Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    AlfaT8
    AlfaT8

    Posts : 1867
    Points : 1862
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  AlfaT8 on Sat Sep 09, 2017 1:54 am

    IMO, they need another one of these Shipyards in the North.
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 4426
    Points : 4404
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  miketheterrible on Sat Sep 09, 2017 2:02 am

    AlfaT8 wrote:IMO, they need another one of these Shipyards in the North.

    they can upgrade existing ones but that will happen much later. With the ice breakers, these ships can transport to Baltic sea from pacific rather easily. That's good enough for now since small shipyards can deal for the black sea and Caspian.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4988
    Points : 5016
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:54 am

    Short info vid about new corvette's layout.

    https://iz.ru/642002/video/grafika-korvet-lider-nov

    and some pics:

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 1

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 2449b79b46b841dbb0682a00fd60c0da


    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Da540537cbfd41c5b4930ddcfaae7064
    avatar
    T-47

    Posts : 217
    Points : 217
    Join date : 2017-07-17
    Location : Planet Earth

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  T-47 on Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:54 pm

    Thats the destroyer in the video, not this corvette -_-
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 9023
    Points : 9105
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  PapaDragon on Sun Sep 10, 2017 5:39 pm

    T-47 wrote:Thats the destroyer in the video, not this corvette -_-

    In the end it's all just anime fanart just like everything else from Krylov.
    avatar
    T-47

    Posts : 217
    Points : 217
    Join date : 2017-07-17
    Location : Planet Earth

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  T-47 on Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:18 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    In the end it's all just anime fanart just like everything else from Krylov.

    Well at least that destroyer model matches with description provided unlike the corvette.
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza

    Posts : 1926
    Points : 1928
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  Big_Gazza on Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:01 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    T-47 wrote:Thats the destroyer in the video, not this corvette -_-

    In the end it's all just anime fanart just like everything else from Krylov.

    Its just fanart...  until the 1st one gets built.

    Seriously, instead of just shitting on Krylov because of their "pagoda" Lider, whats your issue with this corvette design?  I personally like it, and if they can keep the manning level down to a minimum, I think its feasible.

    Krylov, Khunichev, Kurganmashzavod...  I think you just hate enterprises starting with K....  Very Happy
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 5305
    Points : 5297
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  Isos on Mon Sep 11, 2017 1:19 pm

    Big_Gazza wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    T-47 wrote:Thats the destroyer in the video, not this corvette -_-

    In the end it's all just anime fanart just like everything else from Krylov.

    Its just fanart...  until the 1st one gets built.

    Seriously, instead of just shitting on Krylov because of their "pagoda" Lider, whats your issue with this corvette design?  I personally like it, and if they can keep the manning level down to a minimum, I think its feasible.

    Krylov, Khunichev, Kurganmashzavod...  I think you just hate enterprises starting with K....  Very Happy

    They have tons of new corvette design ... They should start working on bigger ships. At the end all their corvettes are same with UKSK and redut vls. That's what happen when you standartize your ships every design will be equal to the other. Soviet ships were designed around their missiles that's why they were beautifull while now you put the VLS and make it work in the open ocean. Steregouchy proved to be able to do that ... why waste time with more corvette design.



    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 9023
    Points : 9105
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  PapaDragon on Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:28 pm

    Big_Gazza wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    T-47 wrote:Thats the destroyer in the video, not this corvette -_-

    In the end it's all just anime fanart just like everything else from Krylov.

    Its just fanart...  until the 1st one gets built.

    Seriously, instead of just shitting on Krylov because of their "pagoda" Lider, whats your issue with this corvette design?  I personally like it, and if they can keep the manning level down to a minimum, I think its feasible.

    Krylov, Khunichev, Kurganmashzavod...  I think you just hate enterprises starting with K....  Very Happy

    I got no beef with K. Especially not with Kurganmashzavod. As for Krunichev are you going to tell me that you are a fan of those dicks? Cool

    My issue is that everyone is having a boner when they start counting missiles on this anime BS while nobody make an effort to ask about RANGE and ENDURANCE. That's the problem here.

    If you remember it was short range and endurance that prompted Navy to go from Steregushy to Gremashi/Derzki corvettes.

    And now we have this fanart that is supposed to have same or even smaller range and endurance than Steregushy. WTF???

    And they have the balls to claim that it will cost little more than Buyan. Horseshit!!!

    This has ''SCAM'' written all over it.

    VLS systems alone will cost as much as Buyan and then you need to add price of hull itself + radars + sonars + torpedoes + helicopter infrastructure + CIWS. At least.

    All for ship that will not be leaving coastal AA and anti-ship coverage 90% of the time. With that attitude it is cheaper to just bolt some sonars on Karakurts and call it a day.

    They have plenty of corvette types in production. They need to move on to building stuff they actually need.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4988
    Points : 5016
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:33 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:

    My issue is that everyone is having a boner when they start counting missiles on this anime BS while nobody make an effort to ask about RANGE and ENDURANCE. That's the problem here.

    If you remember it was short range and endurance that prompted Navy to go from Steregushy to Gremashi/Derzki corvettes.

    And now we have this fanart that is supposed to have same or even smaller range and endurance than Steregushy. WTF???


    But Russian Navy also evolves in needs first 20380 then 11356 then again 22800 so direction is depending on combination financing, political situation and shipyards' abilities. If this can fulfill duties of Groskhovs in littoral waters, especially in North for one third in price and with high pace of production then why not?

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 9023
    Points : 9105
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  PapaDragon on Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:02 pm

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:...................

    But Russian Navy also evolves in needs first 20380 then 11356 then again 22800 so direction is depending on combination financing, political situation and shipyards' abilities. ....

    Shipyards are supposed to carry out orders of the MoD not the other way around

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:........
    If this can fulfill  duties of Groskhovs in littoral waters, especially in North for one third in price and with high pace of production then why not?


    Anything can fulfill Gorshkov's duties in littoral waters because there you have naval aviation, coastal defenses and land based AA systems on speed-dial.  

    As for anything further it would have to go back to restock not long before coastline is out of sight.

    They have corvettes in production. Much superior ones than this horseshit financial scam.  

    They need to take off their diapers, grow up and start working on frigates because they have corvettes and missile boats coming out of their asses.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4988
    Points : 5016
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:29 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:...................

    But Russian Navy also evolves in needs first 20380 then 11356 then again 22800 so direction is depending on combination financing, political situation and shipyards' abilities. ....

    Shipyards are supposed to carry out orders of the MoD not the other way around


    My point was MoD has been changing mind so many times that current adjustment can be also a viable option.



    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:........
    If this can fulfill  duties of Groskhovs in littoral waters, especially in North for one third in price and with high pace of production then why not?


    Anything can fulfill Gorshkov's duties in littoral waters because there you have naval aviation, coastal defenses and land based AA systems on speed-dial.  


    What is obviously not true in case of Arctic or even most of far east. Sparse bases sparse airfields. Say 500 miles from land. S-400 at best can cover 100, Kh-35 100 miles too. 100 miles from base not forman point of land right?






    PapaDragon wrote:
    They have corvettes in production. Much superior ones than this horseshit financial scam.  
    They need to take off their diapers, grow up and start working on frigates because they have corvettes and missile boats coming out of their asses.

    You clearly are not big fan of this concept well let's wait for Navy decision makers. None of current corvettes or MRK have not even close parameters. In case of real war there might be no time to get back to base. Whatever you have in one salvo might be all.

    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 5305
    Points : 5297
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  Isos on Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:55 pm

    They should design a new anti ship missile specific for big ships like P-700 was. Military speaki,g not really good idea but financially speaking they will need to produce big ships so they will give more work to shipyards.
    AlfaT8
    AlfaT8

    Posts : 1867
    Points : 1862
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  AlfaT8 on Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:13 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Big_Gazza wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    T-47 wrote:Thats the destroyer in the video, not this corvette -_-

    In the end it's all just anime fanart just like everything else from Krylov.

    Its just fanart...  until the 1st one gets built.

    Seriously, instead of just shitting on Krylov because of their "pagoda" Lider, whats your issue with this corvette design?  I personally like it, and if they can keep the manning level down to a minimum, I think its feasible.

    Krylov, Khunichev, Kurganmashzavod...  I think you just hate enterprises starting with K....  Very Happy

    I got no beef with K. Especially not with Kurganmashzavod. As for Krunichev are you going to tell me that you are a fan of those dicks?   Cool

    My issue is that everyone is having a boner when they start counting missiles on this anime BS while nobody make an effort to ask about RANGE and ENDURANCE. That's the problem here.

    If you remember it was short range and endurance that prompted Navy to go from Steregushy to Gremashi/Derzki corvettes.

    And now we have this fanart that is supposed to have same or even smaller range and endurance than Steregushy. WTF???

    And they have the balls to claim that it will cost little more than Buyan. Horseshit!!!

    This has ''SCAM'' written all over it.

    VLS systems alone will cost as much as Buyan and then you need to add price of hull itself + radars + sonars + torpedoes + helicopter infrastructure + CIWS. At least.

    All for ship that will not be leaving coastal AA and anti-ship coverage 90% of the time. With that attitude it is cheaper to just bolt some sonars on Karakurts and call it a day.

    They have plenty of corvette types in production. They need to move on to building stuff they actually need.

    Gonna have to go with PD on this one.

    IMO, With respects to Corvettes, the Russian navy should focus on the Karakurt and the Drezki, and if anything bigger is needed than expand the Drezki design.
    With that said, i am not against something like this, problem is, in it's current form it just doesn't make sense, the superstructure alone has me baffled, and what the hell is that thing between the missiles and the superstructure.

    On a lesser note, the missile config is just wrong, anti-air need to be in front while UKSKs in the back, unless there are two Pantsirs in front (picture isn't very clear), if so, then it's doable.

    And as PD said, no way in hell is it gonna be cheaper or even as cheap as the Buyan.

    P.S: Can you guys give this ship a name, can't find any info without it's name.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4988
    Points : 5016
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:32 pm

    AlfaT8 wrote: Gonna have to go with PD on this one.

    IMO, With respects to Corvettes, the Russian navy should focus on the Karakurt and the Drezki, and if anything bigger is needed than expand the Drezki design.
    With that said, i am not against something like this, problem is, in it's current form it just doesn't make sense, the superstructure alone has me baffled, and what the hell is that thing between the missiles and the superstructure.

    On a lesser note, the missile config is just wrong, anti-air need to be in front while UKSKs in the back, unless there are two Pantsirs in front (picture isn't very clear), if so, then it's doable.

    And as PD said, no way in hell is it gonna be cheaper or even as cheap as the Buyan.

    P.S: Can you guys give this ship a name, can't find any info without it's name.

    Oh guys it is like you discuss something not reading source Smile

    https://iz.ru/636793/dmitrii-litovkin-aleksei-ramm/voenno-morskoi-flot-poluchit-narodnyi-korvet

    source said:
    The corvette will cost the military seamen a little more than a small rocket ship (MRK) of the "Buyan" type. Therefore, the project has already received an informal name "people's" and "budget." According to its characteristics, the novelty seriously exceeds the MRK. According to experts, a new corvette is needed for the Russian Navy. It is a good option to get for a relatively small amount of money a fleet of shock ships with great potential and unique characteristics.

    Nobody said it is cheaper. How little is this "little bit" nobody knows. Buyan -M is also not for free. Relatively cheap might mean 35% of Gorskhov's price for example so 130 mln USD Smile


    but this is most interesting for current discussion
    As "Izvestia" was told in the General Staff of the Navy, the draft of the new corvette has already been preliminarily studied and received positive reviews.


    AlfaT8
    AlfaT8

    Posts : 1867
    Points : 1862
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  AlfaT8 on Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:53 pm

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    AlfaT8 wrote: Gonna have to go with PD on this one.

    IMO, With respects to Corvettes, the Russian navy should focus on the Karakurt and the Drezki, and if anything bigger is needed than expand the Drezki design.
    With that said, i am not against something like this, problem is, in it's current form it just doesn't make sense, the superstructure alone has me baffled, and what the hell is that thing between the missiles and the superstructure.

    On a lesser note, the missile config is just wrong, anti-air need to be in front while UKSKs in the back, unless there are two Pantsirs in front (picture isn't very clear), if so, then it's doable.

    And as PD said, no way in hell is it gonna be cheaper or even as cheap as the Buyan.

    P.S: Can you guys give this ship a name, can't find any info without it's name.

    Oh guys it is like you discuss something not reading source Smile

    https://iz.ru/636793/dmitrii-litovkin-aleksei-ramm/voenno-morskoi-flot-poluchit-narodnyi-korvet

    source said:
    The corvette will cost the military seamen a little more than a small rocket ship (MRK) of the "Buyan" type. Therefore, the project has already received an informal name "people's" and "budget." According to its characteristics, the novelty seriously exceeds the MRK. According to experts, a new corvette is needed for the Russian Navy. It is a good option to get for a relatively small amount of money a fleet of shock ships with great potential and unique characteristics.

    Nobody said it is cheaper.  How little  is this "little bit" nobody knows. Buyan -M is also not for free. Relatively cheap might mean 35% of Gorskhov's price for example so 130 mln USD Smile


    but this is most interesting for current discussion
    As "Izvestia" was told in the General Staff of the Navy, the draft of the new corvette has already been preliminarily studied and received positive reviews.


    There's an oddity in that very article, apparently it'll have 24 UKSK's and only 16 (32) Reduts, that don't add up, they got it backwards (it's 16 UKSKs and 24 (48) Reduts).

    At the same time on its board are 24 universal launchers 3S-14 for the launch of long-range cruise missiles Caliber and anti-ship Onyx. This is more than on ships with a similar displacement of the type "Buyan-M" or "Karakurt." And little less than the "Leader".

    The corvette also has a powerful air defense system. These are 16 long-range guided missiles and 32 are small ones.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 9023
    Points : 9105
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  PapaDragon on Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:09 am

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:...................

    But Russian Navy also evolves in needs first 20380 then 11356 then again 22800 so direction is depending on combination financing, political situation and shipyards' abilities. ....

    Shipyards are supposed to carry out orders of the MoD not the other way around

    My point was MoD has been changing mind so many times that current adjustment can be also a viable option.

    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:........
    If this can fulfill  duties of Groskhovs in littoral waters, especially in North for one third in price and with high pace of production then why not?

    Anything can fulfill Gorshkov's duties in littoral waters because there you have naval aviation, coastal defenses and land based AA systems on speed-dial.  

    What is obviously not true in case of Arctic or even most of far east.  Sparse bases sparse airfields. Say 500 miles from land. S-400 at best can cover 100, Kh-35 100 miles too.  100 miles from base not forman point of land right?

    PapaDragon wrote:
    They have corvettes in production. Much superior ones than this horseshit financial scam.  
    They need to take off their diapers, grow up and start working on frigates because they have corvettes and missile boats coming out of their asses.

    You clearly are not big fan of this concept well let's wait for Navy decision makers. None of current corvettes or MRK have not even close parameters. In case of real war there might be no time to get back to base. Whatever you have in one salvo might be all.



    1) If they even dare to change their mind one more time after all the naval construction bullshit they pulled off over the decades they will prove to be far dumber than Soviets ever were and that they deserve to be partitioned and colonized

    2) Arctic and Far East require ships with range and endurance. This thing has neither. Wouldn't last one good storm in Arctic. It would work in Baltic maybe, nowhere else. 

    3) Derzkii and Gremashi are in those parameters weapons wise and far surpass it in terms of range and endurance.

    As for price they are trying to sell something that they claim is same as Lexus, that is size of Smart car and that it will cost "little more" than Fiat. Horseshit start to finish.
    flamming_python
    flamming_python

    Posts : 3875
    Points : 3961
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  flamming_python on Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:22 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:...................

    But Russian Navy also evolves in needs first 20380 then 11356 then again 22800 so direction is depending on combination financing, political situation and shipyards' abilities. ....

    Shipyards are supposed to carry out orders of the MoD not the other way around

    My point was MoD has been changing mind so many times that current adjustment can be also a viable option.

    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:........
    If this can fulfill  duties of Groskhovs in littoral waters, especially in North for one third in price and with high pace of production then why not?

    Anything can fulfill Gorshkov's duties in littoral waters because there you have naval aviation, coastal defenses and land based AA systems on speed-dial.  

    What is obviously not true in case of Arctic or even most of far east.  Sparse bases sparse airfields. Say 500 miles from land. S-400 at best can cover 100, Kh-35 100 miles too.  100 miles from base not forman point of land right?

    PapaDragon wrote:
    They have corvettes in production. Much superior ones than this horseshit financial scam.  
    They need to take off their diapers, grow up and start working on frigates because they have corvettes and missile boats coming out of their asses.

    You clearly are not big fan of this concept well let's wait for Navy decision makers. None of current corvettes or MRK have not even close parameters. In case of real war there might be no time to get back to base. Whatever you have in one salvo might be all.



    1) If they even dare to change their mind one more time after all the naval construction bullshit they pulled off over the decades they will prove to be far dumber than Soviets ever were and that they deserve to be partitioned and colonized

    2) Arctic and Far East require ships with range and endurance. This thing has neither. Wouldn't last one good storm in Arctic. It would work in Baltic maybe, nowhere else. 

    3) Derzkii and Gremashi are in those parameters weapons wise and far surpass it in terms of range and endurance.

    As for price they are trying to sell something that they claim is same as Lexus, that is size of Smart car and that it will cost "little more" than Fiat. Horseshit start to finish.

    1. If Karakurt is designed as a partially ocean-going or Arctic/Pacific version of the Buyan-M; which it is, then this new ship ought to hold out in such waters too.

    2. This new ship is basically a Karakurt with anti-sub capability and Redut - otherwise it seems to be not significantly larger and probably not more than say 30% more expensive.

    3. This thing compared to Steregushchyj/Gremyashnyj/Derzkiy is an actual Corvette, as in the actual concept of that class. The 20380/20385/20386 project ships are called Corvettes too but are larger and have more firepower. Really, they are more like light frigates.

    4. Which means there could be a niche for thia ship. But I agree with your other post for the most part; really, this is another Krylov vapourware initiative that will likely go nowhere, and the focus now should be on larger ship projects.
    KomissarBojanchev
    KomissarBojanchev

    Posts : 1440
    Points : 1601
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 22
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  KomissarBojanchev on Sat Sep 16, 2017 4:39 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:...................

    But Russian Navy also evolves in needs first 20380 then 11356 then again 22800 so direction is depending on combination financing, political situation and shipyards' abilities. ....

    Shipyards are supposed to carry out orders of the MoD not the other way around

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:........
    If this can fulfill  duties of Groskhovs in littoral waters, especially in North for one third in price and with high pace of production then why not?


    Anything can fulfill Gorshkov's duties in littoral waters because there you have naval aviation, coastal defenses and land based AA systems on speed-dial.  


    They have corvettes in production. Much superior ones than this horseshit financial scam.  


    But it takes upwards of 6 years to build Buyans. Russian shipyards can't competently build anything other than kilos and maybe the karakurts.
    Singular_Transform
    Singular_Transform

    Posts : 771
    Points : 761
    Join date : 2016-11-13

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  Singular_Transform on Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:27 am

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:

    But it takes upwards of 6 years to build Buyans. Russian shipyards can't competently build anything other than kilos and maybe the karakurts.

    They need to rebuild the industrial background.
    The 2014 ukrainan problems thrown a wrench into the process, but as soon as they can make the first the things will speed up.

    First is when you learn, second-fourth where you practice to acceptable level, and five - thirty where you master, and afterwards all of the simple routine.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 9023
    Points : 9105
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  PapaDragon on Sat Sep 16, 2017 1:36 pm

    KomissarBojanchev wrote:
    But it takes upwards of 6 years to build Buyans. Russian shipyards can't competently build anything other than kilos and maybe the karakurts.

    If that's the case then absolutely last thing they need is another ship c!ass on the roster, especially fanart frigate whose equivalents are already in production.
    AlfaT8
    AlfaT8

    Posts : 1867
    Points : 1862
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  AlfaT8 on Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:27 pm

    Still no name for our mystery ship guys, what's going on?? Suspect
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 4426
    Points : 4404
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  miketheterrible on Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:43 pm

    He is lying about the Buyan claim:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyan-class_corvette

    Average is about 3 years.
    SeigSoloyvov
    SeigSoloyvov

    Posts : 1734
    Points : 1724
    Join date : 2016-04-08

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  SeigSoloyvov on Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:06 am

    miketheterrible wrote:He is lying about the Buyan claim:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyan-class_corvette

    Average is about 3 years.

    which is still pathetic for a 500 ton ship.
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 4426
    Points : 4404
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  miketheterrible on Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:32 am

    SeigSoloyvov wrote:
    miketheterrible wrote:He is lying about the Buyan claim:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyan-class_corvette

    Average is about 3 years.

    which is still pathetic for a 500 ton ship.

    Actually, 1,000 Ton since all new ones have be the newer model (Buyan-M. You thinking of Buyan).  But nice try retard.  Lie to us more about your position in Syria instead of bullshitting your knowledge here.

    BTW, this small ship sure packs a punch.  Something that corvettes in most western countries cannot do.  But hey, tell me more.

    Sponsored content

    Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News - Page 12 Empty Re: Russian Naval Shipbuilding Industry: News

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Jun 06, 2020 1:45 pm