Mig-21 Bison
https://twitter.com/zone5aviation/status/1101850703159533568
https://twitter.com/zone5aviation/status/1101850703159533568
Austin wrote:Intelligence agencies have evidence, in the form of imagery from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), showing that the four buildings, identified as targets, were hit by five S-2000 precision-guided munition (PGM) fired from IAF’s Mirage-2000 fighter jets.
https://twitter.com/YusufDFI/status/1101670035485913088
Check the whole thread
You guys had AWACS in that area. Why didn't the AWACS use its main radar to fry the sensors of the incoming AMRAAM?
jhelb wrote:Austin wrote:Intelligence agencies have evidence, in the form of imagery from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), showing that the four buildings, identified as targets, were hit by five S-2000 precision-guided munition (PGM) fired from IAF’s Mirage-2000 fighter jets.
https://twitter.com/YusufDFI/status/1101670035485913088
Check the whole thread
Austin, as you would imagine being a Belarusian/Russian I've no stake in this conflict. So I'm not taking sides. That being said, several things don't add up.
You guys had AWACS in that area. Why didn't the AWACS use its main radar to fry the sensors of the incoming AMRAAM?
The death toll of jihadis seems to be a lot less than the 300-350 claimed by Indian Government. Maybe the ring leader of the jihadis was hit but it's impossible not to get images of 300-350 dead jihadis.
Is it possible that this is a stunt that Modi has pulled to win the forthcoming election? I understand he has failed to fulfill most of his election promises so he is desperate to win.
Lastly, that guy Yusuf whose Twitter feed you have posted is a arms broker who operates with several other Delhi based arms brokers on behalf of Western & Israeli government. So trust him only as far as you can throw him.
GarryB wrote:Don't know of any AWACS anywhere that could do that...
Austin wrote:We did use AWACS but the smaller Netra not the A-50. Like Garry said not sure any awacs can fry the AMRAAM or even detect it at long ranges.
Austin wrote:I dont think modi used this as stunt to win election but it might certainly help his cause the previous congress government practically did nothing and let the people and armed forces die from terror strike. I dont think modi did any thing great I expected more but atleast he did something rather let the armed forces die from terror strikes.
jhelb wrote:Meant the AWACS could have used their main radar to jam the incoming AMRAAM that was fired at the Mi 21 Bis.
Austin wrote:Look Austin, unlike Russian fighter jets, AWACS or for that matter even NATO's, Indian fighter jets don't have a on-board tactical data link,nor do the Indian AEW & CS platforms have them. This prevents the latter from providing real-time airborne battle management cues to airborne IAF combat aircraft while operating inside contested/hostile airspace. Neither do they have SATCOM suite aft of the cockpit since such installations will enable the MWF to receive battle management situational awareness updates in real-time from AEW & CS platforms.
So I'm unable to understand with such severe shortcomings, how did the IAF decide to fight against Pakistan effectively.
Austin wrote:If Indian media reports are to be believed, last year itself 43 Indian soldiers were killed by jihadis in Kashmir in various incidents. IOW, that's almost equal to the number of Indian soldiers killed on 14th Feb by jihadis.
So why did Modi have to wait for the 14th Feb attack in order to authorize an air strike? Could have done that before.
Also following the Indian air strike, Pakistan attacked Indian military installations in broad daylight and India is yet to retaliate. Clearly it's Pakistan that has won the battle.
jhelb wrote:Look Austin, unlike Russian fighter jets, AWACS or for that matter even NATO's, Indian fighter jets don't have a on-board tactical data link,nor do the Indian AEW & CS platforms have them. This prevents the latter from providing real-time airborne battle management cues to airborne IAF combat aircraft while operating inside contested/hostile airspace. Neither do they have SATCOM suite aft of the cockpit since such installations will enable the MWF to receive battle management situational awareness updates in real-time from AEW & CS platforms.
So I'm unable to understand with such severe shortcomings, how did the IAF decide to fight against Pakistan effectively.
medo wrote:On the other hand Indian Su-30MKI doesn't have any IFDL antenna behind radome. It also have empty tail fins, so no RSBN antenna, no ground control data link, etc, like Su-30SM. Most probably its basic radio navigation is civil VOR/DME, which is not that precise. Russian RSBN is the most precise radio navigation system, more precise than NATO TACAN. Civil VOR/DME is far less precise so it is useless for combat operation, specially for bombing with dumb bombs as position of the plane is not precise enough to hit anything. Plane is depending on SATNAV, but the signal could be jammed. Su-30MKI doesn't have Pastel RWR, so it could not program anti-radar missiles. There is a good question, what kind of data link Su-30MKI have and if it is compatible with different AEW&C planes and other fighters like Mirage-2000. MiGs do not have any IFDL.
Meant the AWACS could have used their main radar to jam the incoming AMRAAM that was fired at the Mi 21 Bis.
Austin wrote:Fishbed vs Falcon: Why the ancient MiG-21's F-16 kill is no fluke
medo wrote:
On the other hand Indian Su-30MKI doesn't have any IFDL antenna behind radome. It also have empty tail fins, so no RSBN antenna, no ground control data link, etc, like Su-30SM.
medo wrote:
This is the problem, that India have bad habit to replace original components with a mix of foreign components and than have a lot of problems for which they always blame producer and not themselves. Interesting is Su-30MKI, which have only radar Bars-M and IRST from Russia, all other equipment is from India, France, Israel,...
magnumcromagnon wrote:Looks like it's been confirmed that a PAF F-16 was shot down, particularly PAF F-16 that was bought from Jordan:
|
|