
I kinda assumed it was going to lose the missile hatches with the upgrade, wonder if it still has missile tubes too?
verkhoturye51 wrote:...
- fast pace of ship construction in last years will be maintained
hoom wrote:Updated diagram of ships under construction
http://charly015.blogspot.com/2019/04/actualizando-el-grafico-de-los-buques-y.html
Purple = launched but not complete/in service yet.
medo wrote:
Hole wrote:In the Kosovo war the bases in Italy were effective. There were even studies done by western "think tanks" that showed how ineffective the carriers were compared to the land bases.
Hole wrote:In the Kosovo war the bases in Italy were effective. There were even studies done by western "think tanks" that showed how ineffective the carriers were compared to the land bases.
Vladimir79 wrote:Hole wrote:In the Kosovo war the bases in Italy were effective. There were even studies done by western "think tanks" that showed how ineffective the carriers were compared to the land bases.
It makes sense if you can get a land base close to the action but that is not always the case. A carrier aircraft dropping bombs is just as effective as a land based one. It is all about sortie generation rate. A carrier operating 200km from the target area can turn around fighters faster than a land base 1000km away.
Isos wrote:
Re-supplying a carrier is much more difficult and costly. Helicopters can bring some foods but what can supply it with 1t bombs and 4-5m missiles.
Landing with not used bomb is risky also. If the deck is dammaged bye bye your air force.
Isos wrote:
Re-supplying a carrier is much more difficult and costly. Helicopters can bring some foods but what can supply it with 1t bombs and 4-5m missiles.
Landing with not used bomb is risky also. If the deck is dammaged bye bye your air force.
|
|