.

    Yeah, they need to be punished. I never deal with DHL even for long distance shipping from China to here.

    GarryB, magnumcromagnon, kvs and GunshipDemocracy like this post

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8159
    Points : 8304
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  magnumcromagnon Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:19 pm

    GarryB, Big_Gazza, kvs, GunshipDemocracy, Hole and Autodestruct like this post

    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy


    Posts : 5329
    Points : 5353
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  GunshipDemocracy Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:44 pm

    China makes brave face? like what is not in the west is by definition not profitable?
    well India and China are pretty promising market. China is the first and India the second gas importers respectively ...



    Putin raised stakes as a logical next step. The original decision wasn't taken without foreseeing response from west. 1/April will be definitely a fools day.
    The funny here is explanation: our contracts stipulate payments only in Euro. And forget about  CBR  contacts or companies working in Russia contracts?

    This time we see the April Fools' ( without fuel da) Smile


    The Ministry of Digital Development proposed to expand support for the IT industry
    The Ministry of Digital Development proposed to expand support for the IT industry to companies in the field of information security

    https://ria.ru/20220328/it-1780534646.html


    The dollar ended trading below 90 rubles, the euro fell to 96.6 rubles
    https://ria.ru/20220328/kurs-1780554087.html

    GarryB, dino00, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs, Hole and lancelot like this post

    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 1810
    Points : 1812
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  ALAMO Mon Mar 28, 2022 8:27 pm

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:China makes brave face? like what is not in the west is by definition not profitable?
    well India and China are pretty promising market. China is the first and India the second gas importers respectively ...

    Not only them.
    It is Pakistan, with 220 mln inhabitants. Why Iran can't deliver some gas to them, that will be transported via Russian-build pipe? Why Russia can't just make a barter switch with them, making the contracts with Pak, but delivered from Iran's storage?
    It is 55mln Myanmar, plus 130+ mln Vietnam/Laos/Cambodia, and Malaysia 34 mln being just around the corner. Will 70 mln Thailand deny their precious friends from Sinopec to buy some inexpensive gas, freshly delivered from Mother Russia?
    300mln consumers, just sitting there. All of them were friendly toward Russia for decades. Well, maybe not Thai, but things changed there seriously as I have heard Twisted Evil

    The western world lost common sense at so an unimaginable level, that they seem to forget that they are not a centre of the universe anymore. There are billions of people living there, and they give a fuk about Anglosaxon bullshit. Oh, sometimes they actually have their own warm feelings toward them Laughing

    Russian turning 180 deg is something that will hurt. Oh that will ...

    GarryB, flamming_python, magnumcromagnon, kvs, Hole, owais.usmani and Autodestruct like this post

    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 6736
    Points : 6814
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  flamming_python Mon Mar 28, 2022 9:12 pm

    ALAMO wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:China makes brave face? like what is not in the west is by definition not profitable?
    well India and China are pretty promising market. China is the first and India the second gas importers respectively ...

    Not only them.
    It is Pakistan, with 220 mln inhabitants. Why Iran can't deliver some gas to them, that will be transported via Russian-build pipe? Why Russia can't just make a barter switch with them, making the contracts with Pak, but delivered from Iran's storage?
    It is 55mln Myanmar, plus 130+ mln Vietnam/Laos/Cambodia, and Malaysia 34 mln being just around the corner. Will 70 mln Thailand deny their precious friends from Sinopec to buy some inexpensive gas, freshly delivered from Mother Russia?
    300mln consumers, just sitting there. All of them were friendly toward Russia for decades. Well, maybe not Thai, but things changed there seriously as I have heard Twisted Evil  

    The western world lost common sense at so an unimaginable level, that they seem to forget that they are not a centre of the universe anymore. There are billions of people living there, and they give a fuk about Anglosaxon bullshit. Oh, sometimes they actually have their own warm feelings toward them Laughing

    Russian turning 180 deg is something that will hurt. Oh that will ...

    The most damage that will be done (other than to the Ukraine of course), is to the EU and to Russia

    To Russia probably more relatively speaking, but to the EU much more cumulatively (given it's much larger economy, even a conservative 5-6% GDP drop will be gigantic)

    The US won't go unscathed, as countries ditch the dollar. India's central bank chief was already talking about the need to diversify

    And the rest of the world will suffer a little too of course, but they'll be better off than the countries I mentioned. End result, is that this will all accelerate the decline of Western economies, globalism and US dominance most significantly. To the point that you're already looking at a world reordering as we speak.

    As for Russian oil, the volumes being signed with India are still a drop in the bucket. 3 million barrels, and then another few million barrels being signed. Russia has to sell them cheap and it's not going to make much of a profit due to transportation. The same problem will be apparent in dealings with south-east Asia.

    Russia had to wait until 2024, ideally. By then another pipeline to China would have been built, some huge petrochemical facilities in Siberia, and additional LNG export potential in the Arctic, as well as St. Petersburg and possibly Vladivostok. As it is, it's not quite ready. It has to make do with the LNG export from Sakhalin island, a little bit from Vysotsk, and the bulk from the Yamal peninsula, the later of which has been growing significantly in recent years

    GarryB, gc3762 and Autodestruct like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 33223
    Points : 33737
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  GarryB Tue Mar 29, 2022 3:28 am

    Hahaha... so the G7 have had a tantrum and will refuse to pay rubles for the gas they receive from Russia...

    They didn't discuss sanctions or anything else with Russia before they imposed them, why should Russia talk about this... both positions are pretty clear... the gas will be turned off when the payment stops.

    Which is ironic because that was the one part of SWIFT that the west was prepared to keep open... the part that allowed them to pay Euros or Dollars for Russian oil and gas... and now they wont be needing that so essentially Russia is also out of SWIFT completely.

    Of course when they quietly climb down from their ridiculous position they might end up using SWIFT to give Russia some Rubles...

    magnumcromagnon, Hole and gc3762 like this post

    avatar
    ALAMO


    Posts : 1810
    Points : 1812
    Join date : 2014-11-25

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  ALAMO Tue Mar 29, 2022 2:18 pm

    flamming_python wrote:

    The most damage that will be done (other than to the Ukraine of course), is to the EU and to Russia

    Honestly speaking, I hardly believe there will be any serious damage to the Russian economy at all.

    First of all, the whole of EU is bonded with contracts well into 20s, and sometimes in mid-30s. That is more than a decade perspective.

    They can't cancel them not because of some contractual claims, but because they would starve its own economy to death.
    Germany is industrial power and needs billions of m3 of gas to sustain its status. They would give a shit about the gas prices or supply for population, but switching off the tube for BASF is another thing.
    The whole chemical, metallurgical, and energy cluster hangs on Russian CNG, and there is no way to replace it.
    Zeo, null, nada.
    They don't have either terminals nor carriers. There is no supply.
    Qatar already told them to GTFO, because they don't have the gas they need.
    Building the whole infrastructure is possible, but would take years, and costs billions.

    They don't have both. Have you heard about the latest European superprojects in industrial or infrastructure? Yeah, me neither!
    A bridge linking Denmark and Sweden is 20 years old, and Eurotunel would be 30 soon.
    This is a real shape of the "economic powers" of G7 Shocked

    Russia is an autarky. There is hardly anything they really need for keeping the comfort, and simply zero what they need for survival.
    Taiwan just announced, that they give a shit about pressure either, and will continue projects they run with Russia now. That would be the only serious blow, as Taiwan share for semiconductors is 90+%
    There is nothing left for ze Wezt to bribe or bully other world community members. And you know what is funny? The longer it goes, the more countries will see it. And act accordingly.

    GarryB, magnumcromagnon and Hole like this post

    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 4491
    Points : 4491
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  LMFS Tue Mar 29, 2022 2:27 pm



    Any info on what Escobar reports?

    Pepe Escobar
    WELCOME TO THE GOLDEN RUBLE

    By now many of you know that the Russian Central Bank pegged 1 gram of gold to 5,000 rubles - which is already around $60, and climbing.

    And starting Thursday, NO RUBLES NO GAS (and no oil).

    What we have here is energy de facto pegged to gold.

    The EU chihuahuas + the Japanese colony will need to buy a lot of rubles in gold OR buy a lot of gold.

    Ready to dump your back-by-nothing greenbacks? Ready for the hyperinflation tsunami?

    It gets better. Russia may re-peg the ruble to gold in the near future. Could go to 2,000 rubles, 1,000 rubles, even 500 rubles for a gram of gold.

    That's how you play chess.

    https://vk.com/pepeasia?w=wall578617852_15315%2Fall

    GarryB, franco, dino00, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs, miketheterrible and Hole like this post

    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 6736
    Points : 6814
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  flamming_python Tue Mar 29, 2022 4:28 pm

    ALAMO wrote:
    Honestly speaking, I hardly believe there will be any serious damage to the Russian economy at all.

    First of all, the whole of EU is bonded with contracts well into 20s, and sometimes in mid-30s. That is more than a decade perspective.

    They can't cancel them not because of some contractual claims, but because they would starve its own economy to death.
    Germany is industrial power and needs billions of m3 of gas to sustain its status. They would give a shit about the gas prices or supply for population, but switching off the tube for BASF is another thing.
    The whole chemical, metallurgical, and energy cluster hangs on Russian CNG, and there is no way to replace it.
    Zeo, null, nada.
    They don't have either terminals nor carriers. There is no supply.
    Qatar already told them to GTFO, because they don't have the gas they need.
    Building the whole infrastructure is possible, but would take years, and costs billions.

    They don't have both. Have you heard about the latest European superprojects in industrial or infrastructure? Yeah, me neither!
    A bridge linking Denmark and Sweden is 20 years old, and Eurotunel would be 30 soon.
    This is a real shape of the "economic powers" of G7 Shocked

    Russia is an autarky. There is hardly anything they really need for keeping the comfort, and simply zero what they need for survival.
    Taiwan just announced, that they give a shit about pressure either, and will continue projects they run with Russia now. That would be the only serious blow, as Taiwan share for semiconductors is 90+%
    There is nothing left for ze Wezt to bribe or bully other world community members. And you know what is funny? The longer it goes, the more countries will see it. And act accordingly.

    Taiwan is completely dependent on the US, and only announced that as it seems a 'ceasefire' is set to be signed. So it's a sort of sweetener. As is Turkey's pretend neutrality, which can switch to hostility if the ceasefire is not signed.

    But Taiwan and Turkey (+ Azerbaijan) are about it really.
    LMFS
    LMFS


    Posts : 4491
    Points : 4491
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  LMFS Tue Mar 29, 2022 5:55 pm

    The real deal:

    “Events like this happen once a century”: Sergey Glazyev on the breakdown of epochs and changing ways of life

    Original Link:  https://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/544773

    Translated via Yandex
    “Events like this happen once a century”: Sergey Glazyev on the breakdown of epochs and changing ways of life

    Is it possible to stabilize the ruble in three days and why don’t the Ukrainian”zombies” give up?

    “After failing to weaken China head-on through a trade war, the Americans shifted the main blow to Russia, which they see as a weak link in the global geopolitics and economy. The Anglo-Saxons are trying to implement their eternal Russophobic ideas to destroy our country, and at the same time to weaken China, because the strategic alliance of the Russian Federation and the PRC is too tough for the United States. They don’t have the economic or military power to destroy us together, not separately,” says Sergey Glazyev, an academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences and former adviser to the Russian President. Glazyev spoke in an interview with BUSINESS Online about what opportunities are now opening up for the Russian economy, whether the Central Bank is pandering to the enemy and whether a new world currency will replace the dollar.
    “The new world economic order is ideologically socialist”

    – Sergey Yuryevich, commenting on today’s tragic events, you wrote in your telegram channel that it was necessary to read your book about the” last world war”, written about 6 years ago. How did you manage to predict everything so accurately?

    — The fact is that there are long-term patterns of economic development, the analysis and understanding of which allows us to predict events that are currently taking place. We are now experiencing a simultaneous change in technological and world economic structures, while the technological basis of the economy is changing, the transition to fundamentally new technologies is taking place, and the management system is also being transformed. This kind of event occurs about once a century. However, technological patterns change about once every 50 years, and their change is usually accompanied by a technological revolution, depression, and an arms race. And world economic patterns change once every 100 years, and their change is accompanied by world wars and social revolutions. This is due to the fact that the ruling elite of the core countries of the old world economic structure prevents changes, does not take into account the emergence of more effective management systems, tries to block the development of new world leaders using them, and tries to maintain its hegemony and monopoly position by any means, including military and revolutionary ones.

    Say, 100 years ago, the British Empire was trying to maintain its hegemony in the world. When it was already losing economically to the combined resources of the Russian Empire and Germany, the First World War provoked by British intelligence was unleashed, during which all three European empires self-destructed. I am talking about the collapse of tsarist Russia, the German and Austro-Hungarian empires, but this also includes the fourth-Ottoman Porto. As for Britain, it held global dominance for a while and even became the largest empire on the planet. But due to the inexorable laws of socio-economic development, the colonial world economic system, based in fact on slave labor, could no longer provide economic growth. Introduced two completely new political models of Soviet and American — has demonstrated a much greater production efficiency, because they were organized on different principles: not for private family capitalism, and the power of large transnational corporations with centralized structures of economic regulation and limitless monetary emission using Fiat currency (paper or electronic means — approx. ed.). They enabled mass production of products much more efficiently than the control systems of the colonial empires of the nineteenth century.

    The emergence of social states in the USSR and the United States with centralized management systems made it possible to make a sharp leap in their economic development; In Europe, the corporate governance system was formed, unfortunately, according to the Nazi model in Germany, and also not without the help of British intelligence. Hitler, backed by British intelligence agencies and American capital, quickly deployed a centralized corporate governance system in Germany, which allowed the Third Reich to quickly take over all of Europe. With God’s help, we defeated this German (or rather, European — taking into account today’s realities) fascism. After that, two models remained in the world, which I refer to as the imperial world economic order: the Soviet and the Western (with the center in the United States). After the collapse of the Soviet Union, which failed to withstand global competition due to the fact that the directive management system was not flexible enough to meet the needs of technological progress, the United States for a while seized global dominance.

    — But now this period of “American unipolar loneliness” is already passing, and probably not only thanks to Russia, but first of all to China and the Asian regions as such. Isn’t that right?

    — Indeed, the hierarchical vertical structures characteristic of the imperial world economic system turned out to be too rigid to ensure continuous innovation processes and lost their comparative effectiveness in ensuring the growth of the world economy. On its periphery, a new world economic order has been formed, based on flexible management models, a network organization of production, where the state works as an integrator, combining the interests of various social groups around achieving one goal — raising public welfare. The most impressive example of such an integrated world economy today is China, which has been three times faster than the growth rate of the American economy for more than 30 years. At the moment, China already surpasses the United States in terms of output, exports of high-tech goods, and growth rates.

    Another example of the model of the new world economic order, which we called integral (due to the fact that the state in it unites all social groups that differ in their interests), is India. It has a different political system, but it also has the primacy of public interests over private interests, and the State seeks to maximize growth rates in order to combat poverty. In this sense, the new world economic order is ideologically socialist. At the same time, it uses market mechanisms of competition, which makes it possible to ensure the highest concentration of resources for the technological revolution in order to ensure economic leaps based on a new advanced technological order. If we look at the growth rate since 1995, the Chinese economy has grown 10-fold, while the American economy has grown only 15 percent. Thus, it is already obvious to everyone that the pace of global economic development is currently shifting to Asia: China, India and Indochina countries already produce more products than the United States and the European Union. If we add Japan or Korea, where the management system is similar in its principles of integrating society around the goal of improving public welfare, we can say that today this new world economic order already dominates the world, and the center of reproduction of the world economy has moved to Southeast Asia. Of course, the American ruling elite cannot agree with this.

    “Put up with it, I’d say…

    – yes. They, like the British Empire once did, seek to maintain their hegemony in the world. The events taking place today are a manifestation of how the financial and power oligarchic elite of the United States is trying to maintain world domination. It can be said that for the past 15 years, it has been waging a global hybrid war, seeking to chaotize countries beyond its control and restrain the development of the PRC. But due to the already archaic management system, they cannot do this. The financial crisis of 2008 was such a transitional moment when the life cycle of the outgoing technological order actually ended and the process of mass redistribution of capital to a new technological order began, the core of which is a complex of nanobioengineering and information communication technologies. All countries started pumping money into their economies. The simplest thing a modern state can do is to give all businesses access to cheap long-term money so that they can adopt new technologies. But if in America and Europe such funds were spent mainly in financial bubbles and provided budget deficits, then in China this huge monetary issue was completely directed to the growth of production and the development of new technologies. There were no financial bubbles, while the ultra-high monetization of the Chinese economy did not lead to inflation, the growth of the money supply was accompanied by an increase in the output of goods, the introduction of new advanced technologies and an increase in public welfare.

    Today, economic competition has already led to the fact that the United States has lost its leadership. If you remember, Donald Trump tried to contain China’s development through a trade war, but nothing came of it.
    “The Americans opened a biological war front by launching the coronavirus in China”

    — Why not?” Did Trump, who is used to taking risks and going all-in, not have enough determination?

    — And even Trump couldn’t do it, because China has a more efficient management system, which allows us to concentrate the available production resources as fully as possible. At the same time, effective money management keeps the money issue in the contour of expanded reproduction of the real sector of the economy, focusing on financing development investments. China has reached the highest savings rate of any country: about 45 percent of GDP is invested, compared to 20 percent in the United States or Russia. This, in fact, ensures the ultra-high growth rate of the Chinese economy.

    In general, the United States was doomed to defeat in this trade war, because the Middle Kingdom can produce products more efficiently and finance development cheaper. The entire banking system in China is state — owned, it operates as a single development institution, directing cash flows to expand output and develop new technologies. In the United States, the money supply is used to finance the budget deficit and is reallocated to financial bubbles. As a result, the efficiency of the US financial and economic system is 20 percent-there only one in five dollars reaches the real sector, and in China almost 90 percent (that is, almost all the yuan created by the Central Bank of the PRC) feed the contours of expanding production and ensure ultra — high economic growth.

    Trump’s attempts to limit China’s development through trade war methods have failed. At the same time, they boomeranged on the United States itself. Then the Americans opened a biological war front, launching the coronavirus into China, hoping that the Chinese leadership would not cope with this epidemic and chaos would arise in China. However, the epidemic has shown poor health care effectiveness and has created chaos in the United States itself. The Chinese management system has also shown much greater efficiency here. In China, the death rate is significantly lower, and they coped with the pandemic much faster. Already in 2020, they even reached economic growth of 2 percent, while in the United States there was a decline of 10 percent of GDP (analysts noted the largest drop since World War II–ed. ). Now the Chinese have regained growth rates of about 7 percent per year, and there is no doubt that China will continue to develop confidently, expanding the production of a new technological mode.

    In parallel with the trade war against China, the US special services were preparing a war against Russia, since the Anglo-Saxon geopolitical tradition considers our country to be the main obstacle to the establishment of world domination by the power and financial elite of the United States and Great Britain. I must say that the war against the Russian Federation unfolded immediately after the annexation of Crimea and after the American special services organized a coup in Ukraine. They can be said to have tricked Russia into agreeing to the American occupation of Ukraine, considering it as a temporary phenomenon. However, the Americans took root in the Square, created not only strong points, raising Nazis under their wing, but also trained the Nazi armed forces, gave the Nazis the opportunity to get a military education, trained them in their academies, and “flashed” all the Armed Forces of Ukraine with them. And for 8 years, they prepared the Armed Forces of Ukraine to fight the only enemy-Russia. While the mass media, which is also completely controlled by the Americans in Ukraine, formed an image of the enemy in the public consciousness.

    In addition, the United States used the currency and financial front of a hybrid war against the Russian Federation. Already in 2014, they imposed the first financial sanctions and knocked out a significant part of Western loans from the Russian economy. Now we are seeing the next phase, when they have effectively disconnected Russia from the global monetary and financial system, where they dominate. However, all this was predicted by me 10 years ago, based on the theory of changing world economic patterns and the specific logic of the US ruling elite, focused on world domination. Anglo-Saxon geopolitics is traditionally oriented against the Russian Empire and its successors, the USSR and the Russian Federation, because, since the time of the British Empire, Russia has been seen as the main opponent of the Anlo-Saxons. All the so-called geopolitical science that was written in London was reduced, in fact, to a set of recommendations on how to destroy Russia as the dominant force in Eurasia. I mean all sorts of speculative constructions like “countries of the sea against countries of the land” and so on.

    — Why did Russia interfere with the “countries of the sea” so much? After all, geographically we have never bordered on the UK.

    — In this regard, a formula was invented: whoever controls Eurasia controls the whole world. Actually, applied development has already gone further. Zbigniew Brzezinski’s famous theorem says that in order to defeat Russia as a superpower, you need to tear Ukraine away from it. All this political dogma, which, it would seem, has long gone down in history, is nevertheless reproduced today in the thinking of the American political elite. I must say that there are still courses in 19th-century geopolitics at Harvard and Yale University, sharpening the brains of future American politicians against Russia. So they, in fact, jumped on this old and time-tested Russophobic stream, which has always been characteristic of Anglo-Saxon geopolitics. And, considering Russia as the main opponent of its domination in the world, they used Ukraine as an outpost, or rather, as a tool for undermining Russia, weakening it, and in the future for destroying it as a sovereign state, in accordance with Brzezinski’s proposal.

    So, what is happening today was easily predicted, based on a combination of long-term patterns of economic development, which actually condemned the world to a hybrid war, and the traditional Russophobia of the Anglo-Saxon political elite. After the weakening of the PRC did not turn out head-on through a trade war, the Americans transferred the main blow of their military and political power to Russia, which they see as a weak link in the global geopolitics and economy. In addition, the Anglo-Saxons seek to establish dominance over Russia in order to implement their eternal Russophobic ideas to destroy our country, and at the same time to weaken China, because the strategic alliance of the Russian Federation and the PRC is too tough for the United States. They have neither the economic nor military power to destroy us together, not separately, so the US initially sought to put us at odds with China. They didn’t succeed. But they, taking advantage of our, I would say, complacency, seized control of Ukraine, and today they are using our fraternal republic as a weapon of war to destroy Russia, and then-to seize control of our resources in order, I repeat, to strengthen their position and weaken the position of China. In general, all this is obvious, as twice two makes four.
    “The Americans will not be able to win, just as the British did not succeed in their time”

    — It’s probably obvious, but not for everyone. There are many opponents of an alliance with China among the Russian elite. At least before the special operation in Ukraine, it seemed to these people that American and Western culture were clearer and closer to us than Chinese hieroglyphic wisdom, and that we would always find a common language with our “Western partners”.

    — You know, back in 2015 I wrote the book ” The Last World War. The United States starts and loses, ” which you mentioned at the beginning of the conversation — everything was thought out and justified there. The United States launched a global hybrid war-starting with the Orange revolutions – to disrupt those regions of the world that it did not control — in order to strengthen its position and weaken the position of its geopolitical competitors. After the famous Munich speech of President Putin (February 2007–ed. they realized that they had lost control of Yeltsin’s Russia, and they were seriously concerned. In 2008, the financial crisis broke out and it became clear that the transition to a new technological order was beginning, and the old world economic order and the old management system no longer provide for progressive economic development. China takes the lead. Well, then the logic of the world war unfolds, only not in the forms that existed 100 years ago, but on three conditional fronts — monetary and financial (where the United States still dominates the world), trade and economic (where they have already lost the primacy to China) and information and cognitive (where the Americans also have superior technologies). They are using all three fronts to try to hold the initiative and maintain the hegemony of their corporations.

    And finally, the fourth front — the biological one, which opened with the appearance of the coronavirus from the US-China laboratory in Wuhan. Today we see that a whole network of biological laboratories existed in Ukraine. So the United States has long been preparing to open a biological front for world War II.

    The fifth, and most obvious, front is, in fact, the front of military operations-as the last tool for forcing the states they control to obey them implicitly. Today, the situation on this front is also getting worse. In other words, active operations are underway on all five fronts of the global hybrid war and it is possible to predict the result. The Americans will not be able to win, just as the British did not succeed in their time. Although Britain formally won the Second World War, they lost politically and economically. The British lost their entire empire, more than 90 percent of their territory, and 95 percent of their population. Two years after the Second World War, where they were the victors, their empire collapsed like a house of cards, because the other two winners — the USSR and the United States — did not need this empire and considered it an anachronism. Similarly, the world will not need American multinational corporations, the US dollar, US currency and financial technologies and financial pyramids. All this will soon be a thing of the past. Southeast Asia will become an obvious leader in global economic development, and a new world economic order will be formed before our eyes.

    — To paraphrase Remarque, we can say that changes have finally come to the western front. But what signs do you see of this powerful global system’s imminent demise?

    — After the Americans first seized the Venezuelan foreign exchange reserves and handed them over to the opposition, then-the Afghan foreign exchange reserves, before that — the Iranian ones, and now — the Russian ones, it became absolutely clear that the dollar ceased to be the world currency. Following the Americans, this stupidity was also committed by Europeans — the euro and the pound ceased to be world currencies. Therefore, the old monetary and financial system is living out its last days. After the US dollars that no one needs are sent back to America from Asian countries, the collapse of the global monetary and financial system based on dollars and euros is inevitable. Leading countries are switching to national currencies, and the euro and dollar are no longer foreign exchange reserves.

    — How do you see the world after the disappearance of the dollar monopoly?

    — We are currently working on a draft international agreement on the introduction of a new world settlement currency, pegged to the national currencies of the participating countries and to exchange-traded goods that determine real values. We won’t need American and European banks. A new payment system based on modern digital technologies with a blockchain is developing in the world, where banks are losing their importance. Classical capitalism based on private banks is a thing of the past. International law is being restored. All key international relations, including the issue of world currency circulation, are beginning to be formed on the basis of contracts. At the same time, the importance of national sovereignty is being restored, because sovereign countries are coming to an agreement. Global economic cooperation is based on joint investments aimed at improving the well-being of peoples. Trade liberalization ceases to be a priority, national priorities are respected, and each state builds a system for protecting the internal market and its economic space that it considers necessary. In other words, the era of liberal globalization is over. Before our eyes, a new world economic order is being formed — an integral one, in which some states and private banks lose their private monopoly on the issue of money, on the use of military force, and so on.
    “The third scenario is catastrophic. Destruction of humanity”

    — And why did you name your book “The Last World War?” What makes you hope that this global war is really the last?

    — I called this world war the last, because we see that there are several scenarios of movement out of today’s crisis. The first scenario, which I have already described, is a calm and prosperous one. It consists in overcoming the US monopoly. In order to do this in the financial sector, you need to abandon the dollar. In order to overcome the monopoly in the information and cognitive sphere, we need to isolate our information space from the American one and switch to our own information technologies. Creating their own contours of economic reproduction, but without the US dollar and euro, and relying on their information technologies for managing money, the countries of the new world economic order ensure high rates of economic development, while the Western world collapses. There is a situation of collapsing financial pyramids, disorganization and a growing economic crisis, aggravated by rising inflation due to uncontrolled money issuance over the past 12 years.

    The second scenario of possible development of events is similar to the one that Hitler wanted to implement during the change of previous world economic structures. This is an attempt to create a world government with a superhuman ideology. If Hitler thought of the German nation as superhumans, then the current ideologists of world domination impose a transition to a post-humanoid state on humanity. In contrast to the posthumanism of the West, the core countries of the new world economic order are characterized by a socialist ideology, albeit with respect for private interests, protection of private property and the use of market mechanisms. In China, India, Japan, and Korea, socialist ideology — or rather, a mixture of socialist ideology, national interests, and market competition-dominates. It is this mixture that forms a fundamentally new power and political elite, focused on economic development and the growth of the welfare of nations.

    Western politicians, intellectuals, and businessmen have a different approach. What we are seeing today is an attempt to create a certain image of a new world order with a world government at the head, where people are driven into an electronic concentration camp. You can see from the example of restrictions during the pandemic, how it happened: all people are given tags, access to public goods is regulated by QR codes, and everyone is forced to walk in formation. By the way, in the Rockefeller Foundation scenario back in 2009, the pandemic and, in fact, everything that happened in connection with it was laid out in a stunning way — they actually predicted the future. This scenario was called Lock Step, that is, “Walk in formation”, and the Western world followed it. By sacrificing their own democratic values, people are being forced to obey commands. International organizations, including the World Health Organization, are used as a kind of base for assembling a world government that would be subordinate to private capital.

    But, I must say, Donald Trump strongly hindered these plans, because he stopped the signing of the transatlantic and trans-Pacific partnership agreements, where all countries participating in the treaties sacrificed national sovereignty in all disputes with big business. And you need to understand that today any multinational corporation can act as a foreign investor, including in the United States. According to these agreements, if foreign capital is present in a business, then in a dispute with the national government, an international arbitration court is formed, it is not clear how and by whom it was drawn up. And these unelected judges, appointed, in fact, by large international businesses, resolve these disputes. In fact, the point was that the state was losing all sovereignty in regulating relations with big business. However, Trump stopped the agreement — the United States did not sign it. Thus, the process of forming a world government was stopped. This is the second alternative, and it is currently experiencing a crisis due to the collapse of the idea of globalization and the gradual abandonment of “pandemic” restrictions.

    We must understand that the world government option is incompatible with a sovereign Russia, with our independence and role in the world. In the globalist scenario, the Russian Federation is considered as a territory that is intended for exploitation by Western multinational corporations. At the same time, the” indigenous population ” should serve their interests. Under this scenario, Russia disappears as an independent entity, as does China. The Western world government may incorporate some of our oligarchs into its own version of the future, but only on the second and third roles.

    The third scenario is catastrophic. The destruction of humanity…

    — The apocalypse everyone’s talking about?”

    — Well, not all of them… But everyone is definitely afraid. By the way, about American biolabs that synthesize dangerous viruses, it was said in another book of mine, published a little later: “The Plague of the XXI century: how to avoid disaster and overcome the crisis?”.

    I remember that back in 1996, when I had to work in the UN Security Council, I proposed to develop a national biosecurity concept. Because even then, almost 30 years ago, genetics was a sufficiently advanced science to synthesize viruses directed against people of a certain race or a certain gender, a certain age. This has long been possible. You can create a virus that will work only against whites or, conversely, only against blacks, only against men or only against women. Now the Americans are going further — you can see that, according to the data of our Ministry of Defense, announced the day before, American biolabs were developing viruses aimed against the Slavs. Apparently, it is now possible to make a virus against some ethnic group that has its own genetic code.

    What is happening in Ukraine today is an echo of the agony of the US ruling elite, which cannot accept that it will no longer be a world leader. This is becoming clear to everyone — at least to those who are not connected with Americans by their interests and are not subject to their cognitive influence.

    Here is an example. When the United States imposed anti-Russian sanctions in 2014, I asked my Chinese colleagues: “Do you think the Americans can impose sanctions on China?” They were sure not. It was said that this was impossible, because the United States depends on China as much as China depends on the United States. That is, it will be more expensive for America. Two years later, Trump launched a trade war against China. And Beijing now understands that America is an enemy that will sink the Chinese economic miracle in any way possible. Before that, my Chinese colleagues were not very convinced by my arguments, just as my book mentioned by you did not greatly influence our political and economic elite. My arguments were dismissed. Although we have said for many, many years that the dollar should be abandoned. Foreign exchange reserves should have been removed from dollar-denominated instruments, from euro-denominated instruments to gold, they should have switched to their own currency and financial system, and developed their own settlements in national currencies with partners. We have been proposing all this since the noughties, when it was already clear what the global economic development was leading to. And only now, finally, everyone has seen the light.
    “The Americans brainwashed the Ukrainians and turned 150-200 thousand people into a fighting machine that works without thinking”

    — Judging by the heart-rending howl that comes from the camp of liberals, as well as the events in Ukraine, not everyone has seen the light yet.

    — Yes, we are faced with the fact that the Americans have managed to fool the Ukrainian people so much in 8 years that the people who resist the Russian army, the so-called Armed Forces of Ukraine, look simply zombified. They are controlled like puppets. Not Zelensky commands the Ukrainian army, not even the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and the General Staff, but the Pentagon. He commands very effectively from the point of view of fighting “to the last Ukrainian soldier”, because these zombie guys do not give up. But they are in an absolutely hopeless situation. All experts have already recognized that Russia won the military special operation, that Ukraine has no chance of resistance, that the entire military infrastructure has been destroyed… the APU can only surrender in order to minimize human losses. However, Ukrainian officers (and especially, of course, nationalists) act like externally controlled zombies-they follow instructions from the Pentagon, which are received on their personal computers and special tablets.

    Moreover, the Americans command their puppets from the APU, breaking them into the appropriate units. Each unit is assigned a number, and each number is assigned tasks by artificial military intelligence every day. They really turned 150-200 thousand people into a fighting machine that works without thinking, only stupidly follows all their orders. For 8 years, they have managed to force a significant part of the youth of Ukraine not just to join the ranks against Russia, but by brainwashing them into their own weak-willed tools. Not just cannon fodder, but controlled cannon fodder.

    Being in an absolutely hopeless situation, surrounded, deprived of any supplies at all, they still continue a senseless war, condemning themselves to death, and dragging the surrounding civilians with them to the grave. This is a good example of how American modern technologies work. We must understand that we are facing a very powerful force. You know, we have previously heard from Russian experts and politicians that the Ukrainians themselves will suffocate economically and then crawl to us and in general where Ukraine will go without us. After all, it will not be able to ensure the reproduction of the economy without our resources and cooperation with us. Indeed, Ukraine has entered a state of economic catastrophe, as we expected, as we explained to our Ukrainian colleagues. The Ukrainian Republic has become the poorest state in Europe, along with Moldova. Due to the fact that Ukraine has severed ties with Russia, its losses amount to more than $ 100 billion. Nevertheless, this did not prevent American and British political strategists and instructors from forming a 200-thousandth army of thugs and murderers who completely inadequately represent reality and are an obedient tool of American interests.

    — Aren’t there equally obedient American puppets in Russia? Was it only Ukrainians who were zombified?

    — Yes, and here it should be noted that almost the same thing is happening with the Central Bank, but only on other issues.

    — Before we move on to the Central Bank, let me clarify. You said that you are working on introducing a new currency. And in what format and with what team?

    — We have been doing this for quite a long time, as a group of scientists. 10 years ago, at the Astana Economic Forum, we presented the report “Towards Sustainable Growth through a Fair world economic order” with a draft transition to a new global financial and monetary system, where we proposed to reform the IMF system based on the so — called special drawing rights, and on the basis of the modified IMF system-to create a world settlement currency. This idea, by the way, aroused great interest at that time: our project was recognized as the best international economic project. But in a practical sense, none of the states represented by the official monetary authorities were interested in this project, although the publications of Nursultan Nazarbayev, who proposed a new currency, followed. I think he offered altyn.

    – Altyn? It is interesting.

    — Yes, his article on this topic was published even in Izvestia. But negotiations and political decisions were not reached, and to this day it is more of an expert proposal. But I am sure that the current situation forces us to create new payment and settlement instruments very quickly, because the dollar will be practically impossible to use, and the ruble cannot find stability due to the incompetent policy of the Central Bank, which, in fact, acts in the interests of international speculators.

    Objectively, the ruble could become a reserve currency along with the yuan and the rupee. It would be possible to switch to a multi-currency system based on national currencies. But you still need some equivalent for pricing… We are currently working on the concept of the exchange space of the Eurasian Economic Union, where one of the tasks is to form new pricing criteria. That is, if we want metal prices to be formed not in London, but in Russia, just like oil prices, then this implies the emergence of some other currency, especially if we want to act not only within the Eurasian Economic Union, but in Eurasia in a broad sense, in the center of a new world economic order, to which I refer China, India, Indochina, Japan, Korea and Iran. These are big countries that all have their own strong national interests. After the current history of confiscation of dollar reserves, I don’t think any country will want to use another country’s currency as a reserve currency. So we need some new tool. And such a tool, from my point of view, can first become a certain synthetic settlement currency, which would be built as such an aggregated index.

    – Can I get some examples? What is it?

    — Well, let’s say the ecu-there was such an experience in the European Union. It was built as a basket of currencies. All countries that participate in the creation of a new settlement currency must be granted the right to have their national currency in this basket. And the common currency is formed as an index, as a weighted average component of these national currencies. Well, to this we must add, from my point of view, exchange-traded commodities: not only gold, but also oil, metal, grain, and water. A sort of commodity bundle, which, according to our estimates, should include about 20 products. They, in fact, form global price proportions and therefore must participate in the basket to form a new settlement currency. And we need an international treaty that will define the rules for the circulation of this currency and create an organization like the International Monetary fund. By the way, we proposed reforming the IMF 15 years ago, but now it is already obvious that the new monetary financial system will have to be built without the West. Perhaps one day Europe will join it and the United States will also be forced to recognize it. But it is still clear that we will have to build without them, for example, on the basis of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. However, these are just expert developments that we will submit to the official bodies for consideration in the coming month.

    — And at the level of the government or at the level of the president?

    — We will first send it to the departments that are responsible for these issues. We will hold discussions, develop some common understanding, and then reach the political level.
    “The central Bank continues its policy of pandering to the enemy”

    — In your telegram channel, you write that all that remains is to nationalize the Bank of Russia. Why hasn’t it been completed yet? Here, for example, there is a point of view that Elvira Nabiullina remains in her post as a screen, but she will no longer manage anything serious. Can you refute or confirm this?

    — You know, I don’t want to do conspiracy theory.

    “Is this a conspiracy theory?”

    — Yes, we can talk about the American deep state in conspiracy terms. In this case, conspiracy theory is a very appropriate line of thought, because in America, behind the screen of presidents and congressmen, there are some deep forces — special services. But in our Country, everything is simple. We have a president, a head of state, who has built a vertical of power. We absolutely understand how the parliament and the judicial system are formed. Here, in general, no conspiracy theory can be applied. The same goes for the Central Bank. Let me remind you that, according to the law on the Central Bank, all its property is federal property. Therefore, the Central Bank is a state structure, there is no doubt about it.

    — And they always said that he was separated, as if on the sidelines.

    — The Board of Directors of the Central Bank is appointed by the State Duma on the recommendation of the President. I have worked for many years as its representative in the National Banking Council, which oversees the activities of the Central Bank. I can say that there is no doubt that the Central Bank is the state body regulating monetary circulation, and it is also the main financial regulator in the country.

    But there are nuances. The Constitution stipulates that the Central Bank conducts its policy independently, that is, it is independent of the government. But this does not mean that it is independent of the state. This is a government agency. Our judicial system is also officially independent of the government. Therefore, being an independent body, the Central Bank is nevertheless formed as a state regulatory body and must fulfill the tasks that are necessary for the development of our economy. To do this, it is necessary to involve the Central Bank in strategic planning. The classic theory of monetary circulation stipulates that the main goal of the monetary authorities, i.e. the Central Bank, should be to create conditions for maximizing investment. This is exactly what the banking system should do — maximize investment. Because the more investment, the more production, the higher the technical level, the lower the costs and lower the inflation, the more stable the economy. Macroeconomic stabilization in the modern economy can be achieved only on the basis of accelerated scientific and technological progress. Attempts to target inflation (such a buzzword), which the Central Bank has been practically imitating for the past 10 years, by manipulating the key interest rate against the background of the freely floating ruble exchange rate, are short — sighted, primitive and counterproductive. These measures are usually recommended by the IMF for underdeveloped countries that do not know how to think themselves.

    What is inflation targeting in practice? This is an extremely primitive and internally contradictory set of measures, the application of which drives the economy into a stagflationary trap. The Central Bank threw the ruble into free floating, which is absurd from the point of view of targeting inflation in an open economy, where the exchange rate directly affects prices. And we see how the devaluation of the ruble periodically accelerates prices. In addition, they have reduced monetary policy to only one absolutely primitive tool — manipulation of the key interest rate. But the key rate is the percentage at which the Central Bank issues money to the economy and withdraws money from the economy. Its attempts to suppress inflation by raising the interest rate cannot succeed in the modern economy, because the higher the interest rate, the less credit, the less investment, the lower the technical level and competitiveness. A decline in the latter leads to a devaluation of the ruble in 3-4 years, after they raise the interest rate ostensibly to fight inflation. By letting the ruble exchange rate float freely, they essentially left it at the mercy of currency speculators.

    Americans really like this policy, so they strongly praise the leadership of our Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance. After all, what is important to them? So that everything is pegged to the dollar, so that the ruble is a “junk” currency that is unstable. And this is a paradox, because the number of foreign exchange reserves of the Russian Federation has recently been 3 times more than the money supply in rubles! This means that the Central Bank could stabilize the exchange rate at any level. But he didn’t.

    And who are the speculators to whom the Central Bank actually threw the ruble to the mercy? The main speculators are American hedge funds, which actually form the ruble exchange rate by manipulating the market. And the Central Bank does not notice this, or rather, it does not seem to notice. To keep them in the foreign exchange market by raising the interest rate, the Central Bank kills credit and makes our economy dependent on foreign sources of credit, and the foreign exchange financial system-dependent on the interests of speculators. It is in whose interests the Central Bank is working, hiding behind buzzwords like “inflation targeting”, which has shamefully failed in recent years in terms of real price dynamics. So we have the weakest point of the entire national security system in general — this is the Central Bank. His leadership is overwhelmed by the enemy’s cognitive weapons, in other words, zombified by them. In fact, our monetary authorities are doing what the enemy needs.

    By the way, I proved mathematically and chronologically that the first wave of sanctions was imposed against Russia only after the Central Bank prepared the ground for this, namely, it let the ruble exchange rate float freely and announced that it would raise the interest rate if inflation started in the country. As soon as the Central Bank adopted this strange policy, the Americans immediately imposed sanctions. Their speculators ensured the collapse of the ruble exchange rate, which caused an inflationary wave, and the Central Bank, on the instructions of the IMF, raised the interest rate, which completely paralyzed our economy. The total damage caused by this policy has already reached 50 trillion rubles of unproduced products and approximately 20 trillion rubles of undeveloped investments. Now we need to add to this the $ 300 billion invested in foreign assets that are currently frozen — that’s the damage.

    Therefore, when we talk about nationalizing the Central Bank, we are not talking about formally nationalizing it (it is already nationalized), but about bringing it into a policy that is consistent with national interests. Now his policy is contrary to the national interests. And there is no conspiracy theory here. We can see in whose interests such a policy is being implemented. The central bank raised the interest rate to 20 percent, giving bankers a dominant position in the economy. Having the most expensive and scarce resource, money, they determine which enterprise will survive, and which enterprise will die, go bankrupt, and so on. Rising interest rates make the entire Russian economy a hostage to a handful of bankers. This is the first one. Second, the Central Bank’s management allowed another collapse of the ruble exchange rate and closed the currency exchange. As a result, today banks have become the main currency speculators: they buy foreign currency for about 90 rubles per dollar, and sell it for 125 rubles. The difference settles for them as a super-profit.

    — But why does the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, in your opinion, pursue a policy in the interests of the enemy?

    — As I said, he does this on the recommendation of the International Monetary Fund. But his interests are also shared by our large banks, which objectively like this policy, as well as our currency and financial structures, which are also involved in manipulating the ruble exchange rate. Therefore, an influential lobby is formed around this policy, which supports this policy based on its private interests. These interests run counter to the interests of the country, they are directly opposite to them. And if you look at what the Central Bank is doing today, I have no doubt that it is continuing its policy of pandering to the enemy. It undermines macroeconomic stability by allowing international speculators to manipulate the ruble exchange rate and does not control the currency position of banks that have become currency speculators, although the Central Bank could easily withdraw banks from the foreign exchange market by fixing their currency position, prohibiting banks from buying currency. And secondly, by raising the interest rate, the Central Bank actually killed investments in the development of the Russian economy, which are very much needed right now, primarily for import substitution and for restoring economic sovereignty, while our leadership says that we should not be afraid of sanctions, because they create conditions for economic growth, for import substitution…

    Look, about a third of the EU’s imports have left our market. These are huge opportunities for import substitution. If we assume that our enterprises will start developing these markets, then we will develop at a rate of 15 percent per year. But this requires loans. Import substitution cannot occur without credits. We need loans to set up production facilities, develop new technologies, and load idle production facilities. We have long developed such a strategy of advanced development at the Academy of Sciences, and we are promoting it. But, unfortunately, the Central Bank’s crazy policy, from our point of view, has quite specific influential structures that like it and they support it. That is why this policy is so stable.
    “You can stabilize the ruble in three days”

    – Sergey Yuryevich, if this is not a conspiracy theory, then why does the Central Bank continue to pursue such a policy? Only based on the interests of lobbyists?

    – To whom the war, and to whom the mother is native. Commercial banks make a 40% profit on currency speculation. Bought for 90 rubles per dollar-sold for 125. 35 rubles — nothing easy! As a result, we are experiencing inflation, imports are becoming more expensive, and everyone sees this crazy exchange rate. Prices for all goods are rising, but banks are making super-profits.

    Once again, a very influential lobby has formed around this policy, and for many people to admit the failure of such a strategy means, in fact, admitting their incompetence and even sabotage. And speculators with large banks are quite influential structures in our country that influence decision-making.

    — Well, what if the first person does not get this information, it is blocked?

    — When I was an adviser, I brought this information to you.

    — Did they listen to you?

    — Yes, there were discussions, discussed at the economic council, then it was closed so as not to annoy the officials. I don’t want to comment on it now. We see today that if we do not change monetary policy, it will be impossible for us to survive in this hybrid war. We need to counter economic sanctions now with a serious increase in domestic production. There are production facilities for this, people, raw materials, brains — too, but there is no money. Right now, the simplest thing that the state can give people is money.

    — What’s your feeling?” Is there any understanding at the top?

    — I think that you need to address this question directly to them.

    — But many people call you almost the No. 1 person in the current situation — a public figure who can save Russia.

    – Thank you for this review. I try my best.

    — I just want to understand: if there was no prophet in our Homeland before, is there one now? Is this a temporary situation with the Central Bank?

    — It is so prolonged, I would say, for 30 years. If we carried out a competent monetary policy in accordance with the requirements of the new world economic order, the integrated system, we would develop like China — by 10 percent a year. There were such opportunities. And we have been practically marking time for these 30 years. So it’s not even a question of whether they are listening or not, you just need to look objectively and see how China and India are developing and how we are developing. What prevented us from developing in the same way?

    Moreover, the management system of the new world economic order, which I describe in my books, is universal. It worked successfully in Japan until the Americans disrupted Japanese economic growth. And even in Ethiopia, where they also began to form this management model (and achieved growth several times). In other words, this universal management model of the modern economy, focused on the growth of public welfare through investment in a new technological order, needs to be implemented. At the same time, of course, the targeted use of money implies high responsibility. Throwing money from a helicopter is not our thing.

    “Not our way.

    — We are talking about a targeted credit issue based on modern digital tools with a strict control system focused on investment in new technologies. We know how to do this, how to minimize the human factor by introducing digital technologies, including the digital ruble. But this is not profitable for those who still adhere to the previous strategies. They made a cash cow out of Russia, and they sucked $ 100 billion out of it to offshore companies. But now the Americans have closed offshorization for us. There is a real chance, we must use it.

    — What would you advise people to do? Now the main query in Internet search engines is where to invest money in the era of turbulence. What should people do?

    — First of all, do not make any sudden movements, I would say so. In any case, what exactly is not necessary — to run for dollars or euros. Because we don’t know what will happen to these currencies next. If our system is disconnected from the western one, then our banks cannot effectively invest dollars and euros anywhere, except in currency speculation. But I hope that our authorities will still curb the foreign exchange market.

    In this context, what the banks did, raising the interest rate on foreign currency deposits sharply, turned out to be a clear overkill, which spurred panic. I think the ruble will stabilize if, of course, speculators are removed from the foreign exchange market and the currency is sold only to importers and people who transfer money abroad within reasonable limits to relatives or are going on a business trip according to the regulations. Otherwise, block the channels of currency leakage. Then the currency inflow will return to normal.

    You know, we have a very positive trade balance. Mandatory sale of 80% of foreign currency earnings has been introduced. If you sell this revenue on the stock exchange, the volume of currency will be more than importers need. We will have a surplus of currency. This means that the ruble exchange rate will strengthen, that is, it will return to the old indicators-80 or even 70 rubles per dollar. But until the Central Bank removes speculators from the market and allows commercial banks to become such, the ruble exchange rate will not stabilize. So, unfortunately, the monetary authorities have not yet come to their senses and have not begun to implement the correct policy of macroeconomic stabilization, and I can’t give any advice other than how to invest in gold if possible (especially since the government has removed VAT from gold). There are no other real assets and safe havens.

    “So you want to buy gold?”

    – Buy basic necessities. Or invest in real estate, in something reliable. As for investing in dollars and euros… They have already ceased to be a currency for us. This is no longer a currency, but some obligations of other countries that may or may not be fulfilled. So we need to look for other opportunities. But I would like to emphasize once again that with the right policy, we can very quickly stabilize the ruble and even restore its purchasing power.

    — And in what perspective, after all?

    — It can be done tomorrow, you know? The Primakov and Gerashchenko governments did it in one week.

    — Can the government do that?”

    “Of course it can. To do this, in general, you need to make two decisions: fix the currency position of commercial banks and introduce currency sale standards for non-trading operations, and keep the freely convertible foreign exchange market only for trading operations. That’s all. You can write this in 15 minutes and announce it within a day, or enter it within three days, and the ruble will stabilize.

    http://thesaker.is/events-like-this-happen-once-a-century-sergey-glazyev-on-the-breakdown-of-epochs-and-changing-ways-of-life/

    GarryB, dino00, GunshipDemocracy and lancelot like this post

    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 1110
    Points : 1110
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  lancelot Wed Mar 30, 2022 12:40 am

    So he basically proposes a non-convertible ruble. Similar to the Chinese yuan.
    You have one currency for foreign exchange and another for internal circulation. Yes, this makes sense I think.
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible


    Posts : 7403
    Points : 7377
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  miketheterrible Wed Mar 30, 2022 12:42 am

    lancelot wrote:So he basically proposes a non-convertible ruble. Similar to the Chinese yuan.
    You have one currency for foreign exchange and another for internal circulation. Yes, this makes sense I think.

    Worked for North Korea and Cuba.
    lancelot
    lancelot


    Posts : 1110
    Points : 1110
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  lancelot Wed Mar 30, 2022 12:48 am

    If foreign trade is restricted as it is right now it makes little sense to have a fully convertible currency in the first place. It means you will be highly susceptible to speculative attacks.

    I disagree with him that the low value of the ruble vs other currencies is necessarily a bad thing though. The lower the rate of the ruble the higher the pull to manufacture things inside Russia. The Yen is in fact worth less than the Ruble. The problem is like he said, how to fund investments to improve the economy. And like he said this can be done like Japan used to do. The government directs policy by instructing banks on how to disperse loans through the industry. The volumes and rates and sectors to invest in. The Russian government basically did this with the low interest loans to agriculture after 2014 and this was highly effective.

    The other possibility is to do what the government is doing i.e. force other countries to buy rubles to get the commodities produced by Russia. That will increase the demand for rubles. But while the value of the ruble as a traded currency will increase a lot of the capital will be stuck in reserves abroad for people who want to get Russian commodities. Similar to how people hold dollars to buy oil. Given how the United States has de-industrialized with such a policy I am not sure that is a good idea either.

    The US also has its stock exchange as a major way of getting those dollars back into the country. But for that you need to have a market with attractive growth rates that is a good investment. And you need to allow the rubles that foreign holders have to be funneled into this Russian stock market.

    Right now the Russian government forbade foreign traders in the Russian stock market and pumped $10 billion USD to stabilize. I think this was a mistake. What I would have done is allow foreign traders to sell, and not buy, and allow Russian traders to do both. This would basically move all the foreign capital back into Russian hands and screw the foreign institutional investors over like they richly deserve. Then I would gradually relax trade.

    GarryB, kvs and miketheterrible like this post

    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible


    Posts : 7403
    Points : 7377
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  miketheterrible Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:17 am

    New website being made all about import substitution in Russia:

    https://делаемвроссии.рф/

    Telegram:

    https://t.me/manufactrussia

    GarryB, dino00, kvs, GunshipDemocracy and LMFS like this post

    avatar
    owais.usmani


    Posts : 1211
    Points : 1209
    Join date : 2019-03-27
    Age : 36

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  owais.usmani Thu Mar 31, 2022 3:10 pm

    GarryB, flamming_python, dino00, Werewolf, magnumcromagnon, kvs, GunshipDemocracy and like this post

    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy


    Posts : 5329
    Points : 5353
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  GunshipDemocracy Fri Apr 01, 2022 2:51 am

    lancelot wrote:If foreign trade is restricted as it is right now it makes little sense to have a fully convertible currency in the first place. It means you will be highly susceptible to speculative attacks.

    speculants use usually term investments. Thus restriction for short term buy/sell perid was actually already in place.


    lancelot wrote:
    I disagree with him that the low value of the ruble vs other currencies is necessarily a bad thing though. The lower the rate of the ruble the higher the pull to manufacture things inside Russia. The Yen is in fact worth less than the Ruble. The problem is like he said, how to fund investments to improve the economy. And like he said this can be done like Japan used to do. The government directs policy by instructing banks on how to disperse loans through the industry. The volumes and rates and sectors to invest in. The Russian government basically did this with the low interest loans to agriculture after 2014 and this was highly effective.

    ++

    lancelot wrote:
    The other possibility is to do what the government is doing i.e. force other countries to buy rubles to get the commodities produced by Russia. That will increase the demand for rubles. But while the value of the ruble as a traded currency will increase a lot of the capital will be stuck in reserves abroad for people who want to get Russian commodities. Similar to how people hold dollars to buy oil. Given how the United States has de-industrialized with such a policy I am not sure that is a good idea either.


    Why capital should be stuck in reserves abroad? earned currencies could be used to pay Russia's sovereign debt. When debt is going to be paid then invest abroad for example. If you mean that rubles will be stuck in foreign banks then simply CBR can start printing additional billions. Which wil be backed by in vast resources (where wit time Food, Uranium and perhaps fresh water will take the first place IMHO), Then with more capital more investments are possible so it works like flywheel for the whole economy.




    Right now the Russian government forbade foreign traders in the Russian stock market and pumped $10 billion USD to stabilize. I think this was a mistake. What I would have done is allow foreign traders to sell, and not buy, and allow Russian traders to do both. This would basically move all the foreign capital back into Russian hands and screw the foreign institutional investors over like they richly deserve. Then I would gradually relax trade.

    IMHO it wasn't mistake. Once you screw them you will pay sooner or later those money x2 or they pronounce Russia's default. IMHO Positive Ruble trends are also caused by the fact that oligarchic scum has nowhere to send earned dollars and exporters have to sell 80% of earnings to rubles.

    kvs likes this post

    teh_beard
    teh_beard


    Posts : 78
    Points : 80
    Join date : 2015-05-04
    Location : St.-Petersburg, Russia

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  teh_beard Fri Apr 01, 2022 11:33 am

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 31061110

    Melitopol forex is setting real market currency trends.
    Multi-currency basket as it is, tied to 1 kilogram of potatoes.

    sepheronx, kvs, zepia, Hole, lyle6, lancelot and bitch_killer like this post

    Kiko
    Kiko


    Posts : 1190
    Points : 1210
    Join date : 2020-11-11
    Age : 73
    Location : Brasilia

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  Kiko Sat Apr 02, 2022 10:16 pm

    Gold-backed ruble could be watershed for global economy: analyst, 02.04.2022.

    Last week (28), the Central Bank of Russia pledged to buy gold from credit institutions at a fixed price of 5.000 rubles (about R$ 272) per gram for the next three months.

    Last week, the Central Bank of Russia established a fixed parity between the ruble and gold to "balance supply and demand in the domestic precious metals market". In this context, the agency undertook to buy gold from credit institutions at a fixed price of 5,000 rubles (about R $ 272) per gram, in the period from March 28 to June 30.

    The move could have huge implications for the Russian national currency, the US dollar and the global economy if Moscow decides to sell its raw materials in rubles only, BullionStar precious metals analyst Ronan Manly told RT.

    With the fixed parity between the ruble and gold, and Moscow's decision to only accept payments for Russian gas supplies in rubles, hydrocarbon is now also pegged to gold through the ruble, so that Russia could start accepting gold directly as payment for its gas exports, which could also be applied to oil or any other raw material, the analyst said.

    "What we are seeing now appears to be the birth of a new multilateral monetary system backed by gold and commodities," Manly says, noting that it would also be" the beginning of the end of that 50-year-old system "of the petrodollar era, which" was only made possible thanks to the continued worldwide use of U.S. dollars " for oil trading.

    "The largest countries in the world with strong raw materials, such as China and oil exporting countries, may now feel that it is time to move to a new and fairer monetary system," he said.

    Since gold is quoted in dollars, the parity between the ruble and gold sets a minimum price for the Russian currency against the US currency, explains the analyst. On the day of the Central Bank's announcement, the ruble was trading at about 100 per dollar, but has since strengthened and is approaching 80 rubles per dollar.

    According to Manly, Moscow's requirement on ruble payments for purchases of Russian gas will act as a "stabilization and support" factor.

    International guarantees

    "If most of the international trading system begins to accept these rubles for commodity payment agreements, this could lead to the Russian Ruble becoming an important world currency," he said.

    Given the freezing of most of Russia's foreign exchange reserves, which "made it clear that property rights to foreign exchange reserves may not be respected," and in the event that Moscow begins accepting payment for gold oil, the world's largest oil and natural gas producers, such as Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, could do the same, the analyst said.

    "If the end of the US dollar is near, all these countries will want their currencies to be beneficiaries of a new multilateral monetary order," he concludes.

    Yandex Translate from Portuguese

    https://br.sputniknews.com/20220402/rublo-lastreado-em-ouro-pode-ser-o-divisor-de-aguas-para-a-economia-global-diz-analista-22097011.html

    GarryB, magnumcromagnon, kvs, LMFS and bitch_killer like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 33223
    Points : 33737
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  GarryB Sun Apr 03, 2022 10:36 am

    Maersk and DHL have proven untrustworthy so Russia needs to find or create for itself alternative service providers, which creates competition for them... I hope they appreciate that.
    avatar
    owais.usmani


    Posts : 1211
    Points : 1209
    Join date : 2019-03-27
    Age : 36

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  owais.usmani Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:30 am

    magnumcromagnon and LMFS like this post

    avatar
    Gazputin


    Posts : 285
    Points : 285
    Join date : 2019-04-07

    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty re Maersk etc shipping

    Post  Gazputin Tue Apr 05, 2022 8:53 am

    I was surprised recently to discover that FESCO is Russian .... founded in 1880

    Far East Shipping Company - a few months ago were stitching up deals with UAE's DP World to have a Vladivostok hub re Arctic route
    seem to specialise in intermodal .... will do ship to train etc .... no problem one transaction
    Rosatom is involved too being given responsibility to develop the arctic

    what does the west not control ?
    Eurasia overland ... and the Arctic ...

    Rosatom don't take prisoners from what I have observed .... this will be entertaining

    GarryB, magnumcromagnon and LMFS like this post


    Sponsored content


    Russian Economy General News: #12 - Page 32 Empty Re: Russian Economy General News: #12

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed May 25, 2022 7:55 am