Tu-160 "White Swan"
Tsavo Lion- Posts : 5188
Points : 5182
Join date : 2016-08-15
Location : AZ, USA
- Post n°851
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Tu-160 set a record for the range and duration of a non-stop flight
mnztr- Posts : 770
Points : 800
Join date : 2018-01-21
- Post n°852
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
has anyone found anything to indicate if the TU-160 can supercruise?
PapaDragon- Posts : 9984
Points : 10062
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°853
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
mnztr wrote:has anyone found anything to indicate if the TU-160 can supercruise?
It can't
GarryB- Posts : 27382
Points : 27914
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°854
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Removed all the stuff about replacing carriers with strategic bombers and and the arctic etc etc.... to the talking bollocks thread in the general chat section.
owais.usmani- Posts : 433
Points : 433
Join date : 2019-03-27
Age : 34
- Post n°855
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"

George1, flamming_python, dino00, magnumcromagnon, Big_Gazza, kvs, tanino and like this post
dino00- Posts : 1469
Points : 1508
Join date : 2012-10-12
Age : 33
Location : portugal
- Post n°856
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Tu-160M first took to the air with new engines
MOSCOW, November 3 - RIA Novosti. The deeply modernized Tu-160M bomber made its maiden flight with new engines, the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) reported .
"The first flight of Tu-160M with new production engines NK-32-02 took place at the KAZ aerodrome named after Gorbunov. The plane was piloted by the crew led by Anri Naskidyants. The flight took place at an altitude of 6,000 meters and lasted 2 hours and 20 minutes," the company noted.
https://ria.ru/20201103/dvigatel-1582868395.html

MOSCOW, November 3 - RIA Novosti. The deeply modernized Tu-160M bomber made its maiden flight with new engines, the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) reported .
"The first flight of Tu-160M with new production engines NK-32-02 took place at the KAZ aerodrome named after Gorbunov. The plane was piloted by the crew led by Anri Naskidyants. The flight took place at an altitude of 6,000 meters and lasted 2 hours and 20 minutes," the company noted.
https://ria.ru/20201103/dvigatel-1582868395.html
franco, markgreven, Big_Gazza, kvs, Maximmmm, thegopnik, LMFS and lancelot like this post
Hole- Posts : 3664
Points : 3662
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 44
Location : Merkelland
- Post n°857
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"


markgreven, George1, dino00, Big_Gazza, PapaDragon, Maximmmm, zardof and lyle6 like this post
Maximmmm- Posts : 229
Points : 232
Join date : 2015-07-27
Location : Switzerland
- Post n°858
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
It's really good news. Kuznetsov was really struggling to restart production since the whole factory had gone to the dogs. Only 2 year delay in delivering the engines is pretty acceptable imho, considering how much work had to be done. Plus it's a modernized variant.
If you would have told me 10 years ago we'd be seeing new production Tu-160s flying soon I'd have been giddy.
If you would have told me 10 years ago we'd be seeing new production Tu-160s flying soon I'd have been giddy.
Big_Gazza- Posts : 2211
Points : 2211
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°859
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Nice pic of the NK-32-02


George1, Arrow, dino00, kvs, PapaDragon, Maximmmm, DerWolf and like this post
mnztr- Posts : 770
Points : 800
Join date : 2018-01-21
- Post n°860
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Maximmmm wrote:It's really good news. Kuznetsov was really struggling to restart production since the whole factory had gone to the dogs. Only 2 year delay in delivering the engines is pretty acceptable imho, considering how much work had to be done. Plus it's a modernized variant.
If you would have told me 10 years ago we'd be seeing new production Tu-160s flying soon I'd have been giddy.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this is not the M2 TU-160. Its a completed older frame and a testbed for the new avionics.
Hole- Posts : 3664
Points : 3662
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 44
Location : Merkelland
- Post n°861
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
That´s why he wrote "new Tu-160 flying soon".

GarryB- Posts : 27382
Points : 27914
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°862
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
There were four unfinished Tu-160s when the Ukraine stopped cooperating... two of which were completed but two more that could not be completed because the box structure that houses the swing wing structure is huge and is made of titanium that has to be wielded in a low oxygen forge... the only place on the planet that could do that was now in the Ukraine, so they were never going to complete those two planes because the cost of building a forge big enough to complete them would be enormously expensive and not something that could be justified to finish two planes.
Fortunately for Tupolev Russia has decided to make the PAK DA which will be a large flying wing made of large titanium sections with large one piece box structures that required a similar forge to the one used to make the original Blackjacks... but in this case built in Russia.
Who knows they might use the same facility to make the PAK DP high speed interceptor...
The point is that now they can build more Blackjacks and make them into a viable and useful fleet of aircraft that will become more affordable... with fifty more aircraft that means 200 more engines and unification with the Tu-22M3M design means 60 of those will need another 120 engines so that is 320 engines they need which makes developing a brand new engine viable as well... and guess what... the engine for the subsonic strategic range PAK DA flying wing that will be based on this new engine will also be useful for long range airliners and heavy and super heavy transports as well... a gift that just keeps giving.
The first 16 odd Blackjacks were different... lots of changes.... a bit like prototypes in many ways... but now they can focus on a new revised and improved design they can apply to new planes and to upgrade older planes to this new standard so they will be cheaper and easier to service... right now they likely have a service manual for each aircraft showing the differences and different equipment etc... not so efficient or desirable.
Fortunately for Tupolev Russia has decided to make the PAK DA which will be a large flying wing made of large titanium sections with large one piece box structures that required a similar forge to the one used to make the original Blackjacks... but in this case built in Russia.
Who knows they might use the same facility to make the PAK DP high speed interceptor...
The point is that now they can build more Blackjacks and make them into a viable and useful fleet of aircraft that will become more affordable... with fifty more aircraft that means 200 more engines and unification with the Tu-22M3M design means 60 of those will need another 120 engines so that is 320 engines they need which makes developing a brand new engine viable as well... and guess what... the engine for the subsonic strategic range PAK DA flying wing that will be based on this new engine will also be useful for long range airliners and heavy and super heavy transports as well... a gift that just keeps giving.
The first 16 odd Blackjacks were different... lots of changes.... a bit like prototypes in many ways... but now they can focus on a new revised and improved design they can apply to new planes and to upgrade older planes to this new standard so they will be cheaper and easier to service... right now they likely have a service manual for each aircraft showing the differences and different equipment etc... not so efficient or desirable.
mnztr- Posts : 770
Points : 800
Join date : 2018-01-21
- Post n°863
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Will the last 2 unfinished be completed or will they just go ahead with the M2 variant?
Maximmmm- Posts : 229
Points : 232
Join date : 2015-07-27
Location : Switzerland
- Post n°864
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
mnztr wrote:Maximmmm wrote:It's really good news. Kuznetsov was really struggling to restart production since the whole factory had gone to the dogs. Only 2 year delay in delivering the engines is pretty acceptable imho, considering how much work had to be done. Plus it's a modernized variant.
If you would have told me 10 years ago we'd be seeing new production Tu-160s flying soon I'd have been giddy.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this is not the M2 TU-160. Its a completed older frame and a testbed for the new avionics.
Yeah you're right and it's why I wrote "soon".
kvs- Posts : 8272
Points : 8417
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Canuckistan
- Post n°865
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Maximmmm wrote:It's really good news. Kuznetsov was really struggling to restart production since the whole factory had gone to the dogs. Only 2 year delay in delivering the engines is pretty acceptable imho, considering how much work had to be done. Plus it's a modernized variant.
If you would have told me 10 years ago we'd be seeing new production Tu-160s flying soon I'd have been giddy.
Pretty acceptable? Two years is miraculous. Even China with all its massive resources couldn't pull something off like this.
As for the USA, it is hard to tell what engine innovation they actually have. I do not think they evenhave an NK-32 class engine.
The GE F101 is basically half of the NK-32. Given the rot in the US MIC, it would take more than 2 years for even just an
improved version of GE F101 to be put into service. And that is without losing the production infrastructure.
People are always putting Russia down, whether consciously or subconsciously. All that hate propaganda has effectively
propagated in the world information space. There are simply no objective comparisons and 100% spin instead.
GarryB likes this post
LMFS- Posts : 2744
Points : 2746
Join date : 2018-03-03
- Post n°866
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Actually they had big delays providing the engine (it was not a two years project) and the whole Tu-160 restart program has been a massive struggle, but it is definitely worth the effort, such a platform is priceless...
PapaDragon likes this post
PapaDragon- Posts : 9984
Points : 10062
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
- Post n°867
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
LMFS wrote:Actually they had big delays providing the engine (it was not a two years project) and the whole Tu-160 restart program has been a massive struggle, but it is definitely worth the effort, such a platform is priceless...
Correct, it was a massive pain in the ass but they pressed on and are now back in the game
Contrast that with stuff like Soviet lunar program where they dumped shitload of time and money only to give up right before the end zone just because they weren't first anymore
Isos- Posts : 6925
Points : 6915
Join date : 2015-11-06
- Post n°868
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Tu-160 was expensive even for USSR.
It's a shame that they let Ukraine destroy plenty of them.
It's a shame that they let Ukraine destroy plenty of them.
mnztr- Posts : 770
Points : 800
Join date : 2018-01-21
- Post n°869
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Maybe they will use the NK-32 for the PAK-DP? The Mig-31 already has 70K lbs of thrust, so 110K on a larger airframe would make for a pretty potent interceptor capable of carrying all kinds of weapons.
kvs- Posts : 8272
Points : 8417
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Canuckistan
- Post n°870
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
LMFS wrote:Actually they had big delays providing the engine (it was not a two years project) and the whole Tu-160 restart program has been a massive struggle, but it is definitely worth the effort, such a platform is priceless...
Would you really claim it was a hohum non-achievement if the "delay" was 8 years? As we see from the PAK-FA engines, it takes a long time
to come out with new ones and reworking old ones to get 10% more fuel economy is not some nose picking exercise.
If we were in 1999 nothing would be happening at all and only a Ukrainian style dissolution would be in progress. Russia should thank its
lucky starts for Putin's "regime" and the various "delayed" military projects. BTW, military projects are not civilian projects so a lot of the
yapping about delays is BS. Delays relative to what?
LMFS- Posts : 2744
Points : 2746
Join date : 2018-03-03
- Post n°871
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
kvs wrote:
Would you really claim it was a hohum non-achievement if the "delay" was 8 years? As we see from the PAK-FA engines, it takes a long time
to come out with new ones and reworking old ones to get 10% more fuel economy is not some nose picking exercise.
If we were in 1999 nothing would be happening at all and only a Ukrainian style dissolution would be in progress. Russia should thank its
lucky starts for Putin's "regime" and the various "delayed" military projects. BTW, military projects are not civilian projects so a lot of the
yapping about delays is BS. Delays relative to what?
No, I totally agree this is a massive success, absolutely relevant and necessary. I was just clarifying that it was a very difficult endeavour. Putin himself had to pull their ears a couple of times, it demanded to process huge amounts of documentation, it has been claimed as a major achievement of the Russian aerospace industry which actually needed sharing resources of all the main companies to see it done. That is why I say the platform is "priceless", because it is just by major resolve and political will that such can be created.
I personally find it very rich how "failures" and "successes" are so lightly attributed by us external observers, without understanding the efforts and difficulties that stand behind feats and platforms that only very few nations (or just one like for the Tu-160) can accomplish. The same goes about constant whining over status of naval industry etc etc. That Russia can even try and achieve what they are achieving, even after many attempts and frustration, has enormous merit IMHO. Nobody should expect the full restoring of the MIC after the 90's could be a cake walk...
kvs likes this post
GarryB- Posts : 27382
Points : 27914
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
- Post n°872
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Will the last 2 unfinished be completed or will they just go ahead with the M2 variant?
As far as I know the two that could be completed were completed and the unfinished two have also been completed on the equipment built for new build Blackjacks and in the future new build PAK DAs.
So the new planes they have gotten are not Tu-160M2s, they are essentially Tu-160s likely upgraded to the current M standard.
Tu-160 was expensive even for USSR.
It's a shame that they let Ukraine destroy plenty of them.
It was made much more expensive by not having enough to make them an effective fleet.
Regarding Ukraine... Russia didn't get much choice in the matter, but now they have production capacity in Russia that is a problem of the past.
That is just Ukraine doing what they do sadly.
Maybe they will use the NK-32 for the PAK-DP?
AFAIK the PD-35 will be developed from the NK-32 and will be used in the PAK DA and in their new An-22 and An-124 replacements... the PAK DA needs a turbofan/ramjet type... the NK-32 would probably be too big and heavy for that job.
The Mig-31 already has 70K lbs of thrust, so 110K on a larger airframe would make for a pretty potent interceptor capable of carrying all kinds of weapons.
To operate at mach 4.2 it wont be using a turbofan or turbojet engine except for takeoff and landing... the rotational speed needed to operate at such flight speeds would destroy any conventional turbojet or turbofan engines... it would be like using rubber tires on a motor bike that can travel at mach 1.5... at that rotational speed the rubber would disintegrate causing the bike to crash... the turbine blades in a conventional jet engine can't operate above about mach 2.8 without damage.
kvs likes this post
lancelot- Posts : 46
Points : 48
Join date : 2020-10-18
- Post n°873
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
kvs wrote:Pretty acceptable? Two years is miraculous. Even China with all its massive resources couldn't pull something off like this.
As for the USA, it is hard to tell what engine innovation they actually have. I do not think they evenhave an NK-32 class engine.
The GE F101 is basically half of the NK-32. Given the rot in the US MIC, it would take more than 2 years for even just an
improved version of GE F101 to be put into service. And that is without losing the production infrastructure.
...
You are correct. They do not. But the US does have civilian subsonic engines of that weight class (think 787 engines) and larger (think 777X engines).
They can "simply" use that engine core and militarize it. It won't be as hard as designing a new engine but it won't be as difficult either.
A Boeing 787 engine has between 28 and 34 ton thrust. A Boeing 777X engine has 48 ton thrust.
For reference the PD-35 will have 35 ton thrust. So that puts it roughly in the Boeing 787/Airbus A330 class.
The PD-35 (35 ton) is going to be a new engine based on a scaled up PD-14 (14 ton) core. Not based on NK-32 at all.
There was talk about using the NK-32 on the CRAIC 929 instead of PD-35.
But PD-35 should have better performance since it is more modern design.
It will use a lot of new technologies for Russian engines including carbon composite cold fan blades and SiC (ceramic) hot section parts.
Big_Gazza- Posts : 2211
Points : 2211
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
- Post n°874
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Isos wrote:Tu-160 was expensive even for USSR.
It's a shame that they let Ukraine destroy plenty of them.
They didn't let them do anything of the kind. How could they stop them, short of paying the absurd ransom that Kiev was originally demanding? The US was dripping its poisoned words into the Ukropi ear to get them to destroy the airframes, so Russia was probably lucky that she was able to salvage the aircraft that she did.
Screw Ukraine and everything about that misbegotten decrepit shithole. A pox on them till the end of days.
flamming_python and miketheterrible like this post
miketheterrible- Posts : 5308
Points : 5282
Join date : 2016-11-06
- Post n°875
Re: Tu-160 "White Swan"
Dunno why people wish for this or that in terms of equipment from Ukraine.
Yes, it would have meant they could get more flying quicker. But then they were sitting idle for a long time and would have been issue for Russia in modernizing it and fixing what needs to be fixed.
Instead, building whole new planes is beneficial for multitude of reasons:
- re opens production which was lost initially. Meaning more jobs and specialists
- gives opportunity to re-tool the plant
- bigger order and thus more money to plant.
- gives opportunity to seek improvements to the plane in the airframe/structure (more composites)
- with newly trained specialists, means better opportunity to have a new design and properly working plane in future.
Yes, it would have meant they could get more flying quicker. But then they were sitting idle for a long time and would have been issue for Russia in modernizing it and fixing what needs to be fixed.
Instead, building whole new planes is beneficial for multitude of reasons:
- re opens production which was lost initially. Meaning more jobs and specialists
- gives opportunity to re-tool the plant
- bigger order and thus more money to plant.
- gives opportunity to seek improvements to the plane in the airframe/structure (more composites)
- with newly trained specialists, means better opportunity to have a new design and properly working plane in future.
GarryB likes this post
|
|