Mark 48's are smaller than the Kalibes that go in those tubes, though the kalibers are faster they have a much shorter range due to the fact they have to burn tons of fuel.
There is no kalibr in the tube bu type 53 torpedoes.
These missiles will not threaten a submarine unless said submarine gets way to close.
Grigorivitch has a ka-27 that can communicate a sub location. 1 minutes after that a torpedo will fall on its top and look for him.
I wasn't counting cruise missiles but alias they do not have a longer range in the water , so when you say longer range that's a very very big lie.
Most nato frigates have small torpedoes (300 or so mm) with ranges of around 20km. Type 53 has 50km range and more for newest variants.
Not sure what you mean by bigger sonar if you mean homing to a signature then no that's also a lie.
The bigger the torpedo is the bigger the inboard sonar is and the better detection is.
In terms of being fired at by Torpedos that is a problem, all navies have a hard dealing with the RBU series of weapons that have a very low intercept rate. So not sure why you are bringing this up, it's a pointless statement.
RBU can launch decoys and rockets to kill the torpedo. Far better than any other system. Maybe not 100% Pk but I would rather have it than not. Decoys are not enough to protect against torpedoes because as long as the torpedo doesn't hit the ship/sub it will keep looking for its target. That's why russian have developed the Paket NK.
RBu's could sink a submarine but the munitions depth they fire is at most 1k.
That's not the main weapon against subs. If there is a sub in range to use the rbu they will use it. And if they use it the sub has no chance to survive.
So the submarine captain would need to be one dumb fuck to get hit by that, again you don't understand the weapons you are ranting about.
Ship in ASW mission will go slowly and be very quite. The sub can come into the engagement zone. But the main goal of the rbu is to destroy torpedoes.
Well it has a 50km range not 45, also when intercepting other missiles you need at least 2 missiles per one trying to intercept so in reality, the system can only make at most 12 intercept attempts.
Not necesserly. They will see if the first missile hit before firing the second.
Also the chances it will be allowed to intercept from max range is very low assuming it spots the missile before it even enters max range which is a huge IF at best., if you knew anything about missile interception which clearly you don't. You'd know max range isn't an effective intercept range.
What you say is true for maned aircraft that have rwr and know that they are engaged. So they can quickly turn 90° or turn back and increase the range of interception above the max range of the air defence missile.
Cruise missiles and antiship missile always go in the direction of the ship so you can engage at max range (if you detect them). And they mostly do evasive manoeuvres and very low altitude during the last km so the best is to destroy them when they are going straight at higher altitude.
It even has some ABM capability.
And for close in protection they have ak630.
Depends on the Nato frigate some carry eight others carry more, get your information in order.
Which one ? In one vs one a grigorovitch can face any nato frigate. Even their destroyers since even nato destroyer carry only 8 antiship missiles.
No, the ship isn't "very good" it only takes someone with an idea of naval knowledge to look at the thing and know it's bad for the times.
It is very good. It's a multi role ship cheaper than anything on the market.
The thing is that for pro US fanboys if a russian ship can't go alone against a carrier group and win then it sucks.