Russian military intervention and aid to Syria #13

dino00 wrote:Vann if was up to you, and because we all know how bad Putin is , who should be the president of Russian Federation?
What will he should do regard SYRIA?(just to Stay on toppic).

dino00 wrote:Vann if was up to you, and because we all know how bad Putin is , who should be the president of Russian Federation?
What will he should do regard SYRIA?(just to Stay on toppic).

Vann7 wrote:

dino00 wrote:Vann if was up to you, and because we all know how bad Putin is , who should be the president of Russian Federation?
What will he should do regard SYRIA?(just to Stay on toppic).

Syria is attacked only ,because is allied with Russia.. nothing more and nothing less.. also because
Israel don't want any Iranian influence there.. So effectively Russia interest conflict with Israel interest there.
And since Russia don't need anything from Syria , then is a serious mistake , to become allied to Syria..
Russia is losing a lot of money in Syria and even giving S-300s air defenses for free ,since Syria can't pay them..

Syria will be today like Jordan.. or like UAE or like Qatar if it was aligned with NATO.. a nation in peace and allowed to exist..  and the war in Syria will have NOT happened , had Russia did not put their noses there.. and encouraged
Syria to imitate Jordan policies.. Hundreds of thousands lives saved..  Instead of Syria , Russia should have picked
Egypt .. allowing Russia to block NATO from suez channel in case of war.. and block Saudis Oil shipment too.
thats a much more bigger interesting target.. From Egypt Russia could have controlled the Mediterranean Sea..

Thing is any nation Russia foolish convince to join Russia alliance will be on hit list of NATO and regime change.
So Russia needs a policy that takes that into account .If Russia will become allied to a nation ,it will need to be ready to fight NATO to the ultimate consequences.. but What Russia is doing in Syria is shameful to say the least.
allowing NATO to bomb their allies left center and right.. So Not only Russia is humiliated but also is losing soldiers and on top of that ,have to give for free everything.  So this is a fools policy what Putin have been doing. If he need a base for refuel.. Egypt or Mexico will have been much better. is a huge country and in a much more strategic place.



What Putin should be doing instead is hand picking its allies more carefully ,nations that it will really be worth of
fighting and of Russia sacrifice.. But Russia earns Nothing from Syria..it lose a lot of money and risking a major war for nothing.. No nation in their right mind after Syria will welcome Russia bases in their country , if it knows Russia will not defend them properly.. Russia needs to pick more carefully its allies , and aim for nations closer to Russia only.. until at least Russia economy becomes big enough to handle a counter to NATO.. with many bases around the world and with a powerful economy.

PapaDragon wrote:

Whole page of drivel and you still haven't answered the question Vann

Who should be in charge of Russia according to you?

Vann7 wrote:

PapaDragon wrote:

Whole page of drivel and you still haven't answered the question Vann

Who should be in charge of Russia according to you?

Someone that understand Leadership , someone not insecure and passive.
Someone not outdated with the times he lives..  

Some that was like Fidel castro ,or Chavez , those were leaders.. with big balls..
they both were arrested trying to overthrow a corrupt tyranny in power in Cuba and
Venezuela respectively. The problem with them ,was they did not had the military
power to survive the attacks of the American empire..

Putin is  insecure man.. he not even have eye contact and looks down to other leaders.. he speak softly and is polite.. this is a recipe for disaster ,Putin promote the disrespect of other nations..with his softness and
polite behavior.. . NATO have been bombing Syria left and right ,only because of
Putin weakness ,they know Putin will not attack them..  

Putin is not a political leader..  but more a religious ethics mentor.. he is very good in diplomacy.. but diplomacy is only needed when the influence of a nation fails..  Don't know of many Russians..figures, to say names.. but anyone will do better than Putin ,in terms of nation development and influence for sure.. Russia needs another Catherine the Great.. an Ellon Musk ,A leader with ambitions . Promoting "Stability" as putin does ,is mediocre
view of the future.. Russia needs a leader ,who wants to make Russia the leader in world development and highest quality of life in the world.

GarryB wrote:

Syria is attacked only ,because is allied with Russia.. nothing more and nothing less.. also because

The conflict in Syria has nothing to do with Russia and everything with Iran.

Syria is friendly with Iran.

Musk is definitely not Russian and I don't see him being interested in the job even if he were one

Careful not to offend him or he might call you a paedo...

To Vann... by stronger leader you mean a hot head that over reacts and does not think... you want Trump to be the next Russian president.

Thing is that Russia would have been at war for most of the time Putin has been president if it was a dick like you want him to be... Russia would be bankrupt and broken economically and politically and would be in a much worse state if you had your way so I guess it is rather good you wont be getting your way...

PapaDragon wrote:
Idiotic headline but pretty decent article:

Russia Admits Its Missiles Failed Because Syria is a Desert

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/russia-admits-its-missiles-failed-because-syria-desert-37402

nomadski wrote:Syria needs to start manufacture and stockpile  of SRBM rockets . For retaliation against attack by zionists and yanks . Must make sure enough stockpile exists to make operations impossible at yank bases . These rockets need to be under Syrian only control . Russia providing pure defensive  measures west of river .

The air defence provided for by Russia , can be effective against aircraft and some missiles . But attack against Syria can come by land or sea . A counterstrike capability is needed . As soon as western Syria is brought under government control . The oil wells east of river must be returned  to Syrian control .