Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Share
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4471
    Points : 4630
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:10 am

    This is directed towards Mike E, a correction on the number of gears forward and backward. So one of you older posts stated that Armata platform has 4 gears forward and backward, I read somewhere some 5-6 months back that it was actually 8 gears forward and backward. Though I sat on the response, because I wasn't sure if the article was a victim of a bad machine translation, so I gave your word the benefit of the doubt, but yes indeed it's been confirmed that Armata has both 8 gears forward and 8 gears backward. Just a minor correction.
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2647
    Points : 2685
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Mike E on Wed Feb 17, 2016 6:37 am

    It has always been 8 in both directions - not sure why I would have mixed that up.

    Thanks
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4471
    Points : 4630
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:11 am

    Mike E wrote:It has always been 8 in both directions - not sure why I would have mixed that up.

    Thanks

    BTW on Gurkhan's website, there's been rumors that Rhinemetal is looking at a 130mm smooth-bore cannon. Do you think there's any substance to the claim?

    If it's true, then that's quite strange and perplexing, considering that there's apparently already a 140mm cannon already designed ready for service.
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2647
    Points : 2685
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Mike E on Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:17 am

    The image GurKhan showed originated from an official Rheinmettal presentation - so it has basically been confirmed.

    A 130 mm makes a little sense - in that the rounds can be smaller and lighter as well. If they stick with unitary rounds, it makes sense, if not, it doesn't really do much.

    I'm certain it will be ETC-based as well,countries have had the technology for a while now. I think we will see T-14 adopt an ETC very soon as well. In fact, possibly in place of the 152 mm.
    avatar
    Militarov

    Posts : 5964
    Points : 5993
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Militarov on Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:33 am

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    Mike E wrote:It has always been 8 in both directions - not sure why I would have mixed that up.

    Thanks

    BTW on Gurkhan's website, there's been rumors that Rhinemetal is looking at a 130mm smooth-bore cannon. Do you think there's any substance to the claim?

    If it's true, then that's quite strange and perplexing, considering that there's apparently already a 140mm cannon already designed ready for service.

    Seems actually that NPzK-140 is dead, as they still want to keep 4 crew members and 140mm ammunition is separate loading ammunition, which means it requires autoloader. So i guess than that is why they want to pursue 130mm guns now, as they are most likely one piece.

    ult

    Posts : 664
    Points : 704
    Join date : 2015-02-20

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  ult on Thu Feb 18, 2016 8:29 pm

    avatar
    Zivo

    Posts : 1488
    Points : 1514
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Zivo on Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:09 pm

    ult wrote:

    What's with the exhaust flame on startup?
    avatar
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 7079
    Points : 7175
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  PapaDragon on Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:19 pm

    Zivo wrote:...................

    What's with the exhaust flame on startup?

    Super stronkk engine!!! Cool
    avatar
    Zivo

    Posts : 1488
    Points : 1514
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Zivo on Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:30 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Zivo wrote:...................

    What's with the exhaust flame on startup?

    Super stronkk engine!!! Cool

    I didn't notice the first time, it's actually the APU's exhaust. That makes more sense, short pipe, plus cold start.

    Cyrus the great

    Posts : 273
    Points : 281
    Join date : 2015-06-12

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Cyrus the great on Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:19 am

    I saw the live firing video of the Armata and it seemed to have had a lot of recoil, and I just don't know why that it is.


    Last edited by Cyrus the great on Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:26 am; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    Mike E

    Posts : 2647
    Points : 2685
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Mike E on Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:22 am

    Some people say barrel or stabilizer trouble with this particular unit, stabilizer was off, etc.

    It is quite clear that the stabilizer was off in both firing videos, the barrel is not 'cushioned' at all.

    Cyrus the great

    Posts : 273
    Points : 281
    Join date : 2015-06-12

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Cyrus the great on Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:30 am

    Mike E wrote:Some people say barrel or stabilizer trouble with this particular unit, stabilizer was off, etc.

    It is quite clear that the stabilizer was off in both firing videos, the barrel is not 'cushioned' at all.

    They definitely should have fixed any problems with the stabilizer or the barrel before releasing the video.
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4471
    Points : 4630
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:26 pm

    Cyrus the great wrote:
    Mike E wrote:Some people say barrel or stabilizer trouble with this particular unit, stabilizer was off, etc.

    It is quite clear that the stabilizer was off in both firing videos, the barrel is not 'cushioned' at all.

    They definitely should have fixed any problems with the stabilizer or the barrel before releasing the video.

    You do know that it's in prototype stage, and not in serial production?
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 18090
    Points : 18650
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  GarryB on Sat Feb 27, 2016 6:05 am

    It might be that they were test firing the barrel without the stabiliser engaged to determine that if can fire without the stabiliser turned on.

    Sort of a worst case accuracy test...
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 11915
    Points : 12390
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  George1 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:53 am

    RuMOD to get first test batch of T-14 Armata tanks and T-15 armored vehicles (~20) in 2016-17

    https://twitter.com/KURYERSAT/status/703661237905854464
    avatar
    franco

    Posts : 3007
    Points : 3039
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  franco on Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:05 pm

    https://www.rt.com/news/333871-armata-tanks-trial-army/

    -------

    http://www.russiadefence.net/viewtopic.forum?t=7345

    Sponsored content

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Sep 21, 2018 8:56 am