Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Share

    par far

    Posts : 1403
    Points : 1560
    Join date : 2014-06-26

    Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  par far on Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:55 am

    After watching and reading about wars for the last 10 years, we have seen tanks get blown up, has the tank become obselte, especially in ubran warfare?

    This video backs up my point:

    http://southfront.org/russia-defense-report-ratnik-system/
    avatar
    OminousSpudd

    Posts : 877
    Points : 894
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Age : 21
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  OminousSpudd on Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:49 am

    Should probably change the title to "Have ATGMs made tanks obsolete" rather than just the American TOW system.

    But in saying that, this thread is rather redundant given the topic has already been discussed multiple times under the Armata thread, Syria threads, and various ATGM threads.
    avatar
    Werewolf

    Posts : 5361
    Points : 5598
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  Werewolf on Sun Jan 17, 2016 3:27 am

    Have headshots made automatic weapons obsolete because sniper rifles seem to kill with one shot?

    It is just a useless question, urban warfare is horrible for everything except artillery and how equipment and technology is used decides its usefullness. The militaries are certainly not total idiots to use tanks in urban warfare without being bound to necessity to contain or purge parts of cities from terrorists.

    par far

    Posts : 1403
    Points : 1560
    Join date : 2014-06-26

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  par far on Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:41 am

    Werewolf wrote:Have headshots made automatic weapons obsolete because sniper rifles seem to kill with one shot?

    It is just a useless question, urban warfare is horrible for everything except artillery and how equipment and technology is used decides its usefullness. The militaries are certainly not total idiots to use tanks in urban warfare without being bound to necessity to contain or purge parts of cities from terrorists.


    Fair enough.

    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16293
    Points : 16924
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  GarryB on Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:21 am

    Tanks will never become obsolete.

    Ratnik is an infantry system. If you want to move infantry around the battlefield you need armoured transport... that means IFVs and APCs. If you are going to have armoured transport vehicles then a tank that can protect yours and attack theirs will always make sense.

    BTW Armata tanks were designed especially for urban warfare... out in open country you can use lighter cheaper vehicles like Kurganets and Boomerang based tanks.

    BTW TOWs taking out 1970s technology T-72s is no real surprise... at 3.5km range a T-72 is going to have trouble spotting and engaging a TOW crew. An Armata on the other hand with long range thermal optics and auto trackers and other sophisticated systems will detect where the TOW round is fired from and would probably be able to get a HE shell off before the TOW missile got close. Its APS system will almost certainly defeat the TOW missile anyway.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    Walther von Oldenburg

    Posts : 904
    Points : 959
    Join date : 2015-01-23
    Age : 26
    Location : Oldenburg

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  Walther von Oldenburg on Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:07 am

    In Syria max. 40% of all firings actually resulted in a destroyed tank - and that is against T-55s, T-62s and early model T-72s without ERA. So TOW is a pretty ineffective weapon even against obsolete threats.

    When facing modern III+ generation MBTs, it's effectiveness would fall to maybe 5%. If the tanks were equipped with modern passive and active protection suystems, it would fall even more - maybe as little as 1%.

    Unlike infantry, tanks evolved in protection trendemously since 1970s - and can now counter most, if not all, threats.
    avatar
    Werewolf

    Posts : 5361
    Points : 5598
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  Werewolf on Sun Jan 17, 2016 3:59 pm

    Walther von Oldenburg wrote:In Syria max. 40% of all firings actually resulted in a destroyed tank - and that is against T-55s, T-62s and early model T-72s without ERA. So TOW is a pretty ineffective weapon even against obsolete threats.

    When facing modern III+ generation MBTs, it's effectiveness would fall to maybe 5%. If the tanks were equipped with modern passive and active protection suystems, it would fall even more - maybe as little as 1%.

    Unlike infantry, tanks evolved in protection trendemously since 1970s - and can now counter most, if not all, threats.

    Well yes aswell as no because urban warfare lot of engagements with ATGM's happen from angles that armor plays only a very little role. Tanks are used more or less half the time as sentries which cover a large amount of space of infested urban environment where rats could be in each building and sometimes you have hard to determine parts of towns and cities that are either infested and just on the other side of a street a daily life with civilians which is the most surreal thing i have ever seen from Syria.

    The tank crew even if it had very potent and modern Thermal Imaging Sights the crew would still be very liable to the conditions they are facing, becauce every glowing thing they see on their monitors could be a civilian and depending on situation it might be not the best thing to deliberatley shoot at everything your monitor shows. This is war against foreign terrorism, any misscalculated actions could kill civilians and they will certainly not like it many are willing to take arms to get revenge and then you are just pushing part of civilian population those who had no reason to pick sides or take part in fights to choose sides and by that you could recruite personal for your enemy.

    Urban warfare isn't that easy and even old Konkurs can penetrate more modern tanks than T-55/62 or T-72 which we have seen due the environment they are in aswell tactics deployed.
    avatar
    KiloGolf

    Posts : 1833
    Points : 1861
    Join date : 2015-09-01
    Location : Macedonia, Hellas

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  KiloGolf on Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:11 pm

    Walther von Oldenburg wrote:In Syria max. 40% of all firings actually resulted in a destroyed tank - and that is against T-55s, T-62s and early model T-72s without ERA. So TOW is a pretty ineffective weapon even against obsolete threats.

    I'd argue that of that 40% there's still a good % of salvageable MBTs. Ones that can be recovered, repaired and put back to action. Penetration, crew death and complete destruction is a metric we may never appreciate.
    avatar
    TheArmenian

    Posts : 1702
    Points : 1863
    Join date : 2011-09-14

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  TheArmenian on Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:39 pm

    During the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, one of the main killers of Israeli tanks was the Malyutka ATGM (AT-3 Sagger).
    That was the first time I heard of "tanks being made obsolete by ATGMs".

    Yet, 33 years later, tanks still soldier on and new ones are still built.
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4495
    Points : 4674
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:42 pm

    Poor tactics and old and outdated equipment hardly signify the end of the MBT's significance. Vehicles that lack MBT armor can also be destroyed even easier by ATGM's, and by other weapons systems that can't defeat MBT armor.

    What I find funny is the over-emphasis on the ATGM asymmetrical threat towards MBT's, when MLRS/rocket artillery is a much, much bigger threat in comparison.
    avatar
    KoTeMoRe

    Posts : 3905
    Points : 3936
    Join date : 2015-04-21
    Location : Krankhaus Central.

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  KoTeMoRe on Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:54 pm

    ATGM's have so many flaws compared to BVR/IF systems one would never want to soldier on with them on an actual hot war. From possible shitty IR guidance, to cables getting tangled in the nature, to ATGM crew getting spotted, to difficulty to get the powerpacks always GO until range becoming a liability etc etc etc. And there's the damn artillery.


    ATGM's are very nice weapons in niche ranges and situations. the BGM-71 is among the less useful systems in a "hot" conflict. It's big, heavy, clumsy has shitty powerpack and you could haul Two Metis and Konkurs for the weight and space or a BGM-71 complement (Launch Unit and two tubes). Basically the tactical environement of the BGM has to be far more "streamlined" than the one of the Metis.

    What you see in Syria is basically a big TRE with poorly formed soldiers and very little overwatch. In different situations, the ATGM's were good threats, but didn't caused the same kind of misery. However, they are still PITA in select situations.






    avatar
    Werewolf

    Posts : 5361
    Points : 5598
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  Werewolf on Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:56 pm

    Target Rich Environment?

    PITA?

    JohninMK

    Posts : 4550
    Points : 4607
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  JohninMK on Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:49 pm

    The Army in the UK certainly doesn't think so. It is gearing up for a tender that will lead to a $1.4B contract to upgrade the Challenger 2.
    avatar
    KoTeMoRe

    Posts : 3905
    Points : 3936
    Join date : 2015-04-21
    Location : Krankhaus Central.

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  KoTeMoRe on Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:47 am

    Werewolf wrote:Target Rich Environment?

    PITA?

    Pain in the Azz.

    And TRE is Target Rich Environement.

    But in fact in Syria it's more ETRE (Easy Target Rich Environement).

    Sponsored content

    Re: Have the ATGM systems make the tank obsolete?

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Aug 18, 2017 6:29 pm