Syrian War: News #22

GarryB wrote:How about Turkey does what it promised and separates the so called moderate rebels from ISIS and Al Quada first?

They cannot do it, they have a very loose group on the rebels.

Not saying they want to but the rebels would just tell them to take a hike, You need to understand this. The rebels know, the Turks need them for their political goals, so the rebels aren't inclined to lesson if they don't want to.

Just like with those joint Patrols, the Turks told them to stop making problems, the rebels told them "F off, we will do what we want"

JohninMK wrote:

SeigSoloyvov wrote:
Just like with those joint Patrols, the Turks told them to stop making problems, the rebels told them "F off, we will do what we want"

You're back, don't say you got some leave

Anyway, just to put some scale on the Turkish 'investment' in Idlib.

RussSyr
@ynms79797979
·
1h
Turkey has deployed more than 2,800 units of military vehicles in Greater Idlib, Syria
 since February last year, a total of 10,300 Turkish troops have been sent to Greater Idlib.

This is a brazen attempt by Turkey to annex parts of Syria. Why not a single use of the word "annexation" by the mass media?
If Crimea where the vast majority of residents wanted to return to Russian jurisdiction is "annexation", then what
is this Turkish operation? Charity?

The ideal situation would be to move up north, the problem for the SAA is their numbers problem have shown.

Last time they tried they left areas lightly defended not by choice and the rebels took advantage of those attacking areas where the SAA was weak.

Now add in increased Turkish vehicle and infantry, the SAA will have a hard time. The Turks have shown they will strike back just as hard against the SAA if they attack their troops. 10K guys isn't a joke that's a HUGE number for the SAA.

The SAA isn't going to have it easy here at all. Their chances of liberating Idlib are getting thinner and thinner.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:The ideal situation would be to move up north, the problem for the SAA is their numbers problem have shown.

Last time they tried they left areas lightly defended not by choice and the rebels took advantage of those attacking areas where the SAA was weak.

Now add in increased Turkish vehicle and infantry, the SAA will have a hard time. The Turks have shown they will strike back just as hard against the SAA if they attack their troops. 10K guys isn't a joke that's a HUGE number for the SAA.

The SAA isn't going to have it easy here at all. Their chances of liberating Idlib are getting thinner and thinner.

Turkey sacrificed hundreds of lives in Syria. No way Turkey will allow SAA to take M4 highway. The sunk cost has been too high for Turkey. Especially now Turkey's economy is in the toilet because of virus.

JohninMK wrote:My oh my.

ZOKA
@200_zoka
·3m
Next Russian-Turkish joint patrol on M4 will be interesting for sure after today events

fiber_ghost
@fiber_ghost
· 1h
Agreement reached between hts and tsk. Only tsk will patrol on m4-highway Russian occupation forces excluded.

RussSyr
@ynms79797979
·2h
The death toll from the clashes between the Turkish army and terrorists  on the Aleppo-Lattakia road M4 near the town of Neirab has increased to 5, and the number of Turkish soldiers has been injured, one of them in a dangerous condition

ZOKA
@200_zoka
·3h
The helicopters of the TSK carried some seriously injured TSK soldiers to the TSK base located in the Idlib from the conflicts with the HTŞ.
StepNews

This is exactly what Erdogan wanted. Russians simply won't be allowed on M4 highway.

JohninMK wrote:Not sure who is bombing Israelis, didn't think anyone was. Don't think they have a bat in hell's chance of getting the Iranians out.

At some point someone is going to have had enough and will knock an IAF plane down over Lebanon.

RussSyr
@ynms79797979
·
14h
The Zionist War Minister, commenting on the aggression at dawn today on  Damascus:
The goal is to get Iran out militarily from Syria before the end of 2020 Israel will not allow its residents to be bombed while Iran's leaders live a quiet life in Tehran
++

The "bombing of Israel" in the past has been some the launch of single MLRS or home-made rockets that land randomly near some northern Israeli
village. Supposedly there were actual deaths from such attacks over a period of 10+ years. These attacks were useful pretexts for "retaliation"
in Gaza and southern Lebanon. Today any "bombing" would be from ISIS controlled territory near the Golan Heights. Given how friendly ISIS is
with Israel these would be pure psyop false flags.

Israel does not have a case against Iran. Support for Hezbollah is not support for terrorism. Hezbollah fought a legitimate resistance war against
Israeli occupants in southern Lebanon and succeeded in driving them out. Including the 2006 re-invasion. Hezbollah never staged any attacks
on civilian aircraft or there transport and any civilian infrastructure. Hamas did bomb buses in Israel. Western fake stream media never gives
their sheeple media consumers a clear picture and context. They deliberately obfuscate terrorism by some dubious elements and all Muslims who
resist their agenda. Iran is being victimized by Israel since, like Russia in the face of NATzO, it fails to submit.

SeigSoloyvov wrote:The ideal situation would be to move up north, the problem for the SAA is their numbers problem have shown.

Last time they tried they left areas lightly defended not by choice and the rebels took advantage of those attacking areas where the SAA was weak.

Now add in increased Turkish vehicle and infantry, the SAA will have a hard time. The Turks have shown they will strike back just as hard against the SAA if they attack their troops. 10K guys isn't a joke that's a HUGE number for the SAA.

The SAA isn't going to have it easy here at all. Their chances of liberating Idlib are getting thinner and thinner.

Mods take note. The yankee troll is back again.