Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
Over the base of American ICBMs, the Chinese US aerosat is unable to shoot it down 
+71
diabetus
billybatts91
Big_Gazza
nomadski
thegopnik
The-thing-next-door
Rodion_Romanovic
walle83
Belisarius
TMA1
Arkanghelsk
Podlodka77
AZ-5
lyle6
RTN
zepia
ALAMO
GreyHog
Finty
lancelot
Backman
miketheterrible
mnztr
Arrow
kvs
jhelb
LMFS
Hole
Isos
d_taddei2
PapaDragon
Odin of Ossetia
airstrike
OminousSpudd
Walther von Oldenburg
Solncepek
JohninMK
Werewolf
Kyo
AlfaT8
AirCargo
sepheronx
max steel
nemrod
victor1985
magnumcromagnon
andalusia
Airbornewolf
ATošić
higurashihougi
Hannibal Barca
Mike E
TR1
Sujoy
Mindstorm
Russian Patriot
medo
IronsightSniper
SOC
GarryB
KamovHelicopter
Viktor
nightcrawler
ahmedfire
NationalRus
solo.13mmfmj
milky_candy_sugar
Jelena
Vladislav
Turk1
Admin
75 posters
US Air Force: Discussion and News
Arrow- Posts : 3657
Points : 3647
Join date : 2012-02-12
Hole likes this post
Hole- Posts : 11170
Points : 11148
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
Russia could lend a helping hand. Or in this case a helping MiG-31.
Broski likes this post
Hole- Posts : 11170
Points : 11148
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
Arrow, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post
ALAMO
ALAMO- Posts : 7664
Points : 7754
Join date : 2014-11-25
Keep on mind, that the thing FIRST traveled across All Canada without event being spotted 
GarryB, Hole and Podlodka77 like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40736
Points : 41238
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
The Chinese claim it is not theirs...
Ironically it was Japan that started launching balloons like that during WWII, but during the Cold war the west sent lots of balloons over the Soviet Union to spy... funny to see them getting a taste of their own medicine...
Ironically it was Japan that started launching balloons like that during WWII, but during the Cold war the west sent lots of balloons over the Soviet Union to spy... funny to see them getting a taste of their own medicine...
Arrow- Posts : 3657
Points : 3647
Join date : 2012-02-12
The US tried to shoot down the balloon without success
https://m.vk.com/video-123538639_456295487
https://m.vk.com/video-123538639_456295487
zepia likes this post
Hole- Posts : 11170
Points : 11148
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
First pic of the failed shot down attempt.
GarryB, ALAMO, zardof, lyle6, lancelot, Broski, Belisarius and Podlodka77 like this post
Hole- Posts : 11170
Points : 11148
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
GarryB, ALAMO, zardof, lyle6, lancelot, Broski, Belisarius and Podlodka77 like this post
ALAMO- Posts : 7664
Points : 7754
Join date : 2014-11-25
... but you do realize that the whole world is watching?
How a bloody balloon paraded across the whole North America continent, being - finally - spotted with the EYES of the witnesses?
And for the third day, they didn't manage to take it down?
NORAD / SHITRAD
How a bloody balloon paraded across the whole North America continent, being - finally - spotted with the EYES of the witnesses?
And for the third day, they didn't manage to take it down?
NORAD / SHITRAD
GarryB, zardof and Hole like this post
Isos- Posts : 11622
Points : 11590
Join date : 2015-11-06
What f-22 doing ?
One bullet above a wood area is enough.
One bullet above a wood area is enough.
Arrow- Posts : 3657
Points : 3647
Join date : 2012-02-12
What f-22 doing ? wrote:
An F-22 shot down a balloon over the Atlantic
https://vk.com/video-123538639_456295523
nomadski- Posts : 3109
Points : 3117
Join date : 2017-01-02
Question for our space experts : At what height does " space " actually start ? For the purposes of it being in international area legally ? After all satellites are not shot down , even if gathering intelligence , because they are in space ? Can balloon be high enough to say , it was in space ? Also , I doubt this Balloon was innocent weather thing . Because the yanks shot it down over Sea . So they can say " we don't know what it was . " But if shot over land ,then no excuse , must say it was spy Balloon and risk souring relations . Therefore the yanks want to back down and not escalate , whatever they were escalating !
Isos- Posts : 11622
Points : 11590
Join date : 2015-11-06
2 days to intercept a balloon... must be a record.
zardof likes this post
lyle6- Posts : 2722
Points : 2716
Join date : 2020-09-14
Location : Philippines
Popped its cherry on a fucking balloonArrow wrote:An F-22 shot down a balloon over the Atlantic
Big_Gazza- Posts : 4965
Points : 4955
Join date : 2014-08-25
Location : Melbourne, Australia
GarryB, flamming_python, Werewolf, kvs, ALAMO, Erk, zepia and like this post
billybatts91- Posts : 775
Points : 777
Join date : 2022-02-23
Airbornewolf, par far, zepia, GunshipDemocracy, TMA1, 11E, jon_deluxe and Belisarius like this post
andalusia- Posts : 774
Points : 838
Join date : 2013-10-01
Can someone explain to me about this Chinese Spy Balloon that the US shot down? What is going on? Do it belong to China and why would China do something like this?
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/us-tracking-large-chinese-spy-221300297.html
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/us-tracking-large-chinese-spy-221300297.html
Sujoy- Posts : 2429
Points : 2587
Join date : 2012-04-02
Location : India || भारत
So the various SAM systems like Patriot that NATO is sending to Ukraine are not even good enough to shoot down a balloon over water. A fighter jet had to be send to do the job.
GarryB, Big_Gazza, ALAMO, Godric, GunshipDemocracy, zardof, Hole and like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40736
Points : 41238
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Can someone explain to me about this Chinese Spy Balloon that the US shot down? What is going on? Do it belong to China and why would China do something like this?
They claim it is a weather balloon... they might be taking the piss or it might be genuine... the US is treating it as a spy platform which is no real surprise because most of their weather balloons were spy platforms...
Not really on topic on this thread however.
So the various SAM systems like Patriot that NATO is sending to Ukraine are not even good enough to shoot down a balloon over water. A fighter jet had to be send to do the job.
To be fair balloons are normally rather tricky targets, the soviets developed a special range of specialist platforms designed to shoot them down.
Last edited by GarryB on Sun Feb 05, 2023 9:51 am; edited 1 time in total
GunshipDemocracy and ucmvulcan like this post
Hole- Posts : 11170
Points : 11148
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
For the Us space begins at 80km, for most of the world 100km (Kármán-line).
But as one Twitter user pointed out, there is a an article in that treaty for balloons. If they are above 80.000ft
they are like satellites (from a legal point of view). Who wanted this article?
The US.
Other question: was the balloon still in american airspace or over international waters?
But as one Twitter user pointed out, there is a an article in that treaty for balloons. If they are above 80.000ft
they are like satellites (from a legal point of view). Who wanted this article?
The US. Other question: was the balloon still in american airspace or over international waters?
GarryB, ALAMO, Broski, Belisarius and Podlodka77 like this post
Hole- Posts : 11170
Points : 11148
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
GarryB, ALAMO, Walther von Oldenburg, zepia, zardof, lyle6, lancelot and like this post
Hole- Posts : 11170
Points : 11148
Join date : 2018-03-24
Age : 48
Location : Scholzistan
Walther von Oldenburg, zepia, zardof, thegopnik, lancelot, Broski, Belisarius and Podlodka77 like this post
Sujoy- Posts : 2429
Points : 2587
Join date : 2012-04-02
Location : India || भारत
GarryB wrote:To be fair balloons are normally rather tricky targets, the soviets developed a special range of specialist platforms designed to shoot them down.
You can shift this discussion to the appropriate thread. What weapons did the USSR use to neutralize such "spy balloons"?
Americans managed to send a F-22 that cost $85,325 an hour to fly and fired a $350K AIM-9X to bring down a $1000 balloon.
Big_Gazza, kvs, owais.usmani, Broski and Podlodka77 like this post
GarryB- Posts : 40736
Points : 41238
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Not even close to the worlds best air defence though....
GarryB- Posts : 40736
Points : 41238
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
So despite the posts are about a Chinese balloon shot down after flying over US territory this thread is about Soviet anti balloon technology of the cold war.
Balloons drift very slowly and are difficult targets to detect and track for radar, which is why the US and the west used them to send spy platforms across the Soviet Union before they could use satellites.
The Japanese also sent balloons to cross the Pacific Ocean to attack the US by starting forest fires... this would not normally be very practical except that the coast of the US is enormous so launching enormous numbers of balloons should result in some hits and cause problems.
The main problems of interception is a high closing speed with a fighter aircraft and a drifting balloon, many Soviet attempted solutions included aircraft with 23mm cannon using very special 23mm cannon shells that had very very sensitive nose fuses.
The problem was normal shells would pass through the balloon without exploding and make tiny puncture holes that would take days to effect the balloons height.
The new shells exploded on impact with the balloons skin but were so sensitive they could explode if fired in the rain.
Low altitude balloons were used as well of course...
Versions of the An-2 and various fighter aircraft and the aircraft that eventually became the M-17 were fitted with dorsal mounted cannon and optimised to fly at altitude for the job of shooting down balloons.
It was a dead end technology however as satellites replaced them for intel gathering.
Balloons drift very slowly and are difficult targets to detect and track for radar, which is why the US and the west used them to send spy platforms across the Soviet Union before they could use satellites.
The Japanese also sent balloons to cross the Pacific Ocean to attack the US by starting forest fires... this would not normally be very practical except that the coast of the US is enormous so launching enormous numbers of balloons should result in some hits and cause problems.
The main problems of interception is a high closing speed with a fighter aircraft and a drifting balloon, many Soviet attempted solutions included aircraft with 23mm cannon using very special 23mm cannon shells that had very very sensitive nose fuses.
The problem was normal shells would pass through the balloon without exploding and make tiny puncture holes that would take days to effect the balloons height.
The new shells exploded on impact with the balloons skin but were so sensitive they could explode if fired in the rain.
Low altitude balloons were used as well of course...
Versions of the An-2 and various fighter aircraft and the aircraft that eventually became the M-17 were fitted with dorsal mounted cannon and optimised to fly at altitude for the job of shooting down balloons.
It was a dead end technology however as satellites replaced them for intel gathering.
Sujoy likes this post