I thought you may find this article interesting. Social organisation. Based on politics or reason and science. In capitalist or later socialist models. As well as earlier religious models.
"....... Aristotle also criticised Spartan women for their wealth. He attributed the state's precipitous fall during his lifetime, from being the master of Greece to a second-rate power in less than 50 years, to the fact that Sparta had become a gynocracy whose women were intemperate and loved luxury...... "
Interesting information and more than likely a valid inference. But I am not an expert in this area so it is hard for me to compare to
current conditions. But feminism in its western variant is indeed virulent and destructive. It tells women to ride the cock carousel
until they are in their 30s and literally spent with no marriage value. Aside from being VD vectors, these "liberated" women are
useless for starting families since they are psychologically damaged by an endless stream of partners that makes them unable to
properly pair bond, their egg count (women are born with a fixed amount of eggs) is way too low and they are always miserable since
their dreamboat delusions were never properly undone. That is, any man who marries these wasted females is never going to satisfy
them and the will pine for the days of the cock carousel.
Since feminism is enabled in western law, these capricious, man-hating sluts can rob men of both their accumulated wealth and their
income at its peak
for life. That is, in Canada and the USA, women get alimony based on the income of the man when they were
married. If the man makes half that amount after divorce, then he still has to pay alimony based on the his peak historical income.
This drives men into bankruptcy and suicide. Meanwhile, never-happy sluts are the main instigators of divorce. The state enables
what amounts to highway robbery by these man haters. And I am not talking about child support. Alimony has nothing to do with
child support. That is why the term "no fault divorce" is Orwellian newspeak. Have you ever heard of a man getting alimony from his
The family kangaroo courts always give custody of children to their mothers. This happens even when those mothers are child abusers and
not fit to be parents. This is not so rare considering the mentality of 3rd wave feminist sluts. The children were a means to
rob their husbands and not some product of "love". If men are supposed to pay child support, then they should get proportional
custody of the children. Instead, they have to pay well beyond the upkeep costs of a child even if the mother does not allow them
to see their child. Women breaking the law get slaps on the wrist. Instead they should lose custody. In the corrupt modern
system in so-called developed countries, women can manipulate their children to hate their father by lying about the father not
caring about them. It is the grotesque legal system and its love for 3rd wave feminist vermin that creates this illusion. The
father cannot be there even if he wants to.
Meanwhile in the fake stream media and popular media (TV, movies) the myth is spread about the "father who runs off, abandoning his
poor wife and children". Men are biologically more responsible than women. Women have a compulsion to sleep around but men have
to provide for the family since the dawn of time. If you note the content of basically all mass media content pertaining to
relationships, the trope about male infidelity is always yapped on about. This is pure propaganda. If a man feels like dumping his
wife, then that is because she is a shrew and not because he has a biological compulsion to spread his DNA. In the USA, over 30%
of children are not biologically related to the woman's husband. And the law is twisted to prevent DNA paternity tests or to use
such tests to avoid having to support the slut's children. These days marriage is a stupid choice unless you really want to have
offspring. But then your chances of even being a father to those offspring are not so great.