Home
Register
Log in
PapaDragonIsos wrote:If I'm not wrong they are not for the army but police.
They are for both, army got the bulk of it
Serbian Air Force Needs and Modernization
PapaDragon- Posts : 9238
Points : 9320
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
They are for both, army got the bulk of it
Cyberspec- Posts : 2873
Points : 3028
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
The Serbian AF favours the MiG-35 and Su-30 as their next fighter according to "Vecernje Novosti"....it's not a serious source but I'll post it for information sake.
The MiG-29's they recently got are only a stop gap measure as they will fly only for another 10 yrs max (maybe less). So around 2025 they'll have start the process of looking for a replacement
The MiG-29's they recently got are only a stop gap measure as they will fly only for another 10 yrs max (maybe less). So around 2025 they'll have start the process of looking for a replacement
Cyberspec- Posts : 2873
Points : 3028
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
Looks like Serbia has purchased the Chinese FK-3 (export version of HQ-22) SAM system. It's been mentioned in the annual report of the main arms import/export company, which pretty much makes it official. This is a major leap in capability....but I was hoping for the S-350 (ideal choice IMO) or BUK-M3 
George1 likes this post
PapaDragon- Posts : 9238
Points : 9320
Join date : 2015-04-26
Location : Fort Evil, Serbia
Cyberspec wrote:Looks like Serbia has purchased the Chinese FK-3 (export version of HQ-22) SAM system. It's been mentioned in the annual report of the main arms import/export company, which pretty much makes it official. This is a major leap in capability....but I was hoping for the S-350 (ideal choice IMO) or BUK-M3
...
Ideal choice is one that can be bought in large quantities and S-350 ain't it (also it's quite cumbersome for something as cramped as Serbia, we ain't a big place)
Is BUK-M3 even for sale?
Missile specs may not be as awesome as Russian ones but important thing is altitude and this one is good for 27km which is 10 more than what we have so far and 10 that we were short back in '99
Distance is secondary for us, altitude is most important part
And this looks far more mobile and compact than S-350 or BUK hence easier to hide
Rumor has it we purchased 3 batteries, how many vehicles is that?
Another possible factor in decision is that apparently we got them so cheap that Chinese were practically giving them away, looks like they were looking for early export adopters and there were definitely no complaints on our end
This could tilt decision on new airplanes in USA favor because we will need to make Uncle Sam happy as well and China seems to be new bogeyman (until Biden wins that is...)
Isos- Posts : 5759
Points : 5751
Join date : 2015-11-06
Really not the best but for low money it's better than their actual soviet made stuff.
Hope they will test them and say what they think about them.
Hope they will test them and say what they think about them.
Isos- Posts : 5759
Points : 5751
Join date : 2015-11-06
Is BUK-M3 even for sale?
I posted 2 days ago in the buk thread that rosoboronexport put the Viking (export buk-M3) on their website. So yes it is.
And this looks far more mobile and compact than S-350 or BUK hence easier to hide
No it's not. Also it has 1 radar with SARH missiles which means same drawbacks as your sa-6. Buk has radar for all its launchers and S-350 ARH missiles.
Buk is far more mobile and its off road capabilities allow to hide in forest or better terrains. This one need to stay on roads and cab be easily spotted.
Not to mention that it is chinese made...
Also they offer buk on wheeled chassis.
Cyberspec- Posts : 2873
Points : 3028
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
Apparently 3 batteries have been ordered. There's also a report (speculation at this stage) that a 4th battery will be provided for free...sort of a buy 3 get 1 free deal. It's part of an larger deal that included the drones and tech transfer
Here's the Chinese domestic version (HQ-22) during an exercise, which has been entering service since 2016 in fairly large numbers. They seem to use it in conjunction with the HQ-9 (their analog to the S-300) as a sort of "gap filler"
Here's the Chinese domestic version (HQ-22) during an exercise, which has been entering service since 2016 in fairly large numbers. They seem to use it in conjunction with the HQ-9 (their analog to the S-300) as a sort of "gap filler"
medo- Posts : 3838
Points : 3922
Join date : 2010-10-24
Location : Slovenia
With 4 batteries Serbia could form 2 battalions with 6 TELs. Each battalion could include 1 Pantsir battery for protection, what means Serbia should buy at least 1 more battery of Pantsirs. Other question is, how much are FQ-3 and Pantsir compatible to work integrated.
Isos- Posts : 5759
Points : 5751
Join date : 2015-11-06
Anyone has more info on the system.
I see only this picture on google about the system's radar and it seems to not rotate. The missiles are also launched only in one direction. Which makes it even less effective than sa-6. And since the serbian air force is very weak with only 4 or so mig-29A enemy can easily go around and destroy them.
So the 4 system will probably work as 1 system to provide 360° protection which sucks.
I see only this picture on google about the system's radar and it seems to not rotate. The missiles are also launched only in one direction. Which makes it even less effective than sa-6. And since the serbian air force is very weak with only 4 or so mig-29A enemy can easily go around and destroy them.
So the 4 system will probably work as 1 system to provide 360° protection which sucks.
Cyberspec- Posts : 2873
Points : 3028
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
The whole radar cabin turns in the direction of the target as detected by the main search radar H-200
Chinese HQ-22 battery deployment is identical to this according to satelite photos
Chinese HQ-22 battery deployment is identical to this according to satelite photos
Isos- Posts : 5759
Points : 5751
Join date : 2015-11-06
I don't see your pictures.
littlerabbit- Posts : 78
Points : 78
Join date : 2017-07-03
Location : Serbia
As far as I found out, usually 1 battery consists of 6 trucks with launchers (6x4=24 rockets), but Chinese are pretty flexible about that, so they are offering 3-6 units per battery. 
With these 3 (or 4) batteries, we can cover our entire air space.
Just need few more batteries of Pantsir S1
With these 3 (or 4) batteries, we can cover our entire air space.
Just need few more batteries of Pantsir S1
Cyberspec- Posts : 2873
Points : 3028
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
Isos wrote:I don't see your pictures.
miketheterrible- Posts : 4560
Points : 4538
Join date : 2016-11-06
Very stupid and inefficient. I presume these were dirt cheap then. Otherwise lol.
Isos- Posts : 5759
Points : 5751
Join date : 2015-11-06
Thanks Cyberspec. But that doesn't change the problem of 1 radar for all the launchers. Multidirectional attacks will be deadly against it. They will need more pantsir.
From what I understood China gave lot of money to help Serbian economy so it's not a real military purchase. It still better to have them than not and they cover a big area.
Very stupid and inefficient. I presume these were dirt cheap then. Otherwise lol.
From what I understood China gave lot of money to help Serbian economy so it's not a real military purchase. It still better to have them than not and they cover a big area.
Cyberspec- Posts : 2873
Points : 3028
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
Actually it's a pretty modern system which only entered service in the last 4-5 years years with the PLA. Serbia is the 1st export customer AFAIK.
As I wrote previously, in the PLA it's role is to replace older systems & supplement the HQ-9B (their premier SAM system)
From what I gather, a Serbian Army delegation was in China for an extended period in 2018 before they signed up for it...At first they were considering the HQ-16B but chose the FK-3 due to longer range and greater resistance to jamming. It can switch between Semi active radar and Command guidance or combine both methods depending on the situation.
In China, the search radar usually used with the HQ-22/FK-3 is the Type 408 (not much known about it). It's not yet known whether Serbia has ordered it or they plan to integrate the FK-3 with their existing search radars
As I wrote previously, in the PLA it's role is to replace older systems & supplement the HQ-9B (their premier SAM system)
From what I gather, a Serbian Army delegation was in China for an extended period in 2018 before they signed up for it...At first they were considering the HQ-16B but chose the FK-3 due to longer range and greater resistance to jamming. It can switch between Semi active radar and Command guidance or combine both methods depending on the situation.
In China, the search radar usually used with the HQ-22/FK-3 is the Type 408 (not much known about it). It's not yet known whether Serbia has ordered it or they plan to integrate the FK-3 with their existing search radars
Cyberspec- Posts : 2873
Points : 3028
Join date : 2011-08-08
Location : Terra Australis
Isos wrote:Thanks Cyberspec. But that doesn't change the problem of 1 radar for all the launchers. Multidirectional attacks will be deadly against it. They will need more pantsir.
It's comparable to a S-300PMU-1...how many engagement radars per S-300 battery?
GarryB- Posts : 25280
Points : 25826
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
The angled missiles are interesting... almost like they borrowed a bad feature of a Patriot and added it to S-300...
Still... seriously... what air threats will Serbia be facing any time soon?
This is a thanks for the support deal where they get something they might not use, which is probably cheaper than other things they could have bought from Russia that they might also never use.
I am sure it will be fine, and I hope no matter what they buy they never need them again.
Their history shows they know how to use even older tech stuff to its best effect... no system is perfect and there is no way they could afford to buy the numbers of SAMs they would need to defeat HATO... and honestly the only other threat might be Albania... for which it should be fine.
They have proven they get the best out of their equipment and this stuff should greatly increase their potential and performance... it is good to see them getting new stuff.
Still... seriously... what air threats will Serbia be facing any time soon?
This is a thanks for the support deal where they get something they might not use, which is probably cheaper than other things they could have bought from Russia that they might also never use.
I am sure it will be fine, and I hope no matter what they buy they never need them again.
Their history shows they know how to use even older tech stuff to its best effect... no system is perfect and there is no way they could afford to buy the numbers of SAMs they would need to defeat HATO... and honestly the only other threat might be Albania... for which it should be fine.
They have proven they get the best out of their equipment and this stuff should greatly increase their potential and performance... it is good to see them getting new stuff.
|
|
|