The truly poor people are generally thin.
Strange way to think, to see, and to debate.
Obviously, if you compare a US poor, with a somalian or an ethiopian, you will see differences. A poor in Russia living near Vladivostok, and a poort in Denver's suburb, you see that one has a car, and the other uses bus, or train, walk simply.
Iam afraid that I was somewhat misunderstood. I don't hate US people, I have nothing against americans people. Because the pain is the same when a drone or a Phantom bombs and hence destroy your home, and an usher ordering you to leave your home in 24 hours with your wife and children.
The barbaric is the same, the great parasytes are the sames who triggered the first, second world war, and the wars nowadays.
My ennemy, your ennemy, US people , Syrian people, russian people, french people, iranian people, venezuelian people, argentinian people' worst ennemy are true bastard like Lloyd Blankfein, Henry Paulson, Maier Amschell Rothschild, Rockefeller, Rajat Kumar Gupta, etc....
You can notice that in this worst economic crisis for average people, for them, they never enriched as today.
They are the ennemy, they want each countries in the world must walnut with debts, as in the middle age. The debt is their weapon of mass destruction, and US army, and some western armies are their henchmen. In order to terrorise every countries in the world.
Fortuneltly now there is only a super power , more than never, that resist to this barbaric system is Russia.
Do not forget just one thing when the bastard of Lloyd Blankfein said he is doing
Warren Buffet added
This crisis is war between the two classes, mine is the winner.
Asking if a poor eat less or more potatoes, or tomatoes, meat than another, has none sens.
The poors whereever they are, they are poor, they have no weighs in the politic context, as average people. In War context -poorest are the best candidates- average people is asked to give its blood for the riches, in peace context, average people is asked its credit card, untill he will be expulsed of this home.
The F-35 will either be a spectacular success or a miserable failure, time will tell.
The only US aircraft that impressed me, this last decades seeing the different wars -if we ignore P-51 mustang's success-, is the relative success of F-117 during Desert's Storm.
After reading very much, looking for more informations that is not US propaganda, I can conclude that untill now, no US aircrafts is really decisive.
Back to the F-15 as the hype, its supposed 100 victories, in fact as Vladimir Iylin, the F-15 had a redoutable opponents third generation soviet aircraft that were Mig-23, and Mig-25. Mig-23 ML downed several F-15 C, and F-16 -the other US shits-. Even a Mig 21 was abble to down a F-15A in the end of 70's.
If we back yougoslavian war, and desert storm, to explain the relative success of US aircrafts. The two countries were under economic embargos, if not a blockade, detering them to have the best conditiions of fights as it was the case during Vietnam War, where north vietnameses downed score of US aircrafts.
Even with that, US losses are untill now subject to controversies, and their success either in Yougoslavia, and Iraq was due mostly to the Russia's help, or Soviet Union's help.
Seeing the history, we can easily conclude that the F-35 won't be a spectacular success
, especially now with Western gloomy economic crisis.
Let's hope for them F-35 will be the shit as the F-16, Phantom II, F-105, F-104 were.