Elena Belozerskaya via Google Translate wrote:Олена Білозерська: Знаю, як треба!Elena Belozerskaya I know how to!Posted on 2015.07.14 at 23:44Some thoughts on the events in Transcarpathia
Some thoughts about the events in Transcarpathia. Hatched them from the first moment of conflict, but did not dare write.
The situation - more than resonance. Members and supporters of the SS, all wishing to "bring a revolution to the end" and just people tired of lawlessness mafia, eternal spikes (not only in Transcarpathia) bandits and security forces - clearly on the side of the SS men.
But there is another part of society - of course, today is the most - which is shocked by the fact of shooting at civilian towns and availability for many kilometers from the front line people with weapons. Of course, the bandits lived in Mukachevo almost the beginning, and they have guns too was not yesterday. But while there was no armed conflict between bandits and aircraft, ordinary citizens have not seen it and lived a quiet.
I closely watch the reaction of the public. After three days, the first shock ceased and people paid attention to the grave, no one has still not solved the problem that, consciously or not, boys raised FP vtyahnuvshys in armed conflict with local crime. People are not ready to say clearly and uncompromisingly that bandyukov and kryshuyuchyh cops should shoot them, but seriously the heads that they did something to do.
These days in my head analogy: December 1 event on Bankova, when after beating students on the first day of true, many thousands, but still quite peaceful Maidan young nationalists tried to transfer power situation in the plane. Then distanced themselves from them and called them provocateurs not only policy (which always dissociate themselves from any radical action), but the vast majority maydanivtsiv. There is a problem, people understood this, but were willing to exclusively peaceful ways to solve it. A little more than six weeks, when everyone saw that peaceful standing in the cold and waving flashlights led only to the adoption of laws banning large caps, and politicians, the official leaders of the protests, did not offer any alternative - the same guys started doing the same thing December 1 did Bankova. But this time they all supported. And we won.
In the minds of the vast majority of people - a taboo on the use of force by serious battle is easy, especially - on violence against representatives of the state and law. But the taboo of cannibalism even more - but it often disappears when alternative for man is starvation.
In short, if all efforts to quit now - not to have to catch a few PSivtsiv and out to solve the problem, destroying adhesions between the government and mafia clans (You can start with Mukachevo, but may not be limited to) the discharge situation, the escalation of violence would not. If you do not - it is possible that a half or two months, "Mukachevo excess" cover other Ukrainian cities, and two died July 11 in a fight with gangsters and cops PSivtsiv whose names I is not even know will be on the lips of society, as Nihoyan and Zhyznevskyy.
Next point - especially for those who think that the guys or their commanders led financial interest - the desire by the profit from the smuggling. Personally, I do not think so, but given the popularity of this idea, and focus on it.
People you know is bad history. All the popular characters from Robin Hood and Karmelyuka from which side do not look, were robbers. Yes, Robin Hood robbed of "bad" and helped "good". And the men who shot the aircraft - a small defenseless orphans? And all spent, including financial resources FP - is not for victory in the war?
However, why do we need a long, legendary times? Not all famous historical figures of the past century, some of whom we admire, others - our enemies started with things that can be classified as ordinary gangsterism. Stalin and other Bolsheviks before they came to power, robbing banks and doing "eksamy." OUN Bilas and Danylyshyn, praised Olzhych and Teligi, were hanged for having committed an armed raid on the mail to get money for the OUN. I recall that during such actions threaten not fall primarily armed bandits and their "chops", and ordinary civilians - Postman, cashiers, casual visitors.
Do you know who the famous procured money for its activities exclusively legal way?
He was not robbed banks and mail reketyryv not rich. He took money from sponsors. In wealthy people who sympathized with his ideas.
You are convinced that he later proved fundamentally better than the above-mentioned "political bandits"? I think those who thinks so - at least, not most
Think that huge money is needed to ensure that the system break down - even indifferent ways in which to break. And the system will allow his competitors to win the money - too indifferent ways in which to get.
Resist the total hysterics. Think own mind. Continue reading.