Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    avatar
    limb

    Posts : 38
    Points : 42
    Join date : 2020-09-17

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  limb on Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:55 am

    Whats the reason the MiG-31BM can't fire the kinzhal?

    One underrated function that noone talks about of the MiG-31BM is its ability to carry precision air to surface missiles, due to having software upgrades to fire inertial, ARH and TV guided PGMs like the KAB series, Kh-38, Kh-31, Kh-59 . Its a much smarter MiG-25BM. Its basically a much faster Su-24 which makes it one of Russia's most devastating air to ground aircraft due to being able to strike with little warning.

    It can also function as a jammer pod carrying aircraft which has extremely powerful ECM abilities due to its massive engines giving lots of electrical power. If only the MiG-31BM has an AESA radar as large as the zaslon. Then it could be in the back of russian fighter and jam NATO BVR missiles by burning them with its massive AESA radar, acting as a anti missile defence aircraft.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 9533
    Points : 9615
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  PapaDragon on Fri Sep 18, 2020 6:02 pm

    limb wrote:Whats the reason the MiG-31BM can't fire the kinzhal?

    MiG-31BM can fire Kinzhal no problem, it's the main carrier of the missile

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 6219
    Points : 6372
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri Sep 18, 2020 6:46 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    limb wrote:Whats the reason the MiG-31BM can't fire the kinzhal?  

    MiG-31BM can fire Kinzhal no problem, it's the main carrier of the missile


    Technically the Kinzhal carriers have the designation MiG-31K, so a modification of the air-to-surface PGM capable MiG-31BM. How much difference between the 2 variants? Your guess would probably be as good as mine (as that is a highly guarded state secret), however I would assume not much. I presume the difference between the 2 variants rely on a significant software update to the avionics to allow it to use Kinzhal effectively, and likely a airframe structural strengthening of the undercarriage.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 9533
    Points : 9615
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  PapaDragon on Fri Sep 18, 2020 7:10 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    limb wrote:Whats the reason the MiG-31BM can't fire the kinzhal?  

    MiG-31BM can fire Kinzhal no problem, it's the main carrier of the missile
    Technically the Kinzhal carriers have the designation MiG-31K, so a modification of the air-to-surface PGM capable MiG-31BM. How much difference between the 2 variants? Your guess would probably be as good as mine (as that is a highly guarded state secret), however I would assume not much. I presume the difference between the 2 variants rely on a significant software update to the avionics to allow it to use Kinzhal effectively, and likely a airframe structural strengthening of the undercarriage.

    Correct (no way I can keep up with all the suffixes)

    One is for VKS other for Navy (coastal aviation)


    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 2092
    Points : 2094
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  LMFS on Fri Sep 18, 2020 7:53 pm

    The MiG-31K has modified structure and got the recessed panels to carry R-33/37 removed, more internal fuel and apparently lost the radar, too...
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 4710
    Points : 4706
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:13 pm

    Can it still carry other AAMs during its mission & defend itself? If not, it'll need escorts.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 6434
    Points : 6426
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  Isos on Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:00 pm

    Tsavo Lion wrote:Can it still carry other AAMs during its mission & defend itself? If not, it'll need escorts.

    No need when the missile has 2000km range.

    Mig-31K is IMO just a quick solution until they modify Tupolevs to carry it. And with the new hypersonic missiles Kinzhal could even be not bought anymore.

    They would have too much type of missiles for antishiping. Their strategy is overwhelming with a same type of missile. Tens of different sort of missiles makes it harder to achieve as they don't fly the same path and at the same speed which make coordinated attacks complicated.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 26305
    Points : 26851
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  GarryB on Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:52 pm

    Whats the reason the MiG-31BM can't fire the kinzhal?

    MiG-31BMs are interceptors intended to shoot down heavy bombers and cruise missiles and other air targets at max range.

    They operate for the aerospace defence forces of Russia defending Russian territory from aerial threats.

    Kinzhal is an anti ship missile based on the ground launched solid rocket fuelled Iskander missile and is intended to keep enemy ships and aircraft carriers away from Russian land and airspace.

    The Russians have a pool of MiG-31s... most are old and some are new upgraded BM interceptors.

    It costs money to upgrade an old MiG-31 to be a good interceptor... it essentially uses all new electronics and systems.

    To fire the Kinzhal the important feature is top speed and altitude, so an old model MiG-31 with unnecessary stuff removed and upgraded to fly fast and high is what you want... because when launching Kinzhal missiles air speed and altitude is all that really matters in terms of its performance.

    No airborne radar mounted in the nose of a current fighter can detect targets at 2,000km range so the radar is not really critical either.

    One underrated function that noone talks about of the MiG-31BM is its ability to carry precision air to surface missiles, due to having software upgrades to fire inertial, ARH and TV guided PGMs like the KAB series, Kh-38, Kh-31, Kh-59 .

    That is true, but in service it is rather unlikely to ever be able to use those features unfortunately because in the Far North and the Far East there will not be any HATO or enemy ground targets to engage... and if there are they will likely use Su-34s or Tu-22M3Ms instead.

    Its a much smarter MiG-25BM. Its basically a much faster Su-24 which makes it one of Russia's most devastating air to ground aircraft due to being able to strike with little warning.

    It has enormous potential that may never be realised.

    A smaller country like Australia perhaps could have used it as an F-111 and F-18 replacement, but politically that was never going to happen... a Tu-22M3M or Su-34 could also have been interesting alternatives that they never would have considered too. F-35 it is.... Smile

    If only the MiG-31BM has an AESA radar as large as the zaslon.

    I would imagine new radars are in its future...

    Technically the Kinzhal carriers have the designation MiG-31K, so a modification of the air-to-surface PGM capable MiG-31BM. How much difference between the 2 variants? Your guess would probably be as good as mine (as that is a highly guarded state secret), however I would assume not much. I presume the difference between the 2 variants rely on a significant software update to the avionics to allow it to use Kinzhal effectively, and likely a airframe structural strengthening of the undercarriage.

    I would think it would be a bit of a waste taking an aircraft already upgraded as a capable interceptor to then adapt it to use a single missile and transfer it from the aerospace defence forces to the Navy would be a bit of a shock... especially considering for the role of launching Kinzhal good comms and nav systems would be important, but radar and a variety of weapons would not.

    I would think a priority would be top speed (and therefore light weight and new heat resistant materials) and altitude (again light weight new materials that are heat resistant...).

    The MiG-31K has modified structure and got the recessed panels to carry R-33/37 removed, more internal fuel and apparently lost the radar, too...

    With such modifications I would think old model MiG-31s from storage were used rather than taking BMs out of interceptor service to use in the Navy...

    Mig-31K is IMO just a quick solution until they modify Tupolevs to carry it.

    MiG-31K is primary user because it is fast and they tend to use them in the far north and far east anyway.

    The extra height and speed of the MiG means better speed and range for the missile... they likely wont be needing them in enormous numbers...

    And with the new hypersonic missiles Kinzhal could even be not bought anymore.

    It was certainly a stopgap... but as Iskander is in production for ground forces I would think producing quite a few could be fairly straight forward and relatively cheap.

    They would have too much type of missiles for antishiping. Their strategy is overwhelming with a same type of missile. Tens of different sort of missiles makes it harder to achieve as they don't fly the same path and at the same speed which make coordinated attacks complicated.

    Different types of missiles complicate the defences and cover more bases... when working together in a coordinated attack they will be most effective... the fastest missiles can take down the air defence ships and aircraft carriers leaving the rest of the ships open to slower missiles arriving later to clean what is left up....

    avatar
    Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E

    Posts : 45
    Points : 47
    Join date : 2016-01-20

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  Mig-31BM2 Super Irbis-E on Sun Sep 20, 2020 9:57 am

    The BM is also supposed to defend the Tu-95 against F-15, Tornadoes, EF2000 and F-22. She also practices against Su-27/35 for such scenarios.
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 3269
    Points : 3269
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 44
    Location : Merkelland

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  Hole on Sun Oct 04, 2020 8:16 pm

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Eje7o110
    ASAT version

    GarryB, medo, George1, dino00, LMFS and lyle6 like this post


    Sponsored content

    MiG-31BM Interceptor: News - Page 30 Empty Re: MiG-31BM Interceptor: News

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:03 am