Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Taking down American stealth jet's.

    Share

    obliqueweapons

    Posts : 44
    Points : 88
    Join date : 2017-04-21
    Age : 38
    Location : Adelaide, Australia.

    Taking down American stealth jet's.

    Post  obliqueweapons on Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:28 am

    400 Russian jets V 1,000 working U.S jets.

    10min 10 seconds video link.

    1, we work in packs of 50 and have clip on tanks that spray chemicals out in a dog fight, why dropping heat seeking missile that turn on in 3 or so seconds.....Behind enemy jets. .

    2. We attack low and spray the sky with chemicals / particles and ash that charges the sky....More like a basic chemicals that do the same.

    3. We make mass S-400 missiles that have 40 small lock-on inferred missiles in them also.

    4. we spray and ionise air molecules, that flame up enemy jets engines. That or spray a chemical that does the same.

    5. The chemicals / electrons and ash will heat the jets up instantly, and Inferred missiles will lock-on big time.

    6. Can ever drop them off in artillery shells, that kick start its speed instantly to 2,000 - 6,000km/h. They lock on and turn back to the fighter instantly.

    Volcanic ash, as seen on the flight going across Indonesia years ago, seen it's window flickering with light "distracting 1,000s of jet pilots" why jet motors flame up at the back. This means we can flame up American F-22 jet motors and frames, giving away massive heat signatures allowing all small inferred missiles to lock on.....Along with new missiles made to attack metal frames charged.

    F-22 will be downed and will give off massive heat now.

    When them come in masses, the sky will be flooded with chemicals seeing masses of heat seeking missiles locking onto 1,000s of jets and bombers. Russia can make missiles fly at 5,000km/h. F-22 fly at 1,700/h.

    There would be many chemicals that can do this.

    1. We make 1,000 missiles that hold 30 - 100 small infrared inside them. The bombers and jet fighters drop the ash / chemical lighting up their jet engines why blinding them. Missile are already getting there, spiting out 100ds of small inferred missiles "each" taking out 100,000 jet fighters from 1,000 missiles.

    We can work in wolf packs and drop it on small numbers, setting up traps. They will not fly in 2,000 numbers, but hundreds or 1,000s tops. If they do, they are fucked.

    If you can't get volcanic ash "that you can", make something the same "charged clouds" that do the same thing. Like a thick smoke with moisture in it charged.

    We can now use 400 fighter jets and 100 new space jet bombers to dive down and drop the shit all over the sky around them. We dive as the lock on missiles go up seconds later.

    We will see the enemy in shock, not able to see, and their jet motors flaming at the back big time, seeing 1,000s of lock on heat missile hitting there targets.

    500 craft v packs of 100drs. If they use 20,000, we will destroy them all.

    We can take on America to. Add 30,000 more craft who cares.

    Put charges in the ash / smoke and dump it all around them. Them charges will do the above....Heat the jet's up then fire them missiles. Bonus if the F-22 jets stat flaming like that lol....Fuck them 2.

    You can 100% make clouds of shit like that, so start working on it.

    We divide them up, and take them out.

    This is to prevent nuclear war.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpuxqBp-CXw

    In the future all missiles are jammed. It down to canon ro

    unds and bullets.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16293
    Points : 16924
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Taking down American stealth jet's.

    Post  GarryB on Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:21 pm

    It is not about numbers... it is about using forces efficiently and effectively...

    The Russian AF does not operate on its own in a vacuum.

    Together with aerospace defence and the Russian Army and Russian Navy it would be a very formidable foe for any force.

    Even with 20,000 stealth fighters the US would struggle because losing hundreds or even thousands of aircraft is not something they could stomach.

    Against third world countries that cannot retaliate it is much easier to get local superiority in numbers and mop up the enemy force. When the enemy force can strike back however at your airfields where you stage forces for attacks then you start to have real problems... problems the US would have no solutions for.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    obliqueweapons

    Posts : 44
    Points : 88
    Join date : 2017-04-21
    Age : 38
    Location : Adelaide, Australia.

    Re: Taking down American stealth jet's.

    Post  obliqueweapons on Fri Jun 09, 2017 1:33 am

    "
    GarryB wrote:It is not about numbers... it is about using forces efficiently and effectively..."

    Witch is numbers. WW2 proved that numbers would out do faster jets. Nazi made the jet that could fly much faster "but yet" they lost because of the shear numbers.

    What is efficiently and effectively for you? what would you do.


    "Together with aerospace defence and the Russian Army and Russian Navy it would be a very formidable foe for any force."

    why? What's the weapons difference....Who would win?

    "Even with 20,000 stealth fighters the US would struggle because losing hundreds or even thousands of aircraft is not something they could stomach."

    That's right. Are you saying spraying out a chemical will work?

    Do you think a chemical added might even make the jet motors over heat and burnt out? If so do you think that will be a disaster for America in dog fights? Because it will be weapons jammed, electronics jammed "so" it will be ww2 stile warfare/ dog fighting?

    "Against third world countries that cannot retaliate it is much easier to get local superiority in numbers and mop up the enemy force. When the enemy force can strike back however at your airfields where you stage forces for attacks then you start to have real problems... problems the US would have no solutions for.
    "

    But what if America has weapons that can cut off guided bombs signal? It will be like Wernher von Braun missiles, aiming it and ruffle hitting an airfield. Russia won't be able to hit the enemy airfields. Would/could they?

    Spraying out a chemical might even burn out their jet engines? How hot do they burn to what they can take? I would say this idea would not only see inferred missiles lock on from the extra heat coming off of it "but" It may drop all Americas jet's like fly's because it overheated then engine.

    Like you said and I already new. ww3 will be cannon rounds and bullet's, because missiles will be jammed. Is that jammed from launching? What if America can launch it before Russia can jam the launcher? Is that the way it works.



    obliqueweapons

    Posts : 44
    Points : 88
    Join date : 2017-04-21
    Age : 38
    Location : Adelaide, Australia.

    Jamming American stealth jets.

    Post  obliqueweapons on Fri Jun 09, 2017 1:51 am

    Russia would float up jamming dives all around their country in a time of war. That stops Americas missiles from locking on first.

    American jet's missiles can lock on way before Russian jammers are in range. So putting jammers all in the sky will keep them jammed.

    That means it will be like ww2 fighting.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Taking down American stealth jet's.

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Aug 18, 2017 6:27 pm