You misunderstand my point.
You can't counter something that doesn't exist yet.
To counter something you need to know how it works and then based on how it works work out some weakness that you can take advantage of to make the system ineffective.
For instance does it use radar detection. How long does it take to reset between engaging targets. how many targets can it engage at once or is it multi target capable?
There is no point in creating a jammer if you don't even know if it uses radar or what radar frequencies it uses.
Im not sure if this will answer your questions..
But US defense Industry , i really think ,they design weapons ,based on their needs and probable wars.. Because US army will never be used against Russia in a conventional war ,and neither they have any plans to suicide and invade Russia or not even engage in a direct confrontation with Russia , then they have no need to create a new tank , the ones they have
will work for third world nations well. All the show the americans do in Baltic states.. and ukraine ,what they seek is provoke Russia into attack either ukraine or their allies ,so that US can have excuse to pressure Europe into full economic blockade against Russia.
US military doctrine is achieve Air superiority first.. and after their enemy defenses destroyed and they have air superiority , invade with tanks with the backup of their airforce. ,why they don't develop much their Artillery forces and or missiles forces. because those are short range
weapons and they will never fight on equal terms.. ie. they will never do duels with artillery or tanks.. unless hey know is safe. ie.. like in IRAQ they fought at night with tanks , knowing IRAQUI army have no night vision. if the enemy have good air defenses ,then they will think twice sending their planes.. So i think US defense industry make their conventional weapons for fights in Middle east or Africa.. but not to fight CHina or India or Russia. because they will not do such a fight.. for fighting against Russia US wants to deploy an offensive missile wall (that they call "Anti ballistic Shield" )next to Russian borders that could be armed with nuclear warheads in no time.
Russia in the other hand needs to develop a Tank ,because contrary to US ,that do not share borders with enemies.. Russia have many enemies..at their borders. Ukraine ,baltic states and Poland. IF Mexico and Canada became for example close allies of Russia and Russia had military bases there.. and threatening them.. then they will need to invest a lot in land combat weapons ,including tanks and artillery .. just in case they face an armed insurrection ,that is supplied with weapons by Russia. All said.. US defense industry develop weapons , based on the conflicts
they expect to fight with conventional weapons. the only exception is weapons their defense industry is asked to develop for export..