Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+73
Rasisuki Nebia
lyle6
andalusia
LMFS
miroslav
xeno
ultimatewarrior
thegopnik
owais.usmani
Rodion_Romanovic
miketheterrible
Labrador
mnztr
Ned86
franco
hoom
PapaDragon
walle83
KiloGolf
Hole
verkhoturye51
Tsavo Lion
Peŕrier
nastle77
Singular_Transform
Arrow
Project Canada
Honesroc
Tolstoy
Singular_trafo
SeigSoloyvov
Isos
slasher
Svyatoslavich
Big_Gazza
artjomh
Morpheus Eberhardt
JohninMK
GunshipDemocracy
Stealthflanker
RTN
jhelb
Kimppis
Dima
Werewolf
mack8
flamming_python
eridan
kvs
Zivo
sepheronx
max steel
Austin
chicken
par far
Mike E
KomissarBojanchev
Flyingdutchman
collegeboy16
etaepsilonk
navyfield
calripson
Vann7
George1
dionis
TheArmenian
Hachimoto
TR1
Viktor
GarryB
runaway
Admin
Russian Patriot
77 posters

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Rasisuki Nebia
    Rasisuki Nebia

    Posts : 60
    Points : 62
    Join date : 2020-12-25

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Rasisuki Nebia Tue Jan 19, 2021 4:33 pm

    I think most agree that they're behind in the field of shipbuilding, with that said the pace they've been improving is really not bad considering how rough the last 20 years were for Russia

    Big_Gazza and owais.usmani like this post

    avatar
    Arrow

    Posts : 976
    Points : 974
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Arrow Tue Jan 19, 2021 4:55 pm

    Not only ships. Watch the amazing F 35 production bluntly.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 7908
    Points : 7892
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Isos Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:12 pm

    Rasisuki Nebia wrote:I think most agree that they're behind in the field of shipbuilding, with that said the pace they've been improving is really not bad considering how rough the last 20 years were for Russia

    Their problems are the bad infrastructure and lack of investment in the navy, ground and air forces have the priority.

    The ships they make are good. Compare that to the German frigates that are upside down or the US freedom class that is totally useless.

    Japan/south korea make US ships and not their own designs even if they have a nice naval industry.

    UK destroyers were louder than carriers and they suck. Their QE2 carriers are a failure as a concept (based around f-35 and don't have a real landing zone because of the skijump).

    Chinese have lot of issues on engines. And their ships have still to prove something.

    Only France and Italy know how to make something good in the west and surpringly they are not that expensive but they lack good weapons.

    GarryB and lancelot like this post

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 30685
    Points : 31215
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  GarryB Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:06 am

    The US has been using this method for a long time. You can see how they are doing incredibly fast production of Virginia.
    Russia is still far from having such capabilities.

    Russia does not need enormous numbers of new ships and subs for the moment.

    New ship building technologies didn't just fall from the sky, Russia paid France (for Mistrals) and South Korea (various new shipyards) for boat building technologies and techniques.

    I think most agree that they're behind in the field of shipbuilding, with that said the pace they've been improving is really not bad considering how rough the last 20 years were for Russia

    They have gone from cold war situation to having to make vastly more advanced and capable vessels over a period of very few orders and not a lot of commercial orders either... the fact that they still exist is a miracle, yet they seem to be coping with the jobs they have been getting despite funding not being up front... remember it is not just a shipyard, but also companies and sub contractors that make parts and provide materials that need to perform properly.

    You can boast about how wonderful Virginia Class sub production has been going but how much of it with substandard steel that could fail in certain operational conditions.

    Not only ships. Watch the amazing F 35 production bluntly.

    F-35 production is a joke, that aircraft has so many problems... many of them quite fundamental, yet they blindly keep making the things like nothing is wrong... that is not something to be proud of.

    Their problems are the bad infrastructure and lack of investment in the navy, ground and air forces have the priority.

    And that is key because their Navy and shipping fleet are not a priority or focus... but in the near future they are going to have to focus more and more on trade partners who really do want to trade fairly who don't share a land border with Russia, so shipping becomes a rather more important component of their economy.

    The ships they make are good. Compare that to the German frigates that are upside down or the US freedom class that is totally useless.

    Another good point... the Corvettes they are building are better than most western frigates and destroyers, and are rather better than the products the amazing US MIC have come up with in the last few years.... need I point out Ford class carriers, Zumwalt class destroyers, and LCS class bits of crap?

    Their solution to the LCS fiasco was an european frigate not that much different from a Russian Gorshkov conceptually.


    UK destroyers were louder than carriers and they suck.

    Not to mention overheating propulsion systems... and the less said about SSKs the better...

    The main problem for the Russians is that they still have a lot of stuff left over from the cold war and not enough to replace it... but they have set in motion plans to create modern modular capable new ship designs... they have a variety of fleets in different situations and environments and honestly one Corvette design likely wont cut it in all the different situations, but larger ships can be more flexible and dynamic, so a couple of Corvette designs, and a single Frigate and Destroyer and Cruiser type is probably what they will need... once they are sorted they should be able to start producing them in numbers... that is the point of standardisation and modular design... claiming they are shit because they are not mass producing them now is naive... you have to check the product is good before putting it into mass production because like the F-35 after you made 1,000 planes you might realise that there is a fundamental problem that creates a range of issues if it is not changed, so those first 1,000 planes distributed out to users who find all these faults now have to return those planes to get major changes and repairs made... which might take a while and be very expensive and result in a plane that does what it was supposed to in the first place... so you get a plane that is too expensive and doesn't work and make it much more expensive to get it to work properly... when you know its primary feature of stealth already does not work when radars in Russia are tracking them operating on the Iran Iraq border.

    They could have been using F-16s for that job... would have been faster, much cheaper, longer ranged, better payload.... and not stealthy either...

    Isos, lancelot and Rasisuki Nebia like this post

    avatar
    owais.usmani

    Posts : 814
    Points : 812
    Join date : 2019-03-27
    Age : 35

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  owais.usmani Tue Mar 09, 2021 8:15 am

    https://twitter.com/EmbersOfStirn/status/1369158161173725186

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Ewa6ef10
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Ewa6ee10
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Ewa5ag10
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Ewa5ag11
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Ewa5ag12

    franco, George1, dino00, Big_Gazza, walle83, LMFS, Hole and lancelot like this post

    avatar
    mnztr

    Posts : 1218
    Points : 1252
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  mnztr Wed Mar 10, 2021 8:45 am

    Silly question: what is the snorkel for on a nuclear sub? Just for fresh air?
    Dima
    Dima

    Posts : 1165
    Points : 1178
    Join date : 2012-03-22

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Dima Wed Mar 10, 2021 10:30 am

    mnztr wrote:Silly question: what is the snorkel for on a nuclear sub? Just for fresh air?
    Yes. For Diesel/DG
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Kolomn10

    LMFS and owais.usmani like this post

    avatar
    owais.usmani

    Posts : 814
    Points : 812
    Join date : 2019-03-27
    Age : 35

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  owais.usmani Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:15 am

    https://www.providencejournal.com/story/news/local/2021/03/09/submarine-catches-fire-providence-port/4643050001/

    PROVIDENCE — Like many old warships, the afterlife of Juliet 484 has been quite extended and nowhere near as heady as those Cold War days when the Russian K-77 submarine tracked the USS Saratoga.

    Another chapter in that afterlife unfolded Tuesday morning when the hull of Juliet caught fire as workers disassembled it with blowtorches in a scrapyard off Allens Avenue.

    The blaze inflamed an outer sheathing of black rubber, which sent thick black smoke billowing high above the port area along Route 95.

    Providence firefighters went to the location at 9:34 a.m., set up their hoses and quickly doused the fire.

    The project of dissembling Juliet, underway since June 2019, continues.

    The former tourist attraction-turned-sunken-wreck-turned environmental hazard has been a scrap metal prospect far longer than the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management would have hoped.

    The project to dispose of the submarine, by Rhode Island Recycled Metals LLC, is the subject of a standing consent decree ordered by Superior Court.

    At one time during the Cold War, both the sub and the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier Saratoga shadowed each other.

    The boat’s afterlife kicked off following the thaw after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    It was sold and used as a restaurant and vodka bar in Helsinki, Finland, in the 1990s, towed to Florida and abandoned. It then became a set for the 2002 Harrison Ford movie “K-19: The Widowmaker.”

    The USS Saratoga Museum Foundation in Rhode Island acquired the boat and created a floating museum in 2002.

    Then, during a 2007 nor'easter, it sank. It was subsequently sold for scrap.

    On Tuesday, a spokesman for the Department of Environmental Management, Michael Healey, said the scrapyard has been the target of DEM legal actions since 2010.

    In 2019, said Healey, under that pressure from DEM, the scrapyard pumped out Juliet, refloated her, and moved her closer to shore and began tearing the hull apart.

    On Tuesday, he said, part of the sub remained in the water but other parts were on dry ground.

    Workers were within the interior of the hull, cutting from the inside, when the thick rubber on the exterior caught fire, said Healey.

    The prompt response by Providence firefighters controlled the blaze in time to head off potential environmental blight, Healey said.

    “The fire was not hot enough to liquify that rubber into an oil, which could have been an environmental problem because that’s going to drain into the river,” he said.

    Both Healey and Deputy Assistant Fire Chief Steve Capracotta said that only about a third of the former 282-foot submarine was left over prior to the fire.

    "Yes, it's a submarine, but it's not what people think of when you say submarine," Capracotta said.
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza

    Posts : 2735
    Points : 2735
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Big_Gazza Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:17 pm

    Another chapter in that afterlife unfolded Tuesday morning when the hull of Juliet caught fire as workers disassembled it with blowtorches in a scrapyard off Allens Avenue.

    The blaze inflamed an outer sheathing of black rubber, which sent thick black smoke billowing high above the port area along Route 95.

    Providence firefighters went to the location at 9:34 a.m., set up their hoses and quickly doused the fire.

    So when Russian subs catch fire in Russian shipyards due to hot works igniting their rubberised acoustic coatings it is a sign of Rusky incompetence and corruption, but when it happens in the US it passes with little mention, and certainly doesn't cast a shadow over US exceptionalism... Suspect

    magnumcromagnon, kvs, owais.usmani and lancelot like this post

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 7324
    Points : 7473
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  magnumcromagnon Thu Mar 11, 2021 4:51 pm

    Big_Gazza wrote:
    Another chapter in that afterlife unfolded Tuesday morning when the hull of Juliet caught fire as workers disassembled it with blowtorches in a scrapyard off Allens Avenue.

    The blaze inflamed an outer sheathing of black rubber, which sent thick black smoke billowing high above the port area along Route 95.

    Providence firefighters went to the location at 9:34 a.m., set up their hoses and quickly doused the fire.

    So when Russian subs catch fire in Russian shipyards due to hot works igniting their rubberised acoustic coatings it is a sign of Rusky incompetence and corruption, but when it happens in the US it passes with little mention, and certainly doesn't cast a shadow over US exceptionalism...   Suspect


    Uncle Sham's exceptionalism on display! Wink

    "Unusual adversary": The crew of a nuclear submarine of the US Navy faced an invasion of bedbugs

    dino00, Big_Gazza, kvs and Hole like this post

    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 3896
    Points : 3898
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  LMFS Fri Mar 19, 2021 10:50 am

    From an interview today with Evmenov:

    – What kind of replenishment is waiting for nuclear submariners in the near future?

    – By the end of the year, the Russian Navy will receive the Knyaz Oleg strategic missile submarine of the Borey project, the Kazan and Novosibirsk nuclear submarines of the Yasen project, which are being built at the Sevmash enterprise. This year, two strategic missile submarines, the Knyaz Potemkin and Dmitry Donskoy, will also be laid down.
    Along with the construction of the 4th generation of nuclear submarines, work is underway to create the next, 5th generation of multi-purpose and strategic submarines. This task is assigned to designers, scientific organizations and the Military training and research center of the Russian Navy, which provides military scientific support for the design and construction of ships throughout the entire cycle.
    I would like to emphasize that the process of designing and building submarines of the series has an important feature. Each subsequent ship of the same project embodies more and more new technological solutions. There is an indisputable logic in this, following which we keep up with, and often outstrip, the world's scientific and technological progress in the field of underwater shipbuilding. To do this, we have everything: a scientific base, a brilliant design idea, and enterprises capable of building reliable and modern submarines.

    http://redstar.ru/ih-stihiya-glubina-morskaya/

    GarryB, dino00, kvs, x_54_u43 and Hole like this post

    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 3896
    Points : 3898
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  LMFS Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:34 am

    The source spoke about the re-equipment of all Russian multi-purpose submarines

    MOSCOW, March 24-RIA Novosti. All multi-purpose nuclear submarines (submarines) The Russian Navy of projects 971, 949A and 885 will be armed with Kalibr, Onyx and Zircon missiles, a source in the military-industrial complex told RIA Novosti.
    Earlier, the commander-in-chief of the Navy, Admiral Nikolai Evmenov, said that the service life of the most numerous multi-purpose nuclear submarines of projects 949A and 971 in the Russian fleet will be doubled, they will be re-equipped.

    "After modernization, the multipurpose nuclear submarines of projects 971 and 949A will be armed with kalibras, onyx And Zircons. Containers for these missiles are universal, " the source said.
    Now these submarines are regularly armed with mine-torpedo weapons.

    https://ria.ru/20210324/podlodka-1602570481.html

    dino00 and kvs like this post

    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza

    Posts : 2735
    Points : 2735
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Big_Gazza Wed Mar 24, 2021 7:56 am

    LMFS wrote:The source spoke about the re-equipment of all Russian multi-purpose submarines

    MOSCOW, March 24-RIA Novosti. All multi-purpose nuclear submarines (submarines) The Russian Navy of projects 971, 949A and 885 will be armed with Kalibr, Onyx and Zircon missiles, a source in the military-industrial complex told RIA Novosti.
    Earlier, the commander-in-chief of the Navy, Admiral Nikolai Evmenov, said that the service life of the most numerous multi-purpose nuclear submarines of projects 949A and 971 in the Russian fleet will be doubled, they will be re-equipped.

    "After modernization, the multipurpose nuclear submarines of projects 971 and 949A will be armed with kalibras, onyx And Zircons. Containers for these missiles are universal, " the source said.
    Now these submarines are regularly armed with mine-torpedo weapons.

    https://ria.ru/20210324/podlodka-1602570481.html

    How can Pr.971 carry Onix and Zircons? Suspect

    They are too broad to be launched from torpedo tubes (dia ~ 0.7m) , and the 971M modernisation is not adding a VLS.

    Journos getting it wrong again??
    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 3896
    Points : 3898
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  LMFS Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:23 pm

    Big_Gazza wrote:How can Pr.971 carry Onix and Zircons? Suspect

    They are too broad to be launched from torpedo tubes (dia ~ 0.7m) , and the 971M modernisation is not adding a VLS.

    Journos getting it wrong again??

    I have read that before and it makes sense with the "general mobilization" we are seeing in the VMF to get as many Tsirkon carriers as possible, specially if they are subs. The 971 has 4x 650 mm torpedo tubes, apparently that could be enough for Tsirkon.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 11478
    Points : 11548
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  PapaDragon Wed Mar 24, 2021 3:33 pm

    BigGazza wrote:How can Pr.971 carry Onix and Zircons?

    They are too broad to be launched from torpedo tubes (dia ~ 0.7m) , and the 971M modernisation is not adding a VLS. ...

    Onyx part probably refers to Oscars not Akulas



    LMFS wrote:...service life of the most numerous multi-purpose nuclear submarines of projects 949A and 971 in the Russian fleet will be doubled, they will be re-equipped....

    Doubled service life? What does this mean exactly?

    Are they overhauling them to such extent that they will realistically double their service life? Can it even be done? (Yay if yes)

    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 3896
    Points : 3898
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  LMFS Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:45 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:Doubled service life? What does this mean exactly?

    Are they overhauling them to such extent that they will realistically double their service life? Can it even be done? (Yay if yes)

    I guess it will depend on the particular condition and already spent life of each unit, the message I take is that they will be added to the VMF for the foreseeable future as attack / missile carrier subs, at least until they can be substituted by the Yasen. It is clear that new subs are not produced fast enough for either deterrence or actual fight against the USN submarine forces, so they need all the usable old units completely modernized and thrown into the mix for at least 10-15 years.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 30685
    Points : 31215
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  GarryB Thu Mar 25, 2021 3:18 am

    Well I suspect doubled their service life can be looked at in two different ways.

    First would be how old are they now... the time from being put into service to now a doubled service life means they can remain in service for the same period again... ie

    The ones getting upgrades now entered service in the early 1990s so doubled service life by that definition would be another 30 years of potential service life... which seems a lot.

    The other way they could look at it was they expected these boats to last say 40 years in total, so a boat that entered service in 1990 would be expected to last until about 2030... which would be another 10 years, so with this overhaul and upgrade to double their expected service life they expect to keep using them till 2040, or another 20 years.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 11478
    Points : 11548
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  PapaDragon Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:56 am


    Also how much time those Akulas spend in the water and how much on dry land?

    Because that could be extremely important factor
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 4556
    Points : 4548
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 45
    Location : Merkelland

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Hole Fri Mar 26, 2021 8:52 pm

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Umka-210
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Umka-211
    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Umka-212
    3 subs in the Arctic.

    GarryB, George1, dino00, Big_Gazza, zardof, LMFS and lancelot like this post

    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza

    Posts : 2735
    Points : 2735
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Big_Gazza Sun Mar 28, 2021 12:36 pm

    The three boats are apparently:

    K-18 Karelia, Pr 667BDRM

    K-407 Novomoskovsk, Pr 667BDRM

    K-549 Kynaz Vladimir, Pr 955A

    Prince Vladimir is the closest to the camera in the 3-boat view

    GarryB likes this post

    Kiko
    Kiko

    Posts : 798
    Points : 814
    Join date : 2020-11-11
    Age : 72
    Location : Brasilia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Kiko Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:34 pm

    "Strengthen the naval component of the nuclear triad": what makes the Liner ballistic missile unique
    March 31, 2021
    Alexey Zakvasin, Elizaveta Komarova for RT Russian.

    On March 31, 2011, Russian specialists completed R&D work on the creation of the R-29RMU2.1 Liner sea liquid intercontinental ballistic missile. The weapon was developed to equip the Project 667BDRM Dolphin nuclear submarine cruisers, which are part of the Northern Fleet. The peculiarity of the missile is that it can be equipped with a wide range of nuclear weapons and missile defense penetration complexes. In terms of payload volume and flight range, the R-29RMU2.1 confidently surpasses the solid-propellant Bulava. Experts call the Liner the most powerful and effective sea-based nuclear weapon in the world.

    Ten years ago, Russia completed experimental design work (R&D) on the creation of a sea three-stage intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) R-29RMU2.1 "Liner". The key role in the implementation of the project was played by the specialists of JSC “SRC named after academician V.P. Makeeva "(Miass, Chelyabinsk region) Yuri Kaverin and Boris Smirnov.

    The first test launch of the rocket took place on May 20, 2011 in the Barents Sea from the mine of the Yekaterinburg nuclear submarine. The Liner warhead successfully hit the target at the Kura training ground in Kamchatka.

    The new ICBM was officially adopted by the Navy in January 2014. The serial production of missiles was deployed at the facilities of the Krasnoyarsk Machine-Building Plant JSC.

    "Outperforms all modern naval missiles"

    The Liner is a representative of the class of liquid-propellant ICBMs, which were developed as part of the program for the rearmament of Project 667BDRM Dolphin submarine cruisers built in the 1980s. The goal of this modernization was to extend the operational life of the submarines until 2030.

    This type of nuclear-powered submarines is part of the Northern Fleet and still forms the basis of the naval component of Russia's strategic nuclear triad, but in the coming years the role of the main strike force of the Navy should be transferred to the family of the new generation of Project 955 Borey submarines .

    Each submarine of the 667BDRM project houses 16 launchers. The peculiarity of cruisers of this type is the possibility of launching ICBMs in any direction relative to the course of movement. Under water, rockets, as a rule, fly out at depths of up to 55 m at a speed of 6-7 knots (11.1-12.9 km / h). If necessary, ammunition can be launched in one salvo.

    R-29RMU2.1 was created on the basis of R-29RMU2 "Sineva", on which work took place from 1998 to 2007. The firing range of this missile exceeds 11.5 thousand km. The ICBM received medium-power warheads, anti-missile defense systems, a satellite navigation system and a Malakhit-3 computer complex.

    "The fundamental difference between this machine (" Sineva ". - RT ) from its predecessor (R-29RM. - RT ) is that it has changed the size of the steps, installed ten nuclear units for individual guidance, increased the security of the complex from the action of an electromagnetic pulse, a system for overcoming the enemy's missile defense has been installed, ”the materials of the RF Ministry of Defense say.

    As reported earlier in an interview to the Interfax news agency, the General Designer of the SRC im. Makeeva Vladimir Degtyar, "Sineva" has significant modernization potential. Proof of this, as the scientist emphasized, is the development of the Liner.

    In a commentary on RT, the founder of the Military Russia portal, Dmitry Kornev, noted that the R-29RMU2.1 is unified with the Sineva for most of its components, but it compares favorably with it by the ability to install warheads of various capacities and more advanced missile defense systems.

    In the GRTs them. Makeeva argue that the "Liner" is not inferior to the American UGM-133A Trident II ICBM in terms of combat equipment, and "in terms of energy perfection (technical level) it surpasses all modern sea missiles of Great Britain, China, the United States and France."

    "The multivariance of the combat equipment of Russian missiles will allow to adequately respond to changes in the foreign policy situation associated with the deployment of an anti-missile defense system or treaty restrictions on the number of warheads," the developer's website explains.

    Depending on the assigned tasks, the Liner can be equipped with three types of weapons: ten small-power warheads with anti-missile defense systems, eight of the same class with enhanced anti-missile defense capabilities, or four middle-class ones with complexes to break through enemy defense systems.

    Liner missiles can carry a mixed configuration of warheads of different power classes. The operation of any combination of missiles and their combat equipment on submarines of the 667BDRM project is ensured by the modernized shipborne digital computer system "Arbat-U2.1" Makeeva.

    The developer does not disclose the tactical and technical characteristics of his brainchild. However, from Degtyar's words, it follows that the Liner's range is equivalent to Sineva (over 11.5 thousand km).

    Only approximate information about R-29RMU2.1 is disseminated in the media According to open data, the length of the Liner is about 15 m, the hull diameter is 1.9 m, the launch weight is 40.3 tons, the payload (throw weight) is up to 2-2.8 tons, the guaranteed service life is 18- 20 years, circular probable deviation (accuracy indicator) - no more than 250 m.

    Degtyar believes that the high technical characteristics of the Liner were achieved thanks to a number of innovations: the increased size of the circular and arbitrary zones for disengagement of warheads, the use of flat trajectories “in the entire range of firing ranges in astro-inertial and astro-radio-inertial (with correction using GLONASS satellites. - RT ) modes operation of the control system".

    Overcoming missile defense

    In an interview with RT, the editor-in-chief of the National Defense magazine, Igor Korotchenko, noted that the Russian Defense Ministry made an adequate decision by launching a program to re-equip Project 667BDRM cruisers with the placement of Liner-type missiles.

    “The creation of this ICBM allowed keeping Project 667BDRM submarines in service and at the same time strengthening the naval component of our nuclear triad. The modernization was dictated by the need to improve the capabilities of overcoming the missile defense of a potential adversary, ”said Korotchenko.

    According to the expert, there is every reason to believe that the Liner is able to cope with the task of breaking through any missile defense system, like the R-30 Bulava naval ICBM , which is part of the arsenal of Project 955 submarine cruisers.

    As Dmitry Kornev explained, in terms of energy characteristics, Liner confidently surpasses Bulava. In practice, this advantage translates into a higher range and a larger payload. According to the expert, Sineva and Liner are the most powerful and efficient missiles in the world.

    “However, it is necessary to understand that liquid and solid-propellant ICBMs are weapons of different classes. Liquid-propellant rockets a priori have the best energy and mass characteristics. At the same time, they are not devoid of certain drawbacks, ”says Kornev.

    The main problem with liquid-propellant ICBMs is the less safe (compared to solid-propellant samples) operating conditions. In addition, Liner is structurally more complex, which naturally makes its production very time consuming, argues Kornev.

    “Another disadvantage of liquid-propellant ICBMs when compared with solid-propellant samples is the so-called liquid start. Before launch, the mine where the missile is located is filled with water, which increases the likelihood of being detected by the enemy. The Bulava has a dry start and a short active (initial - RT ) flight section, "Kornev noted.

    On the whole, according to the expert, Moscow is moving in the right direction, betting on the construction of Boreyevs with an arsenal of relatively simple, lightweight and safe solid-propellant missiles of the Bulava type. Nevertheless, according to Kornev, liquid ICBMs will play a significant role in the naval component of the Russian nuclear forces for a long time to come.

    “The power of liquid-propellant naval ICBMs will definitely be in demand as long as Project 667BDRM submarines are in service. It cannot be ruled out that the planned date of their decommissioning will shift to the right. Thus, the Liner will participate in ensuring the nuclear deterrence of the United States and its allies for about 20 years, ”summed up Kornev.

    https://russian.rt.com/russia/article/847950-lainer-r-29rmu21-podlodki-667

    franco, Big_Gazza and Hole like this post

    avatar
    limb

    Posts : 331
    Points : 341
    Join date : 2020-09-17

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  limb Fri Apr 02, 2021 12:26 am

    Why did the russians never develop conventional ballistic missiles with maneuverable MIRVs accurate enough to hit carriers , like the DF series? Being able to equip SSBNs with anti ship BMs(like a conventionally armed bulava) wouldve been pretty useful to soften up CBG defenses, even if they're not that accurate. The air force have very aeroballistic missiles, so why can't the bulava or Leiner be as accurate?
    lancelot
    lancelot

    Posts : 478
    Points : 480
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  lancelot Fri Apr 02, 2021 12:54 am

    limb wrote:Why did the russians never develop conventional ballistic missiles with maneuverable MIRVs accurate enough to hit carriers , like the DF series? Being able to equip SSBNs with anti ship BMs(like a conventionally armed bulava) wouldve been pretty useful to soften up CBG defenses, even if they're not that accurate. The air force have very aeroballistic missiles, so why can't the bulava or Leiner  be as accurate?

    Because they did not need to? They have had ramjet powered missiles like the Granit for decades.
    An air breathing missile will always have more range than a rocket. Or be smaller so you can pack more of them.
    Aircraft and ships are way, way slower than a ramjet missile and have less range than one.

    They can even carry tactical nuclear warheads (500kt ones) so a single Granit can wipe out a carrier battle group.

    Historically Soviet solid rockets had really crap miniaturization. After being one of the leaders in solid rocket technology in WW2 the Soviet Union squandered that lead by massive investments into hypergolic rockets to the detriment of solids. Just look at the size of the Typhoon class submarines because of those R-39 Rif missiles. This made solid rockets to hit ships highly unwieldy. Only recently in modern Russia has the gap been filled. You also need highly specialized modern electronics to have enough precision at those high velocities. That only became realistic in the late 1980s, early 1990s at best.


    Last edited by lancelot on Fri Apr 02, 2021 1:14 am; edited 1 time in total

    PapaDragon likes this post

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 11478
    Points : 11548
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  PapaDragon Fri Apr 02, 2021 1:11 am

    lancelot wrote:...They can even carry tactical nuclear warheads (500kt ones) so a single Granit can wipe out a carrier battle group....

    People keep forgetting what nuclear weapons actually are

    This missile can pack 500kt

    For reference bomb that hit Hiroshima was  ''just'' 15kt

    Here is reminder of what 15kt did to Hiroshima:

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 _113815510_83a99b1e-7787-41b7-a3b1-d8d01d071b87

    Now multiply this by 34 pwnd

    Big_Gazza and lancelot like this post

    lancelot
    lancelot

    Posts : 478
    Points : 480
    Join date : 2020-10-18

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  lancelot Fri Apr 02, 2021 1:18 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    lancelot wrote:...They can even carry tactical nuclear warheads (500kt ones) so a single Granit can wipe out a carrier battle group....

    People keep forgetting what nuclear weapons actually are

    This missile can pack 500kt

    For reference bomb that hit Hiroshima was  ''just'' 15kt

    Here is reminder of what 15kt did to Hiroshima:
    ...
    Now multiply this by 34 pwnd

    Yeah calling it a "tactical" nuclear warhead is a big understatement. More because of the role it has in the field than the terminal effect to be honest.

    Even a Trident II SLBM warhead is typically like 100kt or less. Although it can carry less warheads with close to 500kt power.

    One of those 500kt Granit warheads blowing up is enough to bring down the carrier, the cruisers, the destroyers, and even the submarines below water with the carrier battlegroup. It is a huge wallop. Any naval US invasion of the Soviet Union would have been dead stopped before it even started. The Granit can also carry conventional and thermobaric warheads in case you want to have more limited effects.

    Sponsored content

    Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion - Page 23 Empty Re: Russian Nuclear Submarine Force: Discussion

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue Sep 28, 2021 4:15 am