The problem is not the succession, the problem is the system (that we call Algeria, and that is really named National Liberation Front) in which the sucession has to be made.
The turkish, as always, justify their imperialism (which is only and very only ethno-linguistic and nothing else) by the religion : Islamic expansion. Which of course is only a justification of their ethnic imperialism.
When they take North-Africa (except morocco) with the pretext of protecting the islamic society from the spanish reconquista in the 16th century, they simply put some naval bases on the littoral cities, to have the gibraltar straits control (what they really and only want in their ethnic, non-muslim imperialism). These cities only satisfy their naval views, no economic or social development, not even religious management (that they pretend to be the casus belli).
What the turkish do then ? Two things. One for the locals, the other for the neighbors, who were Christians and who will suffer a hell during at least 3 centuries.
- They first pay some tribes which leave at the periphery of the littoral cities they need to control, they pay some tribes to take a tax from other tribes...for nothing in return (tribes of the same north-african roots and language) and those tribes threaten the others of killing and destruction. When the turkish masters don't find tribes to collect that tax on the others , they do it with mercenaries coming from all their shity empire. (you can find everything, european renegades, slavic christian slaves... even nigers)
- The other political project if we can call it as a project, is simply the one of piracy, stealing the other, as simple, with total barbary, total undiscrimination of target or geographic spaces. Boats or land, they attack permanently christian kingdoms, whether it is their fleets or their lands. They take gold, goods and... crew to turn into slaves. We know that episode, for those who live in non muslim countries, as "White Slavery"
==> between 2 and 3 millions of slaves.
Which lead us to 1830, when after 3 centuries of successive bombing expeditions by almost all the europeans kingdoms, and even the young American navy, France rebuild her very known project of permanent and definitive solution : military invasion
. The first iteration of it was the confidential and very sadly episode of the Jijel Expedition... in 1664.
That french expedition was a massive and in fact almost didactic fail : lack of logistics, confusion on the tactical objectives, internal rivalty in the high military hierarchy, climatic parameters, and even hygienic with the pest, and unpredictable resistance of local tribes. It was a total disaster, at a point that the contemporary historiograph just try to erase it of the official history...
In 1830 that time, the level of preparation, political determination and let's say it, the delta of quantitative (soldiers) and qualitative (technology) investments allow them to take the city (Algiers) quite easily. Then, a colonial adventure of 50 years of territorial conquests and integration from the West to the East will start. But at the difference of the turkish, they will integer the locals, it is true, in a total racialist and ideologic paradigm (which was the norm in Europe at that time, including in Russia) that, whether you want it or not, will lead to a massive and substantial improvement of the life quality, regarding the objectives indicators of social confort for the locals
The genocide is a very interesting ambition : but it as to be predicted and established in his political volunty by his author which is absolutely not the case of the French, unlike Herr Dog -Han say it. Moreover, the population of the locals was about 3 or 3 million and a half at 1830. In 1962, it was about 9 millions. A x3 demographic increase genocide... those french are even bad at doing the bad...
Then in 1954, happen what I describe earlier, barbaric Nasserian insurrection (with the terror at an artistic level, as only weapon.) 200 000 north African fight for France, thousands of countrymen were cut in peaces by N.L.F and by international pressure, France leave a Country she developed, design the border of, put institutions in, with French language, pipelines, petrol discovering, railway, highways, urbanism, everything a modern state has.
But that state has no nation. And France choose to give the power to people who were nothing more than a team of terrorist and criminals, with no other National project to just take sovereignty (and not independance) on French Algeria, and leave on the French foundations, including petrol and gas to today.
Algeria is french, always was, always will be. It was thinked, created, developed and maked by and for the french, which loose it by international pressure and give it to a Terrorist team. Nothing in Algeria is not french, out of the total islamization of the society of course ( the only thing the criminal N.L.F do by himself).
The people in North-Africa, their language, (which can not be Arabic since Arabic is... from Arabia, 3000 km away), their social structure, their agriculture and so their culture (no culture without agriculture), are literally and absolutelty forbidden to death.
North Africa is the only part of the world where people can die for speaking North-African. If they let people do what they want, they will refuse all the N.L.F and in fact the whole french colonial concept of "Algeria", to start to create a society by themselves, with THEIR free will.
You can not force people to leave in something they do not choose, or with barbaric terror.