Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Share

    chicken

    Posts : 98
    Points : 103
    Join date : 2014-09-04

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  chicken on Fri May 08, 2015 11:42 am

    What of happenings?

    avatar
    KoTeMoRe

    Posts : 3905
    Points : 3936
    Join date : 2015-04-21
    Location : Krankhaus Central.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  KoTeMoRe on Fri May 08, 2015 11:44 am

    chicken wrote:What of happenings?


    Looks like auto transmission has teething issues. Second take.
    avatar
    Morpheus Eberhardt

    Posts : 1945
    Points : 2066
    Join date : 2013-05-20

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt on Fri May 08, 2015 11:58 am

    Using this photo, the tack width seems to be 550 mm; however, in this day and age, there are many distorted photos, thanks to change in aspect ratios that can often happen.




    Due to fundamental armor vehicle design requirements, I think, a track-width of 580 mm (that for T-72, T-80, or T-90) is an upper bound for a good tank design. That is the reason ob''ekt 279 had 4 tracks; having only 2 tracks wouldn't have worked for its weight without thinning the armor.

    T-72 started life with a ground pressure of 0.85 kgs/cm^2; 0.8 kgs/cm^2 may be too good, in this day and age, for a tank.

    Hence, for a track width of 0.58 m, a track length on the ground of 5 m, and a ground-pressure of 0.85 kgs/cm^2, the total weight would be 49 t.

    sheytanelkebir

    Posts : 498
    Points : 515
    Join date : 2013-09-16

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  sheytanelkebir on Fri May 08, 2015 12:24 pm

    One issue with the microelectronics / imports highlighted is not for the basic ballistic computers and autoloaders etc (which the current generation of russian electronics will easily handle)... but for current / future augmented reality systems where you would need 22nm and better chips to reduce power consumption on visor and UAV mounted electronics.

    Also I would say that in the future Armata tanks and IFVs should each have 2-3 small UAVs which are charged on board and launch and fly automatically above / in front of the vehicle as a forward scout and give a better Situational awareness for the crews. Those would also benefit from the 22nm and better chips to reduce power consumption and improve the endurance of each UAV... Imagine that a "buttoned up" tank would be launching and recovering these small UAVs automatically, the commander simply having the feed from these cameras fed to him without having to think about launching or controlling an individual UAV. whilst one UAV is in the air, the other 2 are getting charged on the tank in their own "recharge stations" that they land into automatically when their power goes low.

    Such an addition would only cost maybe $100k per tank (with three thermal camera equipped UAVs). a small price for a dramatic improvement in SA.

    As was shown a few pages ago, there are a series of rear view cameras... so I imagine that the driver can drive the tank forward and backwards effortlessly without having to "think" about which direction he's driving in. when he engages reverse, his visor and controls automatically switch... perhaps he just has a little sign on his visor/screen with "R" on it.




    Austin

    Posts : 6233
    Points : 6639
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Austin on Fri May 08, 2015 2:07 pm

    Some special features of Russia's new generation Armata combat platform disclosed
    avatar
    BKP

    Posts : 342
    Points : 351
    Join date : 2015-05-02

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  BKP on Fri May 08, 2015 2:08 pm

    Thanks for replies regarding bbc piece. And, yeah, the British press is a real pisser.

    sheytanelkebir wrote:One issue with the microelectronics / imports highlighted is not for the basic ballistic computers and autoloaders etc (which the current generation of russian electronics will easily handle)... but for current / future augmented reality systems where you would need 22nm and better chips to reduce power consumption on visor and UAV mounted electronics...

    Interesting. If RF needs to develop the capability to produce 22nm chips, then I would guess it's considered a priority to do so.

    I remember reading a piece in (I believe) an IEEE publication a couple of years ago about the supreme difficulty in detecting trapdoors and other malicious code in firmware, much more so than in OS or application software. So I would hope that Russia would never opt to use western-designed chips in critical systems.

    Austin

    Posts : 6233
    Points : 6639
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Austin on Fri May 08, 2015 2:47 pm

    Interview with deputy general director of corporation "Uralvagonzavod" Vyacheslav Halitov.

    Armata : http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/1954916?page=2
    Kuragnets: http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/1954916?page=3

    sheytanelkebir

    Posts : 498
    Points : 515
    Join date : 2013-09-16

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  sheytanelkebir on Fri May 08, 2015 2:51 pm

    they could licence ARM risc chipset base design and purchase fabrication plant equipment from Korea / Taiwan. Its not something that's particularly difficult for Russia to Achieve. Certainly they should develop their OS / real time OS / ASIC software in house which would be the bigger effort.

    They could also start by buying some "foreign" off the shelf tech (DJI drones and some commercial AR visors) setup on a T90MS type tank and sold on the export markets / tested internally to see the viability of some of these techs in combat use. The ability to detect the enemy from a long range by individual tanks and maybe even the ability to guide missiles over the line of sight using your small UAV would be a nice potent capability... I guess even the new Kornet-ED / krysanthema could use it to achieve maximum range effectively.
    avatar
    Regular

    Posts : 2034
    Points : 2041
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Western Hemisphere.. mostly

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Regular on Fri May 08, 2015 5:17 pm

    It seems Armata is having problems with transmission, now it was T-15. It could only move in reverse. So it was evacuated.
    }
    Eventually it managed to board trailer.
    Now makes me thing why they wanted to present tank now, not after a year or so?
    avatar
    Zivo

    Posts : 1494
    Points : 1528
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Zivo on Fri May 08, 2015 6:12 pm

    Regular wrote:It seems Armata is having problems with transmission, now it was T-15. It could only move in reverse. So it was evacuated.
    }
    Eventually it managed to board trailer.
    Now makes me thing why they wanted to present tank now, not after a year or so?

    Keep your fingers crossed for the actual parade.

    Armata has a complex transmission, and relies on sensors and computer control to operate. It's a shame that they couldn't sort out the problems with it before the parade.
    avatar
    JohnSnow

    Posts : 32
    Points : 34
    Join date : 2015-05-02

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  JohnSnow on Fri May 08, 2015 6:19 pm

    Zivo wrote:
    Regular wrote:It seems Armata is having problems with transmission, now it was T-15. It could only move in reverse. So it was evacuated.
    }
    Eventually it managed to board trailer.
    Now makes me thing why they wanted to present tank now, not after a year or so?

    Keep your fingers crossed for the actual parade.

    Armata has a complex transmission, and relies on sensors and computer control to operate. It's a shame that they couldn't sort out the problems with it before the parade.

    I don't get it. If this thing will be going into production in 2 years, why does it need to appear in a parade this year?
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4495
    Points : 4674
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri May 08, 2015 6:24 pm

    JohnSnow wrote:
    Zivo wrote:
    Regular wrote:It seems Armata is having problems with transmission, now it was T-15. It could only move in reverse. So it was evacuated.
    }
    Eventually it managed to board trailer.
    Now makes me thing why they wanted to present tank now, not after a year or so?

    Keep your fingers crossed for the actual parade.

    Armata has a complex transmission, and relies on sensors and computer control to operate. It's a shame that they couldn't sort out the problems with it before the parade.

    I don't get it. If this thing will be going into production in 2 years, why does it need to appear in a parade this year?

    Remember to introduce yourself in the member introduction forum.
    avatar
    archangelski

    Posts : 439
    Points : 462
    Join date : 2015-04-25

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  archangelski on Fri May 08, 2015 6:41 pm

    T-15 walkaround :

    http://walkarounds.scalemodels.ru/v/walkarounds/afv/after_1950/bmp_t-15/
    avatar
    AbsoluteZero

    Posts : 81
    Points : 105
    Join date : 2011-01-29
    Age : 29
    Location : Canada

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  AbsoluteZero on Fri May 08, 2015 7:12 pm

    Thats too bad.. i hope everything goes well tomorrow

    victor1985

    Posts : 723
    Points : 764
    Join date : 2015-01-02

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  victor1985 on Fri May 08, 2015 8:01 pm

    sheytanelkebir wrote:One issue with the microelectronics / imports highlighted is not for the basic ballistic computers and autoloaders etc (which the current generation of russian electronics will easily handle)... but for current / future augmented reality systems where you would need 22nm and better chips to reduce power consumption on visor and UAV mounted electronics.

    Also I would say that in the future Armata tanks and IFVs should each have 2-3 small UAVs which are charged on board and launch and fly automatically above / in front of the vehicle as a forward scout and give a better Situational awareness for the crews. Those would also benefit from the 22nm and better chips to reduce power consumption and improve the endurance of each UAV... Imagine that a "buttoned up" tank would be launching and recovering these small UAVs automatically, the commander simply having the feed from these cameras fed to him without having to think about launching or controlling an individual UAV. whilst one UAV is in the air, the other 2 are getting charged on the tank in their own "recharge stations" that they land into automatically when their power goes low.

    Such an addition would only cost maybe $100k per tank (with three thermal camera equipped UAVs). a small price for a dramatic improvement in SA.

    As was shown a few pages ago, there are a series of rear view cameras... so I imagine that the driver can drive the tank forward and backwards effortlessly without having to "think" about which direction he's driving in. when he engages reverse, his visor and controls automatically switch... perhaps he just has a little sign on his visor/screen with "R" on it.



    That UAV can be a quadricopter. They can land on objects that are in move. And can carry a lot. Also a separate machine on t14 chassis could have a huge quadricopter.
    avatar
    Viktor

    Posts : 5672
    Points : 6321
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Viktor on Fri May 08, 2015 9:21 pm

    Austin wrote:Interview with deputy general director of corporation "Uralvagonzavod" Vyacheslav Halitov.

    Armata : http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/1954916?page=2
    Kuragnets: http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/1954916?page=3

    from your link:

    And we offered today its unprecedented level, providing, in addition to the passive armor with ceramic plates, a kind of "protective dome", consisting of active protection and the protection of the upper hemisphere, systems setting screens and electromagnetic protection.

    that settles some speculation Very Happy

    -------

    http://www.russiadefence.net/viewtopic.forum?t=6846

    Sponsored content

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:27 am