In science and engineering , but more specially in engineering , there is a principle that never
changes , and that is you work with what you know first and start steps by steps improving it.
After the first rocket propulsion plane was invented , every other plane that came after it , were evolutionary steps from the first one. The reason is simple , is better and far far cheaper and far far safer to work with the things you know , than to adventure into completely new exoteric designs .
This is true for civilians industries . This save a lot of time in maintainance ,trainning and repairs too.
This principle have always existed in engineering always , in the entire world , brand new things ,new inventions are never replaced as soon you manage to make them work through trial and error.
the vast overwhelming majority of civilians cars today ,are gasoline engines ,still have the same basic concept of the original ones ,developed many decades ago and after they master car production ,they improve things using that working car model as reference , improve the engines , improve the brakes , improve the electric wiring ,improve the gasoline efficiency and improve the environment pollution .reduce the weight ,so is more efficient and improve the production and materials to reduce the cost.
this is the same for planes , for housing , for roads , you always keep things simple ,when budget is tight and safety is very important.
This principle of work with what works , and not radically change a new invention ,was first broken
by NASA with the invention of the space shuttle. There is no way , no way , anyone can convince me , in any way ,shape or form ,that NASA decomissioned the saturn rocket ,after beign so successful ,as they claimed that made it easy for them ,to travel to the moon back and fort , for near a dozen of times . and do it in the first try.
So the west according to NASA story ,they mastered the moon landing ,sent many manned missions to the moon back and fort ,without problems for a decade or more, played golf in the moon, and then suddenly got bored with the moon and decided , hey let put this saturn rocket in a museum forever and focus in low earth orbit now ,and try something totally radically different ,never done before.
Lets build now a space shuttle and stay in low earth orbit .
This simply did not happen , this is not logical ,they will abandon so successful rocket ,that supposedly landed in the moon many times with humans , and totally decommission it and try
something completely new and start from zero again with a space shuttle ?
this are pure lies . this did not happen , you never get bored in leading in space , this is very prestigious for any nation ,to have leadership in space ,and what will have been natural thing to do ,
is exactly what Russia did.. they keep working with their same space rocket Soyuz that after so many trials and errors they did it ,and mastered sending probes to moon and even venus. and keep improving it , they did not drop it in a museum like NASA did with saturn rocket.. they still today ,50 years later use the basic design ,of the rocket soviet union designed in the 60's. It is thanks to this principle of keeping things simple and work with what works , what have allowed Russia to avoid
human casualties. but nasa did something totally different ,totally crazy ,unknow to science ,that is drop what works their saturn rocket , that supposedly was very successful in 70s and 80s ,and start again from zero ,with a new radically new design that was far far away more expensive than saturn rocket ,far more complicate to maintain ,repair and assembly and that began to kill astronauts time after time. and another thing that is unthinkable ,that Americans did ,is that they byte their pride
and ask Russia help to send their astronauts to the ISS , helping their openly declared enemies Russia ,to earn some influence in the world.
So based on this facts alone ,that NASA controversial decision to start the space shuttle program ,and abandon a working project. they not even sold it to their british allies , or to japan. then decomission saturn ,that all they had to do is improve it , if they got a near close fatal accident with apollo13 .
based on this non sense , is enough proof for me ,that NASA played everyone with a fake moon landing ,and that the only reason they decomission their saturn rocket and apollo program, is because it was fake as hell , and never left the earth orbit , and that they simply made studio videos
to fool everyone , some say moon landing was filmed by stanley kubrish , others say it was disney studios ,that they actually had a moon replica at a very small scale ,that they could use to simulate
the orbiter and landers ,landing in the moon ,using movie tricks of the time.
it was a hoax , and no less that 2 putin closes aides , one of them now the director of russia space program ,questioned NASA story of landing inthe moon.
There is no way NASA sent humans to the moon.. had they done that..
this is what they will have done next.
1)continue using their saturn/apollo program , just like russia is doing in soyuz, and improve it ,more and more , to make it better and safer .
2)if they very successful , start colonization of the moon and build a base there , this will have been
an astronomical public relations event for NASA to have a base in the moon.it will ahve been worth of every cent ,spend ,because the entire world ,scientist and engineers will move to america to be part
of the most advanced nation in the world.
3)and with more success ,they will have started space tourism , and give tours to the moon to the billionaires.
in short , is non sense ,that nasa got bored with the moon and now 50 years later ,they have interest
again .
this is flying pigs story ,it never happened. the obvious thing that happened ,is
that nasa lied the world with their moon landing ,it was a fake movie ,and could not continue faking it , and when switched to their space shuttle ,their fakes could not be hold longer with the tons of accidents they had.
russia did abandoned their buran space shuttle , but it was only build to proof ,russia can do it too ,took them a decade later to do one . but russia continues today and will continue for decades using soyuz ,because of the principle.. if it works. it works and is more cheaper to stay with something
you know and understand and have everyone trained to build it and if more money shows , they will try a new design ,for bigger projects.. but to decomission soyuz ,when is super safe and they can build it with close eyes , is non sense. but yet americans did it.. at least they claim. but is fake stories. Nasa space shuttle program, was a failure of epic proportions nd they gave up after two different teams space shuttles.
if you study the details , it only reinforce how fake the entire project was . this is why russia needs
to hurry up and land in the moon ,and win the space race ,that is not over yet .the west will have serious problem to explain where they landed in the moon ,if russia visit it first with humans ,the nasa landing sites.
you never send humans first to the moon , without sending first animals , and testing the lander too.
we are to believe neale armstrong was forced to manually control a lander with his bare hands ,when landing in the moon ,what could go wrong? the epic scale of the disaster ,that could be ,if he lands in the wrong angle , or that one engine fails , will have not only killed them ,but transform nasa on the biggest joke on the world ,and people will be remembering their failure or much worse will have been if nasa lose their astronauts in space ,forever lost..
that will be horrible to just think about that , that everyone with telescope will be trying to locate the death americans in space..
simply engineering does not work that way , before humans are asked to do something very dangerous ,that a million things can go wrong as landing in the moon with humans , you need to practice it several times first. you don't send humans first without sending probes or robots to test that first , but nasa claims they did it in the first try to the moon.. is non sense. Russia was first in the moon with probes , and never send humans ,because it was very huge risk , many things could go wrong and you need first to test , to practice , common sense will not send humans to a very dangerous mission ,something never tested before ,and risk losing 3-4 lives for nothing. The backlash
of the death of astronauts will produce the opposite of what they intended ,that it was to proof that the west was leaders in space and leaders in the world.
Home
Register
Log in
