Oh, that guy is one of those "foreign policy experts" on Finnish TV (EDIT: yes jhelb, you're correct
), atleast he was back in 2014-15, I really stopped watching Finnish news after that (you can guess why). But he didn't seem like an actual full-on Russophobe, and his tweets seem to confirm that atleast, but that is of course not saying much.
I also just love how they keep using the basically totally fake "hybrid war
" term, i.e. a conspiracy theory. It's a grand narrative on Russia, in which the whole country and Putin can be blamed for literally everything and anything. If you are not 100% convinced, if you don't believe the Western MSM's Russia bashing, you're just a victim of Putler's "hybrid warfare
". That shit every time... you can't make it up. They don't see the problem in any of that?
I'm sorry that I'm not convinced of your great Russophobic theories, which have been proven to be fake news. Among so many others, 1. Putin killing journalists and dissidents have been proven to be statistically nonsense, 2. Westerners really do believe it was Russia that started the Georgian war (talk about propaganda...) and 3. using either totally BS or atleast a decade old narratives on Russian demographics and living standard and social indicators... and the list goes on and on. So I wonder why I'm not very convinced? Just blame yourselves. Putler got me there, too bad, sorry.
I mean jeez... We all pick our side. They clearly have theirs, I have mine. But please, can those "experts" and "intellectuals" apply the same standards to all the Western/NATO/US actions? I might as well believe all the anti-Western conspiracy theories, by their standards? Everything else is just Western hybrid war
.... jewish-lizard influence... or something.
Just please, don't insult our intelligence.