Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues

    New Automatic ΑΑ 57mm gun development


    Posts : 16532
    Points : 17140
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: New Automatic ΑΑ 57mm gun development

    Post  GarryB on Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:23 am

    I think 140 is a little less amount ammo considering the RoF

    You are clearly not familiar with Anti aircraft gun systems...

    The Shilka carries about 2,000 rounds of ready to fire ammo but each of the four cannon fire 1,000 rpm... meaning 30 seconds of ready to fire ammo.

    Tunguska has a similar amount of ammo on board but each of the two twin barrel 30mm cannon fire between 2,000 and 2,500 rpm.

    A paper rate of fire of 120rpm means 140 rounds would last more than one minute if it ever fired continuously... which it wont.

    The barrel would melt and droop.

    With modern fire control system and air burst shells and guided shells a shell or three would be fired and the results assessed... against many targets that would be enough.

    Like the 2S31, the 2S38 seems also an artillery piece to export.

    This is a high velocity anti armour gun, not artillery... and fitting it to a BMD chassis means airborne or naval infantry while its potential for anti aircraft use also suggests Aerospace Defence Force use too.

    Ignore the vehicle chassis platform... we are talking about a new modular turret system for AA use or possible anti armour use or both.

    This is potentially a new IFV turret, or a new SPAAG turret or possibly both... though I would expect the new SPAAG turret to have radar sensors too.

    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Posts : 1465
    Points : 1490
    Join date : 2015-05-13

    Re: New Automatic ΑΑ 57mm gun development

    Post  eehnie on Mon Aug 28, 2017 7:30 pm

    GarryB, the 2S38 is not an artillery piece? I think you need to remember what the designation 2S38 means.

    Being on the BMD-4M platform would be a different piece of air defense artillery with a different designation. Then it would have some chance if the weapon is good enough.

      Current date/time is Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:39 am