Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Sat Jan 12, 2019 3:25 pm

    dino00 wrote:Source: The Navy plans to put up to 32 Poseidon vehicles on combat duty.

    It is noted that one of the regular carriers of UUV will be a special-purpose submarine "Khabarovsk"


    "It is assumed that the Poseidon carrier will have two submarines each.
    They will be part of the Northern and Pacific fleets. Each will carry a maximum of eight UUV, that is, the total number of Poseidons on alert can reach 32 units," the agency’s source said.............

    Khabarovsk-class (let's call it that for now) will be main carrier but it will have 8 Poseidons instead of 6. This is news.

    I doubt it will end on just one submarine in that class so realistic scenario is two. That's 16 torpedoes.

    Maybe three subs for 24 Poseidons depending on how Poseidon performs and how fast Khabarovsk is built.

    Other torpedoes would either be in maintenance or deployed on other platforms/coast.
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51

    Posts : 449
    Points : 445
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  verkhoturye51 on Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:32 pm

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    verkhoturye51 wrote:Meaning that two GUGI boats will have to be transfered to PF? And consequently also Losharik/Paltus midget submarines.


    why? there are many SSN/SSGNs still to be converted if wont be specially built for this purpose. 949s seem to be a good candidate. HowLosharik can carry 8 so big vehicles?



    Conventional warhead? why waste such  torpedo only for one CVN?

    GUGIs are modular AFAIK, they go either with midget boats either with Poseidon. I don't believe midgets are intented for an indepenent use.

    All 949s in modernization should get Onyx...reconstructing them to carry Poseidon like Belgorod and Podmoskovye was never mentioned. But they said they want 4 carriers and they already have 4 GUGI boats + Khabarovsk in production. That should be enough. With Khabarovsk they'll have 5 big + 4 miget GUGIs. I don't think they want to have more of them than regular submarines Laughing
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:40 pm

    verkhoturye51 wrote:............

    All 949s in modernization should get Onyx...reconstructing them to carry Poseidon like Belgorod and Podmoskovye was never mentioned. But they said they want 4 carriers and they already have 4 GUGI boats + Khabarovsk in production. That should be enough. With Khabarovsk they'll have 5 big + 4 miget GUGIs. I don't think they want to have more of them than regular submarines

    Belgorod and Podmoskovye are spy subs and they will only be handling tests (Belgorod will to be more precise)

    They will not be used as Poseidon carriers beyond testing phase
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51

    Posts : 449
    Points : 445
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  verkhoturye51 on Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:45 pm

    Also: who says Losharik can't carry Poseidon? HI Sutton suggested that Sarov will play a major role in the testing of Poseidon and it's 70 m long, while Losharik should be 60-70 m Wink

    PapaDragon wrote:
    verkhoturye51 wrote:............

    All 949s in modernization should get Onyx...reconstructing them to carry Poseidon like Belgorod and Podmoskovye was never mentioned. But they said they want 4 carriers and they already have 4 GUGI boats + Khabarovsk in production. That should be enough. With Khabarovsk they'll have 5 big + 4 miget GUGIs. I don't think they want to have more of them than regular submarines  

    Belgorod and Podmoskovye are spy subs and they will only be handling tests (Belgorod will to be more precise)

    They will not be used as Poseidon carriers beyond testing phase

    Come on, everybody says Belgorod will have Poseidons. It's ex Antey after all, and "the agency says" they are perfect for Poseidon. National Interest guys go as far as suggesting even Podmoskovye could carry at least one, and since also Orenburg has undergone similar reconstruction, all GUGIs could be poseidoned.


    Last edited by verkhoturye51 on Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    Arrow

    Posts : 418
    Points : 418
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Arrow on Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:50 pm

    Poseidon is a very stupid and expensive idea. It is better to build an additional SSBN or allocate money for the development of the SSBN such as Borey-B, which was canceled. One SSBN has incomparably greater strength than 32 Poseidons.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:01 pm

    Arrow wrote:Poseidon is a very stupid and expensive idea. It is better to build an additional SSBN or allocate money for the development of the SSBN such as Borey-B, which was canceled. One SSBN has incomparably greater strength than 32 Poseidons.

    It's smart and dirt cheap idea, they will be building SSBNs in numbers they need anyway (14 in total), Borei-B is postponed not canceled (Barei-A works fine), and 32 Poseidons can nuke two US seaboards no problem.

    US seaboard roasted 20 minutes or 2 hours from zero hour, it makes no difference. The deed is done either way.

    It's about not giving boys in Pentagon any ideas about doing something stupid and getting away scott free. Same philosophy as with Avangard. You are not safe so don't bother trying.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4913
    Points : 4943
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Age : 77
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:44 pm

    Arrow wrote:Poseidon is a very stupid and expensive idea. It is better to build an additional SSBN or allocate money for the development of the SSBN such as Borey-B, which was canceled. One SSBN has incomparably greater strength than 32 Poseidons.


    oh,no no no. On the contrary Poseidon is very cheap. One  torpedo and Los Angeles ceases to exist, one more and no NYC either. Boink. Sweet.  11 more and each and every CSG is destroyed.  Very very cost effective russia russia russia


    PapaDragon wrote:It's about not giving boys in Pentagon any ideas about doing something stupid and getting away scott free. Same philosophy as with Avangard. You are not safe so don't bother trying.

    that actually might not work if pentagram military have arrow's mindset lol1 lol1 lol1
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Sat Jan 12, 2019 6:15 pm

    verkhoturye51 wrote:Also: who says Losharik can't carry Poseidon? HI Sutton suggested that Sarov will play a major role in the testing of Poseidon...

    Sarov MAY have played a role in testing of Poseidon but that's it. Sarov hasn't left pier in months, probably longer according to Sutton himself

    And Losharik is slow short-range deep-sea submersible without any combat capability, it's a spy vessel


    verkhoturye51 wrote:Come on, everybody says Belgorod will have Poseidons...

    Nobody says that except Sutton


    verkhoturye51 wrote:It's ex Antey after all...

    Which has been completely converted into spy-sub


    verkhoturye51 wrote:...and "the agency says" they are perfect for Poseidon

    News agency does, it means nothing


    verkhoturye51 wrote:...all GUGIs could be poseidoned

    And who will handle intelligence work?


    verkhoturye51 wrote:...National Interest guys go as far as suggesting even Podmoskovye could carry at least one...

    National Interest guys parrot Sutton

    Also, here is new Defense Editor for National Interest:

    David Axe serves as the new Defense Editor of the National Interest. He is the author of the graphic novels War Fix, War Is Boring and Machete Squad

    Failed comic book guy

    They could have at least try to get someone like Tod McFarlane, at least he can write comics but I doubt he would be caught dead anywhere near those amateurs (not that they could ever afford him)
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51

    Posts : 449
    Points : 445
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  verkhoturye51 on Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:16 pm

    Sarov MAY have played a role in testing of Poseidon but that's it. Sarov hasn't left pier in months, probably longer according to Sutton himself

    Do you even read any article to the end? Sarov will play it in the future, according to Sutton. After it was moored for years, it entered dry dock, presumably to get it ready for Poseidon testing.

    And Losharik is slow short-range deep-sea submersible without any combat capability, it's a spy vessel

    It's nuclear propelled and of short range? Well maybe they plan to use entire 40 years of reactor life for patrolling shallow waters around Murmansk and spy on Russia itself Very Happy

    Nobody says that except Sutton

    Are you trying to be the next forum clown after the CVN fanatic in the other topic? Lowy institute sounds credible to me. Besides the author is Russian if it makes you feel more of a russophile.

    https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/moscows-other-navy
    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a22749605/how-can-we-stop-russias-apocalypse-nuke-torpedo/

    And who will handle intelligence work?

    Keeping an eye on the LA-class hunter killers with Poseidon aboard is absolutely impossible of course.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:03 pm

    verkhoturye51 wrote:
    Sarov MAY have played a role in testing of Poseidon but that's it. Sarov hasn't left pier in months, probably longer according to Sutton himself

    Do you even read any article to the end? Sarov will play it in the future, according to Sutton. After it was moored for years, it entered dry dock, presumably to get it ready for Poseidon testing.

    And Losharik is slow short-range deep-sea submersible without any combat capability, it's a spy vessel

    It's nuclear propelled and of short range? Well maybe they plan to use entire 40 years of reactor life for patrolling shallow waters around Murmansk and spy on Russia itself Very Happy

    Nobody says that except Sutton

    Are you trying to be the next forum clown after the CVN fanatic in the other topic? Lowy institute sounds credible to me. Besides the author is Russian if it makes you feel more of a russophile.

    https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/moscows-other-navy
    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a22749605/how-can-we-stop-russias-apocalypse-nuke-torpedo/

    And who will handle intelligence work?

    Keeping an eye on the LA-class hunter killers with Poseidon aboard is absolutely impossible of course.


    And there you go again repeating Sutton's crap like a clown

    Just because Sutton dropped a turd does not mean you need to jump after it

    Poseidon has been undergoing tests for months in North Sea while Sarov hasn't left port in way longer time than that

    Whatever role Sarov had in Poseidon tests is long over and real testing platforms have taken over that job (Podmoskovye)

    Once it's done Poseidon will be mounted on proper platforms, not test or spy subs

    You don't mount cruise missiles on spy ships, you don't mount​ ICBMs on pickup trucks and you sure as hell don't use glorified diesel or midget sub as platform​ for nuclear weapons




    Last edited by PapaDragon on Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:49 pm; edited 3 times in total (Reason for editing : Sub name)
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 2239
    Points : 2237
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 43
    Location : Merkelland

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Hole on Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:37 pm

    Belgorod is not in service.

    Sarov can carry one or two Poseidons. Why shouldn´t they use it in wartime?
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Sat Jan 12, 2019 9:51 pm

    Hole wrote:Belgorod is not in service.

    Sarov can carry one or two Poseidons. Why shouldn´t they use it in wartime?

    Podmoskovye

    Fixed it

    And they wouldn't use it because you want to use stuff that's designed for it, not retrofitted spy subs with miniscule payload and dubious survivability

    Why didn't USAF use AWACS planes with bombs bolted on them during Desert Storm? Because they had A-10s good to go.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21756
    Points : 22302
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  GarryB on Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:21 am

    They could have at least try to get someone like Tod McFarlane, at least he can write comics but I doubt he would be caught dead anywhere near those amateurs (not that they could ever afford him)

    Seth McFarlane would do a better job IMHO...
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 2757
    Points : 2755
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:45 am

    11 more and each and every CSG is destroyed.

    some of them will be in port, so they & SSBNs there can be wasted with even less.
    The Posidons can be used tactically: nuke a certain area in the ocean/along the coast to deny it to any1 for decades, thanks to high levels radiation. For example, explode 1 under the N. Pole ("sorry, it was an accident!") & force others to use the NSR & pay for icebreaker escort.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21756
    Points : 22302
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  GarryB on Sun Jan 13, 2019 9:47 am

    Or just as easily sail one through each of the Suez and Panama canals... detonate it somewhere where it could do the most damage...


    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 2239
    Points : 2237
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 43
    Location : Merkelland

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Hole on Sun Jan 13, 2019 11:40 am

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Hole wrote:Belgorod is not in service.

    Sarov can carry one or two Poseidons. Why shouldn´t they use it in wartime?

    Podmoskovye

    Fixed it

    And they wouldn't use it because you want to use stuff that's designed for it, not retrofitted spy subs with miniscule payload and dubious survivability

    Why didn't USAF use AWACS planes with bombs bolted on them during Desert Storm? Because they had A-10s good to go.

    The question was why the russian navy shouldn´t use Sarov in wartime. It is based on a Kilo sub and wouldn´t come closer to the targets then 10.000km.
    verkhoturye51
    verkhoturye51

    Posts : 449
    Points : 445
    Join date : 2018-03-02

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  verkhoturye51 on Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:29 pm

    Hole wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    Hole wrote:Belgorod is not in service.

    Sarov can carry one or two Poseidons. Why shouldn´t they use it in wartime?

    Podmoskovye

    Fixed it

    And they wouldn't use it because you want to use stuff that's designed for it, not retrofitted spy subs with miniscule payload and dubious survivability

    Why didn't USAF use AWACS planes with bombs bolted on them during Desert Storm? Because they had A-10s good to go.

    The question was why the russian navy shouldn´t use Sarov in wartime. It is based on a Kilo sub and wouldn´t come closer to the targets then 10.000km.

    Ok I think PapaDragon wanted to say that Sarov's role isn't a missile carrier, which is true. It could be used in wartime, of course, but for it's normal roles - spying, fixing underwater installations etc. Anyway, like I said missile carrying is technically possible. Will they add this new function on the list of regular roles of Sarov or make a new boat for it? Only time will show, if we'll get any official confirmation on this at all.
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 2239
    Points : 2237
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 43
    Location : Merkelland

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Hole on Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:25 pm

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 004410
    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 005111

    The only purpose of Sarov is testing/using the Poseidon.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:34 pm

    Hole wrote:........
    The only purpose of Sarov is testing/using the Poseidon.

    Launched: 17-12-2007
    Commissioned: 07-08-2008

    They were still best buddies with USA when this sub was launched and Poseidon wasn't even conspiracy theory at a time

    Sarov is barely footnote in Poseidon project

    It's only important in mind of that guy Sutton (probably because it spends so much time tied to pier doing nothing that he keeps seeing it in satellite images and can't get it out of his head so he makes up stories about it)
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 2757
    Points : 2755
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Sun Jan 13, 2019 6:03 pm

    GarryB wrote:Or just as easily sail one through each of the Suez and Panama canals... detonate it somewhere where it could do the most damage...
    At such shallow depths, it may/will be detected & destroyed. Those canals will be needed by Russia again, esp. the Suez, so it'll be stupid to contaminate them for decades. Easier to use CMs to destroy locks & wreck large tankers to block the waterway for months, if not years.
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 2239
    Points : 2237
    Join date : 2018-03-24
    Age : 43
    Location : Merkelland

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Hole on Sun Jan 13, 2019 9:26 pm

    Development of Avangard was started shortly after Bushistan canceled the ABM treaty. It would be not far fetched to consider that the development of Poseidon also started back then. Sarov was modified in 2008/09 which would fit into that timeframe.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21756
    Points : 22302
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  GarryB on Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:00 am

    At such shallow depths, it may/will be detected & destroyed. Those canals will be needed by Russia again, esp. the Suez, so it'll be stupid to contaminate them for decades. Easier to use CMs to destroy locks & wreck large tankers to block the waterway for months, if not years.


    Keep saying.... these are doomsday devices... Russia is not expecting to survive this, and even if they did it would be 50 years or more just to get back to where we are now.

    Like I said before... this missile does not need any air cavities for people... it is likely not many conventional weapons could destroy it... and to put it mildly making it detonate when attacked means a 100MT blast in shallow water near either canal would be devastating too.
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 2757
    Points : 2755
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:43 am

    GarryB wrote:..Russia is not expecting to survive this, and even if they did it would be 50 years or more just to get back to where we are now.
    Even with a full nuclear exchange, Russia due to its size & resources will have more chances of surviving than the US, that has only 2 land borders & 3 long coastlines.
    They wouldn't risk using Posidons or other nukes against canals, killing many neutral sailors & hurting their own & their friends' economies for decades. Their own inland waterways canals & dams could be retaliated against in a tit-for-tat.
    Detonate a small charge in the middle of North Sea/Mexican Gulf & the oil prices will go up to the level high enough to negate all the losses from American sanctions on Russia & Iran.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8237
    Points : 8321
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  PapaDragon on Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:02 am

    Tsavo Lion wrote:
    GarryB wrote:..Russia is not expecting to survive this, and even if they did it would be 50 years or more just to get back to where we are now.
    Even with a full nuclear exchange, Russia due to its size & resources will have more chances of surviving than the US, that has only 2 land borders & 3 long coastlines.
    They wouldn't risk using Posidons or other nukes against canals, killing many neutral sailors & hurting their own & their friends' economies for decades. Their own inland waterways canals & dams could be retaliated against in a tit-for-tat....

    There will not any survival in any recognizable for for either country, there will not be any need left for canals, there will not be any friendly nations left in existence and those that do survive will not be friendly with either of them.

    Only thing survivors will need are basic farming tools to grow what food they can and to euthanize their deformed offspring with.

    If you still have any delusions about surviving nuclear war then you clearly have no idea what nuclear war is.

    Long story short, Suez is valid target should they have any Poseidons to spare.

    Opinions or needs of other nations, friendly or otherwise, are of no relevance or concern.
    Tsavo Lion
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 2757
    Points : 2755
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:24 am

    Only thing survivors will need are basic farming tools to grow what food they can and to euthanize their deformed offspring with.
    If you still have any delusions about surviving nuclear war then you clearly have no idea what nuclear war is. Long story short, Suez is valid target should they have any Poseidons to spare.
    I hope we all will never learn what a nuclear war is like! But small mammals, crocs & birds survived the last nuclear winter- so there'll be survivors, & they will use sperm banks if their own is no good!
    China, Iran, & Russia will need the Suez more than US/NATO. Occasional cruises by the RN & FN to E. Asia isn't worth nuking it. Keeping it intact will allow ambushes to be set up around it. Even w/o it, the USN 7th fleet CSGs can reach the Arabian/Red Sea in 3-4 days from Singapore, & there 1 forward deployed in Japan. Calibres/Onikses fired from the Caspian & Black Seas/Syria can strike them there/in the Med Sea.

    Sponsored content

    "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone - Page 6 Empty Re: "Poseidon" Nuclear-armed Underwater Drone

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:16 am