Still trying to like this & mostly failing
Couple of interesting things via Balancer forum:
Some people have been modelling the hull with ship design software, either: the given dimensions are correct but the displacement has a typo & should be 2,400t -> 2*MF90 would be crazy high power, or the 3,400t displacement is correct but the dimensions are waterline -> overall dimensions more like proj. 11356 & 2*MF90 is a reasonable power.
Its a very fine bow, only hits max beam about the rear of the superstructure, unusual but should be good for high-speed.
I like the new gun shield & locating it to rear of Redut.
Amazes me how many designs put missiles so close to the bridge where misfire or combat damage could potentially wipe out the command crew.
The cost is slightly lower traverse arc for the gun but it's still a pretty good arc, definitely better than 20385.
I don't like just one AK-630 or even the original 2*, they have poor arcs & a lot of the arc is blocked for the Centaur fire control radar by the funnels.
It's tempting to think it's just a temp setup for something better later but I see nowhere to put a better point defence like Naval Pantsir, Naval Tor or even a Gibhka without looking really odd & probably being a big CoG issue.
I still don't like Urans instead of UKSK.
I want to see a better explanation for the containerised system, from what I've seen of it I think its much more limited than people are assuming