
http://www.take-off.ru/news/124-news01-12-2013/848-pervye-su-35-s-vvs-rossii
magnumcromagnon wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't true that the Su-35 is the only jet fighter in the world that is mass produced with 3D-TVC engines.
TR1 wrote:BTW Werewolf, funnily enough, on the subject we were discussing:
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?128826-Su-27-s-family-is-the-most-maneuverable-aircraft-in-the-world
Take a loook @ Andraxxus posts. He goes into this and more.
TR1 wrote:BTW Werewolf, funnily enough, on the subject we were discussing:
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?128826-Su-27-s-family-is-the-most-maneuverable-aircraft-in-the-world
Take a loook @ Andraxxus posts. He goes into this and more.
Werewolf wrote:
He seems like the only one with a clue about the matter in that forum and some obvious trolls.
But really interesting post, maybe i should throw myself into that materia more often sounds fun and interesting to look up some information specially based on physics of airframes and their advantages and disadvantages.
Nice find btw.
Stealthflanker wrote:Hmm i'm still wondering whether i should use reference wing area OR the whole thing that generate lift for calculations.
Sujoy wrote:
I suspect not just thrust-to-weight ratio or wing loading, but also other variables like turning radius, instantaneous turn rate & climb rate should be taken into account . Only then can a realistic ‘agility quotient’ be derived.
BTW - Impressive graph
Stealthflanker wrote:
Hmm anyway thrust to weight ratio and wing loading also determines the turn rates and thus turning radius and climb rate. Typical measure i read so far about fighter agility is "Energy maneuvering" by John Boyd where fighter agility is determined by "Potential energy" Measured in "specific excess power"
I'd about to do it along with other measure of merits calculation of fighter jets, one problem is the reference data. Plane data especially some obscure one like wing measurements (Say Chord length and tip length) or "wetted area" Are somewhat scarce
- Simply the result looks like this: Automatic not only determines the position of the aircraft in space, receiving the information from the sensors, but also sets the trajectory. On this basis, construct including combat modes when in the presence of target plane itself determines the optimal entry and exit automatically act on the target. In this case the pilot is released from piloting tasks and can engage dopritselivaniem or interaction with information and control field.
George1 wrote:Two-seat version of Su-35 will not be developed
Two-seat version of Su-35 fighter will not be developed, ITAR-TASS reports with reference to Chief Designer, Igor Demin.
"During development of Su-35 we have placed a bet on development of single-seat aircraft", - Demin said.
President of United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), Mikhail Pogosyan, reported earlier that Su-35 fighter is complemented by two-seat Su-30SM jet, which may be used as an operational trainer.
"Su-30SM is the two-seat aircraft derived from the export version of the jet. It complements Su-35, because it features a thrust-vectoring nozzle and new functional capabilities provided by the advanced avionics suite", - Pogosyan said. According to him, Su-30M2 jets are used as an operational trainer for Su-27SM pilots due to shortage of trainer aircraft.
TR1 wrote:Su-35 with unguided rockets. Enough of this nonsense!
Guided rockets shot from pods?Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:TR1 wrote:Su-35 with unguided rockets. Enough of this nonsense!
You know many of these "unguided rockets" have their guided variants, including air-to-air ones.
Regular wrote:Guided rockets shot from pods?Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:TR1 wrote:Su-35 with unguided rockets. Enough of this nonsense!
You know many of these "unguided rockets" have their guided variants, including air-to-air ones.
|
|