Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Share
    avatar
    flamming_python

    Posts : 3203
    Points : 3317
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  flamming_python on Sun Mar 29, 2015 11:50 pm

    akd wrote:If you make a "certain vehicles" exception in general, why not for other specialist vehicles (if logistics is the driver)?

    In an Armata brigade I'd imagine the only other vehicles you would have are trucks and perhaps some jeeps/4x4 light transports.

    So you'd be left with a choice between putting your SHORAD on a truck, or on an Armata chassis.

    Given that the SHORAD is very much a front-line combat element that could reasonably be expected to take enemy fire, and would also have to move together with the rest of the formation rather than some way behind like the infastructure/logistics non-combat vehicles - it would make more sense to fit the SHORAD onto an Armata-chassis.
    avatar
    runaway

    Posts : 348
    Points : 369
    Join date : 2010-11-12
    Location : Sweden

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  runaway on Mon Mar 30, 2015 7:44 am

    TR1 wrote:No, I am implying the concept of an entire Armata based brigade is bullshit and will never appear.

    You can quote me on that.

    Logistical savings still apply if the entire military is transferred to three basic platforms. Brigades don't operate in bubbles outside the larger logistical chain.

    Placing a SHORAD on a heavy, expensive Armata chassis will not gain some magical logistical savings that are worth it- if once again the armed forces as a whole have transferred to the 3 new unified chassis as a whole.

    Armata brigades will have reco vehicles, they will have liaison vehicles....you guys seriously think they will all be on the Armata chassis? Please.


    Agree, there is also a benefit in using a few different vehicles as they are good for different tasks, they compliment each other. Using similiar engines, elctronics and weapons is much worth in maintenence, but the whole vehicles is not crucial.

    avatar
    Zivo

    Posts : 1494
    Points : 1528
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Zivo on Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:45 am

    There was speculation earlier about Armata's glacis.

    Here's a theory from posters at Otvaga2004...







    It could have a modular beak like the T-15.
    avatar
    Werewolf

    Posts : 5361
    Points : 5598
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Werewolf on Wed Apr 01, 2015 8:30 am

    That is actually the case for some other tanks like Merkawa uses also modular upper chassis armor and from the advertizment pictures of the Armata chassis it looks bulkier and has no falling glacis lower than the side skirt at the front, so it could be likely the case and i hope so.
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 10222
    Points : 10710
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  George1 on Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:25 pm

    Russia’s All-New Armata Tank Rolls Over the Competition - Stern

    Even though its official debut at the May 9 Victory Day parade in Moscow is more than a month away, the world is are already heaping praise on the unique characteristics of Russia’s all-new Armata tank.

    The T-14 Armata main battle tank is a prime example of the rapid modernization of Russia’s armed forces, German newsmagazine Stern reported on Tuesday.

    “An absolutely new main battle tank is certainly not something most of the world’s exiting armies can boast about. The German Leopard-2 tank was developed 35 years ago, just like the American M1 Abrams.The existing versions of the western tanks feature many improvements, but the basic characteristics do not differ much from the original,” the magazine said.

    The new Armata armored tracked platform combines and assimilates all the last decade’s major developments and innovations in battle vehicle design and construction.

    The T-14’s main forte is its unmanned remotely controlled turret armed with a brand new 125 mm smoothbore cannon. Its muzzle energy is greater than that of the world’s now 2nd most powerful cannon: the German Leopard-2 Rheinmetall 120 mm gun.

    The tank crew is securely enclosed in a multi-layer armored capsule separated from the ammunition container. The vehicle is fully computerized and remote-controlled via high-resolution video cameras.

    “Being on the cutting edge of the Russian tank building industry, the Armata tank is a highly maneuverable and fast machine,” the Stern concluded.

    The tank’s builder, the Uralvagonzavod plant, can roll out around 500 T-14 Armata tanks each year.

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150401/1020302063.html#ixzz3W4UUX54m
    avatar
    Werewolf

    Posts : 5361
    Points : 5598
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Werewolf on Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:49 pm

    An absolutely new main battle tank is certainly not something most of the world’s exiting armies can boast about. The German Leopard-2 tank was developed 35 years ago, just like the American M1 Abrams.The existing versions of the western tanks feature many improvements, but the basic characteristics do not differ much from the original,” the magazine said.

    Uhhh, what a self defeating argument. Constantly calling T-90 just a T-72 not better than it which they "devestated in iraq" while calling their own tanks like something 21st century gods chariots undefeatable and now finally they say the same about theirs.
    avatar
    higurashihougi

    Posts : 2152
    Points : 2255
    Join date : 2014-08-13
    Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  higurashihougi on Thu Apr 02, 2015 4:10 am

    The original German article may be this

    http://www.stern.de/auto/news/kampfpanzer-armata-t-14-putins-neue-wunderwaffe-2184103.html

    @Werewolf, can you translate it for us Very Happy Very Happy
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4495
    Points : 4674
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:04 am

    higurashihougi wrote:The original German article may be this

    http://www.stern.de/auto/news/kampfpanzer-armata-t-14-putins-neue-wunderwaffe-2184103.html

    @Werewolf, can you translate it for us Very Happy Very Happy

    Using Google translate, one of the first things that popped up is the whole bit of "The T-14 is the first real military innovation since the breakup of the USSR", I stopped reading the article after that. Clearly if the author believes that than he/she's and imbecile. There's plenty military systems that are vastly superior to 'Legacy' Soviet systems, but I don't have time do a explanation any justice. Maybe GarryB could flesh that out?
    avatar
    TR1

    Posts : 5699
    Points : 5735
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  TR1 on Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:18 am

    Well, it is one of the first new totally clean-slate designs, that much is true.

    PAK-FA is clean slate as well.

    Vann7

    Posts : 3452
    Points : 3570
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Vann7 on Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:11 am

    higurashihougi wrote:The original German article may be this

    http://www.stern.de/auto/news/kampfpanzer-armata-t-14-putins-neue-wunderwaffe-2184103.html

    @Werewolf, can you translate it for us Very Happy Very Happy

    Here is an article about the article that was catched by RT media in spanish.... Smile

    http://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/170784-video-nuevo-tanque-ruso-armata-rival

    Basically the article.. apparently the Stern report says.. Armata have nothing that could
    match it on the world. from its features.. it mention..

    - 125mm gun in an unmanned turret and with a crew that is on a armored capsule . (old news this)

    -high resolution cameras on the turret and digital operation the whole tank.

    - The tank will a radar with 100km range that will be able to track automatically up to 40 projectiles or aerodynamic targets.. (artillery shells ,antitank missiles or low flying planes ?)

    -The active defenses of armata can intercept any incoming missile or projectile at up to
    1,700 m/s.. that is match 5.0. Shocked

    So basically if the last one is correct.. and as good as they claim.. it should be able to intercept
    any Rocket artillery ,anti-tank missiles like Javeline or Spikek or Kornet. and or perhaps Sabot tank rounds too.. if it can change the alignment ,even by few inches of any projectile it will make to completely enter in the wrong angle ,failing to either penetrate the tank and or even hit the tank after all. that will be indeed interesting to see.. if they pulled such thing.. It seems
    as if armata MBT will be a hybrid between a tank and a mini-pantisir air defense.
    avatar
    collegeboy16

    Posts : 1184
    Points : 1201
    Join date : 2012-10-05
    Age : 20
    Location : Roanapur

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  collegeboy16 on Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:29 am

    100km radar range is too much- you need a dedicated vehicle to house and power such system with that kind of capability.

    APS capable of intercepting APFSDS is old news, but it would be real interesting how tank gun and ammo designers tackle this new countermeasure.

    victor1985

    Posts : 723
    Points : 764
    Join date : 2015-01-02

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  victor1985 on Thu Apr 02, 2015 11:46 am

    50 km would be enough. Thinking that a helicopter would fire from max 10 km the armata would have about 10,3 seconds to prepare for incoming missile. That is enough. Thinking that the helo would be observed from 50 (lest say 30 km) is enough to prepare. Mean aquisition of trajectory from is supposed the missile to come, and arming the weapons. I think at something: if a countermeasure deviate far away from course the missile for it it will be hard to correct the path in time. Armata i saw has some stealth caracteristics which makes hard for a helo to see until reach the visible light range.
    avatar
    Stealthflanker

    Posts : 798
    Points : 882
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 29
    Location : Indonesia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Stealthflanker on Thu Apr 02, 2015 5:21 pm

    Any good estimates for weight ?

    I think Armata would hit 55-60 ton range.
    avatar
    Werewolf

    Posts : 5361
    Points : 5598
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Apr 02, 2015 5:34 pm

    Stealthflanker wrote:Any good estimates for weight ?

    I think Armata would hit 55-60 ton range.

    52t, the turret is small and weights a few tons less than T-90 turret but the hull is longer and wider, should not exceed 56t combat loaded.
    avatar
    Zivo

    Posts : 1494
    Points : 1528
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Zivo on Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:41 pm

    Werewolf wrote:
    Stealthflanker wrote:Any good estimates for weight ?

    I think Armata would hit 55-60 ton range.

    52t, the turret is small and weights a few tons less than T-90 turret but the hull is longer and wider, should not exceed 56t combat loaded.

    Pretty much. With the exception of Coalition, all the variants will fall into the 50-55 ton range.

    I still get a laugh when people who first heard about Armata a few weeks back are saying it's as big as an M1A2 and that Russia's "copying western design". The only vehicle whose weight I'm worried about is Kurganets.
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4495
    Points : 4674
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:00 pm

    Zivo wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:
    Stealthflanker wrote:Any good estimates for weight ?

    I think Armata would hit 55-60 ton range.

    52t, the turret is small and weights a few tons less than T-90 turret but the hull is longer and wider, should not exceed 56t combat loaded.

    Pretty much. With the exception of Coalition, all the variants will fall into the 50-55 ton range.

    I still get a laugh when people who first heard about Armata a few weeks back are saying it's as big as an M1A2 and that Russia's "copying western design". The only vehicle whose weight I'm worried about is Kurganets.

    Oh yes the imbecile named 'UnionJackass' on MP.net, you got to love how he thinks the T-14 Armata is a 'Westernized' Russian tank, but of course he doesn't think Western tanks adopting autoloaders, GLATGM's, APS, PPS, composite armors, ERA as being 'Easternized' or 'Russofied' lol!
    avatar
    Zivo

    Posts : 1494
    Points : 1528
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Zivo on Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:18 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    Zivo wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:
    Stealthflanker wrote:Any good estimates for weight ?

    I think Armata would hit 55-60 ton range.

    52t, the turret is small and weights a few tons less than T-90 turret but the hull is longer and wider, should not exceed 56t combat loaded.

    Pretty much. With the exception of Coalition, all the variants will fall into the 50-55 ton range.

    I still get a laugh when people who first heard about Armata a few weeks back are saying it's as big as an M1A2 and that Russia's "copying western design". The only vehicle whose weight I'm worried about is Kurganets.

    Oh yes the imbecile named 'UnionJackass' on MP.net, you got to love how he thinks the T-14 Armata is a 'Westernized' Russian tank, but of course he doesn't think Western tanks adopting autoloaders, GLATGM's, APS, PPS, composite armors, ERA as being 'Easternized' or 'Russofied' lol!

    Trust me, he's not the only one. Just be sure to rub it in peoples face when the west inevitably copies Armata.  Very Happy

    Perhaps someone can answer this. Like Obj. 195, Armata's engine has twin turbos, each fed through separate exhaust. As such, there's going to be a dual exhaust system on the right and left side of the hull like China's Type-99 MBT. How will this effect the thermal signature?
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4495
    Points : 4674
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:08 am

    collegeboy16 wrote:100km radar range is too much- you need a dedicated vehicle to house and power such system with that kind of capability.

    APS capable of intercepting APFSDS is old news, but it would be real interesting how tank gun and ammo designers tackle this new countermeasure.

    What we know for certain is that the radar will likely be at least 10 km range (like Obj. 195), however with the proper amount of power it could certainly be higher. The 100 km range is likely speculation, they probably heard it's a off-shoot of the  PAK-FA X-band AESA, and took a wild guess of it's capabilities...if it did have a 100 km range than MOD would certainly 'NOT' advertise it.
    avatar
    Werewolf

    Posts : 5361
    Points : 5598
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Werewolf on Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:30 am

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    collegeboy16 wrote:100km radar range is too much- you need a dedicated vehicle to house and power such system with that kind of capability.

    APS capable of intercepting APFSDS is old news, but it would be real interesting how tank gun and ammo designers tackle this new countermeasure.

    What we know for certain is that the radar will likely be at least 10 km range (like Obj. 195), however with the proper amount of power it could certainly be higher. The 100 km range is likely speculation, they probably heard it's a off-shoot of the  PAK-FA X-band AESA, and took a wild guess of it's capabilities...if it did have a 100 km range than MOD would certainly 'NOT' advertise it.

    It of course has not 100km range, that would be not possible to achieve for such small devices but also would be like a beacon for any HARM missile, yelling "shoot me".

    Vann7

    Posts : 3452
    Points : 3570
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Vann7 on Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:51 am

    Werewolf wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    collegeboy16 wrote:100km radar range is too much- you need a dedicated vehicle to house and power such system with that kind of capability.

    APS capable of intercepting APFSDS is old news, but it would be real interesting how tank gun and ammo designers tackle this new countermeasure.

    What we know for certain is that the radar will likely be at least 10 km range (like Obj. 195), however with the proper amount of power it could certainly be higher. The 100 km range is likely speculation, they probably heard it's a off-shoot of the  PAK-FA X-band AESA, and took a wild guess of it's capabilities...if it did have a 100 km range than MOD would certainly 'NOT' advertise it.

    It of course has not 100km range, that would be not possible to achieve for such small devices but also would be like a beacon for any HARM missile, yelling "shoot me".


    Armata could achieve a 100km range vision easily.. if for example every armata is equipped with a small helicopter drone that carry radars and becomes the eyes of the arma on the battle field.. and its only mission is to stay a little behind of the tank and track down ,what is around the tank and in front of it..

    If the drone is controlled by an optical antenna that only is guided by lazer from below and from an specific lazer signal..(or even simpler physically connected by a wire connection) it cannot be hacked. And the counter electronics hardware that Russia have can protect the drone from anti radiation missiles or remote guided ones.

    So a combination of Armata + integrated drone designed for armata + counter electronics jamming vehicle following behind.. can essentially create a shield to the armata tank from projectiles and missiles ,and also made difficult for any missile to hit the tank or the drone..
    Radio operated missiles like Javelines some versions and spike will be vulnerable to counter electronics and be blinded its communication and tv camera. and missiles guided by lazer could still be intercepted by Armata active defenses. So it can't get better than that.

    The tank will be even protected against saturation attacks ,against radio controlled missiles or anti tank weapons. Ironically the most simple weapons ,like rocket grenades Rp-7  those cannt be jammed ,it doesn't depends on technology for guidance.. still they are useless to counter a modern tank like arma to bypass its active defenses and or its reactive armor in most parts.

    For me it will be no less interesting the control remote capabilities of armata.. that could be priceless in an urban warfare.. you for example could station an armata tank in a check point ,
    and control it , from a short distance its turret ,its guns and its chain guns.. so you can be all day defending check point from a safe location underground ..near the tank.. and the tank will
    be without crew ,and terrorist not aware of whether there are people inside or if their rocket attack was successful until the tank fire with precision at them back. Wink

    You could for example could send the tank without a crew ,(with small modifications to the tank)towards a zone with many terrorist hidden in elevated buildings and the tank clean the entire place without exposing anyone life. So i really see a lot of potential in armata control remote capabilities. it will be like a Tank drone.. but on a full scale.. i think that is the future.


    Last edited by Vann7 on Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:01 am; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    TR1

    Posts : 5699
    Points : 5735
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  TR1 on Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:53 am

    lol @ you guys talking about these Armata radars.

    You are all going to be very disappointed indeed when you see what he actual radar sight looks like, if it is even adopted.

    Vann7

    Posts : 3452
    Points : 3570
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Vann7 on Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:06 am

    TR1 wrote:lol @ you guys talking about these Armata radars.

    You are all going to be very disappointed indeed when you see what he actual radar sight looks like, if it is even adopted.

    Obviously you didn't read ,what i posted..

    Armata could receive information from radars outside the tank and fire it guns using that info..
    The Radars do not need to be physically in the tank for armata take advantage Radar data. It
    only needs a powerful network receiver antenna. that obtain information from outside.
    avatar
    TR1

    Posts : 5699
    Points : 5735
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  TR1 on Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:15 am

    Yeah and when will this capability be tested?

    20 years from now? Stick to reality not fanciful capabilities please.

    The kind of capability you described makes sense for artillery.
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4495
    Points : 4674
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri Apr 03, 2015 3:43 am

    TR1 wrote:lol @ you guys talking about these Armata radars.

    You are all going to be very disappointed indeed when you see what he actual radar sight looks like, if it is even adopted.

    What's wrong with you? The only guy who believe's that the radar has a 100 km range is 'Vann7' (who's known for his beliefs) virtually everyone else was highly skeptical, I far one still maintain it's '10 km' range but definitely not '100 km' range. How do you come to the conclusion of 'guys' when only 'one' person is advertising it (outside the German idiot who wrote the article, who I already denounced as a imbecile)?

    BTW who needs radars on T-14 Armata's to be that powerful anyway? With a BMS as well as powerful Armata command posts they could easily get more powerful radars at their disposal (such as the ones in a S-400 battery for airspace surveillance or Zoopark for ground surveillance) without the cost of fitting one for every Armata vehicle.

    AJ-47

    Posts : 116
    Points : 117
    Join date : 2011-10-05
    Location : USA

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  AJ-47 on Fri Apr 03, 2015 3:49 am

    Why don’t we see IFVs with 57 mm gun?
    I understand the telescopic rounds and the guided rounds are still under development, but until they will be ready, and it might take 10 years, why not to use the AU-220 turret with the 57mm gun?

    We can change the turret when the telescopic rounds will be ready, but till than we can use one of the new turrets for the 57mm.

    I would take the IFV, take out the dismount soldiers, and fill it with all the weapons and ammunition that we need. The soldiers will ride only on APCs.

    In this way we can use this vehicle that I would call it FSV-Fire Support Vehicle, with tanks and with the APC.  This combination called High/Low Mixed Forces.

    Sponsored content

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #2

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:06 pm