Su-57 Stealth Fighter: News #7

Backman wrote:

thegopnik wrote:

Because of this I am assuming that only a single order of the Su-57 would be made, but I could be wrong or I am setting my expectations way too high.

Edit: I mistook your post for a new one. Either way.

If you think drones are the future, then do you believe that all Flanker derivative production will stop ? Mig 35 also ?

The su 57 is a true stealth blend wing with a small silhouette and we already know that they built it with unmanned capability in mind. So even if what you are saying becomes true, su 57 will be in more demand. Not less.

Hole wrote:

TMA1 wrote:

Hole wrote:

kvs wrote:

magnumcromagnon wrote:Can we get a discussion going how ridiculous it is that so many countries have "5th generation" fighter programs when they haven't proven that they're capable of designing and building indigenous 4th generation jets?

Japan: Has no indigenous 4th gen fighters but has a 5th gen program. Took the F-16, gave it an additional seat and dubbed it the F-2 and bloated the price out the atmosphere. The F-2 cost's $127 million in FY2009 Dollars, with inflation it costs $160 million in 2021. Imagine paying $160 million for a glorified F-16 lol!    

Turkey: No indigenous 4th gen fighters of their own, has a 5th gen program, but also negotiating trying to buy Su-57's. What's even amusing is that their drones are literally pieced together from parts sourced all over the world, but they think they can create a domestic 5th gen fighter lmao?

India: Their 4th gen fighter is a stillborn abortion that's 30 years late, they turned down the FGFA(Su-57) program and now they're claiming that they can create 5th gen fighters? Fuck outta here! Their media's idiocy rivals the bullshit excreted by US/UK media concerning Russian MIC, but that's expected from those licking Anglo-Suckson nutsack. You go from being independent to wanting to be colonized again.

South Korea: No indigenous 4th gen fighters but has a 5th gen program.

Notice how Western media never once questions their ability to create 5th gen fighters despite never having successful indigenous 4th generation programs, but they lodge infinite amounts of criticism for the Su-57.

It's the me-too club.  

I am sure they will also produce the bestest stealth ever.

At least their jets will be much better then this shitty russian Su-57.

...someone got salty very quickly! looks like a comment you'd see on f-16.net. the irony is that if I made even a milder criticism of f-35 on f-16.net id be banned in point zero five seconds. anyways...

Turkey's project is kinda silly. same with India's. SK seems to be goin an interesting route and is on course to realizing their goal. dont know enough about Japan's project but it will probably be very good and very expensive.

frankly the su-57 is very unique and isn't following the same paths as others. all I can hear are "muh one piece canopy" tier complaints, or "uv maws is so dated" kind of nonsense. the aircraft is front hemisphere oriented, and very aggressive. the EO and radar sensors are top notch. when I hear people bitch about su-57 for shit like "not having diverterless intakes" it makes my eyes roll.  they all envision a Mach 1.6, chunky little strike fighter f-35 clone.

Obviously you don´t know what sarcasm is.

LMFS wrote:

Gomig-21 wrote:If those are in fact 3 fuel tanks on its back and spine, that is quite the internal load of fuel this thing can carry!  It would be something if that center, spine "box" was actually a container for additional missiles that would automatically feed down into the forward weapons bay once its missiles are used up.  That would give this aircraft quite the weapons load as you could pack in what, 20 R-77s in that space?  Even split it where the lower half holds additional missiles while the upper half holds fuel.  That would be quite the setup to make this thing even more lethal than it already seems to be.

If the Su-57 is to match the massive 11.5 t of fuel of the Su-35 for a range >3500 km, which I take as the "no brainer" approach to the plane's baseline requirements, then they need something close to 14.5 cubic meter fuel volume, and that is a LOT. Some knowledgeable guys doubt this is even possible, since the linear dimensions of the Su-57 are smaller than those of the Flankers. The plane already has way bigger weapons bays than any other competitor and, as discussed, the current issue would be how to make the best use of it. Two layers of magazine would make the handling of the missiles very complex, the mechanicals would be quite challenging. I think the plane as designed is a masterpiece and the only piece missing is to know more abut the real capabilities including operational concept, engines, systems and armament.

thegopnik wrote:

Backman wrote:

thegopnik wrote:

Because of this I am assuming that only a single order of the Su-57 would be made, but I could be wrong or I am setting my expectations way too high.

Edit: I mistook your post for a new one. Either way.

If you think drones are the future, then do you believe that all Flanker derivative production will stop ? Mig 35 also ?

The su 57 is a true stealth blend wing with a small silhouette and we already know that they built it with unmanned capability in mind. So even if what you are saying becomes true, su 57 will be in more demand. Not less.

The problem is how convinced the general western public is by saying shit like how the su-57 canopy is not shaped like other 5th gens, or not having a 6 polygon shape for their sensors but bulb shapes. Etc, etc while puling .000001 claims.

Because of this i would find it hilarious that i decide to go shitpost drones taking out f-35s for less than 10 million dollars and that candidate would be the su-70. Only current complaints are back engines meaning i can go pull .000001 from front claims and western public would seem more convinced because i barely see criticism from su-70 than su-57. Meaning that with those RCS figures both su-70 and f-35 will have short missile engagements only, combine that with EW immunity from PICs(which raytheon is still struggling with) than we can say the su-70 is a serious threat to f-35s. with 1/10 production costs of the f-35 traumatizing f-35 fans.

LMFS wrote:If the Su-57 is to match the massive 11.5 t of fuel of the Su-35 for a range >3500 km, which I take as the "no brainer" approach to the plane's baseline requirements, then they need something close to 14.5 cubic meter fuel volume, and that is a LOT. Some knowledgeable guys doubt this is even possible, since the linear dimensions of the Su-57 are smaller than those of the Flankers. The plane already has way bigger weapons bays than any other competitor and, as discussed, the current issue would be how to make the best use of it. Two layers of magazine would make the handling of the missiles very complex, the mechanicals would be quite challenging. I think the plane as designed is a masterpiece and the only piece missing is to know more abut the real capabilities including operational concept, engines, systems and armament.

Backman wrote:

There is no convincing the western public of anything. They argue in bad faith. We can see that by them giving the J-20 a pass on everything including those canards.

Finty wrote:

Backman wrote:

There is no convincing the western public of anything. They argue in bad faith. We can see that by them giving the J-20 a pass on everything including those canards.

You sure about that? Of course it's hard to get a consensus on such things but I'd guess that people here would have lower opinions of Chinese aircraft than Russian ones, perhaps considering how they like to copy stuff and sometimes build without licenses. Fair play to PRC for trying to develop 5th gen but the J-20 looks rather awkward, like a Typhoon that's been pancaked.

Isos wrote:They try to divide to rule better.

They have access to none but yet have a lot to say...

Nato shits in their pants when they see the new weapons that Russia sells to everyone. The technological gap is no more. They used to have total technological advantage against 3rd world countries but now those same countries can buy similar weapon that NATO use.

Even guerillas now have night fighting capabilities, AD missiles, antiship missiles, ballistic and cruise missiles, last atgm...

In any new war they will loose more and more.

LMFS wrote:

Yes, you can see this in the same picture where the dorsal tanks are visible. This is one of the main advantages of the integral aerodynamic layout or blended wing-body. There is a space for the wheels of the main landing gear and another for the side bays, essentially the rest of that volume is available for fuel. But that was also the case in the Flanker.

mnztr wrote:He is talking about if the engine is adapted for use in the PAK DP

TMA1 wrote:

mnztr wrote:He is talking about if the engine is adapted for use in the PAK DP

sorry wrong article

https://redsamovar.com/2020/12/26/actu-livraison-du-premier-sukhoi-su-57-de-Serie/

in the article the author cites an invoice of some kind. here is the link.

https://zakupki.gov.ru/223/purchase/public/purchase/info/lot-info.html?lotId=13455655&purchaseId=10143489&purchaseMethodType=IS

I translated it and this is a portion of what the author quoted.

1700-2020-02468 Implementation of research and development work on the topic: "Research to determine the causes of destruction of the welded section of 1-2 stages of HPC kit No. С17-004 of product 30-05 assembly 7".

anyone with jet engine knowledge out there? the hot compressor core is the beating heart of the whole thing. what do you guys make of all this?