Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Missiles & Missile Defence System: Various technologies under development

    Share
    avatar
    kvs

    Posts : 3757
    Points : 3856
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Re: Missiles & Missile Defence System: Various technologies under development

    Post  kvs on Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:46 pm

    Teshub wrote:
    KomissarBojanchev wrote:I have a hard time believing that fallout doesn't happen in atmospheric detonations. By that logic we would already be having fission engine rockets but they were never put into service exactly because of fallout danger in case they explode.
    First off the fallout produced by airbursts is primarily restricted to irradiated weapon debris, of which there's not much left with modern fusion warheads. In comparison, surface bursts produce multiple orders of magnitude more irradiated material with a greater range of radionuclides.  

    Secondly when I talk about high altitude bursts, I am talking about a detonation in the mesosphere to low orbit. At these heights whatever irradiated dust remaining from the detonation is likely to take between 0.5 and 1.7 years (and more) to transition back through the stratosphere. During that time the majority of the most dangerous radionuclides have already decayed. Furthermore high altitude winds disperse the dust so that we are talking microscopic amounts per square kilometre, planet-wide.

    Granted, if Russia detonated hundreds of warheads this high up it would produce a perceptible increase in background radiation, but whether it would amount to more than a couple of MRIs is debatable.

    Excellent summary. You know your physics.
    avatar
    Tsavo Lion

    Posts : 963
    Points : 961
    Join date : 2016-08-15
    Location : AZ, USA

    Re: Missiles & Missile Defence System: Various technologies under development

    Post  Tsavo Lion on Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:01 pm

    New Skyph (Skif) sea bottom ICBM: http://svpressa.ru/war21/article/186921/?cba=1 skif

    They can put them in the Okhotsk Sea too. Cheaper than old Delta III/IVs & new Borey SSBNs that also can safely deploy there & in the Arctic only. If these new ICBMs deployed in sufficient #s, at least some of the subs already built could be converted to SSGNs, perhaps eliminating the need for a few new Yasen SSGNs.

      Current date/time is Tue Oct 16, 2018 3:21 pm