I am guessing it hit a mine.
Uran is not a bad missile, but it should be stoppable by the Moskva...
Sea mines on the other hand are always tricky.
Moskva Cruiser is lost Shocked Shocked .... what a bunch of incompetent idiots..... and you still dream how the Russian navy is capable to fight NATO...
Russia needs a total reset of the whole system,.. this is nothing more than pure humiliation.
Yeah, but then if you believe Nazi propaganda then there is no hope for you really.
You cannot compare the Ukrainian navy with the Argentinian in 1980, Argentina had carriers, cruisers, most modern destroyers, specialized naval attack planes, and most modern antiship missiles. Their navy in 1980 was stronger than the Ukrainian navy now.
And the presence of the Conquerer SSN meant they rarely left port... except the General Belgrano... with well known results.
Ukraine is not even near to standards of most modern western armies, especially in the navy.
Which just goes to show Russia just needs sea mines and anti ship missiles to defeat HATO navies and render them impotent.
Russian navy suck... so many disasters, during peace, so huge casualties in the local war against an almost nonexisting navy.... but ok, just find excuses that will help you to be better in the future...
This is such a dissaster, Moskva is lost this is unbelievable...
What a coward you are.
If it was Ukrainian missiles Russia has serius problems, if the cruiser that carries advanced anti missiles defence can be hit all other vessels could be in danger.
The only source saying it was Ukrainian missiles is the Ukraine... nuff said.
No, some GB vessels were sunk by Exocet fired from Super Etendard, but one ship was destroyed by the improvized land-based launcher, and many more were destroyed/damaged by air bombs and rockets. But Britain fought (and won) war 12. 000km away from their home, and without losing any critical asset. ( no carriers or nuclear submarines lost).
They lost the ship carrying all their helicopters and some spare Sea Harriers on board... that could have been critical...
Is it so hard to admit that this is a disaster and that all excuses are just plain bullshit?
Guys if somebody told you 2 days ago that Moskva would be destroyed( badly damaged) by Ukraina what would your reaction be? You would call that person an idiot, wouldn't you? So isn't that clear that this is an utter disaster and total humiliation of the Russian navy?
When you stop crying and we learn some more facts perhaps a discussion could happen, but until then just tell Zelensky to write your cheques out to your name so you can cash them nice and fast so you can spend you nazi money before the cheque bounces.
Yes totally! Even a hard core Russian supporter like me thinks this is a disaster. FFS this is the flagship of the BSF!
Current reports say it has not sunk.
I am also hard core Russian supporter and Russophile, but that doesn't make me blind.
You are making the French look good at the moment and are risking taking their title Cheese eating surrender monkey... you just need to blame Putin and you will get your CIA funding I am sure.
I feel so bad, that was one of my favorite ships.
In terms of air defence it is an S-300F battery with an OSA battalion and 6 Tunguska vehicles without the SA-19 SAMs loaded... great in the early 1980s... not so great now.
That is the difference, you can recognize big leaders in hard days, they do not hide they step in front of the nation....
There it is... you get a nuland cookie for being number one cheese eating surrender monkey... go and cry in the corner...
Sea mines are effective weapons of war and important for Russia because it is a really good way to deny countries with lots of ships access to the sea and open ocean...
But of course it is all Putins fault and he should resign and Russian troops should surrender... we know what honourable enemies like the Nazis will do but that is OK right?