Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+63
Regular
Heartbeer
AlfaT8
PapaDragon
Dima
KomissarBojanchev
Vann7
Cyberspec
ult
cracker
Zivo
Cyrus the great
Bolt
sheytanelkebir
Karl Haushofer
Bidoul
Walther von Oldenburg
victor1985
Godric
coolieno99
d_taddei2
Solncepek
Book.
BKP
Cowboy's daughter
Prince Darling
whir
zg18
Airbornewolf
ultron
Kyo
GarryB
Neutrality
par far
auslander
Werewolf
iraqidabab
Siempre_Leal
Khepesh
Project Canada
flamming_python
Hachimoto
x_54_u43
Stealthflanker
jhelb
wilhelm
Shadåw
franco
mack8
medo
Akula971
George1
Erk
Monarchist
KoTeMoRe
Morpheus Eberhardt
magnumcromagnon
NationalRus
HUNTER VZLA
OminousSpudd
max steel
Rodinazombie
JohninMK
67 posters

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon


    Posts : 13246
    Points : 13288
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  PapaDragon Wed Oct 14, 2015 9:20 pm


    Sham Legion ( lol ) HQ fried by VKS thumbsuprussia



    Distinct lack of snackbars would indicate plunging morale among beardies. lol1
    avatar
    ultron


    Posts : 588
    Points : 569
    Join date : 2015-09-18

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  ultron Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:07 pm

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRS18z_WcAAsJ6r
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Guest Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:11 pm



    Must see, literally, i died laughing Very Happy
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Guest Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:19 pm

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRSd_vZU8AAkbhQ
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  OminousSpudd Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:29 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Six Ways Russia's Action in Syria Has Turned the Tables On the West

    Intelligence bonanza for Russia

    After a near collision with a Russian jet, the US Air Force ordered its fighter pilots to stay clear of areas where Russians are operating. The near miss gives you an idea of the cramped confines in which foreign aircraft have to fly. This proximity has allowed Russia to gather valuable intelligence on a variety of US and NATO aircraft, including the F-22, claimed to be the world's premier stealth fighter.

    Have they really been able to monitor F-22s? Nothing amazing about it, but it would be interesting if it's true.
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  max steel Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:43 pm

    Russians brought SA-21/22 anti-aircraft guns . They did it to get us aircraft signatures and improve their weaponry.
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  OminousSpudd Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:54 pm

    China to join Russian led coalition in Syria?

    This rumour has been around for awhile now... I'm still not convinced.
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  max steel Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:06 pm

    Chinks aren't coming , forget it. Russia is on its own.
    Airbornewolf
    Airbornewolf


    Posts : 1464
    Points : 1530
    Join date : 2014-02-05
    Location : https://odysee.com/@airbornewolf:8

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Airbornewolf Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:06 pm

    Militarov wrote:Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRSd_vZU8AAkbhQ


    So its confirmed?. MI-28's operational in Syria?. saw another shot of Ultron a post or two before in another angle of the two Havocs.

    also, something else while im here to throw into the group.

    For some reason NATO cant keep track of all the Russian activity inside and around Syria, Dutch airforce guy friend of mine operating from Iraq in the NATO Coalition where Dutch F-16's are operating says the Russians are employing some sort of Electronic warfare that blanks NATO AWACS with in his words" a static blanket" that makes it seem some objects just do not exist and never appear on NATO AWAC sensors untill they get so close to NATO aircraft they get an small radar signature and mistake an SU-35 for an drone at first in some cases while the SU-35 is not by design stealth. the Russian Cruise Missiles went undetected too untill they reached Syria. No Nato escorts where send to follow the russian cruise missiles trough Iraqi airspace as at least the coalition task force in Iraq was unaware of them flying trough Iraqi territory.
    altough Russians seem unaffected by this sort of "effect" as they even sniff out Drones in Syrian Airspace by the U.S and Israel. "one time stumbling on an drone is an accident, three times in a week is because the Russians know they are flying there". as he cited some U.S officer where the Dutch F-16's fall under.

    so what is it?, are these the ground-based ECM systems of Russia as posted on the hill in Latakia Air Base so powerful to do this kind of thing to NATO observation and early warning systems?. they virtually blind them without them knowing they are jammed and do not affect friendly units operating?. i never heard of it before. but apparently it did happen. apparently this confusion is also the reason the Nato coalition to opt to stay clear from the Russian aircraft for now.
    NationalRus
    NationalRus


    Posts : 610
    Points : 611
    Join date : 2010-04-11

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  NationalRus Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:09 pm

    Militarov wrote:

    Must see, literally, i died laughing Very Happy

    i posted it already with the real translation if someone is interested in the real translation that is of course

    but i have to say funny as fuck lol1 lol1

    better parody:

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b22_1444668434

    lol1 lol1 lol1


    Last edited by NationalRus on Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:17 pm; edited 2 times in total
    Erk
    Erk


    Posts : 933
    Points : 946
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Empire of Lies

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Erk Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:10 pm

    OminousSpudd wrote:China to join Russian led coalition in Syria?

    This rumour has been around for awhile now... I'm still not convinced.

    China have some technical issues they need to sort out first.

    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8495
    Points : 8757
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  sepheronx Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:13 pm

    Airbornewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRSd_vZU8AAkbhQ


    So its confirmed?. MI-28's operational in Syria?. saw another shot of Ultron a post or two before in another angle of the two Havocs.

    also, something else while im here to throw into the group.

    For some reason NATO cant keep track of all the Russian activity inside and around Syria, Dutch airforce guy friend of mine operating from Iraq in the NATO Coalition where Dutch F-16's are operating says the Russians are employing some sort of Electronic warfare that blanks NATO AWACS with in his words" a static blanket" that makes it seem some objects just do not exist and never appear on NATO AWAC sensors untill they get so close to NATO aircraft they get an small radar signature and mistake an SU-35 for an drone at first in some cases while the SU-35 is not by design stealth. the Russian Cruise Missiles went undetected too untill they reached Syria. No Nato escorts where send to follow the russian cruise missiles trough Iraqi airspace as at least the coalition task force in Iraq was unaware of them flying trough Iraqi territory.
    altough Russians seem unaffected by this sort of "effect" as they even sniff out Drones in Syrian Airspace by the U.S and Israel. "one time stumbling on an drone is an accident, three times in a week is because the Russians know they are flying there". as he cited some U.S officer where the Dutch F-16's fall under.

    so what is it?, are these the ground-based ECM systems of Russia as posted on the hill in Latakia Air Base so powerful to do this kind of thing to NATO observation and early warning systems?. they virtually blind them without them knowing they are jammed and do not affect friendly units operating?. i never heard of it before. but apparently it did happen. apparently this confusion is also the reason the Nato coalition to opt to stay clear from the Russian aircraft for now.  

    More than likely, yes.  Previous tests of various EW from Russia, like Talisman (well, that is technically Belarussian) gives the strangest effects to an enemy when trying to detect them, it causes a distortion that makes the aircraft not be picked up by the radar but other signatures of aircraft that are not there.  So it could be Talisman if it is in use on Su-34's and Su-30SM's.  

    This is Krasuha-4




    @2:13

    As well:
    http://sputniknews.com/world/20151005/1028033057/syria-russia-electronic-warfare-systems.html#ixzz3nghmRqpm


    Last edited by sepheronx on Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
    Cyberspec
    Cyberspec


    Posts : 2904
    Points : 3057
    Join date : 2011-08-08
    Location : Terra Australis

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Cyberspec Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:20 pm

    Mi-28's Question ...very nice if true

    ....

    Interesting video...you can see the bomb/missile before impact...some say it's a BETAB-500 or X-29

    ult wrote:

    another one from the receiving end




    Fox News has spotted Cubans in Syria  Razz

    Cuban military operatives reportedly have been spotted in Syria, where sources believe they are advising President Bashar al-Assad’s soldiers and may be preparing to man Russian-made tanks to aid Damascus in fighting rebel forces backed by the U.S.
    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/10/14/cuban-military-forces-deployed-to-syria-to-operate-russian-tanks-say-sources/?intcmp=hpbt1

    150  "moderate" CIA backed rebels KIA say the Americans

    "Our guys are fighting for their lives," said the official, estimating up to 150 CIA-trained moderate rebels have been killed by the Russians.
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/14/official-russia-deliberately-targeting-us-backed-forces-in-syria/


    8 x Ex-Turkish civilian cargo ships have been added to the "Syrian Express". One (Previously "ALICAN DEVAL" Built in 1985, now called 'Dvinitsa 50') has been spotted with a Ru-Navy flag in the Bosphorus

    http://imp-navigator.livejournal.com/384118.html
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8495
    Points : 8757
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  sepheronx Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:23 pm

    Cuban's? When was the last time they been used overseas? Angola and Congo? Damn, that is interesting if very much true. And if true, still shows Cuba's support to Russia even if they want warm ties with US.
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  OminousSpudd Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:31 pm

    NATO's confusion with this EW and ECM coverage is, primarily I suspect, due to the fact this is the first time they're (facing, for the lack of a better term) an OPFOR that is on par if not superior in terms of sophisticated assets. In fact I'd venture to say it's the first time since Yugoslavia they've faced EW of any kind.
    Airbornewolf
    Airbornewolf


    Posts : 1464
    Points : 1530
    Join date : 2014-02-05
    Location : https://odysee.com/@airbornewolf:8

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Airbornewolf Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:35 pm

    sepheronx wrote:
    Airbornewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRSd_vZU8AAkbhQ


    So its confirmed?. MI-28's operational in Syria?. saw another shot of Ultron a post or two before in another angle of the two Havocs.

    also, something else while im here to throw into the group.

    For some reason NATO cant keep track of all the Russian activity inside and around Syria, Dutch airforce guy friend of mine operating from Iraq in the NATO Coalition where Dutch F-16's are operating says the Russians are employing some sort of Electronic warfare that blanks NATO AWACS with in his words" a static blanket" that makes it seem some objects just do not exist and never appear on NATO AWAC sensors untill they get so close to NATO aircraft they get an small radar signature and mistake an SU-35 for an drone at first in some cases while the SU-35 is not by design stealth. the Russian Cruise Missiles went undetected too untill they reached Syria. No Nato escorts where send to follow the russian cruise missiles trough Iraqi airspace as at least the coalition task force in Iraq was unaware of them flying trough Iraqi territory.
    altough Russians seem unaffected by this sort of "effect" as they even sniff out Drones in Syrian Airspace by the U.S and Israel. "one time stumbling on an drone is an accident, three times in a week is because the Russians know they are flying there". as he cited some U.S officer where the Dutch F-16's fall under.

    so what is it?, are these the ground-based ECM systems of Russia as posted on the hill in Latakia Air Base so powerful to do this kind of thing to NATO observation and early warning systems?. they virtually blind them without them knowing they are jammed and do not affect friendly units operating?. i never heard of it before. but apparently it did happen. apparently this confusion is also the reason the Nato coalition to opt to stay clear from the Russian aircraft for now.  

    More than likely, yes.  Previous tests of various EW from Russia, like Talisman (well, that is technically Belarussian) gives the strangest effects to an enemy when trying to detect them, it causes a distortion that makes the aircraft not be picked up by the radar but other signatures of aircraft that are not there.  So it could be Talisman if it is in use on Su-34's and Su-30SM's.  

    This is Krasuha-4


    http://sputniknews.com/world/20151005/1028033057/syria-russia-electronic-warfare-systems.html#ixzz3nghmRqpm

    thanks for the reply, and considering Russia might have employed several systems like these trough SAA controlled territory/Iran it just might be the case. after all, its the perfect battlefield to put these things to the test.

    still, it was unexpected news for me anyway NATO was so hard-hit by Russian ECM and radar technology in Syria. altough perhaps i should have known seeing that ECM truck on top of that hill in Latakia Airbase, it was not there for nothing afterall. and the "anti isis coalition" still do not know what to do about it they decided to stay clear of Russian Aircraft Operations as they might not see them until the last moment.
    KoTeMoRe
    KoTeMoRe


    Posts : 4212
    Points : 4227
    Join date : 2015-04-21
    Location : Krankhaus Central.

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  KoTeMoRe Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:36 pm

    Militarov wrote:Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRSd_vZU8AAkbhQ

    I hope they've invested in a good video cell.

    The US can't see what's Loaded in a Condor. It can only guess. Okhotnik seems to be real.


    Last edited by KoTeMoRe on Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8495
    Points : 8757
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  sepheronx Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:37 pm

    Airbornewolf wrote:
    sepheronx wrote:
    Airbornewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRSd_vZU8AAkbhQ


    So its confirmed?. MI-28's operational in Syria?. saw another shot of Ultron a post or two before in another angle of the two Havocs.

    also, something else while im here to throw into the group.

    For some reason NATO cant keep track of all the Russian activity inside and around Syria, Dutch airforce guy friend of mine operating from Iraq in the NATO Coalition where Dutch F-16's are operating says the Russians are employing some sort of Electronic warfare that blanks NATO AWACS with in his words" a static blanket" that makes it seem some objects just do not exist and never appear on NATO AWAC sensors untill they get so close to NATO aircraft they get an small radar signature and mistake an SU-35 for an drone at first in some cases while the SU-35 is not by design stealth. the Russian Cruise Missiles went undetected too untill they reached Syria. No Nato escorts where send to follow the russian cruise missiles trough Iraqi airspace as at least the coalition task force in Iraq was unaware of them flying trough Iraqi territory.
    altough Russians seem unaffected by this sort of "effect" as they even sniff out Drones in Syrian Airspace by the U.S and Israel. "one time stumbling on an drone is an accident, three times in a week is because the Russians know they are flying there". as he cited some U.S officer where the Dutch F-16's fall under.

    so what is it?, are these the ground-based ECM systems of Russia as posted on the hill in Latakia Air Base so powerful to do this kind of thing to NATO observation and early warning systems?. they virtually blind them without them knowing they are jammed and do not affect friendly units operating?. i never heard of it before. but apparently it did happen. apparently this confusion is also the reason the Nato coalition to opt to stay clear from the Russian aircraft for now.  

    More than likely, yes.  Previous tests of various EW from Russia, like Talisman (well, that is technically Belarussian) gives the strangest effects to an enemy when trying to detect them, it causes a distortion that makes the aircraft not be picked up by the radar but other signatures of aircraft that are not there.  So it could be Talisman if it is in use on Su-34's and Su-30SM's.  

    This is Krasuha-4


    http://sputniknews.com/world/20151005/1028033057/syria-russia-electronic-warfare-systems.html#ixzz3nghmRqpm

    thanks for the reply, and considering Russia might have employed several systems like these trough SAA controlled territory/Iran it just might be the case. after all, its the perfect battlefield to put these things to the test.

    still, it was unexpected news for me anyway NATO was so hard-hit by Russian ECM and radar technology in Syria. altough perhaps i should have known seeing that ECM truck on top of that hill in Latakia Airbase, it was not there for nothing afterall. and the "anti isis coalition"  still do not know what to do about it they decided to stay clear of Russian Aircraft Operations as they might not see them until the last moment.  

    Here is the kicker. Krasuha-4 is not meant for the terrorists. Terrorists are not running around with radar systems of any type and does not have AWAC's support or fighter jets. This system, as discussed much earlier (prior to your return), is entirely for NATO in the region. It is entirely to cause disruptions and other issues in terms of airborne radar and communications. If it was to aim at the insurgents, then they would have used what was mentioned in the second video I posted - systems integrated in small drones or on the Tiger-M vehicle.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Guest Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:38 pm

    Airbornewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 CRSd_vZU8AAkbhQ


    So its confirmed?. MI-28's operational in Syria?. saw another shot of Ultron a post or two before in another angle of the two Havocs.

    also, something else while im here to throw into the group.

    For some reason NATO cant keep track of all the Russian activity inside and around Syria, Dutch airforce guy friend of mine operating from Iraq in the NATO Coalition where Dutch F-16's are operating says the Russians are employing some sort of Electronic warfare that blanks NATO AWACS with in his words" a static blanket" that makes it seem some objects just do not exist and never appear on NATO AWAC sensors untill they get so close to NATO aircraft they get an small radar signature and mistake an SU-35 for an drone at first in some cases while the SU-35 is not by design stealth. the Russian Cruise Missiles went undetected too untill they reached Syria. No Nato escorts where send to follow the russian cruise missiles trough Iraqi airspace as at least the coalition task force in Iraq was unaware of them flying trough Iraqi territory.
    altough Russians seem unaffected by this sort of "effect" as they even sniff out Drones in Syrian Airspace by the U.S and Israel. "one time stumbling on an drone is an accident, three times in a week is because the Russians know they are flying there". as he cited some U.S officer where the Dutch F-16's fall under.

    so what is it?, are these the ground-based ECM systems of Russia as posted on the hill in Latakia Air Base so powerful to do this kind of thing to NATO observation and early warning systems?. they virtually blind them without them knowing they are jammed and do not affect friendly units operating?. i never heard of it before. but apparently it did happen. apparently this confusion is also the reason the Nato coalition to opt to stay clear from the Russian aircraft for now.  

    Well i wouldnt say confirmed 100%, but i guess since photos started showing up it might be true. We shall see very soon.

    When its about electronic warfare its very, very complex field, you have counter EW suits too, you have different types of EW, what he described is probably abit overstated tho, but such things can happen. Most common type of Electronic warfare is what we Air defence guys call Spoofing, basically feeding you with useless and unexisting targets, longterm goal is to hide actual targets among many. But its hard to belive that USAF AWACS is lacking polarization, fast frequency hopping or similar capabilities to fight enemy EW i assume jamming has effects but not that severe. Big part of EW is actual detection of enemy radiation and measuring its output power, bandwidth, scanning speed etc etc, its intelligence gathering EW.

    And yeah these are ground based EW systems, Russia operates few types, some new some older. Story about drone is click bite by media hubs, its quite big drone you know it cant hide itself its natural that they knew where its flying.

    I know from stories of my superiors during service, our P40 radars were heavily under influence of EW, multiple decoy targets, random range measurements and altitude measure radar would show random stuff too. Com systems would go wild and air only static, it was so severe sometimes that tens of miles of copper cabling was layed between units to secure communication to at least some extend.
    zg18
    zg18


    Posts : 888
    Points : 958
    Join date : 2013-09-26
    Location : Zagreb , Croatia

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  zg18 Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:38 pm

    Russian equipment is pouring in Syria russia

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 B4a8178d495d

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 3179dfb702dc
    Airbornewolf
    Airbornewolf


    Posts : 1464
    Points : 1530
    Join date : 2014-02-05
    Location : https://odysee.com/@airbornewolf:8

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Airbornewolf Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:39 pm

    OminousSpudd wrote:NATO's confusion with this EW and ECM coverage is, primarily I suspect,  due to the fact this is the first time they're (facing, for the lack of a better term) an OPFOR that is on par if not superior in terms of sophisticated assets. In fact I'd venture to say it's the first time since Yugoslavia they've faced EW of any kind.

    True, a while ago i made a lenghty post about NATO's vulnerability to ECM and other means of electronic jamming and attack. i was just not aware it was employed on such a scale to lock any "nato" allied party out of Syria so quickly by means of ECM. for NATO and probably Israel Syria became pretty much a black hole in surveillance terms. as aircraft crew and NATO radar mechanics still do not know how they did it.
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8495
    Points : 8757
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  sepheronx Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:48 pm

    I am not entirely sure about it, but my understanding is that it could possibly affect Russian jets too as I doubt one can simply control who it affects or not (physics man). Anyway, so it may only be open to certain times and what not. That is a pure guess though. Judging by the setup of Karusah-4, it looks like it can concentrate on area judging by the dishes.

    Anyway, yeah, it is meant directly to stir crap on AWACS and jets radar. When it comes to electronic warfare, ground systems will be the benefit since a huge portion of it has to do with the applied energy and output of energy.

    Heck, Russia created an Il-76 jet with pure electronic warfare. Strong enough to jam S-300 radar.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  magnumcromagnon Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:53 pm

    flamming_python wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    sepheronx wrote:What are the range of Russia's EW systems? And are they able to pinpoint it at an area/devices to prevent their own equipment from going haywire?

    Kras-3 passive listening (400km), Kras-4 passive listening, and attacking (300km), but the one I'm talking about is Murmansk-BN with a 5,000 km range:

    Credit Cyberspec for this find:

    https://www.russiadefence.net/t2461p120-russian-ecm-ew-equipment#84333

    By using the strategic Caspian Sea, and getting Iran's support, Russia can transport it from Northern Iran to Southern Iran and completely blanket the GCC territories with static and fried electronics. There's also the compact EMP generators developed a little less than a decade ago.

    FFS, what is it with all this jacking off to dreams of a war with the Gulf States (and yes, electronic warfare is an act of war).

    Yes they are brutal medieval theocracies.
    But it's their country and frankly their own peoples' problem.
    Yemen is not our problem either, much as I sympathise with the people there.

    And a war against any Gulf Monarchy will still be aggression, and it will still bring much suffering. It's not something to advocate, especially not in every bloody post. It's something to avoid in all situations but the most dire.

    Of course though if these shitholes commit to bringing international terrorism to Russia again then I'll be all for it.

    FFS, who told you to tuck your family jewels, and straddle that bottle of KY Jelly®️ lol? Razz BTW the Saudi's have been waging covert war against Russia for 3 decades, delivering weapons to insurgents 'IS' an act of war, do I need to spell out for ya? Rolling Eyes

    Put some serious ECM warfare assets on the coast of Iran, it should help 'cool' some Wahhabi heads, and to be in a position of strength means you can negotiate in strength,  such as encouraging them *cough, jammed comms in a warzone in Yemen, cough* to stop delivering weapons to insurgents in Syria.Wink Teach them how asymmetrical/hybrid warfare really works. Twisted Evil
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Guest Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:56 pm

    sepheronx wrote:I am not entirely sure about it, but my understanding is that it could possibly affect Russian jets too as I doubt one can simply control who it affects or not (physics man).  Anyway, so it may only be open to certain times and what not.  That is a pure guess though.  Judging by the setup of Karusah-4, it looks like it can concentrate on area judging by the dishes.

    Anyway, yeah, it is meant directly to stir crap on AWACS and jets radar.  When it comes to electronic warfare, ground systems will be the benefit since a huge portion of it has to do with the applied energy and output of energy.

    Heck, Russia created an Il-76 jet with pure electronic warfare.  Strong enough to jam S-300 radar.

    Faraday cage is one of the laws of physics used to counter EW, however way to prevent your equipment to be jammed by your own signals is frequency swapping, for this however you need epic information sharing capabilities and this is where Russians seemed to be lacking. EW equipment on IL76 that you mentioned for an example had huge issues with that, affecting own equipment, same happened with TU160 electronic warfare suite coz it was jamming itself basically.

    There is reason why radar frequencies, wavelengts, poweroutput etc are basically a secret and why Indians/French always fly with radar in training mode during international exercises. French used their Rafales to gather radar signatures during Red flag from US machines, while themself flew in training mode, EW is as i said so complex that its mindblowing.
    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8495
    Points : 8757
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada

    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  sepheronx Thu Oct 15, 2015 12:02 am

    Militarov wrote:
    sepheronx wrote:I am not entirely sure about it, but my understanding is that it could possibly affect Russian jets too as I doubt one can simply control who it affects or not (physics man).  Anyway, so it may only be open to certain times and what not.  That is a pure guess though.  Judging by the setup of Karusah-4, it looks like it can concentrate on area judging by the dishes.

    Anyway, yeah, it is meant directly to stir crap on AWACS and jets radar.  When it comes to electronic warfare, ground systems will be the benefit since a huge portion of it has to do with the applied energy and output of energy.

    Heck, Russia created an Il-76 jet with pure electronic warfare.  Strong enough to jam S-300 radar.

    Faraday cage is one of the laws of physics used to counter EW, however way to prevent your equipment to be jammed by your own signals is frequency swapping, for this however you need epic information sharing capabilities and this is where Russians seemed to be lacking. EW equipment on IL76 that you mentioned for an example had huge issues with that, affecting own equipment, same happened with TU160 electronic warfare suite coz it was jamming itself basically.

    There is reason why radar frequencies, wavelengts, poweroutput etc are basically a secret and why Indians/French always fly with radar in training mode during international exercises. French used their Rafales to gather radar signatures during Red flag from US machines, while themself flew in training mode, EW is as i said so complex that its mindblowing.

    Russia made many strides in information sharing technology, but that was all entirely thanks to the major screwups during 2008 war. Now their C4I systems are leaps and bounds better than they ever had.

    Sponsored content


    Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3 - Page 8 Empty Re: Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #3

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:48 pm