Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+66
AMCXXL
ALAMO
Mir
Russian_Patriot_
xeno
Kiko
owais.usmani
ultimatewarrior
MiamiMachineShop
Gazputin
SeigSoloyvov
GunshipDemocracy
Truck
Rodion_Romanovic
dino00
PapaDragon
LMFS
walle83
eehnie
hoom
marat
JohninMK
KiloGolf
Isos
verkhoturye51
Hole
Kimppis
miketheterrible
Luq man
Peŕrier
franco
AlfaT8
T-47
George1
miroslav
Russian Patriot
Honesroc
Benya
Flanky
Mirlo
OminousSpudd
ult
Zivo
Cplnew83
wilhelm
Werewolf
Dima
zg18
kvs
Firebird
Big_Gazza
magnumcromagnon
Vympel
Flyingdutchman
runaway
navyfield
KomissarBojanchev
flamming_python
medo
TheArmenian
TR1
GarryB
sepheronx
milky_candy_sugar
Viktor
Admin
70 posters

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Sun May 06, 2018 9:53 pm

    You don´t get it. The Ami put them in service, but nothing works. Engines breaking down. Electronics jam themself. It´s like building a house and sell it to someone without water pipes and electricity. Would you then also Claim that the house was build in time?
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  GarryB Mon May 07, 2018 3:38 am

    Ford one was year late, it's the first of a new class of AC when Russia lays down it's first AC we will see how mnay delays they have.

    The Zumwalt where to be built in three years each they are in time, the LCS are also on time.

    Do not lie because is literally what you are doing.

    He is lying? but are you being honest?

    I mean the worlds last superpower spending 700 billion dollars a year on attack... oops, sorry defence... and the sky is falling because Russia doesn't get an unimportant ship out on schedule, but when the best navy in the world, of the worlds only super power, and the best ship makers in the world, with no sanctions, money fucking thrown at them, no supplier problems... they haven't had to set up new production facilities in another country because a country let them down, or jumped ship... they are having problems and delays with the most critical ship design in their inventory... cut the shit talk.

    Your Whine cellar must be enormous, but it only contains Russian Whine doesn't it?

    Oh to be fair you do give some credit where it is due, but the US never seems to do any wrong...
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Mon May 07, 2018 12:26 pm

    The methods are different.

    In the west a ship is build and fitted out, the look it the engine is running and... Bingo! It is in service. Money is paid. The oligarchs (share holders) are happy. The rest of the work (some fitting out, fine tuning the systems and the like) is done afterwards. In Russia it was the same in the 70`s and 80`s. But there the times changed. Now the russian Navy only accepts a ship, if anything on board (even the toilets) work perfect. Some issues? The yard has to solve it. If it means a 99% ready ship is not officially accepted into service. Fine.
    SeigSoloyvov
    SeigSoloyvov


    Posts : 3692
    Points : 3672
    Join date : 2016-04-08

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  SeigSoloyvov Mon May 07, 2018 7:00 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    Ford one was year late, it's the first of a new class of AC when Russia lays down it's first AC we will see how mnay delays they have.

    The Zumwalt where to be built in three years each they are in time, the LCS are also on time.

    Do not lie because is literally what you are doing.

    He is lying? but are you being honest?

    I mean the worlds last superpower spending 700 billion dollars a year on attack... oops, sorry defence... and the sky is falling because Russia doesn't get an unimportant ship out on schedule, but when the best navy in the world, of the worlds only super power, and the best ship makers in the world, with no sanctions, money fucking thrown at them, no supplier problems... they haven't had to set up new production facilities in another country because a country let them down, or jumped ship... they are having problems and delays with the most critical ship design in their inventory... cut the shit talk.

    Your Whine cellar must be enormous, but it only contains Russian Whine doesn't it?

    Oh to be fair you do give some credit where it is due, but the US never seems to do any wrong...

    "Ford, Zumwalt, LCS are not build in time."

    Yes he is lying, okay sorry he was kinda truthful ford was about a year and half late, still lying on everything else.

    Was I saying the LCS were worth it? no I wasn't I aid despite them being stupid ships they are being made on time.



    "Oh to be fair you do give some credit where it is due, but the US never seems to do any wrong..."

    I believe I just said the LCS where stupid ships but I am saying the US never does anything wrong? I have said Russia is better then the US in areas and more... Garry mouth shut walk the other way, I really don't like dealing you how you like to try and twist words to fit your narrative. I am not wrong in what you said, I dont need to deal with some keyboard warrior who is trying to make it seem like he is right by twisting things.

    I don't mind a fair discussion but Garry I cannot have one with you, you are to blinded by your fanboyism, it's why I virtually ignore you now.

    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Mon May 07, 2018 10:24 pm

    A last time. The ships are delivered "in time" (whatever that means, did someone see the contract?), but they are not ready. The Zumwalt can barely swim. Its engine broke down twice on the first journey. Its faults will be dealt with in the next years. Like the british carrier. It was "built in time" just to be back in the dock a week later, because the propeller shaft leaked. Its systems are also not ready, but technically its part of the glorious british navy.

    Russia could have done the same with the Gren and the Gorshkov. Declare them fit and solve the problems later. But they don´t do that anymore.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  GarryB Tue May 08, 2018 11:44 am

    Was I saying the LCS were worth it? no I wasn't I aid despite them being stupid ships they are being made on time.

    So what you are saying is that the LCS was made on time but was a fucking waste of time and money...

    Perhaps maybe if they had reevaluated the design half way through and changed the basic plans... it would have caused huge delays and probably horrendous price increases but at least they would have gotten a ship that was more useful... Hmmm think about that for a minute...

    I believe I just said the LCS where stupid ships but I am saying the US never does anything wrong?

    I don't see you endlessly posting on US threads about how useless the LCS is and how, while it is in service it is still of no use...

    I have said Russia is better then the US in areas and more... Garry mouth shut walk the other way, I really don't like dealing you how you like to try and twist words to fit your narrative. I am not wrong in what you said, I dont need to deal with some keyboard warrior who is trying to make it seem like he is right by twisting things.

    You claim to be fair and consistent and you are not. You expect the Russian Navy and Russian shipyards to be better and more efficient than the US navy and shipyards... when they fuck up... you don't say a word, when some report about a delay comes up... even when it is regarding a totally different ship at least one time, you pop up and whinge about the fall of the Russian navy and how the Russian shipyards can't build ships anymore.


    I don't mind a fair discussion but Garry I cannot have one with you, you are to blinded by your fanboyism, it's why I virtually ignore you now.

    Wish I could do the same. As long as you follow instructions to follow the rules I give you as a mod, you can ignore me all you like, but I am not going to ignore your moaning that the Russians navy is in crisis and needs immediate attention... it is moving in a positive direction and is getting better... and ultimately in 15-20 years is going to be enormously important in driving and supporting the growing Russian economy, but for now it is really not that important... they can take their time getting things right now with the smaller boats and long range anti ship missiles.

    I guess that is what offends you... they don't see the world the same way the US does and does not think the same way the US does... if they have a big powerful navy they need 100K ton super carriers... because that is what the US has and they do everything the right way...

    Russia could have done the same with the Gren and the Gorshkov. Declare them fit and solve the problems later. But they don´t do that anymore.

    Call the western method the Microsoft method of development... leave the last testing cycle to the first customers... because it will keep evolving until it is replaced... and it will keep needing patches and fixes until it is obsolete (code for does not sell well anymore, or you have other things to sell in its place and they are not selling well enough).
    SeigSoloyvov
    SeigSoloyvov


    Posts : 3692
    Points : 3672
    Join date : 2016-04-08

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  SeigSoloyvov Tue May 08, 2018 10:31 pm

    I post when there is time, The Russians can make ships just slow as hell and I have said they need to improve that, guys like you, however, don't want to address the problems and pretend everything is peachy.

    REally I have said some Russians designs are great ships, and I have given credit to those ships. I do also say when there is a problem again another lie on your part and more trying to twist the narrative.

    I don't have free time for that, I also happen to think Western fanboys are worse in most cases then Russian ones.

    I'll give you this credit Garry you aren't the worst Russian fanboy I have ever seen.

    I do not expect the russians to match the US but, the delays and problems they have aren't excusable. AGAIN you are twisting my words, can I report your ass over this? you have done this three times so far.

    There is reasonable and then there is unreasonable, I highest suggest you learn the difference.



    God all mghty.....I have SAID dozens of times HERE Russia doesn't NEED a 100k ton supercarrier, that they would do fine with a Kuz sized carrier and four of them. AGAIN TWISTING words.

    You see I was taught to address problems not let them grow and get out of hand and that's the problem russia's shipbuilding industry is having they let these problems grow and grow and do not handle them.

    You prefer to turn a blind eye.

    NOW if you really wanna continue this chat with me you can message me on here, this board isn't for me and you going at eachother.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  GarryB Wed May 09, 2018 2:04 am

    The Russians can make ships just slow as hell and I have said they need to improve that, guys like you, however, don't want to address the problems and pretend everything is peachy.

    But you have not said why they need to pump out ships faster... do you think spending 10 times more on their navy and getting lots of ships in service now will solve their problems?

    What would they even do with 20 new frigates right now?

    Probably retire a couple of older ships and upgrade some other ones.

    So really the cost of building 20 new frigates is rather hard to justify...

    REally I have said some Russians designs are great ships, and I have given credit to those ships. I do also say when there is a problem again another lie on your part and more trying to twist the narrative.

    I keep telling you and you keep ignoring me... what is this fixation you have with wanting Russia to be pumping out ships like China? Or the US?

    Russia is not China and is not the US.

    China is pumping out ships because it realises that sooner or later it is going to be facing the US Navy in the Pacific so they need a decent naval force to stand up to that.

    Russia knows fighting the US is suicide for both parties and a big navy could bankrupt them quicker than the big military is bankrupting the US...

    I'll give you this credit Garry you aren't the worst Russian fanboy I have ever seen.

    And I am adult enough to give you credit for being mature and not petty or abusive. The fact that you come here to an "enemy" web forum shows you at least have an interest to see what other people might think... something the BBC and CNN and Fox News are afraid of... you are only allowed to see both sides of situations that they want you to see.

    I do not expect the russians to match the US but, the delays and problems they have aren't excusable. AGAIN you are twisting my words, can I report your ass over this? you have done this three times so far.

    Words are open to interpretation... you call it twisting... that suggests I am distorting the meaning into something else... I would suggest ambiguity is more the issue and instead of bitching that I am distorting your words why don't you just rephrase what you meant to say so I can understand better what you were trying to say.

    English is a complex language and different words have very similar meanings but often have slightly different slants of meanings at the same time.

    There is reasonable and then there is unreasonable, I highest suggest you learn the difference.

    But that is the problem... reasonable is subjective, not objective. You can say 5 years is too long to develop a brand new multifunction ship class... and that is your opinion. When that ship is not urgently needed and in fact has become surplus to immediate needs during the period of its development and construction it might suddenly become reasonable because it is not worth the money to rapidly finish it... money that could be used on something that is needed.

    You see I was taught to address problems not let them grow and get out of hand and that's the problem russia's shipbuilding industry is having they let these problems grow and grow and do not handle them.

    You prefer to turn a blind eye.

    The Ivan Gren was in one shipyard on one slipway... it is not the reason they don't have 2-3 destroyers and 5-10 frigates in service right now... I don't understand why you think it is even important enough to do something about...

    NOW if you really wanna continue this chat with me you can message me on here, this board isn't for me and you going at eachother.

    Well even if this discussion goes to PM with you and me, I will be having this discussion with all the other people who think the RuN has gone to the dogs because this one ship class has had a few problems.

    BTW I don't remember anyone suggesting the management at the shipyard that made the LCS should be shot, or even fired... hell when British Frigates can't operate in the Med in summer because the sea water is not cold enough to cool its systems there are plenty of problems to go around...
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Wed May 09, 2018 10:47 am

    Couldn´t resist: according to a new report, the Ford will be operational in 2022, not 2019. All delays together: six years.

    Now some people will say: "It´s a carrier, not a small landing ship." Yup. But California, Texas and New York are still parts of Amiland. The Yard never stopped producing anything for ten years and has never done anyting else than building carriers for the last 70 or 80 years.
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51


    Posts : 438
    Points : 430
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  verkhoturye51 Wed May 09, 2018 11:53 am

    With 20 Gorshkovs Russia can write the history their way. They would have more negotiating power with Turks over Syria, finish Libyan civil war, keep Egypt and N. Sudan friendly, befriend alienated Algeria with regular visits and drills. Army isn't just a war tool.
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Wed May 09, 2018 4:21 pm

    The won´t build 20. Just the six, that are already on the building ways. The f...ing engine debacle costed four years. Now the Navy wants something bigger, it seems.

    I hope the do it with the new ship like they did with the Karakurts, order 18+ from three or four yards.

    Does someone know where the Gren will go? Black Sea?
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51


    Posts : 438
    Points : 430
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  verkhoturye51 Wed May 09, 2018 5:04 pm

    Both Grens go to Black sea...North and East will receive one Priboy each.

    I think they'll make only 4 Gorshkovs and then go on with heavier version like you said.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  GarryB Thu May 10, 2018 2:01 am

    To put it in perspective the Gorshkov is a frigate.... that equates to the Krivak class during the cold war... they didn't have a huge number of those vessels.

    They might end up with a dozen or so, but if they are making 20 of anything then a destroyer class would be more useful along with say 8 cruisers and two new carriers...
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51


    Posts : 438
    Points : 430
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  verkhoturye51 Thu May 10, 2018 9:59 am

    Except that Ivans are scalling the game down, with Gorshkovs new light destroyers and Super Gorshkovs new light cruisers and Liders new heavy cruisers. Speed and autonomy isn't comparable to the ships currently in service, but that's the new strategy.

    Ideally, in 25 years Russians would have 2 carriers (East and North), 8 Liders (4 East and 4 North), 15 Super Gorshkovs (1 Baltic, 2 Black sea, 6 East and 6 North) and the frigates.


    Last edited by verkhoturye51 on Thu May 10, 2018 10:05 am; edited 1 time in total
    SeigSoloyvov
    SeigSoloyvov


    Posts : 3692
    Points : 3672
    Join date : 2016-04-08

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  SeigSoloyvov Thu May 10, 2018 10:02 am

    Hole wrote:Couldn´t resist: according to a new report, the Ford will be operational in 2022, not 2019. All delays together: six years.

    Now some people will say: "It´s a carrier, not a small landing ship." Yup. But California, Texas and New York are still parts of Amiland. The Yard never stopped producing anything for ten years and has never done anyting else than building carriers for the last 70 or 80 years.

    That is major sea trails.....not construction and it won't last until 2022.

    Do I got to correct you every time?
    SeigSoloyvov
    SeigSoloyvov


    Posts : 3692
    Points : 3672
    Join date : 2016-04-08

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  SeigSoloyvov Thu May 10, 2018 10:04 am

    Hole wrote:The won´t build 20. Just the six, that are already on the building ways. The f...ing engine debacle costed four years. Now the Navy wants something bigger, it seems.

    I hope the do it with the new ship like they did with the Karakurts, order 18+ from three or four yards.

    Does someone know where the Gren will go? Black Sea?

    It will most likely serve in the BSF yes, officially it is listed has going to that fleet, it will serve has a cargo ship for awhile really.
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Thu May 10, 2018 11:26 am

    2022.
    Six years late.
    Billions over budget.

    According to Bloomberg, the bearing on one engine block broke down. Second time this happens. Not good. For the taxpayer. The "share holder" of the company will be just fine.

    In the end, nobody cares when this ship will be ready. Or not.


    Last edited by Hole on Thu May 10, 2018 5:16 pm; edited 2 times in total
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Thu May 10, 2018 11:27 am

    GarryB wrote:To put it in perspective the Gorshkov is a frigate.... that equates to the Krivak class during the cold war... they didn't have a huge number of those vessels.

    They might end up with a dozen or so, but if they are making 20 of anything then a destroyer class would be more useful along with say 8 cruisers and two new carriers...

    32 isn´t a huge number for a ship class?
    Hole
    Hole


    Posts : 10504
    Points : 10482
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 47
    Location : Scholzistan

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Hole Thu May 10, 2018 5:18 pm

    For all this off-topic bla, bla...

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Lst_pr10
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51


    Posts : 438
    Points : 430
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  verkhoturye51 Thu May 10, 2018 5:51 pm

    And here's how the second ship looks like.

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Project_11711_lst_Petr_Morgunov

    To be put on water in 2/2 of this month and commissioned later this year.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11273
    Points : 11243
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Isos Thu May 10, 2018 6:23 pm

    verkhoturye51 wrote:And here's how the second ship looks like.

    [img]http://www.navyrecognition.com/images/stories/news/2018/february/project_11711_lst_Petr_Morgunov.jpg[

    To be put on water in 2/2 of this month and commissioned later this year.

    3 years to build it sounds pretty normal. The first was clearly the problem and not the class itself. Maybe they could redesign it with more weapons and replace all the other older ships with this.
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51


    Posts : 438
    Points : 430
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  verkhoturye51 Thu May 10, 2018 7:42 pm

    Isos wrote:
    verkhoturye51 wrote:And here's how the second ship looks like.

    [img]http://www.navyrecognition.com/images/stories/news/2018/february/project_11711_lst_Petr_Morgunov.jpg[

    To be put on water in 2/2 of this month and commissioned later this year.

    3 years to build it sounds pretty normal. The first was clearly the problem and not the class itself. Maybe they could redesign it with more weapons and replace all the other older ships with this.

    I hope no Yantar engeneer is reading this Laughing

    This redesigning is the reason why Russians have only 15 % of their fleet at the sea at any time, while easy-to-maintain standarized US navy has 50 %.
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11273
    Points : 11243
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Isos Thu May 10, 2018 7:54 pm


    This redesigning is the reason why Russians have only 15 % of their fleet at the sea at any time, while easy-to-maintain standarized US navy has 50 %.

    One 100mm gun and 2 MRL on the deck isn't going to change the disponibility of the ship. Landing forces need artillery support to clean the beach.

    US have the money to maintain them.
    KiloGolf
    KiloGolf


    Posts : 2481
    Points : 2461
    Join date : 2015-09-01
    Location : Macedonia, Hellas

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  KiloGolf Thu May 10, 2018 8:23 pm

    Isos wrote:
    verkhoturye51 wrote:And here's how the second ship looks like.

    [img]http://www.navyrecognition.com/images/stories/news/2018/february/project_11711_lst_Petr_Morgunov.jpg[

    To be put on water in 2/2 of this month and commissioned later this year.

    3 years to build it sounds pretty normal. The first was clearly the problem and not the class itself. Maybe they could redesign it with more weapons and replace all the other older ships with this.

    Even that is very slow for such a class of warships (light and low level of sophistication).
    I'd say max. 2 years would make sense, anything over that is delayed.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  GarryB Fri May 11, 2018 4:22 am

    This redesigning is the reason why Russians have only 15 % of their fleet at the sea at any time, while easy-to-maintain standarized US navy has 50 %.

    Of course, the Russians have 85% of their fleet in maintainence... nothing to do with the US having a global empire to maintain, while the Russian Navy operating mostly coastal except for a few anti piracy operations and a few ships in the med chasing Brit subs around the place...

    And the 32 Krivaks... how long did they actually have 32 in service at one time... they started entering service in the early 1970s, but they also started decommissioning them in the 1990s... are there any even in service now? Maybe a handful... if that.

    Comparing the capabilities of the old Krivaks with a modern version you could replace 32 with 16 easily... and enjoy an enormous increase in performance too.

    Sponsored content


    Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class - Page 16 Empty Re: Project 11711: "Ivan Gren" class

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Mar 28, 2024 1:06 pm