Werewolf wrote:Knowledge about politics is already quite give away that specifically a russian jet was blown up (the straight down trajectory out sudden is proof that it was not normal cause) paired with Russian actions in Syria and US the spoiled brat that puts a trantrum tell us enough to make conclusions if it is just an accident or not. So far no room was shown to be just an accident.
In politics no coincidences happen.
I very much doubt this was an accident, and of course, its also no coincidence that this happens right after russias involvement into the syrian war as thats the reason for it happening. I noticed that you mention american tantrums yet miss that ISIS declared war against russia recently. Surely that puts them on the suspect list too if we are judging objectively?
Whats interesting for me, is that the egyptians are continuously stating that there is no reason to think this was a terrorist attack, it seems they are trying a little too hard, a bit too desperate, i wonder if they have anything to hide?
Wrong, ISIS is no suspect, the problem you like bln people have is that you believe in every garbage boogieman the US invents. You see ISIS as some own group with own politics, it is not, it never existed before US had not invented this group. They go hand in hand. If ISIS did this that is direct proof US did it. Their mercenaries meaning their order. Mercaniries do not act on own behalf without getting paid to do whatever the payer tells them to do. If you really believe otherwise i suggest to read history of School of Americas, how they have acted with terrorist groups on direct command of CIA agents that will tell you word by word how this works. Diplomacy, Military action and Terrorism are all Political actions on different approaches and pathes to get they way they want. One is by reasoning and compromises or demands, when that fails there are two other options a subtle proxy war with Terrorists or a direct war with the same result, except that Terrorism is more subtle about the intentions, but not today we have enough evidence and information to see who the culprit is.
If violence around the globe occure which country do you suspect first? North Korea? Zimbabwe? Palau? Russia? or the US?
It is not just statistics but defacto reality and knowledge of doctrines of various countries and only one single country on this planet has an open aggressive doctrine that propagates itself the privilege and right for a pre-emptive strikes across the globe. The US Military doctrine is open to anyone who wants to read it and it states that the US must have the capability to fight to full blown wars at the same time on any point on this planet within 24 hours. So if only the US has such a doctrine with a astonishing record of coup de etat's, false flags, wars, "interventions" and terrorist proxies, is it then unfair to have it as the main suspect? No it is just common sense, Logic! To believe every garbage that the first one shouts out is never the best way, just because someone yells out the first lie does not make it valid at all.
Russia broke US's plants in Europe and in ME now US is pissed and takes different approaches, that is common sense to suspect the US.
If laws would be that guilable and blind like most people are like you seem to be then i could get always a free pass whenever i would hire some hitman to do the dirty job, since i haver never killed that person i must be innocent. Problem is, it does not work that way like most people believe, they seem not to have common sense when it comes to geopolitics but seem to understand when it is projected unto them in person.