Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues

    Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Share

    runaway
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts: 348
    Points: 369
    Join date: 2010-11-12
    Location: Sweden

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  runaway on Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:56 pm

    So who´s the customers?

    "Foreign customers have shown high interest in Russia’s advanced Amur-1650 class submarine, state-run arms dealer Rosoboronexport said on Wednesday.

    "Of the nine countries that are planning to modernize or develop their submarine fleets…three have already chosen the Amur-1650 project", Rosoboronexport’s director Anatoly Isaikin said. He did not name the countries in question. "

    PLN China is one but the others? And ordering a sub that isnt working very well... I should chose 636.3 or perhaps the German 214. It can dive to 400m, which exceeds Lada´s 300m, but is not working fairly well and the customers is unhappy with the overall performance.

    No, my choise is the Swedish A26 which will be very good, but i think we still lack the Shkval type torpedo.





    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 5439
    Points: 6094
    Join date: 2009-08-25
    Age: 35
    Location: Croatia

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  Viktor on Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:33 pm

    China is one of those three countries and I suspect Vietnam could be another one no matter 6 Kilo class they bought recently.

    Third might be Venezuela, they wanted those subs for quite a while now but they where not ready.

    TheArmenian
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 1246
    Points: 1407
    Join date: 2011-09-14

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  TheArmenian on Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:20 pm

    You may also add Algeria to the list of possible customers for the Harmonious boats (Lada).

    TR1, they may have actualy solved all the bugs and problems with the first unit (St. Petersburg). I don't see them restart construction unless they have solutions in hand.

    In my opinion, the main advantage of these low displacment (1760 T) boats over the Kilos is their low requirement for manpower. These boats go around the various missile treaties that prohibit the land deployment of long range land attack cruise missiles. With the 2000+ km range KALIBR these smallish boats (with miniscule crews) have a colossal conventional or nuclear beheading strike potential...But I will let Mindstorm elaborate on that further (I just hope he uses simpler english with shorter sentences so that we can all understand him Twisted Evil )

    TR1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 5890
    Points: 5960
    Join date: 2011-12-06

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  TR1 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:26 pm

    TR1 wrote:This is turning out to be a huge year for the RuNavy,

    If I am not mixing anything up (been a busy day), in 2012 we have seen/expect to see:
    Several new nuclear subs commissioned into the fleet;
    2 11356 frigates laid down;
    2 22350 frigates laid down;
    2 20380/20385 corvettes laid down;
    Mistral laid down....

    I'm sure I am forgetting something



    So 2012 passed, let's reflect on how much was pushed back by at least a year.
    Only 1 11356 was laid down
    Only 1 22350 was laid down
    No 885 subs
    1 955 sub, but work practically started many months before that.

    So, not so much of a huge year Smile
    Hoping 2013 delivers.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 14138
    Points: 14872
    Join date: 2010-03-30
    Location: New Zealand

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  GarryB on Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:50 am

    Mass production when the problems on the lead ship have not even been worked out, and the ship has not gone through trials following the latest modifications...hmm...consider me skeptical.

    They have already worked out all the bugs in the first boat and decided on the AIP and new propulsion to deal with the small problems they have found. The fact that they are going ahead suggest all the rumours of lots of problems were BS and that the solutions for those that were real have been found.

    I rather doubt the western alternative subs are perfect either and will have problems too.

    It can dive to 400m, which exceeds Lada´s 300m, but is not working fairly well and the customers is unhappy with the overall performance.

    Being able to operate at a deeper depth is not a huge advantage... it would be much more useful to operate for longer periods without having to surface and the Russian boat has a significant advantage there too.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    TR1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 5890
    Points: 5960
    Join date: 2011-12-06

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  TR1 on Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:42 am

    I would not call the problems small - the program has been stalled for years and repeatedly failed major parameters of testing.

    No solid news on the modifications working in full navy trials as of yet, so I remain skeptical.

    Mindstorm
    Senior Lieutenant
    Senior Lieutenant

    Posts: 698
    Points: 877
    Join date: 2011-07-20

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  Mindstorm on Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:22 pm



    A lot of misconceptions and plain mistakes circulate around both Pr. 677 "Lada" class and its latest export version "Amur-1650",i think it will be useful to delete them one time for all.


    Russian MoD and Navy's Command WILL NOT accept Saint Petersburg , the lead ship of the class on two main basis : underperforming propulsion at high regimes and inconstant/somewhat insufficient energy supply to some key components (among which main sonar).

    The Saint Petersburg has been already used as a tests specimen to validate the functions and sort-out all the problems related to any other system of the Lada class (in particular Lira main sonar showing performance's parameters by a good margin superior to those of any other passive and active sonar mounted on non-nuclear submarine worldwide) but NOT those related to energy storage and propulsion.

    The reason is very simple, "Saint Petersburg" was designed and constructed MUCH BEFORE the achievement and validation of two recent technological breakthrough in those segments :
    A new generation of Lithium-ion battery with energy capacity to volume/weight ratio several times greater than the best lead-acid mounted on foreign SSKs
    An almost revolutionary AIP ,based on hydrogen reforming from common diesel fuel aboard, much more silent, compact and safe than the competitor hydrogen-store based systems and capable to produce over 400 Kw against the 180 maximum of the best foreign competitor !!!


    http://www.stoletie.ru/rossiya_i_mir/sensacii_le_burzhe_929.htm


    Those two new systems will be mounted ,respectively, on the second ship and third ships (the construction of which was purposely frozen waiting for the completion and validation tests of those two systems).
    Kronshtadt will mount the Lithium-ion batteries while Sevastopol will mount both the Lithium-ion batteries and the AIP


    Amur-1650 will integrate the export version of BOTH of those two systems ,therefore if today it already vastly surpass all its competitors in the fire power, main sonar and acoustic/magnetic signature suppression department ,within 4-5 years ,with theirs integration, it will occupy a true league of its-own in the SSK market's sector.



    I rather doubt the western alternative subs are perfect either and will have problems too.

    Absolutely true GarryB Smile Not only they will have.... them had already had problems.
    Terrible experience of the Type-214 in Hellenic and Korean Navy service anyone ?

    http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/dec06-52.php

    http://www.seapower-digital.com/seapower/seapower_sample/?pg=52#pg52



    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 5171
    Points: 5573
    Join date: 2010-05-08
    Age: 39
    Location: India

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  Austin on Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:01 am

    I wonder how safe it is to use Lithium-Ion Batteries on board submarine considering the problem we know it had encounter with 787 Dreamliner and now A350 too decided not to go with LI batteries ?

    I would wait till the final product with new battereris and AIP make it to 3rd submarine before proclaiming it to be the best submarine in the world , They say what is already Engineered is much better then what is on paper Wink

    But the good news is Russian Naval Command has decided to pursue the Lada design and continue to develop it instead of continually pursuing the late 70 design Kilo and stretching it as it is almost end of it design imporvement life.

    If the AIP and LI Batteries make it sucessfully at the earliest , Most certainly Indian Navy will opt for the Amur design

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 14138
    Points: 14872
    Join date: 2010-03-30
    Location: New Zealand

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  GarryB on Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:33 am

    The Navy has already stated that it will keep the Saint Petersberg as a test sub to test new weapons and systems, because it is basically fully functional except in terms of propulsion, so it means that it can be used for testing new equipment without having to bring an active sub off duty for the purposes of testing.

    Claims it is the best are no different from US claims the F-22 or B-2 are the best. Any battery option has its own risks... that is the nature of energy storage.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    AlfaT8
    Major
    Major

    Posts: 826
    Points: 839
    Join date: 2013-02-02

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  AlfaT8 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:11 pm

    To Mindstorm:

    Since your debunking rumors, there are those who say that the Amur/Lada with VLS cruise missiles will have no room for the AIP propulsion, and a follow up question, will the AIP engine replace or will it assist the Diesel engine sorta like a hybrid?

    And wasn't Greece just trying to cancel the contract for the Type214 sub because of financial problems, now it's South Korea, what's wrong with that sub(Type214)?? No

    Austin wrote:I would wait till the final product with new batteries and AIP make it to 3rd submarine before proclaiming it to be the best submarine in the world , They say what is already Engineered is much better then what is on paper Wink

    But the good news is Russian Naval Command has decided to pursue the Lada design and continue to develop it instead of continually pursuing the late 70 design Kilo and stretching it as it is almost end of it design improvement life.

    If the AIP and LI Batteries make it successfully at the earliest , Most certainly Indian Navy will opt for the Amur design

    I wouldn't say the best in the world, but definitely one of the best in the world, the Type214 still wins in depth, at least double that of the Lada. pirat

    With the prospect of the revolutionary AIP propulsion alone it will most definitely continue development, although i wonder if these breakthroughs will be passed to the kilo design? scratch

    That would depend on India's desires and time table.

    runaway
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts: 348
    Points: 369
    Join date: 2010-11-12
    Location: Sweden

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  runaway on Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:27 pm

    AlfaT8 wrote:But the good news is Russian Naval Command has decided to pursue the Lada design and continue to develop it instead of continually pursuing the late 70 design Kilo and stretching it as it is almost end of it design improvement life.
    Its not good news to pursue a failed project, better cut your losses and begin with a new design.

    If the AIP and LI Batteries make it successfully at the earliest , Most certainly Indian Navy will opt for the Amur design
    I dont think so, they will want to see a succesful submarine. And i dont see the Kilo is at the end of its design improvement life.

    I wouldn't say the best in the world, but definitely one of the best in the world, the Type214 still wins in depth, at least double that of the Lada. pirat
    The 214 isnt a succesful design, it has many flaws and design problems, many costumers are unhappy.
    The Lada´s test depth is 300m, the 214 400m, hardly double.. The big difference is 214´s doublehull against Ladas monohull. And it seems the monohull wasnt a good idea.

    With the prospect of the revolutionary AIP propulsion alone it will most definitely continue development, although i wonder if these breakthroughs will be passed to the kilo design? scratch
    Yes, most certainly

    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 5171
    Points: 5573
    Join date: 2010-05-08
    Age: 39
    Location: India

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  Austin on Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:20 pm

    Kilo is being improvised but there is as much juice you can get get from a late 70's design. Kilo design served well but its dated for 21st century.

    Lada is the right move but its taking too long to come up to operational level and now the best hope for it is the next two sub and hopefully they get it right.

    Coming back to depth its not about double or single hull but the materials used , 300 m depth for conventional subs is good enough for most task its designed to perform.




    AlfaT8
    Major
    Major

    Posts: 826
    Points: 839
    Join date: 2013-02-02

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  AlfaT8 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:22 pm

    runaway wrote:
    AlfaT8 wrote:But the good news is Russian Naval Command has decided to pursue the Lada design and continue to develop it instead of continually pursuing the late 70 design Kilo and stretching it as it is almost end of it design improvement life.
    Its not good news to pursue a failed project, better cut your losses and begin with a new design.

    If the AIP and LI Batteries make it successfully at the earliest , Most certainly Indian Navy will opt for the Amur design
    I dont think so, they will want to see a succesful submarine. And i dont see the Kilo is at the end of its design improvement life.

    By Austin not me. Neutral

    runaway wrote:
    AlfaT8 wrote:I wouldn't say the best in the world, but definitely one of the best in the world, the Type214 still wins in depth, at least double that of the Lada. pirat
    The 214 isnt a succesful design, it has many flaws and design problems, many costumers are unhappy.
    The Lada´s test depth is 300m, the 214 400m, hardly double.. The big difference is 214´s doublehull against Ladas monohull. And it seems the monohull wasnt a good idea.

    Thanks for the heads up, i thought the Type214 and 212 had the same max depth, i wonder why they don't?? confused

    AlfaT8
    Major
    Major

    Posts: 826
    Points: 839
    Join date: 2013-02-02

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  AlfaT8 on Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:11 am

    Austin wrote:Kilo is being improvised but there is as much juice you can get get from a late 70's design. Kilo design served well but its dated for 21st century.

    Hmmm....Lets use the western term of battle proven/proven design, anyway if it ain't broken don't "fix" it. paratrooper

    Austin wrote:Lada is the right move but its taking too long to come up to operational level and now the best hope for it is the next two sub and hopefully they get it right.

    I believe Mindstorm already cleared that up in the earlier post. study

    Austin wrote:Coming back to depth its not about double or single hull but the materials used , 300 m depth for conventional subs is good enough for most task its designed to perform.

    I fully agree. pirat

    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts: 5171
    Points: 5573
    Join date: 2010-05-08
    Age: 39
    Location: India

    Re: Russian Navy: Status & News #1

    Post  Austin on Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:37 am

    Kilo is a double hull sub which means it has larger wetted area needing more powerful engine and far more fuel/energy to get greater range compared to single hull submarine. Considering Fuel/Energy is a premium on conventional submarine double hull on SSK can have its own issue.

    Reason Russia moved to single hull Lada design that are smaller , ligher and can geting longer range for similar fuel as kilo.

    So the issue is its not broken lets not fix it does not arise , The reason why russia is continuing with Kilo design is because Lada design has not come up to expectation and is decade behind service due to technical and management issue coupled with financial problems for the 90's

      Current date/time is Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:57 pm