Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 1958
    Points : 1958
    Join date : 2018-03-25
    Age : 42
    Location : Merkelland

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  Hole on Thu Oct 11, 2018 1:41 am

    The success rate (if you can call it as such) of the Patriot was around 3%, according to israeli data.

    The warhead of the 48N6M and 40N6 missiles is "smart", their explosion produces a controlled fragment pattern. If the missile misses the target by a few metres, it can still destroy it that way.

    George1
    George1

    Posts : 13029
    Points : 13514
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  George1 on Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:04 am

    Discussion for ABMs intercepting ICBMs from Borei topic was transferred here
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 1958
    Points : 1958
    Join date : 2018-03-25
    Age : 42
    Location : Merkelland

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  Hole on Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:03 am

    Thank you.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 20277
    Points : 20831
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  GarryB on Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:10 am

    I've read somehwere scud used to desintegrate themselves in many pieces which made a lot of fake targets on patriot radars and most of the time they couldn't know which is the warhead.

    The Iraqis added fuel to extend the rockets range, but they didn't upgrade the structure of the missile... extending a ballistic missiles range makes it go faster and structurally it couldn't handle the increased flight speed so during its fall to the target it often broke up in mid air... and naturally the Patriot focussed on the biggest bits... the fuel tanks and the engines and left the warheads to fall to the ground.

    It was not a design feature, but an unintended consequence of trying to get more range without improving the design to handle the extra speed.

    Discussion for ABMs intercepting ICBMs from Borei topic was transferred here

    Thanks George... was just about to do that myself but you beat me to it... Smile
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 13029
    Points : 13514
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  George1 on Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:56 am



    Thanks George... was just about to do that myself but you beat me to it... Smile

    it seems we have the same moderation spirit! Smile
    The-thing-next-door
    The-thing-next-door

    Posts : 557
    Points : 595
    Join date : 2017-09-19
    Location : Soviet Interdimentional Command

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  The-thing-next-door on Wed Apr 03, 2019 7:21 am

    Hole wrote:The success rate (if you can call it as such) of the Patriot was around 3%, according to israeli data.

    The warhead of the 48N6M and 40N6 missiles is "smart", their explosion produces a controlled fragment pattern. If the missile misses the target by a few metres, it can still destroy it that way.


    Wow how impressive.

    Any news yet on the mind bogolingly high success ratios for the sm3? Im am sure they amaaaazingly hiiigh, that is to say they may give that impression if you ar as hiiigh as the retards whom to whom that are presented.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 20277
    Points : 20831
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  GarryB on Wed Apr 03, 2019 6:06 pm

    To be fair Patriot was never originally intended to shoot down ballistic high speed targets, and the US military have always been pretty half arsed regarding air defence... the Army pretty much expects the Air Force to keep the sky clear of threats and has not really spent much money on effective systems to protect themselves.

    The exception to this rule is the US Navy who has invested a bit of money in air defence and their Standard missiles are quite reasonable in terms of SAM performance. They were intended to be enormously long range two stage SAMs right from the beginning, though the anti ballistic nature is pretty new for them too... in comparison the Soviets and Russians have expected to face NATO ballistic weapons and supersonic anti ship missiles they don't even have yet, because they have been practising against their own stuff.
    Hole
    Hole

    Posts : 1958
    Points : 1958
    Join date : 2018-03-25
    Age : 42
    Location : Merkelland

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  Hole on Wed Apr 03, 2019 7:56 pm

    Until now SM-3 wasn´t used against a real target in a real war-like enviroment. Only tests.

    The russian air defence network goes back to the lessons from the WWII. A lot of fighters were destroyed in the first dayd of the war (on the ground), afterwards they had no air superiority until the end of 1944. With their SAM´s they don´t rely on planes.

    Sponsored content

    Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs  - Page 7 Empty Re: Ιntercepting Ballistic Missiles. US vs Russian ABMs

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Apr 21, 2019 11:08 pm